goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2016, 05:40:03 PM

Title: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2016, 05:40:03 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2FTech2-ADV.png&hash=680b069e87a5f57f54bb5067c8ea25b2c3ca76bd)

Let's be real here Cat fans.

Last year we really only beat TCU and OU twice because of crazy games from Marcus Foster. And we only beat KU and ISU because Nigel played way above his head. Both guys were proven cancers and oscar rightfully got rid of them. So really, you take those 5 wins from our 8 conference wins and oscar's team really only won 3 games.

Then you look at all our young guys this year and oscar managed 5 wins. The way I see it, this is a big improvement from the 3 Big 12 wins of last, PLUS we didn't have those ugly OOC losses this season. oscar has this thing on the right track. We had a 12 point lead today at one of the tougher places to play in the league, on senior night no less.
 
There really is no doubt that next year will be special and if you don't believe that, you clearly aren't a real fan.

Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind to suffer
The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune,
Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them: to die, to sleep
No more; and by a sleep, to say we end
The Heart-ache, and the thousand Natural shocks
That Flesh is heir to? 'Tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wished. To die, to sleep,
To sleep, perchance to Dream; aye, there's the rub,
For in that sleep of death, what dreams may come,
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause....
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: sys on March 05, 2016, 05:41:55 PM
50%, what a travesty.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2016, 05:43:20 PM
50%, what a travesty.

Keep your head up sys. Still #16 in 3PT%D AND overall. That's pretty good if you ask me.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: sys on March 05, 2016, 05:45:35 PM
a wasted opportunity is what it is.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Panjandrum on March 05, 2016, 05:52:06 PM
You would have made a phenomenal cellist on the Titanic, _BBB.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2016, 05:53:28 PM
I still believe in an NIT run.

I'm pretty sure we'll be the youngest team in the NIT too, so it will be tough. But you never know.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: wetwillie on March 05, 2016, 05:57:12 PM
Wednesday's :frown:
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: BostonPancake on March 05, 2016, 06:16:14 PM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: catzacker on March 05, 2016, 06:16:47 PM
"When sorrows come, they come not single spies, but in battalions"
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: sys on March 05, 2016, 06:20:59 PM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 05, 2016, 06:29:57 PM
Nothing new....Ksu 2016 BB has Bad D + Bad O stretches that are too Long.

25-5 run to end 1st half, but it continued on in the 2nd hf

Tech got 48 pts in 30 Poss shooting 20-28 FG
Those same 30 Poss, we Only had 18 pts and 12 TOs.
Those 30 Poss were around 20 minutes of the game. From 23-11 to 41-59.  30 pt swing
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2016, 06:35:51 PM
Nothing new....Ksu 2016 BB has Bad D + Bad O stretches that are too Long.

Hey Mr. Negative Posse, if we had 20 minutes of 18-48 that means we had 20 minutes of 53-32.

That's pretty good.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 05, 2016, 06:51:52 PM
you should've worked the word caucus into the thread title today _BBB, it would've made me laugh so good
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: sys on March 05, 2016, 06:55:03 PM
that means we had 20 minutes of 53-32.

That's pretty good.

the haters are desperate for us to ignore the true stats.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 05, 2016, 06:59:11 PM
Nothing new....Ksu 2016 BB has Bad D + Bad O stretches that are too Long.

Hey Mr. Negative Posse, if we had 20 minutes of 18-48 that means we had 20 minutes of 53-32.

That's pretty good.

I understand BB is a game of runs.  And alot of times runs will happen when you play bad O and either play bad D or give up easier shots because of the poor O.

14-4 type runs happen ( we had 1 to start game). But when you let Tech go off for 48 pts over 30 Poss and then only Ave a measley 0.60 PPP yourself in the same time frame... You are in seriously trouble.  At some point the O or the D has to play better in that stretch...so a 17-5 run to tie the game at 28-28, doesn't end up being 59-41 later in the game.

