goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:08:52 PM

Title: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:08:52 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEjHZjI9QftAHQsCc/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:09:15 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEjHDmTR1ilMIkCFq/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 04, 2016, 08:26:01 PM
These two are bickering hens
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Tobias on October 04, 2016, 08:26:45 PM
i can't muster the energy
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:27:24 PM
It's really bad. Not sure it's worth getting boozed up for.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:28:37 PM
Moderator stinks
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: stunted on October 04, 2016, 08:30:14 PM
I wish it was triple split screen with the mod chick :drool:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Trim on October 04, 2016, 08:31:55 PM
This is my first experience with Hillary's guy and I'm pretty sure I hate him.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:32:30 PM
Shoot, now they're agreeing on stuff!  :curse:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:39:56 PM
Did Mike Pence try to say people in the inner city should be in favor of stop and frisk? I was walking back into my living room when he was talking, but that's what I heard.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: stunted on October 04, 2016, 08:45:07 PM
i'd love to frisk the moderator
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Canary on October 04, 2016, 08:57:13 PM
Lots of dancing around the questions being asked.  Pence seems like he needs to avoid some of Trump's ideas, but I don't think he is debating very effectively.  I never know why I really watch these things. 
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:57:44 PM
Cyber!  :D
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 08:58:52 PM
Lots of dancing around the questions being asked.  Pence seems like he needs to avoid some of Trump's ideas, but I don't think he is debating very effectively.  I never know why I really watch these things.

I've enjoyed him much more than Kaine.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 04, 2016, 09:00:11 PM
I think I'm tapping out
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: mocat on October 04, 2016, 09:01:58 PM
The moderator's eyelashes are outrageous
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 09:02:25 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FErrx40I.gif&hash=391212c9c25d51ea5e2d6558239e01eee4160903)

Pence has had a few good one-liners
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 09:02:50 PM
I think I'm tapping out

Ya, this is nothing like Uncle Joe and Paul Ryan
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 04, 2016, 09:05:56 PM
Tim Kaine is kind of an bad person.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 04, 2016, 09:06:07 PM
This is my first experience with Hillary's guy and I'm pretty sure I hate him.

He is oscar Weber.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:22:37 PM
i want tim kaine to shout aggressively "i'm tim kaine, bitch" and stare at pence in response to at least one of his questions/rebuttals, and i'm not really sure why.

huge tim kaine fan, tho, obviously.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 09:23:37 PM
Uppercut by Mike Pence. Only 10 cents on the dollar of the Clinton Foundation goes to the people and the Clinton's use the funds to travel the world.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: wetwillie on October 04, 2016, 09:24:59 PM
Is kaine wearing his Jayhawk sticker?
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:26:33 PM
Is kaine wearing his Jayhawk sticker?

he's a great tsc'er.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 04, 2016, 09:27:13 PM
I can predict every time Tim is going to interrupt, how do I do it? Simple, everytime Pence is kicking Hills ass, little Bitch Timmy butts in.  :flush:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 09:28:32 PM
Should have known these two would buckle down on abortion.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 09:30:07 PM
I can predict every time Tim is going to interrupt, how do I do it? Simple, everytime Pence is kicking Hills ass, little Bitch Timmy butts in.  :flush:

From what I can tell, Tim has no idea when to interrupt. It's awkward unlike when Trump does it. Trump does it with authority. Kaine is really bad at it.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 04, 2016, 09:31:44 PM
Tim Kaine is getting his ass kicked.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:32:17 PM
Tim Kaine is getting his ass kicked.

are we watching the same debate?
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 04, 2016, 09:35:04 PM
His interruptions are very terrible, his faith answer was terrible, his 9/11 attack on Trump's taxes was very terrible.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:36:14 PM
he's a clumsy interrupter, i agree.  i thought he was fine on everything else.  pence also fine.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Trim on October 04, 2016, 09:36:35 PM
9/11

Did you hear him interject RP-style that he was in Virginia???
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 04, 2016, 09:38:31 PM
he's a clumsy interrupter, i agree.  i thought he was fine on everything else.  pence also fine.

His line about Donald Trump not supporting the firefighters on 9/11 because he didn't pay taxes is awful and stupid and completely nonsensical.

