goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 05:22:01 PM

Title: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 05:22:01 PM
eff that crap. I mean goodness gracious.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 21, 2016, 06:26:09 PM
Thought provoking.

#feelthebern
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 08:40:37 PM
No one else has thoughts on this?

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: wetwillie on February 21, 2016, 08:50:38 PM
It might help if you provide some context
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 08:51:25 PM
It's completely ridiculous. She's getting raped all over again.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: michigancat on February 21, 2016, 08:54:18 PM
http://jezebel.com/how-we-failed-to-protect-kesha-1760142637
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: wetwillie on February 21, 2016, 08:58:27 PM
Have to think Sony is going to take a pretty public beating over this
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 09:02:33 PM
It's insane that they are getting away with this
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 09:05:29 PM
I love Kesha a lot. So this breaks my heart.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 09:05:46 PM
I'm physically ill for her.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: catastrophe on February 21, 2016, 09:11:46 PM
If she doesn't feel safe around the guy she can and should get a restraining order. I'm not sure why recording with a different label was the first thought.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: sys on February 21, 2016, 09:15:51 PM
If she doesn't feel safe around the guy she can and should get a restraining order. I'm not sure why recording with a different label was the first thought.

if this person is a successful singer, then that contract is presumably worth a fair amount to sony.  conversely, breaking it would be worth a fair amount to the singer.


it shouldn't be that hard to come to an agreement that fairly compensates both parties.  the fact that haven't been able to suggests that either one (or both) parties is being unreasonable, or that one or both parties believes they can prevail without reasonably compensating the other party.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 09:16:25 PM

If she doesn't feel safe around the guy she can and should get a restraining order. I'm not sure why recording with a different label was the first thought.

Legally, she isn't allowed to make new music or perform her old stuff unless it's through the guy that raped her. So she could file for a restraining order, but she's still being held hostage.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: bucket on February 21, 2016, 09:18:20 PM
I love Kesha a lot. So this breaks my heart.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 09:19:26 PM
?

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 09:20:17 PM
She's very talented
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 21, 2016, 09:22:35 PM
She is. Great voice too. Hope she gets to make the music she wants someday.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Trim on February 21, 2016, 09:23:18 PM
Quote
§ 30.10 Timeliness of prosecutions; periods of limitation.
    1. A criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation
  prescribed in the ensuing subdivisions of this section.
    2. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision three:
    (a) A prosecution for a class A felony, or rape in the first degree as
  defined  in  section  130.35  of  the  penal  law, or a crime defined or
  formerly defined in section 130.50  of  the  penal  law,  or  aggravated
  sexual  abuse  in  the  first degree as defined in section 130.70 of the
  penal law, or course of sexual conduct against  a  child  in  the  first
  degree as defined in section 130.75 of the penal law may be commenced at
  any time;
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: wetwillie on February 21, 2016, 09:25:00 PM
Quote
In her complaint, Kesha claims Dr. Luke plied her with drugs and alcohol to compromise her defenses and once "forced himself” on her after giving her something illicit to snort before they got on a plane.

She also claims he once physically attacked her at his Malibu house, forcing her to flee barefoot down a coastal highway littered with broken glass.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: catastrophe on February 21, 2016, 09:25:48 PM


If she doesn't feel safe around the guy she can and should get a restraining order. I'm not sure why recording with a different label was the first thought.

Legally, she isn't allowed to make new music or perform her old stuff unless it's through the guy that raped her. So she could file for a restraining order, but she's still being held hostage.

I'm really not trying to be insensitive, but can't her people just handle the business side of it? Surely there is no situation where she needs to see or speak to this guy again.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: renocat on February 21, 2016, 09:42:41 PM
This lady wants to get away from this slime bag producer.  Sony offers to give her another producer, but she doesn't want this deal because she thinks they will not produce her album.  I say tough turds.  Get a diferent producer and make the damn albums, or walk away.  People.should quit using the civil courts to punish people for criminal acts.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 10:08:49 PM



If she doesn't feel safe around the guy she can and should get a restraining order. I'm not sure why recording with a different label was the first thought.

Legally, she isn't allowed to make new music or perform her old stuff unless it's through the guy that raped her. So she could file for a restraining order, but she's still being held hostage.