We allowed 31-10 runs to Ku and 24-3 to Isu at home this year, and we never recovered from the big deficit. We mounted a comeback because....BB is a game of runs...but we never took the lead in either game and I never thought we were gonna win.

Sorry for being so negative FAN ;) but as frustrated as I am, I do hold some hope for next year and 2017-18
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2016, 07:06:02 PM
Posse loves himself a good microcosm
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: wetwillie on March 05, 2016, 07:16:01 PM
Stokes
Brown
Westicles
Wade
DJamer


Is a good enough starting 5 to make the tourney next year. 

Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 05, 2016, 07:18:44 PM
Posse loves himself a good microcosm

Perhaps. But if Ksu would outscore Ku or any team 48-18 or 31-10 in a game..... I would feel really good  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: catzacker on March 05, 2016, 07:31:28 PM
Stokes
Brown
Westicles
Wade
DJamer


Is a good enough starting 5 to make the tourney next year.

A healthy Stokes alone is worth 6 additional conf wins.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: mocat on March 05, 2016, 07:40:37 PM
you should've worked the word caucus into the thread title today _BBB, it would've made me laugh so good
Yes
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: sys on March 05, 2016, 07:43:46 PM
to be or not tubby is rough ridin' great, you philistines.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2016, 08:01:20 PM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Skipper44 on March 05, 2016, 08:04:33 PM
Only if Gregg is in Wade's ear for a just a little too long in the handshake line
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2016, 08:33:22 PM
Only if Gregg is in Wade's ear for a just a little too long in the handshake line

It'd be exactly what about half our fanbase would need just to completely switch allegiance and be WSU fans. Which would be fine with me. I don't think I like that half of our fanbase much anyway.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2016, 09:52:55 PM
not that it even matters...

https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/706251308471222276

https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/706249287361892352

https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/706251849016299520

https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/706269272977207296
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: CHONGS on March 05, 2016, 10:00:14 PM
oscar is not wrong.  Best 16 loss team in the history of the sport.

The ball bounces or way five times this year and oscar is COY.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2016, 10:07:48 PM
He's also correct in that we're not that far behind Tech. They are only one spot ahead of us in conference standings.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2016, 10:27:19 PM
i really liked the we sucked in practice surprised game started well guys really deserve nit combo
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 05, 2016, 10:29:37 PM
I Love Tubby's quote. Great backhanded compliment.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on March 05, 2016, 10:39:00 PM
When the COTY in the Big 12 praises your team, you listen.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: wetwillie on March 05, 2016, 10:43:05 PM
I would like to beat OSU and then play in the NIT
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2016, 10:45:37 PM
KSU and Tech are equals this year - garbage wednesday teams.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2016, 11:47:24 PM
I Love Tubby's quote. Great backhanded compliment.

yeah like when self said we were better than 2-6 earlier in the year. could not be wooldrige'ing any harder
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 06, 2016, 12:56:09 AM
We had 3 OT losses and lost to Texas by 4 in 2games

Add in we had struggles vs Ku Isu and Baylor at home ( 31-10 run, 24-3 run, and Bay started game with 25-11 lead).... It's no surprise we end with 5-13 result.  If we were a little better we could have been 7-11 or 8-10. 9-9 if we were a OK offensive team all Conf season

No excuse for not getting 10-11 wins next year in B12 and 12-13 would be a pleasant surprise

Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: bones129 on March 06, 2016, 01:05:15 AM
We had 3 OT losses and lost to Texas by 4 in 2games

Add in we had struggles vs Ku Isu and Baylor at home ( 31-10 run, 24-3 run, and Bay started game with 25-11 lead).... It's no surprise we end with 5-13 result.  If we were a little better we could have been 7-11 or 8-10. 9-9 if we were a OK offensive team all Conf season

No excuse for not getting 10-11 wins next year in B12 and 12-13 would be a pleasant surprise

oscar will have plenty of excuses for not reaching those B12 win levels.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: ednksu on March 06, 2016, 03:57:50 AM