@Trim  oh yeah, it was mind boggling.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:40:20 PM
His line about Donald Trump not supporting the firefighters on 9/11 because he didn't pay taxes is awful and stupid and completely nonsensical.

i didn't hear the line, but what you just said he said makes perfect sense.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Trim on October 04, 2016, 09:40:38 PM
Goddamn, if he'd only said something about hearing the sirens...
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 04, 2016, 09:43:55 PM
It was an obvious strategy, like a overmatched fighter going for the clench to avoid knockout, I'm not suggesting Pence is a great debater but that his campaign has better solutions to the problems of this country.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 04, 2016, 09:45:29 PM
His line about Donald Trump not supporting the firefighters on 9/11 because he didn't pay taxes is awful and stupid and completely nonsensical.

i didn't hear the line, but what you just said he said makes perfect sense.

Trump pursued a tax break on his property for 9/11, but connecting the 15 years no taxes thing is dumb.  There is a good reason for there to be offsets for people.  Trump is a bad businessman, he may have shady business dealings, his taxes may be embarrassing, those  all would be things to criticize.  But saying because Donald Trump maybe didn't pay taxes in 2001 and that means he's not supporting our first responders is idiotic.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 04, 2016, 09:47:49 PM
It was an obvious strategy, like a overmatched fighter going for the clench to avoid knockout, I'm not suggesting Pence is a great debater but that his campaign has better solutions to the problems of this country.

 :lol:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 09:49:50 PM
Trump pursued a tax break on his property for 9/11, but connecting the 15 years no taxes thing is dumb.  There is a good reason for there to be offsets for people.  Trump is a bad businessman, he may have shady business dealings, his taxes may be embarrassing, those  all would be things to criticize.  But saying because Donald Trump maybe didn't pay taxes in 2001 and that means he's not supporting our first responders is idiotic.

taxes pay for services, a man purportedly building enormous wealth while not paying taxes is not supporting those services and displaces additional tax burdens onto others.  that's a pretty basic and perfectly logical connection to make.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 04, 2016, 09:56:02 PM
Trump pursued a tax break on his property for 9/11, but connecting the 15 years no taxes thing is dumb.  There is a good reason for there to be offsets for people.  Trump is a bad businessman, he may have shady business dealings, his taxes may be embarrassing, those  all would be things to criticize.  But saying because Donald Trump maybe didn't pay taxes in 2001 and that means he's not supporting our first responders is idiotic.

taxes pay for services, a man purportedly building enormous wealth while not paying taxes is not supporting those services and displaces additional tax burdens onto others.  that's a pretty basic and perfectly logical connection to make.

Trump lost a tremendous amount of money, several times.  Our tax system rightly offsets business losses to allow businesses to recoup in good years.  To demagogue that so you can shoehorn in 9/11, is completely bizarre and actively makes everyone stupider. 

It is even weirder, when there is a very direct case of Trump taking 9/11 bailout money for his business.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 10:00:02 PM
Trump pursued a tax break on his property for 9/11, but connecting the 15 years no taxes thing is dumb.  There is a good reason for there to be offsets for people.  Trump is a bad businessman, he may have shady business dealings, his taxes may be embarrassing, those  all would be things to criticize.  But saying because Donald Trump maybe didn't pay taxes in 2001 and that means he's not supporting our first responders is idiotic.

taxes pay for services, a man purportedly building enormous wealth while not paying taxes is not supporting those services and displaces additional tax burdens onto others.  that's a pretty basic and perfectly logical connection to make.

Trump lost a tremendous amount of money, several times.  Our tax system rightly offsets business losses to allow businesses to recoup in good years.  To demagogue that so you can shoehorn in 9/11, is completely bizarre and actively makes everyone stupider. 

It is even weirder, when there is a very direct case of Trump taking 9/11 bailout money for his business.