I'm really not trying to be insensitive, but can't her people just handle the business side of it? Surely there is no situation where she needs to see or speak to this guy again.

That's literally what this case and thread is about.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: sys on February 21, 2016, 10:28:35 PM
ok cat, every article on this case i've read in the last hour says you're wrong.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 21, 2016, 10:56:11 PM
Do tell
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: sys on February 21, 2016, 11:35:47 PM
they say that sony offered to have her work with other people w/o need to contact the person she alleges raped her.


why can't you just google up stories on her yourself?
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 22, 2016, 01:26:15 AM
There has to be a middle ground and I'm sure it will be reached. Sony is full of crap though. They let that one direction guy off the hook I believe.

She shouldn't have to spell out all the reasons she no longer wants to work for a company that employs her rapist. Just let her out of the deal and walk away

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Trim on February 22, 2016, 02:10:54 AM
I haven't come across a concise factual article about the history of the litigation.  It wasn't until after I posted NY's lack of a SOL for rape and someone posted something about Malibu that I found a/this case started in California.  But I saw that one problem she's had in the current matter is her testimony from an earlier case in which she denied some of the things she's now saying happened.  That case had people she had a deal with suing her for breaking that deal and getting w/the guy she's now trying to break off from.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: gatoveintisiete on February 22, 2016, 07:03:34 AM
How come this rapist is not in prison?
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: puniraptor on February 22, 2016, 07:16:12 AM
How come this rapist is not in prison?
Money, power, fame, like normal..
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: chum1 on February 22, 2016, 07:25:03 AM
She sounds like a total mess. High stakes human trafficking.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: 8manpick on February 22, 2016, 07:29:51 AM

How come this rapist is not in prison?
Money, power, fame, like normal..
Pretty sure it's cause of our rape culture
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on February 22, 2016, 09:17:19 AM

How come this rapist is not in prison?
Money, power, fame, like normal..
Pretty sure it's cause of our rape culture

(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: DQ12 on February 22, 2016, 09:27:47 AM
(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 22, 2016, 09:32:56 AM
(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?
I'm curious about that too. I'll add that around 50% of the women I have encountered in my life were sexually assaulted. None of which were ever reported.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: steve dave on February 22, 2016, 09:36:15 AM
a) rape is bad
b) those statistics are pieces of crap
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on February 22, 2016, 09:51:37 AM
(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?

 :dubious:
The graphic is meant to illustrate how many women have been sexually assaulted and not reported it, not to point to specific people who are unconvicted rapists.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: DQ12 on February 22, 2016, 10:11:07 AM
(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?

 :dubious:
The graphic is meant to illustrate how many women have been sexually assaulted and not reported it, not to point to specific people who are unconvicted rapists.
Right but that graphic assumes that all of the men (aside from the two "falsely accused" ones) are, in fact, "rapists."  And I'm saying that's a pretty big assumption to make -- especially when the statistic itself shows that only one in three of the apparent rapists who actually faced trial ended up being jailed.

I'm certainly not claiming that rape isn't underreported, but I am saying that the underreporting problem naturally makes rape statistics pretty much impossible to quantify.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: catastrophe on February 22, 2016, 10:22:12 AM

(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?

 :dubious:
The graphic is meant to illustrate how many women have been sexually assaulted and not reported it, not to point to specific people who are unconvicted rapists.

It's quite a catch 22. I mean, surely those figures were reported, or else the "rapists" number is literally completely fabricated. I guess unreported just means to the police.

Also, when you compare the reported to falsely accused numbers it is a bit more concerning. It doesn't make any sense to compare "falsely accused" to the number of rapes anonymously reported in surveys because there is literally no way to determine if those claims are true or false.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on February 22, 2016, 04:56:10 PM
Gaga and T-Swizzle are Team #FreeKesha so this will probably be a bigger thing soon. <3
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: wetwillie on February 22, 2016, 06:42:49 PM
Surprised 'Ye hasn't come out in support of Kesha yet
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 22, 2016, 10:15:14 PM
This guy's name is Dr. Luke? Like, he's a doctor? Luke is his last name?

This might be a tough business lesson for kesha, but bad relationship with company rep is not a basis to terminate a contract with company (it sounds like she doesn't like the K antmore).

