Post by: renocat on October 12, 2015, 05:04:25 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 12, 2015, 05:30:41 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 12, 2015, 05:43:32 PM
Would like to catch a little of that Whack-A-Doodle Bernie as well.
Post by: CNS on October 12, 2015, 07:55:28 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 12, 2015, 08:05:55 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 12, 2015, 08:43:19 PM
Expect a question or two about Planned Parenthood that won't actually describe what is revealed in the videos - just enough to let the candidates bloviate about women's health.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 12, 2015, 09:09:24 PM
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 12, 2015, 09:37:05 PM
Pull string "wealth gap" pull string "gun control" pull string "women workplace equality" pull string "man made global climate warming" pull string "racist sexist bigot-a-phobe"
Post by: slobber on October 13, 2015, 05:48:51 AM
what was revealed in the videos?if I were you, I would have gone with either a: a questioning of the videos' authenticity, or b: a simple "what videos?"
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: ednksu on October 13, 2015, 09:41:19 AM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 12:13:37 PM
I could see Bernie putting Hilrod in a clownsuit and no one realizing what happened.
Id appreciate a lib perspective on this. How is Bern going to pantsuit I mean clownsuit Hillary?
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 12:30:54 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 12:38:15 PM
Post by: ednksu on October 13, 2015, 12:45:46 PM
I could see Bernie putting Hilrod in a clownsuit and no one realizing what happened.
Id appreciate a lib perspective on this. How is Bern going to pantsuit I mean clownsuit Hillary?
Well since I'm a moderate, I can't really help you with the lib side of things. :surprised:
But we know that Bernie speaks in detail and specifics whereas Hilrod speaks in platitudes and I R experienced talking points. Those typically play better with our ignorant voters than specifics about what each candidate has to offer.
Post by: steve dave on October 13, 2015, 01:10:36 PM
scene-15 minutes into debate. bern is destroying hil but nobody is really paying attention.
:slow music build, people begin to notice. hil is acting exasperated about something and talking loudly then is the last to go quiet:
debate moderator - hold on folks, there seems to be an AV issue here, there's some mu.....That's...THAT'S JOE BIDEN'S MUSIC!
:Diamond Joe busts through the door at the back of the audience and the crowd goes absolutely bonkers:
joe - oh, am I late? :winks at camera, double finger guns, crowd completely loses their crap:
Post by: steve dave on October 13, 2015, 01:12:12 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 01:38:07 PM
Oh crap pantsuit because she's a broad that wears men's clothing LOL
No, it's because her suits are hideous. I don't see anyone making the pantsuit joke about any other female politicians.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpowervrouwen.blog.nl%2Ffiles%2F2013%2F06%2Fhillary-clinton-pantsuit-400x300.gif&hash=6539f586e9e11e49dd12cdf4c1b5ba35839f3769)
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 01:41:32 PM
you want to get sd to tune into this?
scene-15 minutes into debate. bern is destroying hil but nobody is really paying attention.
:slow music build, people begin to notice. hil is acting exasperated about something and talking loudly then is the last to go quiet:
debate moderator - hold on folks, there seems to be an AV issue here, there's some mu.....That's...THAT'S JOE BIDEN'S MUSIC!
:Diamond Joe busts through the door at the back of the audience and the crowd goes absolutely bonkers:
joe - oh, am I late? :winks at camera, double finger guns, crowd completely loses their crap:
I feel like one of the other losers (o'malley?) needs to take a steel chair to the back of the head right before the finger guns
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 05:23:57 PM
Post by: CNS on October 13, 2015, 05:26:15 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 05:27:31 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 06:47:18 PM
You don't often get to see these pantsuits in their full glory, they really are embarrassing.Oh crap pantsuit because she's a broad that wears men's clothing LOL
No, it's because her suits are hideous. I don't see anyone making the pantsuit joke about any other female politicians.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpowervrouwen.blog.nl%2Ffiles%2F2013%2F06%2Fhillary-clinton-pantsuit-400x300.gif&hash=6539f586e9e11e49dd12cdf4c1b5ba35839f3769)
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 06:59:20 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 07:18:20 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 07:39:45 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 07:41:45 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 07:48:51 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 07:50:10 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 07:51:30 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 07:52:36 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 07:53:01 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 07:53:44 PM
Did the first guy say he was a three time elected mayor?
something like that
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 07:55:05 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 07:59:00 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:00:12 PM
I don't care how ridiculous Bernie looks, I like him.
makes me like him more
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:01:22 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:03:02 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:04:18 PM
Christopher Lloyd would play Bernie in a movie, right?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.wonkette.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2Fbernie.jpg&hash=2e998358cd7967cc5c2039acdb734b26e1f18cda)
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 08:04:25 PM
bernie :love:
:love:
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:04:57 PM
Christopher Lloyd would play Bernie in a movie, right?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.wonkette.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2Fbernie.jpg&hash=2e998358cd7967cc5c2039acdb734b26e1f18cda)
Nailed it
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:05:42 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 08:07:37 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 08:08:30 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:08:30 PM
Mean Granny, leave Bernie the eff alone.
:thumbs:
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 08:09:53 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:10:42 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 08:11:28 PM
O'Malley whistles every time he makes an "s" sound.
I can't unhear it!
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 08:12:11 PM
Will Forte would play o'malley in a movie
:thumbs:
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:12:25 PM
O'Malley whistles every time he makes an "s" sound.
noticed it instantly as well :frown:
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:12:37 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:14:59 PM
Holy crap you guys this field has like zero charisma.
hey fuckhead, did you miss bernie talking?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 08:15:25 PM
Holy crap you guys this field has like zero charisma.
Bernie is charismatic. The rest of them are robots.
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 08:16:02 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:16:19 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:17:26 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 08:18:30 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:19:13 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 08:21:06 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:21:22 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:22:11 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:27:24 PM
wanting to sue gun manufacturers is the stupidest rough ridin' thing
Surprisingly simplistic take
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:28:25 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:29:18 PM
wanting to sue gun manufacturers is the stupidest rough ridin' thing
Surprisingly simplistic take
you don't need to get much deeper than that. it's stupid.
Post by: CNS on October 13, 2015, 08:29:49 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: CNS on October 13, 2015, 08:30:20 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:30:41 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:31:33 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:32:17 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:33:13 PM
Webb reminds me of the neighbor from beavis and butthead
omg :lol:
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:33:43 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:34:32 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:35:19 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:35:41 PM
damnit martin, stop wackin' it in my camper
Yes!
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 08:35:56 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:36:23 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 08:36:53 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:37:02 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:37:41 PM
There are like half the normal amount of baters in this thing, wtf
democrats like small debates, republicans prefer to mass debate :ROFL:
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 08:38:00 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:40:51 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:40:59 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 08:41:22 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:41:47 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:42:05 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 08:43:20 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 08:43:32 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:44:30 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:44:52 PM
Who is the craziest on the stage of the three crazy people standing there with Bernie?
Webb IMO
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:45:29 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 08:45:38 PM
This is what we know it is so far. 2 horse race. The other 3 haven't said anything to make them matter
well, webb has said enough
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:45:58 PM
This is what we know it is so far. 2 horse race. The other 3 haven't said or whistled anything to make them matter
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 08:46:06 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:47:10 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 08:48:35 PM
O'Malley whistles every time he makes an "s" sound.
all i can picture is Mac on that one episode of Sunny when he has a wooden tooth
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:48:36 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 08:49:52 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:50:18 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 08:50:26 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:50:31 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:50:44 PM
Bernie doesn't seem to get how this politics thingy works :bang:
:love:
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:50:55 PM
How sad.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:51:16 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 08:51:28 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:51:36 PM
The precursor to Hank Hill??