We had 3 OT losses and lost to Texas by 4 in 2games

Add in we had struggles vs Ku Isu and Baylor at home ( 31-10 run, 24-3 run, and Bay started game with 25-11 lead).... It's no surprise we end with 5-13 result.  If we were a little better we could have been 7-11 or 8-10. 9-9 if we were a OK offensive team all Conf season

No excuse for not getting 10-11 wins next year in B12 and 12-13 would be a pleasant surprise
hey guys if we hadn't been consistent failures, we wouldn't have been consistent failures.  Maybe next year we'll surprise a few people with our inability to even be consistent at failing and fall backward into a few extra wins.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: pvegs on March 06, 2016, 07:04:26 AM
We had 3 OT losses and lost to Texas by 4 in 2games

Add in we had struggles vs Ku Isu and Baylor at home ( 31-10 run, 24-3 run, and Bay started game with 25-11 lead).... It's no surprise we end with 5-13 result.  If we were a little better we could have been 7-11 or 8-10. 9-9 if we were a OK offensive team all Conf season

No excuse for not getting 10-11 wins next year in B12 and 12-13 would be a pleasant surprise

http://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/kansas-state/2006-schedule.html
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2016, 08:05:25 AM
I was very disappointed in the effort during the middle 20 minutes of that game.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 06, 2016, 09:04:59 AM
i really liked the we sucked in practice surprised game started well guys really deserve nit combo

yes.

"i love this team and really want them to get into the nit and also they have had a crappy last week of practice so i expected us to lose to texas tech."-oscar


it's like wt heck weber? i don't get you.

 
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: SdK on March 06, 2016, 09:51:36 AM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Aren't they dancing?
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 10:02:40 AM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Aren't they dancing?

1 top 50 RPI win. 4 Top 100 RPI wins. But still #10 in kenpom and several losses without VanVleet. It will be interesting to see what the committee does. Without their NCAA success and a Final Four, they would be in real trouble, plus, the committee using other metrics starting last year.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: SdK on March 06, 2016, 10:11:09 AM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Aren't they dancing?

1 top 50 RPI win. 4 Top 100 RPI wins. But still #10 in kenpom and several losses without VanVleet. It will be interesting to see what the committee does. Without their NCAA success and a Final Four, they would be in real trouble, plus, the committee using other metrics starting last year.
I was basing my thoughts solely off of what Joe said last night. I figured it meant they had had a decent season and like you said with recent success. I'd take a game against WSU in a heartbeat. Though it'd be in their gym. Haha
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on March 06, 2016, 11:06:05 AM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Aren't they dancing?

1 top 50 RPI win. 4 Top 100 RPI wins. But still #10 in kenpom and several losses without VanVleet. It will be interesting to see what the committee does. Without their NCAA success and a Final Four, they would be in real trouble, plus, the committee using other metrics starting last year.
I was basing my thoughts solely off of what Joe said last night. I figured it meant they had had a decent season and like you said with recent success. I'd take a game against WSU in a heartbeat. Though it'd be in their gym. Haha

Without their previous accomplishments they wouldn't be even talked about right now. We have a real shocker-off right now because everyone at espn has them firmly in and everyone at CBS has them firmly out. I'm not sure how as a bubble team you can be firmly in when most conference tournaments haven't even started yet bids will be stolen.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on March 06, 2016, 11:06:41 AM
http://deadspin.com/texas-techs-toddrick-gotcher-proposes-to-girlfriend-on-1763094693
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 11:09:53 AM
http://deadspin.com/texas-techs-toddrick-gotcher-proposes-to-girlfriend-on-1763094693

https://twitter.com/JamarSamuels/status/706249640291733504

And this...

https://twitter.com/JamarSamuels/status/704042729844707328
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: SdK on March 06, 2016, 11:51:24 AM
Jamar is great
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2016, 12:50:46 PM
Am I a bad fan for not wanting the NIT bid?  I'm kinda in the same place where I was last year......let's just get this year over with.

only bad fans want an nit bid.

I want us to get the bid then lose to Wichita State by 25.
Aren't they dancing?