A 9/11 bailout and tax deductions are very different.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 10:04:53 PM
Trump lost a tremendous amount of money, several times.  Our tax system rightly offsets business losses to allow businesses to recoup in good years.  To demagogue that so you can shoehorn in 9/11, is completely bizarre and actively makes everyone stupider. 


if i can reframe, it's not that kaine's answer was illogical, it was that you disagreed with it.  on that basis, pence got destroyed in the debate in my mind, but i don't consider that a fair, or useful, way of evaluating either man's performance.

i don't agree that trump (from what i know/assume) was fairly taxed, i think he should have paid much more.  i don't blame him for not paying more, but i do blame him for not proposing to change the tax codes that allowed him to avoid taxation.   so i disagree with both you and trump.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 04, 2016, 10:05:22 PM
Do any of you morons think that a guy who Forbes says is worth like 3.5 billion hasn't paid an assload of taxes?
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 04, 2016, 10:10:33 PM
If you wanna talk about a guy who doesn't pay much fed income tax, that would be lib supporter Warren Buffett and I don't blame him either.  Dumb topic unless you are promoting new tax law.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 04, 2016, 10:14:01 PM
actually, that's not true.  i do blame him a bit, in a collective sense.  the tax code did not spring from it's father's forehead, fully formed.  it was written by politicians, influenced by members of the moneyed classes that includes trump's family, for the benefit of those classes.  i find it not particularly convincing to naively maintain that one merely follows the letter of the law when one is also part and parcel to the crafting of the law.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 10:14:16 PM
Eric Trump needs to get the hell off of CNN's set
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: renocat on October 04, 2016, 10:19:36 PM
How dare someone not pay tribute to the Great Government God.   Government God is here to care for all.  How dare anyone take advantage of the law to keep money their business for their families.  If this deduction is so bad, Senators Clinton or Obama could have sponsored legislation to close the loophole.  Tonight clearly defined what Hillary considers her standard for feminism = unfettered killing a baby up to the minute before they are born, that the unborn is hamburger, and we have.to pay for.abortion.  It is okay to use the largesse of the federal to intervene to end life, but not protect it.  I wish Grump would quit, and Pence.take his place.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 04, 2016, 10:23:40 PM
actually, that's not true.  i do blame him a bit, in a collective sense.  the tax code did not spring from it's father's forehead, fully formed.  it was written by politicians, influenced by members of the moneyed classes that includes trump's family, for the benefit of those classes.  i find it not particularly convincing to naively maintain that one merely follows the letter of the law when one is also part and parcel to the crafting of the law.

This is precious, you are supporting Hill who is far more in the pocket of the moneyed classes you speak of.  Then out the other side of your mouth bitch about a guy who has paid more in tax than she could earn in 10 of her bloodsucking lifetimes.  Congrats tard
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bucket on October 04, 2016, 10:37:48 PM
actually, that's not true.  i do blame him a bit, in a collective sense.  the tax code did not spring from it's father's forehead, fully formed.  it was written by politicians, influenced by members of the moneyed classes that includes trump's family, for the benefit of those classes.  i find it not particularly convincing to naively maintain that one merely follows the letter of the law when one is also part and parcel to the crafting of the law.

This is precious, you are supporting Hill who is far more in the pocket of the moneyed classes you speak of.  Then out the other side of your mouth bitch about a guy who has paid more in tax than she could earn in 10 of her bloodsucking lifetimes.  Congrats tard

 :lol:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: treysolid on October 04, 2016, 10:48:55 PM
actually, that's not true.  i do blame him a bit, in a collective sense.  the tax code did not spring from it's father's forehead, fully formed.  it was written by politicians, influenced by members of the moneyed classes that includes trump's family, for the benefit of those classes.  i find it not particularly convincing to naively maintain that one merely follows the letter of the law when one is also part and parcel to the crafting of the law.

This is precious, you are supporting Hill who is far more in the pocket of the moneyed classes you speak of.  Then out the other side of your mouth bitch about a guy who has paid more in tax than she could earn in 10 of her bloodsucking lifetimes.  Congrats tard

you don't know this
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: treysolid on October 04, 2016, 10:49:39 PM
that would require trump to release his tax returns...
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: treysolid on October 04, 2016, 10:50:06 PM
...which, oh wait...
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: puniraptor on October 04, 2016, 11:14:08 PM
I tried to watch this but it was quite difficult to sustain my desire
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 04, 2016, 11:28:32 PM
I tried to watch this but it was quite difficult to sustain my desire

Whatever you did was time better spent
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: 8manpick on October 04, 2016, 11:31:28 PM
Did you guys watch the minor league baseball playoffs too?
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: chum1 on October 05, 2016, 12:17:40 AM
Initial reactions and subsequent coverage sometimes diverge. Cable news people thought Pence won. Many online newspaper headlines so far indicate stories about Pence's denials of provable facts and deflections.