Tom Anderson, he and Hank Hill were based on the same person from Mike Judge's childhood.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:52:01 PM
Nobody cares, dax
Lot's of people care . . . just not the straight line (D) voterlemming.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:52:12 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:52:47 PM
Link?
:lol:
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 08:54:00 PM
Webb took notes from K-S-U on gun control.
Huh?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:54:12 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:54:24 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 08:55:18 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:55:49 PM
There won't be two better moments tonight than Hilary mushing Lincoln Chafee, hard, like mused him right out of the debate and the race; and Martin essentially telling Debbie to kiss his ass.
Yeah both were great. The Hillary mush is my favorite Hillary moment ever.
Really loving Webb being pissed all night
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:56:03 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/obama-hillary-clinton-email-server-60-minutes/index.html
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:56:15 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:57:04 PM
We all had fun during the Republican debates but dax, the partisan dog pissing all over the carpet is ruining this for all of us.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:57:27 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 08:57:53 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 08:58:31 PM
Dax copy paste trump tweets so we actually read your posts
You asked for a link OKC, I guess you really didn't want one, huh?? :dunno:
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 08:58:49 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:59:02 PM
Dax copy paste trump tweets so we actually read your posts
You asked for a link OKC, I guess you really didn't want one, huh?? :dunno:
No, because nobody cares
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 08:59:08 PM
Dax copy paste trump tweets so we actually read your postsOT: they are horrible and he is saying nothing. All he is doing is quoting people tweeting about reading his tweets.
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 08:59:14 PM
O'Malley whistles every time he makes an "s" sound.
all i can picture is Mac on that one episode of Sunny when he has a wooden tooth
Shenator shandersh omg
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 08:59:53 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:00:18 PM
We all had fun during the Republican debates but dax, the partisan dog pissing all over the carpet is ruining this for all of us.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Come on man, give it a rest for just an hour.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:00:32 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:00:50 PM
Dax copy paste trump tweets so we actually read your posts
You asked for a link OKC, I guess you really didn't want one, huh?? :dunno:
No, because nobody cares
Nobody cares, that's why the WH spokes people are publically backing off what Obama said in the Interview with 60 minutes. That's what draws viewers to 60 minutes and follow-up by CNN . . . issues that no one cares about. You're :lol:
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:01:12 PM
I feel like there was a lot more substance in the GOP debate thread. Just a lotta "totally mushed ___" stuff here. Substance, please.
i feel like you're joking
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:01:21 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:01:41 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:02:03 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:02:25 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 09:02:30 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:02:33 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:02:46 PM
Hilary is a fantastic liar.
clintons :love:
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:03:00 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:03:10 PM
Anybody see if chafee is crying
Is he still here?
I feel like there was a lot more substance in the GOP debate thread. Just a lotta "totally mushed ___" stuff here. Substance, please.
No there was not, that thread was fun. You weren't even around for the second one, just a bunch of libs and moderates enjoying the show. There are a million threads to be a partisan fire hose, chill out for 58 damn minutes.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:03:41 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:03:54 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:05:24 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 09:05:37 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:06:38 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:06:45 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:07:16 PM
I know you guys love Bernie, but holy crap - he's a freak. He has ZERO chance of winning the general. Even Jeb! could beat him.
jeb would beat any of the republicans in a general
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:07:21 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:07:43 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:07:52 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 09:07:55 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:08:06 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 09:08:23 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:08:28 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:08:34 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:08:40 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:08:56 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:08:57 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:08:58 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:09:32 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:09:59 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:10:16 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:10:48 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:11:17 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:11:53 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:12:47 PM
Oh, and college tuition is too high, but we need cheaper student loans? Does she not realize that the latter is what enables the former?! It's like she's eating Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) samwitches with a side of crazy pills.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:15:32 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:15:50 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:16:21 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:16:35 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:17:11 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:17:18 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:17:51 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:18:13 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:18:20 PM
JFC shut up ksu
Sorry - would you prefer that I just stick to who's mushing who? I'm actually listening to their batshit crazy claims.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:19:04 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:19:14 PM
JFC shut up ksu
Sorry - would you prefer that I just stick to who's mushing who? I'm actually listening to their batshit crazy claims.
There are dozens of threads for you to rant. This thread was good entertainment, start from beginning. Will Forte!
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:19:43 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:19:53 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:20:27 PM
I bet Webb waits in the parking lot for AndersonHe looks like an SEC football coach.
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 13, 2015, 09:21:01 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:21:11 PM
I bet Webb waits in the parking lot for AndersonHe looks like an SEC football coach.
:lol:
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:21:24 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:21:34 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:22:09 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:22:47 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:23:32 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:24:22 PM
Did I mention that Lincoln f'n Chafee is on this stage?
comic relief, like the republican frontrunner
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:24:38 PM
Did I mention that Lincoln f'n Chafee is on this stage?He looks and acts like a 3rd tier Muppet
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:25:01 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:26:09 PM
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 09:26:17 PM
I bet Webb waits in the parking lot for AndersonHe looks like an SEC football coach.
More high school fb coach than sec coach imo
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:26:24 PM
Did I mention that Lincoln f'n Chafee is on this stage?
comic relief, like the republican frontrunner
oh Lib . . . my gawd, Hillary is the Dem front runner. A side show vs a perpetual liar.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:26:52 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:27:37 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:27:56 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:28:01 PM
Did I mention that Lincoln f'n Chafee is on this stage?
comic relief, like the republican frontrunner
oh Lib . . . my gawd, Hillary is the Dem front runner. A side show vs a perpetual liar.
i know who you're voting for ;)
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:28:05 PM
Webb needs a drink
chafee tears
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:28:11 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:28:28 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:29:08 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:29:20 PM
Did I mention that Lincoln f'n Chafee is on this stage?
comic relief, like the republican frontrunner
oh Lib . . . my gawd, Hillary is the Dem front runner. A side show vs a perpetual liar.
i know who you're voting for ;)
As an unaffiliated voter, I'd have to say, neither.
Post by: mocat on October 13, 2015, 09:29:36 PM
Jim Webb is the only sane candidate on this stage, and he has no chance.
Lol
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 09:29:45 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:29:51 PM
John Kasich is the only sane candidate on this stage, and he has no chance.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:29:59 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:30:03 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:30:16 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:30:33 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:30:54 PM
I bet Webb waits in the parking lot for Anderson
Meanwhile Lincoln will be in some corner sobbing
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:31:11 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:31:21 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:31:42 PM
bern - ok
hil - maybe
martin - maybe but no
lincoln - what?
jim - NO
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:32:04 PM
what's your quick guess on this?
bern - ok
hil - maybe
martin - maybe but no
lincoln - what?
jim - NO
Nailed it
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:32:15 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:32:43 PM
Chafee is going to get high 30 seconds after this is over
Oh man his voice is like towlie from south park.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:32:46 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:33:25 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:34:07 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:35:10 PM
As an unaffiliated voter
What do you gain by keep telling this lie?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:35:46 PM
As an unaffiliated voter
What do you gain by keep telling this lie?
I am a registered unaffiliated voter . . . I don't care if you don't believe it.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:36:33 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:36:54 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:37:14 PM
Seriously guys, this is just embarrassing. Are any of you actually bullish on a single one of these candidates? Holy crap.
