goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: TheHamburglar on December 08, 2015, 11:07:38 AM
-
Big 12 just announced new rule requiring at least 1 P5 and no more than 1 FCS per year. No start date, just all contacts signed going forward must follow. Not forcing current signed agreements broken to meet the rule.
-
I like it.
-
We are already set starting next year and going through 2021. These matchups make the OOC more enjoyable.
-
Having KU in the conferences makes this a delightful little pill to swallow.
-
This was definitely a shot a Baylor. Every other school in the league already does this most years. They haven't played P5 noncon game since 2009!
-
KU and Baylor are the only two that do not have a P5 noncon scheduled for next year. Baylor adds one in '17 (Duke), but KU does not.
Everyone else has at least one in '16 and '17.
-
Where we the last B12 program to play 2 FCS schools in a season?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
This was definitely a shot a Baylor. Every other school in the league already does this most years. They haven't played P5 noncon game since 2009!
Yep.
-
This was definitely a shot a Baylor. Every other school in the league already does this most years. They haven't played P5 noncon game since 2009!
I could be wrong but wasn't that against like Wake Forest? :lol:
-
This was definitely a shot a Baylor. Every other school in the league already does this most years. They haven't played P5 noncon game since 2009!
I could be wrong but wasn't that against like Wake Forest? :lol:
USF?
-
This was definitely a shot a Baylor. Every other school in the league already does this most years. They haven't played P5 noncon game since 2009!
I could be wrong but wasn't that against like Wake Forest? :lol:
USF?
Wake and UConn.
To be fair, they did play an OOC home and home with TCU in 10 and 11 before they joined the league and became a P5 school.
-
Where we the last B12 program to play 2 FCS schools in a season?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Us in 2009? :dunno:
That's probably a reaction to UNC this year. There were rumors (no idea if true) that when the ATL game fell thru, we might have gotten stuck with 2 FCS next year.
-
Add another item to the "reasons why the Big12 is terrible at PR" list: Big12 ADs are telling reporters that Army and BYU count. Office spokesman says they don't.
-
Add another item to the "reasons why the Big12 is terrible at PR" list: Big12 ADs are telling reporters that Army and BYU count. Office spokesman says they don't.
lol
-
https://twitter.com/SpencerKietzman/status/674274714236293121
-
https://twitter.com/SpencerKietzman/status/674274714236293121
Add this to the list of ways Spencer Kietzman is a confirmed dumbass
-
Spencer makes his dad look like that Einstein guy.
-
Does Spencer not realize we are covered on this rule through 2021?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
This dum dum apparently thinks Stanford is DII or something.
-
would be a good incentive for Texas to pick up it's rivalry with A&M, KU could try and schedule Mizzou every year at Arrowhead, etc.
-
I think it should be bumped up to 2 p5 teams.
-
maybe they are doing this now because they are planning on adding 2 crappy teams to the conference and want to make sure everyone is playing at least 9 games against power 5 teams at that time because we might go back to 4 OOC games.
-
maybe they are doing this now because they are planning on adding 2 crappy teams to the conference and want to make sure everyone is playing at least 9 games against power 5 teams at that time because we might go back to 4 OOC games.
I think they're doing it because almost all fans want it as well as tv networks. Also, with this rule the Big 12 can brag that its teams' schedules are harder/more interesting than any other conference due to the 9 conference games and P5 opponent requirement. Instant (though modest right now) bump in conference prestige.
-
would be a good incentive for Texas to pick up it's rivalry with A&M, KU could try and schedule Mizzou every year at Arrowhead, etc.
both sec schools would do back flips to get those games back
-
would be a good incentive for Texas to pick up it's rivalry with A&M, KU could try and schedule Mizzou every year at Arrowhead, etc.
both sec schools would do back flips to get those games back
K-State should start an annual series with Mizzou starting in 2022 or whenever.
-
would be a good incentive for Texas to pick up it's rivalry with A&M, KU could try and schedule Mizzou every year at Arrowhead, etc.
No it wouldn't, UT is taken care of with this rule through 2024, and in 2027.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I think it should be bumped up to 2 p5 teams.
Maybe but I would settle for dropping FCS schools next
-
would be a good incentive for Texas to pick up it's rivalry with A&M, KU could try and schedule Mizzou every year at Arrowhead, etc.
