goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: renocat on January 18, 2015, 10:01:03 PM
-
Our great brain dead keeper almighty of the ballot box is asking the legislature to pass a bill that will have straight party line voting. You only would get to vote for everybody in one party. Kobach says it is to confusing to go line by line on a ballot to vote. He is upset that many ballots have blank spaces on them where no vote was cast. Well Mr. Commie Conservative, I left your name blank because I did want to vote for a glory hound egotistical snake. You should be impeached for wanting to take from us the power of choice at the ballot box - dumbbutt voters or not.
-
He's such a douche. Come on, Kansas.
-
would save precious seconds for all the mouth breathing r voters in this state.
-
Wgaf
-
I think Kobach is basically proof that Satan actually exists.
-
Iowa has a straight line option. Iowa also only uses paper ballots.
-
They should take party affiliation off the ballots. Would be hilarious
-
They should take party affiliation off the ballots. Would be hilarious
Yes, they really should.
-
They should take party affiliation off the ballots. Would be hilarious
Yes, they really should.
eff, this would be amazing for all levels but especially easy and effective for local level government.
-
There would be some off the wall ppl getting elected w/o party affiliation. I mean, old ppl can barely use the elect ballots. Can you imagine them having to remember a dozen names while getting frustrated with the elect ballots?
-
There would be some off the wall ppl getting elected w/o party affiliation. I mean, old ppl can barely use the elect ballots. Can you imagine them having to remember a dozen names while getting frustrated with the elect ballots?
Maybe they would come to the realization that they probably shouldn't be voting.
-
There would be some off the wall ppl getting elected w/o party affiliation. I mean, old ppl can barely use the elect ballots. Can you imagine them having to remember a dozen names while getting frustrated with the elect ballots?
Maybe they would come to the realization that they probably shouldn't be voting.
If a pub suggested this it would be characterized as "voter alienation", for sure.
Pubs would have to up their acorn-y voter registration, absentee ballot, straight-line voting ground game. The dems have a huge advantage in this regard. The dems could just make a cheat sheet for their community organizers to complete to get over the ignorance of their constituency.
-
There would be some off the wall ppl getting elected w/o party affiliation. I mean, old ppl can barely use the elect ballots. Can you imagine them having to remember a dozen names while getting frustrated with the elect ballots?
Maybe they would come to the realization that they probably shouldn't be voting.
If a pub suggested this it would be characterized as "voter alienation", for sure.
Pubs would have to up their acorn-y voter registration, absentee ballot, straight-line voting ground game. The dems have a huge advantage in this regard. The dems could just make a cheat sheet for their community organizers to complete to get over the ignorance of their constituency.
I'm sure the pubs would do just that and not miss a beat.
-
100 percent for getting all party affiliation out of politics, including ballots
-
I can understand party affiliation for positions like senator. There is no need for that with positions like treasurer. A better solution would be to require each candidate to write a bio in 100 words or less and put that on the ballot.
-
I can understand party affiliation for positions like senator. There is no need for that with positions like treasurer. A better solution would be to require each candidate to write a bio in 100 words or less and put that on the ballot.
Might need to do 25 words, because the average attention span of an adult is frighteningly short. Otherwise, I like it
-
140 characters.
-
140 characters.
tim would dominate this
-
140 characters.
@huelscamp: vote 4 me, Cuz I'll tots shred Obamacare and tots cut taxes ROFL # 2nd amendment
@barackO: @blackpeople: fuckthe5-0 @women: free da pill @lbgt: look! I'm for gay marriage now @hispanics: amnesty
-
That's a tough choice there.
-
I know, the (R) and (D) humanizes this rough ridin' dipshits to the point people can vote for them
-
Municipal and school board elections in Texas do not indicate the candidates political affiliation. And they don't put their party affiliation on signs and campaign ads. I just assume they're all Republicans because I'm in Texas.
-
140 characters.