1 top 50 RPI win. 4 Top 100 RPI wins. But still #10 in kenpom and several losses without VanVleet. It will be interesting to see what the committee does. Without their NCAA success and a Final Four, they would be in real trouble, plus, the committee using other metrics starting last year.

They will be the 8/9 opposite ku, and it's going to be glorious.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2016, 01:07:34 PM
Nothing new....Ksu 2016 BB has Bad D + Bad O stretches that are too Long.

Hey Mr. Negative Posse, if we had 20 minutes of 18-48 that means we had 20 minutes of 53-32.

That's pretty good.

I understand BB is a game of runs.  And alot of times runs will happen when you play bad O and either play bad D or give up easier shots because of the poor O.

14-4 type runs happen ( we had 1 to start game). But when you let Tech go off for 48 pts over 30 Poss and then only Ave a measley 0.60 PPP yourself in the same time frame... You are in seriously trouble.  At some point the O or the D has to play better in that stretch...so a 17-5 run to tie the game at 28-28, doesn't end up being 59-41 later in the game.

We allowed 31-10 runs to Ku and 24-3 to Isu at home this year, and we never recovered from the big deficit. We mounted a comeback because....BB is a game of runs...but we never took the lead in either game and I never thought we were gonna win.

Sorry for being so negative FAN ;) but as frustrated as I am, I do hold some hope for next year and 2017-18

I think these stats show two glaring weaknesses this team has: lack of high major depth and a reliable "go to" guy or scorer.

The first problem is exasperated by foul trouble and the loss of Stokes. I fully expected this problem this season, but I think it could have been better managed through more coherent substitution patterns. We should grow out of this some next season with the red shirts and new recruits...I hope.

As to problem #2. We needed Wes or Edwards to be that guy, and I do not think they are physically talented enough to be that person. Hopefully, with some maturity, Brown or Wade or Stokes can be that person on any given day.

I knew this season would be a struggle. I thought it would be worse earlier and better later. The opposite seemed to happen. The lack of effort, at times, concerns me.  I think next year has to be a monstrous step forward, or Weber should go.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 01:15:38 PM
Define "monstrous step"...

IMO that means top 1/3 of the league. NCAAs should never be in doubt and if this "young team" just needed experience, we should compete for a title in a league that allegedly loses lots of players. No worse than 8-1 at home and 4-5 on the road in the league. That should be good enough for a 3 seed in the tournament.

I know oscar is going to be back next year and since that is the case he needs to achieve well beyond some bubble team that sits near .500 in the league if he has any chance of pulling me back in.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2016, 01:26:03 PM
I mean competing for 40 minutes and no pissing down your leg after the under 4.

I think that may achieve top 3 or 4 in the league next year, so what you posted.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2016, 01:28:36 PM
None of the guys on the roster will be able to create their own shot next year, barring a surprise from a newcomer. It will be a problem but we'll still have a better record than this year.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 01:35:45 PM
None of the guys on the roster will be able to create their own shot next year, barring a surprise from a newcomer. It will be a problem but we'll still have a better record than this year.

Yep. This is a similar situation to when Wooly was here. Decent talent, decent coach, but simply not good enough. Basically what most P5 failed coaches look like at schools that are similar to us, few are absolute disasters like what we've seen from Kim Anderson or Trent Johnson.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: The Whale on March 06, 2016, 01:44:34 PM
Is the problem lack of players able to create their own shot or lack of players who can shoot period?

Our 3 pt % in conference is pathetic.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2016, 01:50:53 PM


Is the problem lack of players able to create their own shot or lack of players who can shoot period?

Our 3 pt % in conference is pathetic.