I'm bullish on you getting carbon monoxide poisoning before the next democratic debate, as that may be the only thing to get you to shut the eff up.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 09:37:22 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:37:37 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:37:49 PM
I'd like Anderson to ask each candidate the latest point at which it's Ok to abort a fetus. 8 months? 9 months? As long as at least a little toe is still in the birth canal? Two weeks later? Probably not gonna happen though because that would DO HARM. (Remember the first rule of liberals moderating debates of liberals...)That's a general election question, guy!
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:37:58 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:38:00 PM
Seriously guys, this is just embarrassing. Are any of you actually bullish on a single one of these candidates? Holy crap.
I'm bullish on you getting carbon monoxide poisoning before the next democratic debate, as that may be the only thing to get you to shut the eff up.
LOL
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:38:02 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:38:36 PM
Hil had to run out and cut a brick!
:ROFL:
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:38:52 PM
Best hair tonight? I'm torn.
the heart says bernie, the head says martin
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:38:54 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:38:55 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:39:20 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:39:36 PM
Everytime Webb mentions China, take a drink
:lol:
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:39:58 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:40:00 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:40:14 PM
As an unaffiliated voter
What do you gain by keep telling this lie?
I am a registered unaffiliated voter . . . I don't care if you don't believe it.
I'm not a registered democrat but I'm not in here lying acting like I'm not a liberal.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:40:23 PM
Seriously guys, this is just embarrassing. Are any of you actually bullish on a single one of these candidates? Holy crap.
I'm bullish on you getting carbon monoxide poisoning before the next democratic debate, as that may be the only thing to get you to shut the eff up.
The truth hurts MIR. Deep down, you know I'm right. These people are loons.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:41:05 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:41:16 PM
As an unaffiliated voter
What do you gain by keep telling this lie?
I am a registered unaffiliated voter . . . I don't care if you don't believe it.
I'm not a registered democrat but I'm not in here lying acting like I'm not a liberal.
That has nothing to do with nothing . . . I didn't say I wasn't slightly right. You're wrecking the thread!
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:41:54 PM
Best hair tonight? I'm torn.
Easily that hottie Martin.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:42:24 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:42:47 PM
Best hair tonight? I'm torn.
Easily that hottie Martin.
Yea his smile warms the heart too
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:43:01 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:43:13 PM
Did Barack and Hil have name tags on while the worked the convention room floor looking for the Chinese?You mean when they LITERALLY HUNTED them?
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:43:44 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:43:51 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:44:02 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:44:26 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:44:59 PM
Did Barack and Hil have name tags on while the worked the convention room floor looking for the Chinese?You mean when they LITERALLY HUNTED them?
Little guns that shot flags that said "Bang"
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:45:35 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 09:46:15 PM
Maybe per day.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:46:38 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:46:54 PM
Bernie only smoked weed twice?
Maybe per day.
before age 5
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:47:19 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:47:46 PM
You know Hillary had to have gotten a contact high from Bill
That would require contact. Speaking of which, Bill's got better things to do tonight in Vegas than attend this debate. What a marriage.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:48:44 PM
You know Hillary had to have gotten a contact high from Bill
That would require contact. Speaking of which, Bill's got better things to do tonight in Vegas than attend this debate. What a marriage.
ZING!
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:50:22 PM
You know Hillary had to have gotten a contact high from Bill
That would require contact. Speaking of which, Bill's got better things to do tonight in Vegas than attend this debate. What a marriage.
ZING!
Not a joke. Actually true.
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 09:50:40 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:50:58 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:51:52 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:52:08 PM
I can't decide who is more butthurt about people ignoring him, webb or ksuw
Based on all the times I've been mentioned in this thread, it does not appear that I'm being ignored. Sorry to strike a nerve...
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:52:55 PM
What a pickle for resident libs.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:53:39 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:53:49 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:53:56 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 09:54:23 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:54:28 PM
I bet Webb says vietnamseHe killed that Charlie!
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:54:28 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:54:48 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
She's going to be indicted. That will be problematic for her campaign.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:55:19 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:55:33 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 09:55:37 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:56:32 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:57:05 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 09:57:15 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 09:57:37 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 09:57:38 PM
I will work through issues like I worked my bayonet through Vietcong skulls
LOL
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:58:33 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
America loves liars and certain criminals.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 09:59:18 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 09:59:46 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
I guess you missed the new poll out today where she's losing to pretty much every pub candidate. And that's saying something.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:00:31 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:00:40 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:01:04 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:01:19 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
I guess you missed the new poll out today where she's losing to pretty much every pub candidate. And that's saying something.
the fox news internet poll? i heard it briefly on rush
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:01:29 PM
love when dax goes all phog on the ASCII cusswords
The summations have pretty much dubbed the last 7 years a total: Loser
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 10:02:19 PM
Martin is very polished, he should be the VP choice for either Hillary, Bernie, or Joe.
crushed it at the end there
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:02:29 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 10:02:40 PM
Martin is very polished, he should be the VP choice for either Hillary, Bernie, or Joe.
Oh yea
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:03:30 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:04:27 PM
bernie-martin '16 sounds like a fantastic ticket to me
Man, but they pretty much ripped the Obama administration in their summations, tho. Ouch
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:04:39 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 10:04:58 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
I guess you missed the new poll out today where she's losing to pretty much every pub candidate. And that's saying something.
the fox news internet poll? i heard it briefly on rush
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/politics/hillary-clinton-marco-rubio-jeb-bush-polls/
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 13, 2015, 10:05:52 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:06:07 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 10:06:09 PM
bernie-martin '16 sounds like a fantastic ticket to me
Would do
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:06:52 PM
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 13, 2015, 10:07:03 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:07:33 PM
Did Chafee talk about how he wants to change us over to the metric system?
oh wow! this would gain him some points in my book
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 10:07:35 PM
Did Chafee talk about how he wants to change us over to the metric system?
After Hillary embarrassed him early, he didn't say much of anything
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:07:44 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:08:13 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
I guess you missed the new poll out today where she's losing to pretty much every pub candidate. And that's saying something.
You mean the fox news poll, lol? The same fox news poll that had trump winning the primary but carson polling better in the general than in the primary? :lol: I'll stick with the rcp averages, thank you.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 13, 2015, 10:08:29 PM
well rush only talked about the fox news internet poll, so apparently rush doesn't value your link ratm
Yeah, that was an old link.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 13, 2015, 10:09:25 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:09:31 PM
Did Chafee talk about how he wants to change us over to the metric system?
I think that train has left the station. At this point, it would too confusing for the stoners to switch ounces to grams.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:10:13 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 13, 2015, 10:10:47 PM
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 10:11:10 PM
The libs will eventually come around to supporting the best looking person.
He is damn good looking, it is remarkable.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:11:22 PM
There's a long way to go until Trump actually get the nomination . . . there's only Mailgate in front of Hillary and she's a Clinton, so she'll get out of it.
What a pickle for resident libs.
Yeah, quite a pickle that she's beating every single other candidate running for president, regardless of party, in the polls.
I guess you missed the new poll out today where she's losing to pretty much every pub candidate. And that's saying something.
the fox news internet poll? i heard it briefly on rush
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/politics/hillary-clinton-marco-rubio-jeb-bush-polls/
1. That's a few states, not the national polling
2. You see the date on that?
Post by: puniraptor on October 13, 2015, 10:11:47 PM
Well this has been a real treat, guys. Sweet socialist dreams. G'night.Don't forget to donate!
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:12:05 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:12:25 PM
Did Chafee talk about how he wants to change us over to the metric system?
I think that train has left the station. At this point, it would too confusing for the stoners to switch ounces to grams.
you can buy a gram in colorado
source - i bought a gram in colorado
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 13, 2015, 10:12:38 PM
Did Chafee talk about how he wants to change us over to the metric system?
I think that train has left the station. At this point, it would too confusing for the stoners to switch ounces to grams.
#blessed
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 10:13:14 PM
1) o'malley
2) jeb
3) rubio
4) bernie
5) carson
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 10:13:54 PM
Let's mark MIR down for a Hillary sign in the front yard.
I think he is #feelingthebern dax
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:14:13 PM
Let's mark MIR down for a Hillary sign in the front yard.
Uh, you haven't been paying attention, that's to be expected though I'm not hitting the rush points in my posts.
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 10:15:23 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:15:30 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:16:54 PM
he hasn't listened to rush before, mir
never even heard of him.
sidenote, passed a car on the highway yesterday that had a sticker that said "RUSH is a band"
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:18:06 PM
The libs will eventually come around to supporting the best looking person.
Marty has no shot, loved him in the wire though.
Let's get a top 5 (pubs and dems) based on looks.
1) o'malley
2) jeb
3) rubio
4) bernie
5) carson
1. Marco
2. Martin
3-whatever. Who cares
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:18:34 PM
he hasn't listened to rush before, mir
never even heard of him.
sidenote, passed a car on the highway yesterday that had a sticker that said "RUSH is a band"
That's a website about the . . . band.
Post by: OK_Cat on October 13, 2015, 10:19:04 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:19:27 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:20:13 PM
Okay, just checking . . . you seem pretty defensive of the perpetual liar/criminal/war monger.
Link? I compared her to KSUW itt, dax. But again I wasn't being a sexist by calling her a liar so you missed it.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:21:42 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:22:13 PM
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 10:22:17 PM
CNN seems to be doing Hillary's bidding for her :curse:
moderate media :curse:
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:22:59 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:23:51 PM
Okay, just checking . . . you seem pretty defensive of the perpetual liar/criminal/war monger.
Link? I compared her to KSUW itt, dax. But again I wasn't being a sexist by calling her a liar so you missed it.
Okay, albeit I don't think calling anyone who lies a lot, a liar, is sexist.
Post by: CNS on October 13, 2015, 10:24:04 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:25:22 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2015, 10:25:47 PM
Debate has been handled poorly. The 2000000 pubs running for pres got more Mic time in their first debate than webb or chafee did tonight.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
CNN, bro. All in for Clint-in.
Get it?
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:26:07 PM
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 13, 2015, 10:27:08 PM
Debate has been handled poorly. The 2000000 pubs running for pres got more Mic time in their first debate than webb or chafee did tonight.That's because neither of them is running a serious campaign. They've got as much of a chance as Jill Stein.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
Post by: CNS on October 13, 2015, 10:28:46 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:29:26 PM
Jill Stein.
:love:
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2015, 10:29:55 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:31:27 PM
Is that CNN ' s to determine?
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Anderson Cooper undoubtedly mumped up, but I'm glad Webb and Chafee got mumped over, they need to go away.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:40:44 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fangrywhitedude.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads2%2F2014%2F12%2Fwalter-sobchak1.png&hash=64067969a3dc1f3771e90711038144f93bdcc025)
Quote
just me and charlie, man, eyeball to eyeball. that's rough ridin' combat. the man in the black pajamas, dude. worthy rough ridin' adversary. not a bunch of fig eaters with towels on their heads trying to find reverse on a soviet tank
(credit to shaggy)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 10:50:04 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:51:00 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 13, 2015, 10:51:48 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6kZunTA.jpg&hash=36f438eb79c645538293fbff220e2fc17e6c19af)
holy crap :ROFL:
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2015, 11:00:25 PM
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654113084101922816
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654114071336189952
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654118932521967616
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654126555992424448
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654140276550668289
Post by: Tobias on October 13, 2015, 11:02:39 PM
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 13, 2015, 11:15:49 PM
Jill Stein.
:love:
Right?
Is that CNN ' s to determine?
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
:dubious:
Post by: 0.42 on October 14, 2015, 12:08:21 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6kZunTA.jpg&hash=36f438eb79c645538293fbff220e2fc17e6c19af)
holy crap :ROFL:
it's @pissclams
Post by: bones129 on October 14, 2015, 12:24:55 AM
omg i found ksuw on twitter
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654113084101922816
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654114071336189952
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654118932521967616
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654126555992424448
https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/status/654140276550668289
Is Huckabee capable of any kind of substantive response to anything? Looks like he just throws out a few insults. And the Labrador reference? WTF?
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2015, 06:46:46 AM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: renocat on October 14, 2015, 07:21:17 AM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 14, 2015, 08:07:47 AM
he hasn't listened to rush before, mir
never even heard of him.
sidenote, passed a car on the highway yesterday that had a sticker that said "RUSH is a band"
Good one Getty
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 14, 2015, 08:20:23 AM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:33:25 AM
I didn't like Bernie as much as I thought I might. He is by far the best dem candidate, though.
I appreciate that he's at least honest about being a socialist. But he has close to zero chance of winning the general. If I had to choose a candidate from that dumpster fire, just based on electability, it would be Webb or O'Malley.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:34:28 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Fed-assets%2F2015%2F10%2FDemocratic-Dustup-copy.jpg%3Fresize%3D492%252C600&hash=4113f7135624bd2eca9b13b44a77ec0a17cb1a78)
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:35:06 AM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:35:42 AM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:36:16 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.wp.com%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Fed-assets%2F2015%2F10%2FBernienickel-copy.jpg%3Fresize%3D580%252C408&hash=0893bab7d0e13f3204f476a52665135e71e30e1c)
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 08:36:47 AM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 14, 2015, 08:50:42 AM
"In 2007, before the collapse, I went to Wall Street and said 'KNOCK IT OFF!'"
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 08:56:15 AM
My favorite line of the whole debate was when hillary tried to distance herself from bill and the whole glass-steagall fiasco by saying:
"In 2007, before the collapse, I went to Wall Street and said 'KNOCK IT OFF!'"
that was pretty funny. i yelled "stop" to complete her sentence for her and then she actually said "knock it off"
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 09:05:58 AM
My favorite line of the whole debate was when hillary tried to distance herself from bill and the whole glass-steagall fiasco by saying:
"In 2007, before the collapse, I went to Wall Street and said 'KNOCK IT OFF!'"
Yes, very wtf
Also ksuw, feel free to post the good or funny memes too
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 09:13:39 AM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 09:14:17 AM
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2015, 09:15:27 AM
Post by: mocat on October 14, 2015, 09:31:28 AM
My favorite line of the whole debate was when hillary tried to distance herself from bill and the whole glass-steagall fiasco by saying:
"In 2007, before the collapse, I went to Wall Street and said 'KNOCK IT OFF!'"
She actually said "cut it out" iirc. But yes that was her most lol part
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 09:34:33 AM
great memory mocat
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2015, 10:24:51 AM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: MakeItRain on October 14, 2015, 01:27:08 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 01:56:36 PM
KSUW's ongoing rant of the democrat candidates electability and shallow pool is hilarious, did he forget the three leading republican candidates are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina?
Im not talking about front runners. I'm talking about depth. The GOP could put a dozen candidates on stage before getting to Lincoln Chafee level.
Now if you want to talk front runners, I'd say that Carson, Fiorina, and even Trump are more electable than Sanders or Hillary. One is an avowed socialist, and the other could quite possibly be indicted in the next few months.
Why do I say that? It is A FACT that Hillary sent and received over 500 emails on her private server containing classified information. Her only hope is her excuse that she didn't know they were classified, which is incredibly weak given that she was Secretary of State and the subject matter of those emails.
Post by: mocat on October 14, 2015, 01:58:25 PM
KSUW's ongoing rant of the democrat candidates electability and shallow pool is hilarious, did he forget the three leading republican candidates are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina?Now if you want to talk front runners, I'd say that Carson, Fiorina, and even Trump are more electable than Sanders or Hillary.
For posterity
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 02:05:45 PM
KSUW's ongoing rant of the democrat candidates electability and shallow pool is hilarious, did he forget the three leading republican candidates are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina?Now if you want to talk front runners, I'd say that Carson, Fiorina, and even Trump are more electable than Sanders or Hillary.
For posterity
So you think a socialist can win?
Or do you think Hillary won't be indicted? Or that she would win anyway?
And btw, the GOP nominee is going to Rubio so it doesn't really matter who the current front runners are.
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2015, 02:07:53 PM
Post by: CNS on October 14, 2015, 02:13:46 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 02:58:23 PM
a socialist can absolutely win against ben carson
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 03:02:03 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:03:02 PM
Rubio is a nervous nelly on tv tho
he will drink that water right in putins dry, cool, face
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 03:12:14 PM
Rubio is a nervous nelly on tv tho
Aren't you the same guy who said he talks like a robot? :dunno:
The whole water thing is pretty bizarre. Bernie's a socialist crank, Hillary should be indicted for sending and receiving classified info on a private server she set up to hide her communications, but ZOMG RUBIO TOOK A SIP OF WATER DURING A SPEECH!!! :runaway:
I can see the attack ads now... [Set to ominous music] "Marco Rubio has a drinking problem."
Or how about [more ominous music] “It’s 3 a.m., and your children are safe and asleep. But there’s a phone in the White House, and it’s ringing. Who do you want answering that phone? Not Marco Rubio - he'll probably be down in the kitchen getting some water.”
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:13:30 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 14, 2015, 03:19:25 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 03:20:14 PM
Also has nothing to do with the water. Watch him on tv, he gets nervous, starts talking too fast and starts stumbling on words. Puni is probably right that it's too much memorization, but he looks like his heart is about to beat out of his chest. He's just not comfortable speaking in public.
One on one interviews don't seem to stress him as much.
You don't have to go off the deep end when people offer observations on him. It wasn't an attack on his character, good grief ksuw.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 03:21:47 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:22:01 PM
the water thing is a boon because of all the exposure and it gives him something to joke about
Post by: MakeItRain on October 14, 2015, 03:23:22 PM
KSUW's ongoing rant of the democrat candidates electability and shallow pool is hilarious, did he forget the three leading republican candidates are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina?
Im not talking about front runners. I'm talking about depth. The GOP could put a dozen candidates on stage before getting to Lincoln Chafee level.
Now if you want to talk front runners, I'd say that Carson, Fiorina, and even Trump are more electable than Sanders or Hillary. One is an avowed socialist, and the other could quite possibly be indicted in the next few months.
Why do I say that? It is A FACT that Hillary sent and received over 500 emails on her private server containing classified information. Her only hope is her excuse that she didn't know they were classified, which is incredibly weak given that she was Secretary of State and the subject matter of those emails.
:ROFL: wow, I'm glad you're back. This is great.
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:24:37 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 03:26:05 PM
Monotone empathy voice.
Also has nothing to do with the water. Watch him on tv, he gets nervous, starts talking too fast and starts stumbling on words. Puni is probably right that it's too much memorization, but he looks like his heart is about to beat out of his chest. He's just not comfortable speaking in public.
One on one interviews don't seem to stress him as much.
You don't have to go off the deep end when people offer observations on him. It wasn't an attack on his character, good grief ksuw.
Not going off the deep end - I just don't hear what you're hearing. He speaks quickly because he's got a lot to say and he's so fluent that he doesn't have to hesitate. This is not a matter of memorization - he has talking points like any other politician, but he quickly tailors his answers to the questions. I have not heard him stumbling over words. Do you have some examples?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 14, 2015, 03:26:38 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:27:16 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 03:28:24 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 03:29:07 PM
@k-'-'-', will you say out loud that you really think sanders could not beat ben carson in a general election?
"Sanders would not beat Ben Carson in a general election."
I'm curious why you've singled out Ben Carson, btw. He has much higher favorability ratings than Trump. He's said some whacky things, but he's much, much, much more likable than most other candidates on either side (including grumpy old Bernie) and that covers over a lot of flaws.
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:29:55 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 14, 2015, 03:30:18 PM
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2015, 03:31:29 PM
@k-'-'-', will you say out loud that you really think sanders could not beat ben carson in a general election?
"Sanders would not beat Ben Carson in a general election."
I'm curious why you've singled out Ben Carson, btw. He has much higher favorability ratings than Trump. He's said some whacky things, but he's much, much, much more likable than most other candidates on either side (including grumpy old Bernie) and that covers over a lot of flaws.
i have singled out ben carson because i believe that he is the most unelectable of the red frontrunners, and because i believe that you believe he is electable.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2015, 03:32:04 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 14, 2015, 03:34:11 PM
@k-'-'-', will you say out loud that you really think sanders could not beat ben carson in a general election?
I watched Fox News and they were giddy that Bernie is a socialist and Hillary seems to be moving left. They thought they would get all of the moderates and independents, again forgetting that their leading candidates are Trump, Carson, and Fiorina; as if independents and moderates would love any of those people.
Hillary will probably win the nomination she will face either Rubio or Bush; she will move back right, they will move left and we will be left with the status quo.
Post by: sys on October 14, 2015, 03:38:41 PM
i actually find jeb tolerable as well, but the american in me wants to crush all monarchies and dynasties so he is excluded
same. i've always said that i'd never vote for a 2nd member of any political family. jeb could possibly test that, if he lasts long enough for me to vote on him. i find him appealing.
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2015, 03:42:20 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on October 15, 2015, 12:01:51 PM
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Post by: wetwillie on October 15, 2015, 12:07:45 PM
I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
That question was really good actually, unsurprisingly webb was the only one who failed miserably.
Post by: CNS on October 15, 2015, 12:09:01 PM
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
It is outrageous that a campaign spent marketing money on social media marketing. eff that guy.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2015, 12:45:47 PM
I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Should I waste my time explaining to you about what black lives matter means, or will you not listen to me and continue to listen to the bullshit that rush, megyn, hannity, and mike savage are feeding you?
Post by: puniraptor on October 15, 2015, 12:59:45 PM
im not 100% bernie gets it based on his answer.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 01:59:55 PM
I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Should I waste my time explaining to you about what black lives matter means, or will you not listen to me and continue to listen to the bullshit that rush, megyn, hannity, and mike savage are feeding you?
We all know what it means. Black lives matter, unless you're a black fetus, or youre being killed by another black person, or - well, black lives matter whenever you get killed by a white person, typically during commission of a crime.
Post by: puniraptor on October 15, 2015, 02:18:40 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 02:44:08 PM
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2015, 04:13:11 PM
The second the unwashed masses figured out that guy is a "pinko-commy" he'd be done and probably tarred and feathered for his efforts. He wouldn't win one state. Not that it matters, he isn't getting the nomination and 90% of the public still doesn't have a clue who he is.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 04:49:00 PM
Anyone who thinks a self-described socialist is more electable than a Donald, a physician or regular politician is living in a rough ridin' bubble. Lots of delusional libtards outed in this thread.
The second the unwashed masses figured out that guy is a "pinko-commy" he'd be done and probably tarred and feathered for his efforts. He wouldn't win one state. Not that it matters, he isn't getting the nomination and 90% of the public still doesn't have a clue who he is.
Correct. My point was never that Trump, Carson, or Fiorina are great candidates, but that they're more electable than Bern of Hillary. The libtards don't appreciate how toxic a "socialist" will be in the general, and they also don't seem to appreciate that Hillary is a ticking time bomb on the e-mail issue. So now you're down to Martin O'Malley, Jim Webb, and Lincoln Chaffee. Pfffttt... :lol:
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 05:20:55 PM
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2015, 05:30:44 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 08:03:57 PM
All of the candidates suck. I want Joe Biden.
Yes, he would be stronger than anything they've got. The problem with Joe is that he's stupid. I don't mean that in a mean way - the guy is charming but really dumb. He's already run for president once (maybe twice?) and never really got any traction because he's a lightweight. Being VP should help, but he was Obama's VP, which will be a drag in the general.
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2015, 08:17:07 PM
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2015, 08:44:14 PM
I still have no rough ridin' clue who Chaffie is or why he's in the race. O'Malley couldn't even win in Maryland. Webb is a neocon. Sanders is a nut. Hillary is a wretched psychopath and known criminal. It's a bizarre field. Might as well have Pelosi run. They all think Obama sucks, so at least they're right about one thing.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2015, 08:53:10 PM
The fact that the party is begging uncle Joe (known Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and idiot) to run should be all you need to know about how much faith they have in hillary. Bernie Sanders is a left-winged version of Santorum - unelectable.
I still have no rough ridin' clue who Chaffie is or why he's in the race. O'Malley couldn't even win in Maryland. Webb is a neocon. Sanders is a nut. Hillary is a wretched psychopath and known criminal. It's a bizarre field. Might as well have Pelosi run. They all think Obama sucks, so at least they're right about one thing.
The party isn't begging for Joe, moderates who do not identify as democrats are. Establishment democrats don't want him splitting votes with Hillary and progressives don't want him at all. Politically Joe and Hillary are the same damn person.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2015, 08:59:32 PM
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2015, 09:00:40 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 15, 2015, 09:06:06 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2015, 09:15:09 PM
I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Should I waste my time explaining to you about what black lives matter means, or will you not listen to me and continue to listen to the bullshit that rush, megyn, hannity, and mike savage are feeding you?
We all know what it means. Black lives matter, unless you're a black fetus, or youre being killed by another black person, or - well, black lives matter whenever you get killed by a white person, typically during commission of a crime.
I'm going to attempt to explain this to you because unlike FSD, who is someone's sock, and yard dog, too dense, I think there's a chance you'll understand it. Before I get into that, stop making abortion an issue of race, it's exploitive at best but frankly it's just racist.
Anyway black lives matter isn't about cops, nor is it about making white people feel guilty. It's actually pretty simple and the only reason it's controversial at all is because like most things, has been taken over by talk radio and fox news. By acknowledging black lives matter you are simply acknowledging that institutional policy throughout the history of the country has devalued black lives. Yes, police brutality is a component of this but it is so much more. Things like mass incarceration, black on black crime, educational funding inequities, and media coverage of missing people of color are things that are much more important to the black lives matter movement. Yes, racial issues have progressed but all of these things are still issues. The 45 years in this country that we have had since civil rights legislation hasn't been nearly enough time to correct the 200 years before, and ongoing political inequities like the disparities between sentences of blacks caught with marijuana as opposed to whites and the sentence guidelines of Crack that don't apply to cocaine. Again none of this is remotely controversial.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2015, 09:17:47 PM
Only dumb people don't realize they want Joe to run because they are afraid of Hillary's legal trouble.
Hillary doesn't have legal trouble, unless you think the Republicans in Congress know something that the justice department doesn't.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2015, 09:24:24 PM
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 15, 2015, 09:42:17 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 10:06:29 PM
Only dumb people don't realize they want Joe to run because they are afraid of Hillary's legal trouble.
Hillary doesn't have legal trouble, unless you think the Republicans in Congress know something that the justice department doesn't.
It is a fact that Hillary had hundreds of emails containing classified information on her private server. Again, this is a fact. How do we know this? Because the State Department has now gone back and redacted those emails because they contain classified information.
Hillary has offered two defenses: (1) the emails weren't marked as classified, and (2) she therefore didn't know they were classified. In this way, she hopes to avoid felony charges.
It is an extremely weak defense. First, whether the emails were marked as classified is both irrelevant and dishonest. Irrelevant because high level information is classified the moment it comes into existence regardless of marking. Dishonest because the emails couldn't possibly have been marked as classified because they were hidden in her private server!
As for her feigned ignorance that the information was classified, this is a ludicrous claim. She was sending emails containing DoD satellite photos. She was sending emails to other world leaders discussing countries like North Korea (contents now redacted).
She is in a boatload of legal trouble. It remains to be seen whether she can pull some strings behind the scenes to avoid indictment, but I don't think she can. The case is just too obvious.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 10:20:26 PM
I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Should I waste my time explaining to you about what black lives matter means, or will you not listen to me and continue to listen to the bullshit that rush, megyn, hannity, and mike savage are feeding you?
We all know what it means. Black lives matter, unless you're a black fetus, or youre being killed by another black person, or - well, black lives matter whenever you get killed by a white person, typically during commission of a crime.
I'm going to attempt to explain this to you because unlike FSD, who is someone's sock, and yard dog, too dense, I think there's a chance you'll understand it. Before I get into that, stop making abortion an issue of race, it's exploitive at best but frankly it's just racist.
Anyway black lives matter isn't about cops, nor is it about making white people feel guilty. It's actually pretty simple and the only reason it's controversial at all is because like most things, has been taken over by talk radio and fox news. By acknowledging black lives matter you are simply acknowledging that institutional policy throughout the history of the country has devalued black lives. Yes, police brutality is a component of this but it is so much more. Things like mass incarceration, black on black crime, educational funding inequities, and media coverage of missing people of color are things that are much more important to the black lives matter movement. Yes, racial issues have progressed but all of these things are still issues. The 45 years in this country that we have had since civil rights legislation hasn't been nearly enough time to correct the 200 years before, and ongoing political inequities like the disparities between sentences of blacks caught with marijuana as opposed to whites and the sentence guidelines of Crack that don't apply to cocaine. Again none of this is remotely controversial.
I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2015, 10:28:07 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 10:34:12 PM
Why is black on black crime ever brought up?
Well if your movement is called "Black Lives Matter" you would you think it might focus on the biggest non-natural causes of black deaths: black on black crime and abortion.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 10:47:30 PM
All of the candidates suck. I want Joe Biden.
Yes, he would be stronger than anything they've got. The problem with Joe is that he's stupid. I don't mean that in a mean way - the guy is charming but really dumb. He's already run for president once (maybe twice?) and never really got any traction because he's a lightweight. Being VP should help, but he was Obama's VP, which will be a drag in the general.
Yes, we all know Obama has done horribly in general elections
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 10:54:05 PM
All of the candidates suck. I want Joe Biden.
Yes, he would be stronger than anything they've got. The problem with Joe is that he's stupid. I don't mean that in a mean way - the guy is charming but really dumb. He's already run for president once (maybe twice?) and never really got any traction because he's a lightweight. Being VP should help, but he was Obama's VP, which will be a drag in the general.
