goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:19:46 PM

Title: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:19:46 PM
Omg, laugh factory on right now. Called first in the south democrats forum.  Looking for substance? not here. Vomiting platitudes with Maddow steering the rudderless ship

 :lol: :ROFL:

Lunatics
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:21:23 PM
Pretty sure omalley is mentally handicapped.

Rachel: why did Maryland turn red after your term?

Omalley: because I'm so awesome and climate change is real and that fracking thing isn't
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:36:09 PM
Don't worry North Dakota, all your problems (idk what these are, <2% UE and super high median income) will be solved by bringing renewable energy jobs (apparently these come to fruition when fracking ends) to shithole cities like Baltimore

 :lol:

We are the Party of science  :ROFL:
All this newfangled fracking just wrecking the climate
 :lol: :lol:

Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:37:19 PM
Next up, "an avowed socialist"

 :lol:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:42:45 PM
Black real unemployment is 51%

Holy crap
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:43:42 PM
Moving textiles jobs from China to Vermont by taxing corporations more  :love:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:45:10 PM
Keystone pipeline would destroy climate and create no jobs. Make the world inhabitable . Need to invest in infrastructure

 :lol:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:45:51 PM
Because of ExxonMobil and the Koch brothers  :ROFL:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 06, 2015, 11:51:32 PM
I didn't realize the Bern was simply a walking cliche. He's just a liberal Trump.
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:53:10 PM
Rachel: what do you think about boots on the ground in iraq and syria?
Bern: bush and Cheney are liars
Rachel: you supported the war in Afghanistan, do you still?
Bern: yes, but extreme right wingers run super PACs who run wall street, who are robbing middle class peoples of money, and we had to get bin laden, the talibaner
Rachel: so you agree with b.o. on sending troops to syria
Bern: no?
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2015, 11:53:51 PM
Jesse Jackson  :ROFL:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:01:48 AM
Bern: I want to get rid of the gun strawman exception; the people who want missile launchers in their backyard are creating this problem  :Woot:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:13:01 AM
Dentures!!! I live with bill in NY  :Wha:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:15:52 AM
 :zzz: goodness libtards, this corpse is super boring
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:19:01 AM
Told the nasdaq they were ruining homeownership in 2007   :confused: :lol:

The Koch brothers are cronies to the government  :Crybaby:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:24:30 AM
Rachel: You've accepted millions of dollars from special interest groups
Hillary: verbal diarrhea, libtard platitudes
Rachel: let's talk death penalty because I hate it
Hillary: thank you, I blacked out for 15 minutes there, did I say anything substantive?
Rachel: nah
Hillary: thank god
Crowd: wtf? She is truly awful and we can't hide it. It's on our faces
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 12:30:45 AM
Rachel: 3 minute compound question
Hillary :  51% of kids are on free/reduced lunch  :Yuck: #thanksobama
Rachel: do we need policemen in schools
Hillary: only if it's the same police in white schools as it is in black schools
Rachel:  :confused:
Crowd:  :confused:
Hillary: and we need to get rid of guns #copslivesdontmatter

 :lol:
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 07, 2015, 07:29:41 AM
Nice work Dick, It feels like I was there.
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 07, 2015, 07:42:37 AM
I'm confused. Did the Dems have a debate last night? Friday night? On msnbc?
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 07, 2015, 09:43:43 AM
They continue to readily admit that the last 7 years of the Obama Administration have been an abject failure on every conceivable level.   

Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: renocat on November 07, 2015, 11:10:29 AM
 :Woohoo:
Keystone pipeline would destroy climate and create no jobs. Make the world inhabitable . Need to invest in infrastructure

 :lol:
[/quote
Pipeline is infrastructure.
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: michigancat on November 07, 2015, 11:37:26 AM
Great thread
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 07, 2015, 12:48:08 PM
I'm kicking myself for having missed this last night. I seriously had no idea it was even on. Saw zero promotion for it. I wonder how many people watched?
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2015, 01:12:45 PM

Great thread

Yes, enjoyable read
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: CNS on November 07, 2015, 02:24:23 PM
I'm kicking myself for having missed this last night. I seriously had no idea it was even on. Saw zero promotion for it. I wonder how many people watched?
Hillary ' s super PAC keeping it quiet so that no other candidates get exposere, no doubt.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: wetwillie on November 07, 2015, 02:37:15 PM
i don't think it was labeled a debate, it was a forum or something like that
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 02:45:49 PM
This is what it was:

It was a series of one on one interviews. Rachel would ask some long boring leading question, usually about some hypocritical thing the candidate was campaigning on, then the candidate would meander through about 5 platitudes and not answer the question. Rinse repeat. It was exactly what you'd expect from these psychopaths, lots of unfounded claims about nebulous issues.

Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 07, 2015, 03:24:11 PM
This is what it was:

It was a series of one on one interviews. Rachel would ask some long boring leading question, usually about some hypocritical thing the candidate was campaigning on, then the candidate would meander through about 5 platitudes and not answer the question. Rinse repeat. It was exactly what you'd expect from these psychopaths, lots of unfounded claims about nebulous issues.

Oh. So exactly what the GOP should do with an intelligent conservative host. But nah, they'd prefer to field loaded questions from liberal moderators too.
Title: Re: MSNBC
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 07, 2015, 03:41:29 PM
It seemed too stages, even for msnbc