@huelscamp: vote 4 me, Cuz I'll tots shred Obamacare and tots cut taxes ROFL # 2nd amendment
@barackO: @blackpeople: fuckthe5-0 @women: free da pill @lbgt: look! I'm for gay marriage now @hispanics: amnesty
:lol: this some great FSD right here
-
How do you know which republican is more republicany tho
-
What's the current rule on who gets the top spot on the ballot? Does that always go to the incumbent? Random? Alphabetical?
-
What's the current rule on who gets the top spot on the ballot? Does that always go to the incumbent? Random? Alphabetical?
Should mix that up too. Random.
-
What's the current rule on who gets the top spot on the ballot? Does that always go to the incumbent? Random? Alphabetical?
Should mix that up too. Random.
Random. There is a drawing/lottery.
-
http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/prairie-politics/article12610361.html
-
Klu Klux Klueless.
-
He sure is, renocat
-
I'm glad he's calling attention to the administration's perverse concept of justice. Should have done it through a personal email account tho
-
as much as I hate to admit it, the two-party system makes our government more efficient. it also prevents our government from getting some important things done. it depends on what you value, i suppose.
The important thing is that everybody is in agreement that Kobach is quite possibly one of the worst people on the face of this planet.
-
as much as I hate to admit it, the two-party system makes our government more efficient. it also prevents our government from getting some important things done. it depends on what you value, i suppose.
The important thing is that everybody is in agreement that Kobach is quite possibly one of the worst people on the face of this planet.
Most Kansas voters will continue to think he is a better person than whatever democrat runs against him, though.
-
He was pacifying a nutso caller by saying that was "unlikely to happen" but pointed out that the DoJ has already been racially politicized. What's the controversy here? :dunno:
-
The same site publicized comments Kobach made in November in response to another caller’s question, in which he would not rule out the possibility that Obama’s executive action on immigration would lead to ethnic cleansing of whites.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/prairie-politics/article12610361.html#storylink=cpy
What's the controversy here? :dunno:
-
The same site publicized comments Kobach made in November in response to another caller’s question, in which he would not rule out the possibility that Obama’s executive action on immigration would lead to ethnic cleansing of whites.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/prairie-politics/article12610361.html#storylink=cpy
What's the controversy here? :dunno:
I had to look that one up...
Kobach, a Republican, made the comments on KCMO 710, a Kansas City station, during his regular Sunday night show. Kobach took a call from a man identified as Steve who said that when one culture or race overwhelms another culture it leads to killing or displacement.
“Here’s an interesting, not a counterpoint, but an interesting additional point to that, I guess. What protects us in America from any kind of ethnic cleansing is the rule of law, of course,” Kobach said. “And the rule of law used to be unassailable, used to be taken for granted in America and now of course we have a president who disregards the law when it suits his interests.
“So while I normally would answer that by saying, ‘Steve, of course we have the rule of law, that could never happen in America,’ I wonder what could happen. I still don’t think it’s going to happen in America, but I have to admit things are strange and they’re happening.”
So again, he's pacifying a nutso caller and telling them he doesn't think it will happen, but he also says that Obama is trampling on the rule of law. I agree with both those comments. Again, what's the controversy? :dunno:
-
Lol @ ksuw
:lol:
-
:lol:
-
Kobach is like one-half as nuts as Holder, Obama and the rest of the wack jobs on the president's cabinet. They compliment one another nicely.
Given the crap those lunatics have pulled so far, his answer was completely appropriate. If you think Obama isn't above that kind of crap you aren't paying attention or are delusional.
-
Yes, I'm defending Kobach here. Nothing in that statement was in the least bit unreasonable given the context of the question, the response and the politicized state of the DOJ.
-
For a group of people that genuinely believe anyone who opposes the president's agenda does so because of their uncontrollable racism, the outrage over this is particularly LOL.
-
For a group of people that genuinely believe anyone who opposes the president's agenda does so because of their uncontrollable racism, the outrage over this is particularly LOL.
