goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2015, 09:00:47 PM
-
There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of — not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, ‘Okay, they’re really angry because of this and that.’ This Friday was absolutely indiscriminate. It wasn’t to aggrieve one particular sense of wrong. It was to terrorize people.”
And I thought, My God,
the genius of that! The genius.
The will to do that. Perfect,
genuine, complete, crystalline,
pure. And then I realized, they
were stronger than we. Because
they could stand it. These were
not monsters. These were men,
strained cadres. These men who
fought with their hearts, who have
families, who have children, who
are filled with love...that they
had the strength, the strength to
do that.
-
Gosh, somebody already posted this.
I mean, I read what this creep said and I immediately pictured Col. Kurtz lecturing Willard in the jungle. Really channeling his inner base self.
-
that's stevesie60's favorite movie
-
that's stevesie60's favorite movie
It really is a fantastic movie, I mean the acting across the board was pretty much off the charts.
-
That's very true
-
i had the same kind of feelings as kerry actually.
-
i had the same kind of feelings as kerry actually.
but you see where he said legitimacy and then corrected it to something else? obviously he supports all islamic terrorism.
-
that's stevesie60's favorite movie
My name is mocat bruh
-
i had the same kind of feelings as kerry actually.
everyone had the same feeling as the sentiment kerry was clumsily attempting to articulate - that the attack engendered a different level of fear and sense of outrage because the charlie hebdo employees were knowingly assuming a risk of lunatic islamist murderers trying to kill them while the victims of the current attack were not.
-
You really have to admire the guts of those Hibdo killers, I mean the shear will to carry forth their rage. Positively admirable. I bet John Kerry would let them drink out of his canteen any day.
-
Direct revenge is also something most everyone can understand, random killing isn't
-
Direct revenge is also something most everyone can understand, random killing isn't
Theological Rage and Killing is really an innate human emotion that we can all have empathy with: As long as the killers are Muslim (of course)
-
Well only you are mentioning empathy, but that's because you have a partisan narrative like ksuw
-
Well only you are mentioning empathy, but that's because you have a partisan narrative like ksuw
Oh I could mention lots of things, but that's the first thing that comes to mind.
If Christians had unleashed a killing rampage on, oh, let's say that "Piss Christ" guy, Mapplethorpe (sp?) and killed him and people who associated with him. I'm sure the secular ProgLib community at some base level, would have understood why they did what they did. :thumbsup:
-
Understand as in comprehend, you simpleton. good grief you love to be dense
-
Keep pumping your partisan agenda though, I'm sure it will go well for you
-
Understand as in comprehend, you simpleton. good grief you love to be dense
I'm sure secular proglib community would have understood.
"Ya know, I can really understand that raw animal killing rampage that those Christian radicals unleashed on Robert and friends. I mean, I don't support it, but I really can understand it on some levels . . . get some coffee and scone?"
-
Keep pumping your partisan agenda though, I'm sure it will go well for you
As long as you guys keep defending that certifiable dumbass that is our SOS, I'll be happy to do so. Now carry on you silly little over explainer.
#liblogic
-
Link to pro kerry posts?
-
Link to pro kerry posts?
Over explaining. . . when you go to such lengths we all know what you're doing #liblogic.
Come on man.
Sad
-
Tap out noted
-
Tap out noted
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
U r :curse:
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
You're adorable as well . . . when you're mad! :lol:
jk
-
;)
-
adorable
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
Your butthurt about me is fantastic, but note where I'm done "thrashing" him. Don't think you're the only one having fun with Dax's mind.
-
the last series of dax posts itt were baffling, even for dax
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
Your butthurt about me is fantastic, but note where I'm done "thrashing" him. Don't think you're the only one having fun with Dax's mind.
Oh no, there's whack-a-doodle and then there's you. Just call me astounded.
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
Your butthurt about me is fantastic, but note where I'm done "thrashing" him. Don't think you're the only one having fun with Dax's mind.
Well you certainly ruin everyone else's day :thumbs: (except thumbs down)
-
does dax really read that quote and think Kerry was lauding the hebdo episode?
-
does dax really read that quote and think Kerry was lauding the hebdo episode?
No. Ksuw does tho
-
does dax really read that quote and think Kerry was lauding the hebdo episode?
No. Ksuw does tho
"Lauding?" Of course not. Excusing? Yeah - he got about halfway there and then realized "oh eff, I better fix this."
John Kerry, just like the libtards in this thread, don't seem to understand that the attacks against Charlie Hebdo were no more or less random or justified than the Paris attacks. You think it's just drawing a cartoon of their warlord pedophile prophet that pisses off these radical Islamists? I've got news for you. Pretty much everything about "the west" pisses them off. It's all "targeted."
-
OK ksuw
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
Also, keep in mind that this thread is about a gaff from a politician. Nothing more.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
You realize the only thing accurate in this post is that you said radical islam is a problem right?
-
Dax, I engage you for my own entertainment. don't confuse me with the moron edn, you have never and will never make me angry cause you're just too darn adorable :Carl:
Your butthurt about me is fantastic, but note where I'm done "thrashing" him. Don't think you're the only one having fun with Dax's mind.
Well you certainly ruin everyone else's day :thumbs: (except thumbs down)
Oh man you totally got me
:jerk:
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
You realize the only thing accurate in this post is that you said radical islam is a problem right?
How's that Greenland glacier melt coming along? And rise in sea level yet?