Maybe her attorney can show Sony knew the guy was a cosby, and she can get a big negligence award for putting him in charge of her. But the contract is the contract
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: BrokenSky1113 on February 22, 2016, 11:59:26 PM
There has to be a middle ground and I'm sure it will be reached. Sony is full of crap though. They let that one direction guy off the hook I believe.

She shouldn't have to spell out all the reasons she no longer wants to work for a company that employs her rapist. Just let her out of the deal and walk away

#TheWesIsTheFuture

You can't rip up a legal contract based on allegations. If he was convicted of any offense toward her, this would be a different situation.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 23, 2016, 12:07:32 AM
I know I know. I'm speaking with my heart and not my head.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: BrokenSky1113 on February 23, 2016, 12:09:14 AM
I know I know. I'm speaking with my heart and not my head.

I can feel that bro. Kesha's alright.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 23, 2016, 12:15:00 AM
I know I know. I'm speaking with my heart and not my head.

I can feel that bro. Kesha's alright.
:cheers:
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 23, 2016, 08:09:10 AM
It's weird to me that Nebraska can get out of its Big 12 contract because they get a comparable offer from another Power 5 conference, but Kesha can't get out of her contract with the entity that allegedly raped her. It seems like there should be some sort of fair buyout that could be arranged.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: catastrophe on February 23, 2016, 09:26:50 AM

It's weird to me that Nebraska can get out of its Big 12 contract because they get a comparable offer from another Power 5 conference, but Kesha can't get out of her contract with the entity that allegedly raped her. It seems like there should be some sort of fair buyout that could be arranged.

Anyone can break a contract whenever they want. You just have to be willing to pay for it. That's what Nebraska did.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Stupid Fitz on February 23, 2016, 06:56:26 PM
(https://scontent.fmci1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12717904_1042335052498303_3418940876745047994_n.jpg?oh=826ada06c8a8c2ac2138253b071f2534&oe=575DBBBF)

Has Kesha actually tried to bring criminal charges against Dr. Luke? Just wondering.
How do we know all those beige people are rapists if they've never been convicted?

 :dubious:
The graphic is meant to illustrate how many women have been sexually assaulted and not reported it, not to point to specific people who are unconvicted rapists.
Right but that graphic assumes that all of the men (aside from the two "falsely accused" ones) are, in fact, "rapists."  And I'm saying that's a pretty big assumption to make -- especially when the statistic itself shows that only one in three of the apparent rapists who actually faced trial ended up being jailed.

I'm certainly not claiming that rape isn't underreported, but I am saying that the underreporting problem naturally makes rape statistics pretty much impossible to quantify.

Its a real graph with colors and everything that was passed around via Twitter or something, its obv real/correct.  Don't you know how the internet works?
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on February 23, 2016, 10:30:19 PM
The graphic would be better if they made it too like an American flag
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on February 29, 2016, 02:21:50 PM
Dr. Luke says he didn't rape Kesha. I don't know if he did or did not, but it is pretty clear that she was on drugs at the time - otherwise she never would have fixed her hair like that.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cb2fIldVAAEcEQW.png)

http://www.dailydot.com/entertainment/dr-luke-denies-kesha-rape-allegations-on-twitter/?fb=dd&type=cpc
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on March 09, 2016, 03:51:07 PM
Good sign for Kesha today, Sony is dropping Dr Luke. 
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: Brock Landers on March 09, 2016, 04:37:50 PM
Those songs she did with 3Oh3 were almost as bad as rape.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on March 09, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Good sign for Kesha today, Sony is dropping Dr Luke.
Yayayay!
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: SdK on March 09, 2016, 07:27:34 PM
Those songs she did with 3Oh3 were almost as bad as rape.
No. Stfu.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: OK_Cat on March 09, 2016, 07:38:26 PM

Those songs she did with 3Oh3 were almost as bad as rape.

HUR HUR HUR
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: wetwillie on March 09, 2016, 09:18:44 PM
Those songs she did with 3Oh3 were almost as bad as rape.

Wow, you are a terrible human.
Title: Re: Kesha
Post by: DQ12 on March 10, 2016, 11:31:14 AM

Those songs she did with 3Oh3 were almost as bad as rape.

HUR HUR HUR
Oh you HUR HUR HUR'ing is real rich.