No it wouldn't, UT is taken care of with this rule through 2024, and in 2027.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ok, then starting in 2025 scottwildcat <---lol
-
I think it should be bumped up to 2 p5 teams.
Maybe but I would settle for dropping FCS schools next
Both good ideas
-
I don't see anything wrong with playing an FCS school. A lot of those games aren't the blowouts they once were, and if they are, it gives the bigger school a chance to get playing time for a lot of players. And the FCS school gets a good payday that they wouldn't otherwise get, and I'm sure they enjoy getting to face one of the bigger schools. If we're gonna be playing 10 P5 games, 1 FCS game is fine by me.
-
Let teams schedule FCS schools that want to schedule FCS schools. I really don't like conferences dictating what schools do with their non conference schedules. What's good for Ohio State isn't good for Purdue. I also don't like that the FCS schools are not getting that revenue. What do you do when you're faced with a problem like North Carolina had when they got bought out, thought they could find a FBS opponent, then couldn't?
-
Let teams schedule FCS schools that want to schedule FCS schools. I really don't like conferences dictating what schools do with their non conference schedules. What's good for Ohio State isn't good for Purdue. I also don't like that the FCS schools are not getting that revenue. What do you do when you're faced with a problem like North Carolina had when they got bought out, thought they could find a FBS opponent, then couldn't?
FCS schools give flexibility to the schedule to find a quick fix if a series falls through or someone cancels. Also, if we start doing a bunch of home/home P5 schedules, and pretty much every G5 school dictates some sort of 2:1 deal (i.e. UTSA), seven home games is hard to come by. You can schedule as best you can, but the only way you can almost guarantee seven home games per year in this environment is to schedule FCS.
-
I think the NCAA should manage all OOC scheduling.
-
lol
-
I think the NCAA should manage all OOC scheduling.
Even though they don't run FBS college football?
-
Let teams schedule FCS schools that want to schedule FCS schools. I really don't like conferences dictating what schools do with their non conference schedules. What's good for Ohio State isn't good for Purdue. I also don't like that the FCS schools are not getting that revenue. What do you do when you're faced with a problem like North Carolina had when they got bought out, thought they could find a FBS opponent, then couldn't?
I think if you have more FBS opponents looking for other FBS opponents, this problem will be much less likely. I agree that Kansas shouldn't have the same scheduling philosophy as Oklahoma but the worst of the Sun Belt or whatever is plenty bad enough for them to play.
Personally, I would like for FCS teams to scrimmage in April against FBS teams and they can get their pay day that way. The Spring Games get much better as there is actually a little bit of relevancy, attendance would probably improve but the game would not count on anyone's record.
-
Let teams schedule FCS schools that want to schedule FCS schools. I really don't like conferences dictating what schools do with their non conference schedules. What's good for Ohio State isn't good for Purdue. I also don't like that the FCS schools are not getting that revenue. What do you do when you're faced with a problem like North Carolina had when they got bought out, thought they could find a FBS opponent, then couldn't?
I think if you have more FBS opponents looking for other FBS opponents, this problem will be much less likely. I agree that Kansas shouldn't have the same scheduling philosophy as Oklahoma but the worst of the Sun Belt or whatever is plenty bad enough for them to play.
Personally, I would like for FCS teams to scrimmage in April against FBS teams and they can get their pay day that way. The Spring Games get much better as there is actually a little bit of relevancy, attendance would probably improve but the game would not count on anyone's record.
That's a great idea ColoCat :thumbsup:
-
I think the NCAA should manage all OOC scheduling.
Even though they don't run FBS college football?
Well then whoever is in charge of the CFP or fbs football or whomever
-
Personally, I would like for FCS teams to scrimmage in April against FBS teams and they can get their pay day that way. The Spring Games get much better as there is actually a little bit of relevancy, attendance would probably improve but the game would not count on anyone's record.
Another great idea.
-
The pretty much ensures ku will never make a bowl game again.
-
The pretty much ensures ku will never make a bowl game again.
Could help them in the long run. This will probably catch on in the other P5 conferences, and if KU is smart they'll start a bidding war among teams for the privilege to play the easiest P5 opponent of all. KU just needs to pocket that money over 5-10 years and then they can put a down payment on reasonable facilities and maybe even start paying for a decent coach.