Of course, Trump could easily make Kaine the winner if he winds up having a good old meltdown over 8something stupid.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: stunted on October 05, 2016, 01:53:48 AM
debate moderator is 42? and filipina, the mexico of asia? ugh, i want that fap back
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 05, 2016, 07:14:14 AM
It has been a treat to watch stunted's development into a known bad person/top 5 terrible poster on this blog.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 07:28:12 AM
I honestly feel like Hillary's camp said, "we can't keep putting up with Trump's crap, but Hillary will get treated unfairly if she acts aggressive because she's a woman, so Tim has to do it."

Hillary should have just done it.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 05, 2016, 07:41:31 AM
Sys-

I agree with your broad notions about tax policy favoring the rich and powerful, I disagree this is a very good example of that.  There are plenty of smallish commercial chicken farms, fisherman or mining/logging operations that would be put out of business by this.  It is to smooth out market variance to allow firms with limited capital to survive downturns and be able to rebound.  Is that how Donald Trump used it?  Probably, he lost his ass in NJ.  That doesn't make him good or bad, but he didn't plenty other stuff that is so obviously bad prima facie that it makes zero sense to attack him on something that isn't bad tax policy and actually protects smaller firms from being driven out by a bad year or two.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 05, 2016, 08:22:41 AM
Sometimes, it's better if a business just fails. We certainly would all be better off right now had Trump lost his ass and never come back.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 05, 2016, 08:31:07 AM
kat kid, these are not real losses!  they are fictional, or at least some sizable proportion of them is almost certainly fictional.  trump is a real estate dude, he owns a lot of real estate and the tax code just happens to hugely advantage real estate.  property owners can write down the value of their property as a depreciating asset even though it is actually appreciating in value and generating a growing revenue stream.  they can shelter their income, often up to the sale of the property, which may never come.

i have no problem with the offsetting of income with losses, or with extending those losses into future years, but only genuine cash losses, not paper losses.  there are a lot of fixes for this, but trump is not proposing any of them.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 05, 2016, 08:32:06 AM
leona "only the little people pay taxes" helmsley.  real estate dudette.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 05, 2016, 08:49:41 AM
....so it does make him smart not to pay taxes on his real estate depreciation after a recession. Obama should have worked on changing the tax codes rather than ruining health care during his first two years.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 05, 2016, 08:51:55 AM
Trump isn't proposing "fixes" because he genuinely believes that paying more taxes means he can't invest as much back into his business and therefore can't create as many jobs.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 05, 2016, 09:19:26 AM
Yes, the Clinton's are just pissed they didn't hide more money in that shell game known as their foundation(s). 
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Kat Kid on October 05, 2016, 09:25:26 AM
kat kid, these are not real losses!  they are fictional, or at least some sizable proportion of them is almost certainly fictional.  trump is a real estate dude, he owns a lot of real estate and the tax code just happens to hugely advantage real estate.  property owners can write down the value of their property as a depreciating asset even though it is actually appreciating in value and generating a growing revenue stream.  they can shelter their income, often up to the sale of the property, which may never come.

i have no problem with the offsetting of income with losses, or with extending those losses into future years, but only genuine cash losses, not paper losses.  there are a lot of fixes for this, but trump is not proposing any of them.