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
-
OK ksuw
-
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
I love it! But it's kind of sad too. You are in all seriousness pretty crazy if you think this way.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
You realize the only thing accurate in this post is that you said radical islam is a problem right?
How's that Greenland glacier melt coming along? And rise in sea level yet?
Undeniable facts > you
-
So its not the Syrian part or the refugee part, it's the muslim part. Just dont allow muslims in this country. Literally stop people from entering based on their religion. In the United States
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
Please show me exactly where I said that dumbass.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
Additionally, the Constitution does not apply to people outside of the US who aren't citizens. Which is exactly who these refugees are.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
Please show me exactly where I said that dumbass.
You're the one tossing out stuff that is on its face false. I'm not sure where your scatter shot posting is heading. But it's great your attacking me about whether or not religious tests for entry are un-American and not the people demanding they happen.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
Please show me exactly where I said that dumbass.
You're the one tossing out stuff that is on its face false. I'm not sure where your scatter shot posting is heading. But it's great your attacking me about whether or not religious tests for entry are un-American and not the people demanding they happen.
Nothing I tossed out was false, and even if it were, that doesn't make it okay to say I said something I very clearly did not say, especially considering all one would have to do is look up and see exactly what I said.
-
OK ksuw
if he's genuine, he's lost it. It's fascinating to watch.
Good, substantive points, libtards.
there is nothing substantive to discuss ITT, beyond your descent into a bizarre paranoid state.
I present example after example of how radical Islam is a problem, made worse by importing huge blocks of Muslims that don't assimilate. You response "bizarre paranoid state." Gotcha. Can't make you think, Rusty. Just continue burying your head in the sand.
Even if radical islam was something Americans needed to be afraid of, the refugees are trying to get away from radical Islam! If they wanted to be terrorists they could just join ISIS.
First, by all means let the Christians in, who ISIS will kill.
Second, just because the Muslims want to get away from a war torn region doesn't mean they reject radical Islam. Any more than liberals who flee shitty liberal-run states stop being liberals.
Ah yes, the ole religious test, a tried and true American institution, something our Constitution looks very favorably upon.
The Constitution doesn't haven't anything to do with people who aren't citizens.
You're telling me the Constitution looks favorably on religious tests in the American political system? I could have sworn I read otherwise.
Also the Constitution does apply to people in the US who are not citizens. Sooo.....those facts.....
Please show me exactly where I said that dumbass.
You're the one tossing out stuff that is on its face false. I'm not sure where your scatter shot posting is heading. But it's great your attacking me about whether or not religious tests for entry are un-American and not the people demanding they happen.
Nothing I tossed out was false, and even if it were, that doesn't make it okay to say I said something I very clearly did not say, especially considering all one would have to do is look up and see exactly what I said.
Well it's false on face that the Constitution doesn't apply to non-citizens. You could have been more specific and said outside the US, which would be accurate. But you didn't so by that omission you included in the US as well. Now if you want to amend your statement that is fine. The greater point here though is that religious tests of any sort for access to the body politic in America are inherently un-American.
-
Arrogant dumb bastard, Kerry. People like to crap. Justification why the morons voted for your boss.
-
Woah, how did I miss this whole exchange where Edna plays Constitutional Scholar? Evidently, he is not aware that federal law on both asylum and refugee status explicitly takes religion into consideration. As well it should. Christians are in far greater danger of imminent harm from ISIS.
-
federal law on both asylum and refugee status explicitly takes religion into consideration. As well it should. Christians are in far greater danger of imminent harm from ISIS.
with a quota of just 100k, i doubt there'll be any room left for christians, if accepted on a gradient of most endangered by isis.
-
Woah, how did I miss this whole exchange where Edna plays Constitutional Scholar? Evidently, he is not aware that federal law on both asylum and refugee status explicitly takes religion into consideration. As well it should. Christians are in far greater danger of imminent harm from ISIS.
Total misrepresentation of how religion factors into status. Which by your logic and misinterpretation we wouldn't need Jeb's plan of putting them at the front of the line.
-
does dax really read that quote and think Kerry was lauding the hebdo episode?
No. Ksuw does tho
"Lauding?" Of course not. Excusing? Yeah - he got about halfway there and then realized "oh eff, I better fix this."
John Kerry, just like the libtards in this thread, don't seem to understand that the attacks against Charlie Hebdo were no more or less random or justified than the Paris attacks. You think it's just drawing a cartoon of their warlord pedophile prophet that pisses off these radical Islamists? I've got news for you. Pretty much everything about "the west" pisses them off. It's all "targeted."
I think instead of "excusing" the word your looking for is "explaining." Also notable is that (at least from my understanding), the Hebdo attack was mostly carried out by Al-Qaeda, whose "foreign policy" is different than that of ISIS.
-
I think instead of "excusing" the word your looking for is "explaining." Also notable is that (at least from my understanding), the Hebdo attack was mostly carried out by Al-Qaeda, whose "foreign policy" is different than that of ISIS.
interestingly, yes, but one of the principals reputed to be involved was from the same group (10 years ago).
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/12/-sp-charlie-hebdo-attackers-kids-france-radicalised-paris
-
federal law on both asylum and refugee status explicitly takes religion into consideration. As well it should. Christians are in far greater danger of imminent harm from ISIS.
with a quota of just 100k, i doubt there'll be any room left for christians, if accepted on a gradient of most endangered by isis.
Plus wasn't there something about the previous quota being 75k? So only 25k more?