Meh, I'm not so much :lol: as :rolleyes:. This is the same bullshit game of distortion played against radio hosts all the time. Strip away the context of the crazy caller, spin the host's comments into the worst light, rinse, repeat. In both instances he politely disagreed with the caller's suggestion, but HE DIDN'T DO IT WITH ADEQUATE VEHEMENCE for the libtards! :shakesfist: And, as you say, the libtards aren't giving him the benefit of the doubt because they already know he's the devil (for requiring voter ID and opposing illegal immigration).
-
"It's already happened " "never say never".
-
"It's already happened " "never say never".
"I think it's unlikely" "I still don't think it's going to happen in America".
-
Nutzo radio callers are the republican base, of course he's going to agree with them
-
It's a pretty good practice to simply not respond to stupid crap like that. It legitimizes it.
-
Nutzo radio callers are the republican base, of course he's going to agree with them
Part of the base, but I'll take the right wing crazies over the left wing crazies any day.
-
We should leave the two parties with nothing but their crazies and take everyone else to create a third party.
-
[quoete author=Headinjun link=topic=34335.msg1329035#msg1329035 date=1425675105]
"It's already happened " "never say never".
"I think it's unlikely" "I still don't think it's going to happen in America".
[/quote]
The proper response woulda been " hey you racist piece of crap, get off my show!!!!""
Not worming his way around to giving an ounce of credibility to such a ridiculous assertion that is soaked in backwoods bigotry.
-
Oh look! Headinjun with the "racicm" dig. :Woot:
This type of dialogue is sooo not constructive
-
We should leave the two parties with nothing but their crazies and take everyone else to create a third party.
That's a nice sentiment but what would it mean in reality? What's the "moderate" position on taxes? Spending? Immigration? Abortion? Energy production? Etc.
One could argue that "moderate" is exactly what we're getting now with the current GOP leadership in Congress, and it's just a continuation of the $pend $pend $pend status quo. I don't consider that moderate - I consider it a disaster.
And what do you mean by "crazy"? I believe a good half of all Democrats are closet socialists/fascists - they would have no place in my party. There's a much smaller fringe on the right i'd exclude - basically the militia nuts and the people who actually believe Obama is Kenyan/Muslim (he's an atheist), but that's my conservative viewpoint. Crazy is in the eye of the beholder.
-
Amazing
-
We should leave the two parties with nothing but their crazies and take everyone else to create a third party.
That's a nice sentiment but what would it mean in reality? What's the "moderate" position on taxes? Spending? Immigration? Abortion? Energy production? Etc.
One could argue that "moderate" is exactly what we're getting now with the current GOP leadership in Congress, and it's just a continuation of the $pend $pend $pend status quo. I don't consider that moderate - I consider it a disaster.
And what do you mean by "crazy"? I believe a good half of all Democrats are closet socialists/fascists - they would have no place in my party. There's a much smaller fringe on the right i'd exclude - basically the militia nuts and the people who actually believe Obama is Kenyan/Muslim (he's an atheist), but that's my conservative viewpoint. Crazy is in the eye of the beholder.
:D
-
:lol:
-
Who knew that with all of Kobach's false rhetoric about democrats having illegal immigrants vote that he would be the one cheating?
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/mathematician-suspicious-of-election-fraud-hires-lawyer-to-force-kansas-to-hand-over-voting-records/
-
Who knew that with all of Kobach's false rhetoric about democrats having illegal immigrants vote that he would be the one cheating?
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/mathematician-suspicious-of-election-fraud-hires-lawyer-to-force-kansas-to-hand-over-voting-records/
It's not that surprising. The people who complain the most are usually the most guilty.
-
Who knew that with all of Kobach's false rhetoric about democrats having illegal immigrants vote that he would be the one cheating?
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/mathematician-suspicious-of-election-fraud-hires-lawyer-to-force-kansas-to-hand-over-voting-records/
I had heard on KPR that he blocked the release a week or so ago. I'm glad to see that she has retained an attorney.
-
Liars trust noone.
-
Liars trust noone.
And question everything