goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: ChiComCat on March 02, 2016, 08:22:08 AM

Title: Currie on KMAN
Post by: ChiComCat on March 02, 2016, 08:22:08 AM
I only caught the last 5 or so minutes of Currie on KMAN.  While not naming the basketball team explicitly, he made it clear that K-State teams will struggle from time to time due to having 2 P5 schools in the state, transfers, and injuries.  There are highs and lows like the stock market. 

Didn't sound like anything can be done.  Got stuck with bad hand being a P5, stuck with these transfer rules, and having the one injury this season.  Long live oscar
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 02, 2016, 08:25:11 AM
Who was the transfer that impacted us?
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2016, 08:49:17 AM
Frank
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: CNS on March 02, 2016, 09:04:21 AM
Why does the other P5 in the state not have lows in bball?  Weird. 
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 02, 2016, 09:05:30 AM
Frank

 :lol:
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 02, 2016, 09:08:22 AM
Why does the other P5 in the state not have lows in bball?  Weird.

no institutional control over there
Title: Currie on KMAN
Post by: The Big Train on March 02, 2016, 09:15:34 AM
I listened to the whole thing and it was mostly other news
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: Trim on March 02, 2016, 10:05:44 AM
I only caught the last 5 or so minutes of Currie on KMAN.  While not naming the basketball team explicitly, he made it clear that K-State teams will struggle from time to time due to having 2 P5 schools in the state, transfers, and injuries.  There are highs and lows like the stock market. 

Didn't sound like anything can be done.  Got stuck with bad hand being a P5, stuck with these transfer rules, and having the one injury this season.  Long live oscar

oscar and currie are melding into one entity.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: kso_FAN on March 02, 2016, 10:16:11 AM
oscar will be here next year and could lock up an extension. For the time being I'll still be BBB though.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 02, 2016, 10:24:15 PM
Who was the transfer that impacted us?

Seriously, what the eff were they talking about?
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: wetwillie on March 02, 2016, 10:25:42 PM
Who was the transfer that impacted us?

Seriously, what the eff were they talking about?

He lies a lot, you will just have to get used to it.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: wabash909 on March 03, 2016, 02:45:49 AM
The 9YearPlan.

Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 03, 2016, 11:04:20 AM
Those would be great excuses . . . In 1992
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: kso_FAN on March 03, 2016, 11:26:58 AM
Those would be great excuses . . . In 1992

The 5 and 8 rule bought Wooly at least 1 extra year, probably 2.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 03, 2016, 04:39:26 PM
I loved it when Dave made some crack about the Jayhawks and Currie got totally awkward about it.  Even made me uncomfortable in my car.  :driving:
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: michigancat on March 03, 2016, 06:28:56 PM
Those would be great excuses . . . In 1992

The 5 and 8 rule bought Wooly at least 1 extra year, probably 2.
He always called it the 8 and 5 rule, too. He talked about it so much in interviews that this still sticks with me.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: Ptolemy on March 04, 2016, 12:05:51 PM
My brain hurts from trying to ascertain the logic in his explanation, but give him credit for trying...

bkParallax ?@bkparallax
@KellisRobinett There can be only one question: Why is oscar Weber surviving a 4 year downward trajectory but Deb Patterson did not?

Short answer: John Currie hired oscar Weber and wants to give him every possible opportunity to succeed. Whereas Currie didn’t hire Deb Patterson, their working relationship wasn’t all that friendly and he had little interest in giving her another year to turn things around.

Long answer: No two situations are the same. oscar Weber has been more productive in his four seasons at K-State than Patterson was during her final four. Weber’s records are 27-8, 20-13, 15-17 and 16-14 with a Big 12 championship and two NCAA Tournaments. Patterson’s records were 21-11, 20-14, 19-18 and 11-19 with two NCAA Tournaments, but never challenged for a league title. That’s 78-52 with a conference title and an improved record in Year 4 vs. 71-62 with 11 wins in Year 4. Similar, but not identical. And Weber could still boost his record this season.

One could make a case for or against both coaches in both situations.

Currie spoke about the trajectory of the women’s program when he fired Patterson. Even though she was the most successful coach in program history, she hadn’t won a conference championship since 2008 and she never had much success in the NCAA Tournament. In his mind, the K-State women were never going to be great again under Patterson. K-State also pays Jeff Mittie significantly less than it paid Patterson, so there was some cost-saving strategy involved, too.

He views Weber and the men’s team differently.

I certainly understand why others don’t share that opinion, but Currie thinks Weber can win big again. Maybe even next year.

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/k-stated/article64022117.html#storylink=cpy
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: TownieCat on March 04, 2016, 12:12:34 PM
19-18 is a remarkable record. I can't imagine many teams have ever done that, men or women.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: ednksu on March 04, 2016, 12:28:03 PM
Deb should have been crap canned after the church stuff.  That aside the trajectory system for WBB is so much more different than MBBs it's impossible to look at Ws and Ls.  I would actually argue, and I don't like Deb, her results were far better than oscar. 
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: EMAWzified on March 04, 2016, 12:43:50 PM
I only caught the last 5 or so minutes of Currie on KMAN.  While not naming the basketball team explicitly, he made it clear that K-State teams will struggle from time to time due to having 2 P5 schools in the state, transfers, and injuries.  There are highs and lows like the stock market. 

Didn't sound like anything can be done.  Got stuck with bad hand being a P5, stuck with these transfer rules, and having the one injury this season.  Long live oscar

Currie makes a great case for firing his sorry ass.
Title: Re: Currie on KMAN
Post by: bones129 on March 04, 2016, 11:04:39 PM
I only caught the last 5 or so minutes of Currie on KMAN.  While not naming the basketball team explicitly, he made it clear that K-State teams will struggle from time to time due to having 2 P5 schools in the state, transfers, and injuries.  There are highs and lows like the stock market. 

Didn't sound like anything can be done.  Got stuck with bad hand being a P5, stuck with these transfer rules, and having the one injury this season.  Long live oscar

oscar and currie are melding into one entity.


 :runaway: :runaway: