goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: renocat on January 22, 2015, 04:48:43 PM

Title: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: renocat on January 22, 2015, 04:48:43 PM
I support circumcisioin rights.

http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Federal-circumcision-guidelines-meet-with-5944107.php

In the new guidelines, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stopped short of recommending routine circumcisions. But the agency emphasized that the benefits outweigh the risks, recommended the procedure be covered by insurance, and suggested that males of all ages who are not circumcised should receive counseling about its potential health benefits.
In 2011, members of the anticutting movement known as intactivists pushed for a ballot measure in San Francisco that would have barred the procedure on any male 17 or younger. But a San Francisco Superior Court judge removed it from the ballot after Jewish organizations, the American Civil Liberties Union and San Francisco's Medical Society filed a lawsuit over the issue.

Tina Kimmel, who lives in Oakland, said she has already written to the CDC, warning the agency to not let itself be “manipulated into coming out on the wrong side of this historic issue.”  ,” Kimmel wrote, “It is monstrous for (the) CDC to advise physicians to treat any US citizen as less than human. It is your job to protect us, not subject us to excrutiating, permanent bodily disfigurement — with no medical justification — just because we are (temporarily) in a weak state and you can overpower us.”
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: puniraptor on January 22, 2015, 04:50:07 PM
this thread should be a pole so we can collect some stats and maybe also delegate a map
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2015, 05:05:19 PM
Baby dicks are getting more liberal press than aborted babies
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 22, 2015, 05:05:41 PM
I disagree that circumcision should be covered by insurance. Premiums are high enough without having to cover cosmetic surgeries.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2015, 05:07:16 PM
It's not just cosmetic, that's why it's recommended
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 22, 2015, 05:08:21 PM
It's not just cosmetic, that's why it's recommended

They stopped short of recommending it, actually. There are some very minor health benefits, but it's a surgery performed for cosmetic reasons.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: puniraptor on January 22, 2015, 05:09:59 PM
doctor now or zipper later
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2015, 05:12:21 PM
Adult circumcision is extremely painful, the minor health benefits are worth it in preventing that
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 22, 2015, 05:19:30 PM
San Francisco - land of intolerance.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: bubbles4ksu on January 22, 2015, 05:25:19 PM
the jewish practice of sucking the foreskin off of the baby dick is very uncivilized.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: puniraptor on January 22, 2015, 05:26:34 PM
the jewish practice of sucking the foreskin off of the baby dick is very uncivilized.

my favorite Dirty Jobs episode. Mike Rowe was like  :Yuck:
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Mr Bread on January 23, 2015, 07:32:05 PM
Not at all surprised that ratm has anteater envy.  Got him a crew neck against his will.  Makes a lot of sense actually.  Really explains some things. 
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Spracne on January 23, 2015, 07:48:00 PM
I mean, do whatever you want, but a lot of the vitriol from passionate pro-anteater folks comes across as veiled jealousy, to me. Just cuz you born in the hood don't mean you stuck there.  It's not just that it looks gross; it's that it is gross. No chick's gonna wanna go down on that flaming hot pocket of molten smegma.   No one wants to play with a penis flytrap that chomps on lint, dead cells and sundry other particulate.  Sometimes when I'm getting my main vein thrombosis on, I think about those poor bastards suffering from penis insufficiency.  My advice?  Don't get mad, get glans.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: 8manpick on January 23, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
Spracne hit it right on the head here, folks
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: star seed 7 on January 23, 2015, 08:05:50 PM
Spracne hit it right on the head here, folks

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: brandochav on January 23, 2015, 08:32:37 PM
It's not just cosmetic, that's why it's recommended

They stopped short of recommending it, actually. There are some very minor health benefits, but it's a surgery performed for cosmetic reasons.

Exactly. It's actually an inherited Judaic practice that's become "mainstream", if you will. The medical literature has gone back and forth on the "benefits" of circumcision, and all proclaiming benefits have even noted that basic hygiene is really at the core of it all.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Mr Bread on January 23, 2015, 08:54:56 PM
#dirtydicks
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Cire on January 24, 2015, 08:00:55 AM
We were not going to cut our kids if they were boys.  Barbaric
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: brandochav on January 24, 2015, 10:04:57 AM
#dirtydicks
:Take the Bait:
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: renocat on January 24, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Obama will likely create a czar for this since it is a big subject in Europe.  Maybe a Cleaner Wiener campaign wth Bill Clinton as spokeman.
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: SdK on January 24, 2015, 07:34:24 PM
When I was a kid, my dad played on a softball team. I guess one of the guys had accidentally said they wanted to circumcise their meal at McDonalds and all the guys were having a good laugh. I said I don't get it, one of the guys said well are you circumcised? I said no, they all laughed at my dad. Dad then corrected me and told them I was.

Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Spracne on January 24, 2015, 07:51:45 PM
When I was a kid, my dad played on a softball team. I guess one of the guys had accidentally said they wanted to circumcise their meal at McDonalds and all the guys were having a good laugh. I said I don't get it, one of the guys said well are you circumcised? I said no, they all laughed at my dad. Dad then corrected me and told them I was.

There you go... Giving a eff when it's not your turn to give a eff...
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: SdK on January 24, 2015, 09:01:21 PM
When I was a kid, my dad played on a softball team. I guess one of the guys had accidentally said they wanted to circumcise their meal at McDonalds and all the guys were having a good laugh. I said I don't get it, one of the guys said well are you circumcised? I said no, they all laughed at my dad. Dad then corrected me and told them I was.

There you go... Giving a eff when it's not your turn to give a eff...

Yes, I have slept with many married women  :fatty:
Title: Re: Circumcision Meeting Stiff Opposition. Mutilators vs. Intactivests
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 24, 2015, 11:45:44 PM
I'm not anti-circumcision. I just don't think insurance needs to cover cosmetic surgery.