Yes, we all know Obama has done horribly in general elections
He did worse in 2012 than 2008, and he'd do even worse in 2016. His numbers will never hit Bush lows because his base will stick with him to the end, but he'll finish up around 40%.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 10:59:35 PM
Post by: michigancat on October 15, 2015, 11:06:17 PM
Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.I hadn't had a chance to jump on here since the debate. I was surprised no one commented on the: "Do black lives matter, or do all lives matter?" question. Absolutely ludicrous.
Or the fact that Bernie's campaign spent a six figure sum to pay to have #debatewithBernie trending on twitter.
Should I waste my time explaining to you about what black lives matter means, or will you not listen to me and continue to listen to the bullshit that rush, megyn, hannity, and mike savage are feeding you?
We all know what it means. Black lives matter, unless you're a black fetus, or youre being killed by another black person, or - well, black lives matter whenever you get killed by a white person, typically during commission of a crime.
I'm going to attempt to explain this to you because unlike FSD, who is someone's sock, and yard dog, too dense, I think there's a chance you'll understand it. Before I get into that, stop making abortion an issue of race, it's exploitive at best but frankly it's just racist.
Anyway black lives matter isn't about cops, nor is it about making white people feel guilty. It's actually pretty simple and the only reason it's controversial at all is because like most things, has been taken over by talk radio and fox news. By acknowledging black lives matter you are simply acknowledging that institutional policy throughout the history of the country has devalued black lives. Yes, police brutality is a component of this but it is so much more. Things like mass incarceration, black on black crime, educational funding inequities, and media coverage of missing people of color are things that are much more important to the black lives matter movement. Yes, racial issues have progressed but all of these things are still issues. The 45 years in this country that we have had since civil rights legislation hasn't been nearly enough time to correct the 200 years before, and ongoing political inequities like the disparities between sentences of blacks caught with marijuana as opposed to whites and the sentence guidelines of Crack that don't apply to cocaine. Again none of this is remotely controversial.
I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
Post by: michigancat on October 15, 2015, 11:25:14 PM
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 11:26:41 PM
I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
It is an irrelevant distinction as it pertains to the theoretical purpose of Black Lives Matter. The purpose of BLM - in theory - is as MIR describes above. It is to raise awareness that black lives have been devalued, both by government and black people themselves. That is a highly valid point. Unfortunately, BLM has only focused on perceived police misconduct, so it has not served its theoretical purpose.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 11:31:44 PM
Post by: michigancat on October 15, 2015, 11:36:04 PM
Police brutality is a great place to start trying to influence change, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
It is an irrelevant distinction as it pertains to the theoretical purpose of Black Lives Matter. The purpose of BLM - in theory - is as MIR describes above. It is to raise awareness that black lives have been devalued, both by government and black people themselves. That is a highly valid point. Unfortunately, BLM has only focused on perceived police misconduct, so it has not served its theoretical purpose.
It's rough ridin' absurd that an organization dedicated to ending police brutality of a race is so widely criticized.
Post by: Tobias on October 15, 2015, 11:36:28 PM
The jury is still out on this police misconduct thing for ksuw
the BLM people lay it on too thick at the perceived murder scenes and I've never ONCE seen one at braedyn's PTA meeting
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 11:42:00 PM
The jury is still out on this police misconduct thing for ksuw
In many cases, the jury is in - metaphorically speaking - and has concluded that no brutality occurred. See, for example, the Michael Brown case that helped give rise to BLM. That's not to say police never use excessive force - they certainly sometimes do, regardless of race.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 15, 2015, 11:44:38 PM
Police brutality is a great place to start trying to influence change, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
It is an irrelevant distinction as it pertains to the theoretical purpose of Black Lives Matter. The purpose of BLM - in theory - is as MIR describes above. It is to raise awareness that black lives have been devalued, both by government and black people themselves. That is a highly valid point. Unfortunately, BLM has only focused on perceived police misconduct, so it has not served its theoretical purpose.
It's rough ridin' absurd that an organization dedicated to ending police brutality of a race is so widely criticized.
And yet it is such a relatively small and rare example of devaluing black lives, compared to black on black crime, black abortion rates, and the disintegration of the black family.
Post by: michigancat on October 15, 2015, 11:47:52 PM
Police brutality is a great place to start trying to influence change, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
It is an irrelevant distinction as it pertains to the theoretical purpose of Black Lives Matter. The purpose of BLM - in theory - is as MIR describes above. It is to raise awareness that black lives have been devalued, both by government and black people themselves. That is a highly valid point. Unfortunately, BLM has only focused on perceived police misconduct, so it has not served its theoretical purpose.
It's rough ridin' absurd that an organization dedicated to ending police brutality of a race is so widely criticized.
And yet it is such a relatively small and rare example of devaluing black lives, compared to black on black crime, black abortion rates, and the disintegration of the black family.
good grief you're a dense one
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2015, 11:51:19 PM
The jury is still out on this police misconduct thing for ksuw
In many cases, the jury is in - metaphorically speaking - and has concluded that no brutality occurred. See, for example, the Michael Brown case that helped give rise to BLM. That's not to say police never use excessive force - they certainly sometimes do, regardless of race.
You mean the court system and internal police investigations systemically let perceived police misconduct slide? Well that's all the proof I need that blm are just racist agitators
Post by: SdK on October 16, 2015, 01:22:23 AM
Ok.Why is black on black crime ever brought up?
Well if your movement is called "Black Lives Matter" you would you think it might focus on the biggest non-natural causes of black deaths: black on black crime and abortion.
Post by: SdK on October 16, 2015, 04:55:58 AM
It just seems to me like a veiled (thinly) way of accusing a group of savagery. Like they need to be civilized. Etc. And based on your commentary in the abortion thread about it being barbaric, I am only furthered in thinking that.Ok.Why is black on black crime ever brought up?
Well if your movement is called "Black Lives Matter" you would you think it might focus on the biggest non-natural causes of black deaths: black on black crime and abortion.
That makes me sad.
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 16, 2015, 06:28:38 AM
Police brutality is a great place to start trying to influence change, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.I don't have a problem with the BLM movement in theory, although it should be more appropriately named "Black Lives Also Matter." But you're deluding yourself if you really think BLM is putting as much emphasis on black on black crime as they are on perceived police abuses. Black on black crime is a far bigger problem, but that's not where the BLM protestors focus, and you know it. Another massive problem for black lives is the near extinction of the nuclear black family (and please, don't even try to blame that on "mass incarceration"). BLM doesn't seem to care about this at all.Criminals committing "black on black crime" aren't government institutions funded by taxpayers. That seems like it should be an obvious distinction, but you seem to fail to grasp it.
As for abortion, it's not "racist" to point out that black people are perpetrating a virtual genocide upon themselves. But I guess those lives don't matter.
Again, you are deluding yourself if you really think that BLM isn't myopically focused on perceived police misconduct. Follow the protests.
It is an irrelevant distinction as it pertains to the theoretical purpose of Black Lives Matter. The purpose of BLM - in theory - is as MIR describes above. It is to raise awareness that black lives have been devalued, both by government and black people themselves. That is a highly valid point. Unfortunately, BLM has only focused on perceived police misconduct, so it has not served its theoretical purpose.
It's rough ridin' absurd that an organization dedicated to ending police brutality of a race is so widely criticized.
And yet it is such a relatively small and rare example of devaluing black lives, compared to black on black crime, black abortion rates, and the disintegration of the black family.
you are the worst.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 16, 2015, 06:57:48 AM
It just seems to me like a veiled (thinly) way of accusing a group of savagery. Like they need to be civilized. Etc. And based on your commentary in the abortion thread about it being barbaric, I am only furthered in thinking that.Ok.Why is black on black crime ever brought up?