Well, both are big problems.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 02:00:27 PM
I Love Tubby's quote. Great backhanded compliment.

yeah like when self said we were better than 2-6 earlier in the year. could not be wooldrige'ing any harder

Facts are facts guys. We are the best 16-15 team in the country. Our next closest competition is Arkansas, but come on, let's be real here.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: wetwillie on March 06, 2016, 02:09:21 PM
if xwhomper and bullnuts are half dece this should be a good team next year.  Would be nice to have a 4th reliable guard. Randolph had a meeting with Hollywood yesterday but we would only be able to pickup another dog bite type probably.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 06, 2016, 02:50:35 PM
if xwhomper and bullnuts are half dece this should be a good team next year.  Would be nice to have a 4th reliable guard. Randolph had a meeting with Hollywood yesterday but we would only be able to pickup another dog bite type probably.

Bigs won't matter that much. If you look at oscar's career it is completely defined by having good point guard play. Has nothing to do with "other coaches players." He had good years when Chester was a senior and when McCamey was a senior.

But here is the issue he hasn't recruit a point guard in the fall since he has been at K-State. It is rough ridin' insane.

You are basically looking at Kam and Diarra (who I actually think has some talent) leading a team. You are looking a very wildcard team, they are currently 45 in kenpom and that should be a good jumping point for a team returning 70ish %. But eff you have a sophomore and freshmen point guard.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: CHONGS on March 06, 2016, 02:54:04 PM
Most fans would simply be happy with seeing a team compete hard and not smile on the bench.  Asking for more than that is silly. oscar puts a product on the floor that we can all be proud of and making an NIT this year is an amazing accomplishment that only the biggest fool would sneeze at.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: slobber on March 06, 2016, 03:01:07 PM
 We beat Oklahoma and we almost beat UNC. Name another team anywhere that can say that. Oscar is our guy.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on March 06, 2016, 03:02:40 PM
Our squad consists of an All-Big 12 3rd teamer/Big 12 Defensive team and two guys on the Big 12 Newcomer team.
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 03:14:41 PM
Our squad consists of an All-Big 12 3rd teamer/Big 12 Defensive team and two guys on the Big 12 Newcomer team.

Hey! Tubby had less last year: http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=209934691

Not even 1 award!
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: The Big Train on March 06, 2016, 03:42:00 PM
I feel like our players won't play in the cbi
Title: Re: To be or not Tubby, that is the question...; Tech ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2016, 04:54:45 PM
I Love Tubby's quote. Great backhanded compliment.

yeah like when self said we were better than 2-6 earlier in the year. could not be wooldrige'ing any harder

Facts are facts guys. We are the best 16-15 team in the country. Our next closest competition is Arkansas, but come on, let's be real here.

Rank   Team           W-L
44   Florida   18-13
45   Creighton   18-13
46   Kansas St.   16-15
48   Florida St.   18-12
51   Clemson   17-13
60   Oregon St.   18-11
62   Georgia Tech   18-13
67   Virginia Tech   18-13
68   Georgia   17-12
69   Washington   17-13
81   LSU   18-13
82   Rhode Island   17-14
83   Arkansas   16-15
91   Alabama   17-13
97   UC Santa Barbara   17-12
101   Long Beach St.   18-13
103   Memphis   16-14
105   Davidson   18-11
113   Louisiana Lafayette   16-13
115   College of Charleston   17-14
116   Illinois St.   18-14
121   UNLV   17-14
124   Toledo   17-14
125   Northeastern   18-14
127   New Mexico   17-14
129   Pepperdine   18-12
133   Nebraska Omaha   18-12
135   Penn St.   16-15
142   Marshall   16-15
144   Central Michigan   17-14
146   Nevada   18-12
153   Duquesne   16-15
154   North Dakota St.   18-12
155   Buffalo   17-14
156   Eastern Michigan   17-14
159   Fordham   17-12
160   Elon   16-16
163   Furman   18-14
164   Detroit   16-14
165   Lehigh   17-14
166   Coastal Carolina   18-11
168   Murray St.   17-14
169   Texas Southern   17-13
173   Colorado St.   16-15
174   Bucknell   17-13
178   Western Kentucky   16-15
181   Georgia St.   16-13
186   Western Carolina   16-16
199   Sam Houston St.   17-14
200   Eastern Washington   16-14