We don't know exactly what the losses were at all.  The casinos caused multiple Trump assets to go in to bankruptcy, so it is safe to assume he lost lots of revenue generating income.  It is absolutely fair to attack his shady business practices or refusing to release his taxes, but the tax law is bigger than Trump maybe taking advantage of this thing that is actually pretty good.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 09:25:30 AM
It's obvious Hillary is trying to make this tax issue a Trump version of the email scandal. I just don't think it's going to change anyone's mind because everyone seems to agree that what Trump did was legal.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 05, 2016, 10:22:49 AM
Property taxes fund the education system, DJT pays more property tax than 99.99% of humans on earth, DJT is one of the worlds staunchest supporters of children and their schools.  Hillary doesn't provide anywhere near the support for children that DJT does, whattabitch!
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: renocat on October 05, 2016, 10:34:26 AM
I think this should be a separate thread, but....  Is taxation a legal or moral obligation?  How is this question perceived by progressive liberals and conservative libertarians?  The contrast was evident.  Paine came across as believing it is a moral obligation.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 05, 2016, 10:45:42 AM
It is your moral obligation to pay exactly the amount of taxes that you legally owe.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Trim on October 05, 2016, 10:47:23 AM
I think this should be a separate thread, but....  Is taxation a legal or moral obligation?  How is this question perceived by progressive liberals and conservative libertarians?  The contrast was evident.  Paine came across as believing it is a moral obligation.

Paine didn't come close to making me believe that he believed it's a moral obligation.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 05, 2016, 11:29:52 AM
It is your moral obligation to pay exactly the amount of taxes that you legally owe.

*minimum. Unless you think it's immoral to pay more?
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 11:53:10 AM
Even if it is a moral obligation to pay certain taxes you could legally write off, it's a pointless argument because no swing voters were leaning Trump because of his morals.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 05, 2016, 11:54:04 AM
It is your moral obligation to pay exactly the amount of taxes that you legally owe.

*minimum. Unless you think it's immoral to pay more?

I do.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 12:02:41 PM
so who won
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Tobias on October 05, 2016, 12:18:06 PM
your team won!
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 12:31:17 PM
my team is the entire united states of america. from sea to shining sea tobias.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 12:31:34 PM
that makes us teammates.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Tobias on October 05, 2016, 12:37:33 PM
that was my point, but yes :cheers:
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 12:44:20 PM
Most people seem to think that Pence won, but in a way that didn't really improve Trump's appeal to swing voters...which is probably exactly what Kaine was hoping to accomplish.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 12:47:29 PM
yeah Kaine just needed to play field position and not turn the ball over. sounds like he game managed it ok
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 05, 2016, 12:49:02 PM
I thought Pence did a good job of demonstrating how easy this election would have been for the republicans if they would have nominated anybody else.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 05, 2016, 01:04:45 PM
I actually saw a comment on my FB feed from a person I assumed to be a liberal and it basically said "Pence for president!," so I found that odd. 
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 01:12:05 PM
I though Pence did a good job of demonstrating how easy this election would have been for the republicans if they would have nominated anybody else.

Yep. 90% of Hillary's and Kaine's talking points so far have started with "Trump said..."
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 01:13:02 PM
[youtube]https://youtu.be/f2JuxM-snGc[/youtube]
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 05, 2016, 01:20:12 PM
Blaming Trump and his ancestors for the current tax code is incredibly lol, and defintely falls in the "irrational hate" category.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: renocat on October 05, 2016, 03:33:23 PM
If you are against unfettered (with no restrictions such as limits in 3rd trimester) abortions and using federal funds to pay for abortions, are you a pig sexist?  Kaine insinuated you are.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 05, 2016, 05:02:17 PM
https://twitter.com/toddzwillich/status/783728554202791936
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 05, 2016, 05:10:36 PM
that's essentially saying "this guy I know, well, HIS friend told ME...."
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: catastrophe on October 05, 2016, 05:11:07 PM
Many pastors are saying...
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 05, 2016, 05:40:20 PM
the christian god is the rube goldbergiest of deities.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: star seed 7 on October 05, 2016, 05:58:01 PM
Everything happens for a reason sys
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 06, 2016, 12:09:24 AM
interesting

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/03/it-takes-a-remorseful-tax-cheat-to-catch-a-tax-cheat-and-donald-trump-isnt/
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: bones129 on October 06, 2016, 12:20:23 AM
interesting

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/03/it-takes-a-remorseful-tax-cheat-to-catch-a-tax-cheat-and-donald-trump-isnt/

The True Trump. For himself, and no one else.
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 06, 2016, 04:50:29 AM
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mcmanus-trump-tax-plan-20161005-snap-story.html
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 06, 2016, 05:30:20 AM
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/783645247247114240
Title: Re: VP Debate
Post by: sys on October 06, 2016, 11:36:10 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/07/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0