Well if your movement is called "Black Lives Matter" you would you think it might focus on the biggest non-natural causes of black deaths: black on black crime and abortion.
That makes me sad.
Well, abortion is savagery, but that's not really my point. We're talking about devaluing lives. Not sure why you have to take that in a racist direction.
Post by: sys on October 16, 2015, 01:26:04 PM
Not sure why you have to take that in a racist direction.
the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Post by: MakeItRain on October 16, 2015, 02:04:48 PM
Only dumb people don't realize they want Joe to run because they are afraid of Hillary's legal trouble.
Hillary doesn't have legal trouble, unless you think the Republicans in Congress know something that the justice department doesn't.
It is a fact that Hillary had hundreds of emails containing classified information on her private server. Again, this is a fact. How do we know this? Because the State Department has now gone back and redacted those emails because they contain classified information.
Hillary has offered two defenses: (1) the emails weren't marked as classified, and (2) she therefore didn't know they were classified. In this way, she hopes to avoid felony charges.
It is an extremely weak defense. First, whether the emails were marked as classified is both irrelevant and dishonest. Irrelevant because high level information is classified the moment it comes into existence regardless of marking. Dishonest because the emails couldn't possibly have been marked as classified because they were hidden in her private server!
As for her feigned ignorance that the information was classified, this is a ludicrous claim. She was sending emails containing DoD satellite photos. She was sending emails to other world leaders discussing countries like North Korea (contents now redacted).
She is in a boatload of legal trouble. It remains to be seen whether she can pull some strings behind the scenes to avoid indictment, but I don't think she can. The case is just too obvious.
I'm not defending what she did or her rationale, what I'm telling you is none of what you described will end up in charges, therefore she doesn't have "legal trouble."
Post by: MakeItRain on October 16, 2015, 02:31:20 PM
Now as far as what the emphasis is or should be, who cares? Police brutality, black on black crime, mass incarceration, educational funding inequities, etc. are all symptoms of the disease. It's more convenient for you and others like you to focus on the symptoms when the focus of the disease needs to be the cure.
Finally please don't tell me what the focus of the movement is, trust me, I know more about this than whatever representation of us you may see in the media. You seeing signs at protests when a cop kills someone isn't close to the totality of what this movement means. If you are sincere about knowing about this heed what I'm telling you because I'm a much better source than whatever else you're reading.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 18, 2015, 02:28:31 PM
You can pretend it's a race thing. It's not. It's a poor thing.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 20, 2015, 12:54:50 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2015, 01:00:11 PM
Post by: mocat on October 20, 2015, 01:02:46 PM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 20, 2015, 02:36:51 PM
Now maybe the politicians at Justice posing as our nations chief (politically appointed) law enforcement officers engage in partisan politics and a la carte social justice. But the actual investigators, not so much.
It's hilarious to think that Dems are now using the "This investigation costs too much money" shtick.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 20, 2015, 02:57:50 PM
Not gEing here, you have a really weird obsession with Lincoln Chaffee
Did I mention the Dem field is so thin that Lincoln Chaffee was one of only five candidates on stage? It's literally Hillary Or Bust (unless Uncle Joe gets in).
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2015, 04:05:52 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 20, 2015, 04:29:28 PM
Not gEing here, you have a really weird obsession with Lincoln Chaffee
Did I mention the Dem field is so thin that Lincoln Chaffee was one of only five candidates on stage? It's literally Hillary Or Bust (unless Uncle Joe gets in).
Chaffee is no worse than Huckabee.
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 23, 2015, 09:15:15 AM
Ok Democrats, you're now down to three choices: (1) an ancient crank self-proclaimed socialist, (2) a former governor of Maryland, and (3) a congenital liar and horrible person who exposed state secrets to hackers in order to avoid FOIA requests.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2015, 09:16:05 AM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2015, 09:38:00 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2015, 09:41:36 AM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2015, 09:42:32 AM
Bernie would be so good at maternity leave it'd make your head spin
.39 cent an hour maternity leave doesn't buy much head spinning, lib.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2015, 09:44:03 AM
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2015, 09:45:28 AM
He'd do much better than those chicomms, just terrific
Well, we don't know that, so far one of his models really blows, I mean really really blows. He also clearly doesn't understand his other model. So, wow . . . that's 0 for 2. #confidencefalling
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2015, 09:47:03 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2015, 09:48:38 AM
Feel the bern, no fear
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2015, 09:49:48 AM
Dax is not feeling the bern, how sad for him :frown:
Dude isn't inspiring much confidence, I mean when you're channeling your inner ChiCom (which Bernie is) and you don't really understand the current political movement, emerging mindset, business structure, historical economic factors or financial trends of the country you want to model the United States after . . . well that's just not good lib, not good at all.
But FREE COLLEGE!!
#feeltheconfusion
Post by: brandochav on October 23, 2015, 02:41:37 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on October 23, 2015, 07:20:03 PM
Please elaborate, dax. This time without the rhetoric, and add some empirical support.
You must be new here.
I know you aren't new here but I needed to turn a phrase
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 26, 2015, 07:57:37 AM
Currently:
Corporate tax rates: Lower than U.S.
Middle Class Taxes: High
Bank Holdings: Several resident banks have holdings 1.5 to 2x GDP
The Swiss economy plummeted 10 spots in the world rankings from the 70's to early 90's. In Denmark welfarist politicians have been replaced by Center-Right leaning politicians.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/world/europe/danes-rethink-a-welfare-state-ample-to-a-fault.html?_r=1
http://www.capx.co/scandinavian-unexceptionalism-8-the-third-way-model-a-collosal-failure/
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/07/why-even-scandinavia-moving-right
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 26, 2015, 09:44:26 AM
As I aluded to, those Scandanaian nations now have an immigration problem of their own, and their generous welfare programs are stretched to the breaking point.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 26, 2015, 10:20:46 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on October 26, 2015, 10:36:06 AM
Post by: puniraptor on October 28, 2015, 03:20:13 PM
It is also really difficult to compare Scandanvian countries, which are culturally and ethnically quite homogeneous and relatively affluent (or were, until recently), to a country like the United States which has a bigger, more diverse population and is importing poverty by the millions, both legally and illegally. The projected costs of Bernie's proposed welfare programs are staggering.
As I aluded to, those Scandanaian nations now have an immigration problem of their own, and their generous welfare programs are stretched to the breaking point.
they also have nationalized the oil industry. should we do that?
why does the queen's british petroleum company get to keep all the profits from our god given american natural resources?
Post by: renocat on July 05, 2017, 12:31:31 PM
I guess they are going low ball racking fighting mode. They are acting like they are the gatekeeper of free speech.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 05, 2017, 01:48:24 PM
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/04/extremely-unethical-cnn-draws-backlash-after-threatening-to-id-reddit-user-behind-trumps-wwe-video/
I guess they are going low ball racking fighting mode. They are acting like they are the gatekeeper of free speech.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/882422267166195713
I really don't see anything wrong with trump calling cnn exactly what it is
Post by: SdK on July 05, 2017, 01:51:24 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 05, 2017, 01:52:13 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 05, 2017, 01:53:37 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 05, 2017, 02:10:17 PM
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 05, 2017, 02:15:54 PM
:D
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 05, 2017, 02:17:25 PM
Really shows the integrity difference between cnn and trump tho, trump would have had that crap on tweet blast asap
If there's one thing Trump's known for, it's improperly unmasking his critics.
#ethics #libtards
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on July 05, 2017, 04:21:35 PM
Post by: mocat on July 07, 2017, 09:37:13 AM