goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 03:12:03 PM

Title: Size of Offense
Post by: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 03:12:03 PM
possible line up on the field offensively this fall.

QB - Klein 6-5 235
RB - Thomas 6-2 228
FB - Wilson 6-3 245
WR - Harper 6-1 230
WR - Smith 6-2 210
TE - McDonald 6-8 282
OT - Foteki 6-5 340
OG - Kendall 6-2 312
C - Weibert 6-4 303
OG - Mayfield 6-4 338
OT - Aufner 6-5 300

somebody tell that half-pint Aufner to do some more eating. He's letting us down when we're trying to go big.  ;)



Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: michigancat on April 16, 2010, 03:17:40 PM
WHERE'S THE BEEF?  SNIFF, SNIFF.  I SMELL OUTLAND
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: Saulbadguy on April 16, 2010, 03:27:00 PM
Quote from: michigancat on April 16, 2010, 03:17:40 PM
WHERE'S THE BEEF?  SNIFF, SNIFF.  I SMELL OUTLAND
Classic.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: kougar24 on April 16, 2010, 03:55:25 PM
Quote from: michigancat on April 16, 2010, 03:17:40 PM
WHERE'S THE BEEF?  SNIFF, SNIFF.  I SMELL OUTLAND

Oh, he's already got a 2010 version of an olinegasm post.

"This is BIG... NFL BIG... "
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 04:37:45 PM
horrid responses.

Manhatter, save me. I know you are out there. I need you. Come hug me.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: catzacker on April 16, 2010, 04:49:05 PM
Did you see that pass Klein made @Nebraska?   :drool:
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 04:50:53 PM
Quote from: catzacker on April 16, 2010, 04:49:05 PM
Did you see that pass Klein made @Nebraska?   :drool:

Re-watched it around 25 minutes ago. No Lie.

Amazing pass. Just unreal. Love k's celebration after the completion.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: kougar24 on April 16, 2010, 04:54:49 PM
Fatty, I fear for your safety when we go 4-8 this year. Seriously, don't do anything to...hurt yourself.......
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: Sugar Dick on April 16, 2010, 05:48:26 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 03:12:03 PM
possible line up on the field offensively this fall.

QB - Klein 6-5 235
RB - Thomas 6-2 228
FB - Wilson 6-3 245
WR - Harper 6-1 230
WR - Smith 6-2 210
TE - McDonald 6-8 282
OT - Foteki 6-5 340
OG - Kendall 6-2 312
C - Weibert 6-4 303
OG - Mayfield 6-4 338
OT - Aufner 6-5 300

somebody tell that half-pint Aufner to do some more eating. He's letting us down when we're trying to go big.  ;)





Is that Mayonaise guy really starting at LT, or is he just the fattest guy you could find?  I figured it would be Hanson, who's also 300+
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: stunz on April 16, 2010, 06:56:28 PM
 :love: wow

our offense would probably destroy last-place nfl team's 3rd string offense :excited:
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: stunz on April 16, 2010, 07:06:31 PM
Quote from: stunz on April 16, 2010, 06:56:28 PM
last-place nfl team's 3rd string

and by this i mean the chiefs first string  :surprised:
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: kso_FAN on April 17, 2010, 09:44:45 PM
Ave of 275# for the entire offense.  BIG.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: HeinBallz on April 17, 2010, 11:16:58 PM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 17, 2010, 09:44:45 PM
Ave of 275# for the entire offense.  BIG.

That was the average of the entire O-line prince's first year.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: cowbell17 on April 19, 2010, 09:07:14 AM
Anyone notice how much bigger our players have gotten since Snyder showed Prince to the door?  The size we are putting on the field is nearing NFL-esque. :excited:
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: steve dave on April 19, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
Quote from: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?

I don't think we have much speed on our entire team so I vote we go fattness on both sides of the ball
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: DQ12 on April 19, 2010, 11:37:20 AM
Man, there is no way Andre McDonald is 280 pounds.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: Lamesauce on April 19, 2010, 02:29:32 PM
Quote from: Dlew12 on April 19, 2010, 11:37:20 AM
Man, there is no way Andre McDonald is 280 pounds.

I don't know. I believe it. Tall people are deceptively heavy.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: felix rex on April 19, 2010, 06:31:59 PM
Quote from: steve dave on April 19, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
Quote from: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?

I don't think we have much speed on our entire team so I vote we go fattness on both sides of the ball

Agreed. I want a whole lineup of these guys:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)     (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)             (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
                    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
               (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: LickNeckey on April 19, 2010, 09:22:00 PM
McDonald is huge would be a tackle if Prince were still here.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: The Minister on April 20, 2010, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: felix rex on April 19, 2010, 06:31:59 PM
Quote from: steve dave on April 19, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
Quote from: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?

I don't think we have much speed on our entire team so I vote we go fattness on both sides of the ball

Agreed. I want a whole lineup of these guys:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)     (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)             (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
                    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
               (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)

 :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: DQ12 on April 20, 2010, 01:32:57 AM
Quote from: The Minister on April 20, 2010, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: felix rex on April 19, 2010, 06:31:59 PM
Quote from: steve dave on April 19, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
Quote from: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?

I don't think we have much speed on our entire team so I vote we go fattness on both sides of the ball

Agreed. I want a whole lineup of these guys:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)     (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)             (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
                    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
               (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)

 :love: :love: :love:

We didn't really use much split-back sets under Snydes did we?
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: kso_FAN on April 20, 2010, 08:29:10 AM
Quote from: Dlew12 on April 20, 2010, 01:32:57 AM
Quote from: The Minister on April 20, 2010, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: felix rex on April 19, 2010, 06:31:59 PM
Quote from: steve dave on April 19, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
Quote from: _33 on April 19, 2010, 09:26:44 AM
Do we want size on defense too?  Or do we still want speed?

I don't think we have much speed on our entire team so I vote we go fattness on both sides of the ball

Agreed. I want a whole lineup of these guys:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)     (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)             (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
                    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)
               (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)    (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnoot.org%2Fi%2Fwuss%2Fvg%2Ffatl.gif&hash=f27a3cdf5bc1b3c2a3405e3079f6a44a24c60e49)

 :love: :love: :love:

We didn't really use much split-back sets under Snydes did we?

Not much.  But I do distinctly remember running split back and sneaking out David Allen from the backfield for a long pass play (don't remember if it was a TD or not) against UT in Austin (the Wefald trash talk game). 
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 20, 2010, 11:04:18 AM
You do have to laugh at Prince's whole "undersized, run and hit" load of B.S.

Not that I am currently a huge fan of OB, but my gawd, what a con man Prince was.
Title: Re: Size of Offense
Post by: Sugar Dick on April 21, 2010, 09:39:56 AM
Quote from: Sugar Dick on April 16, 2010, 05:48:26 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on April 16, 2010, 03:12:03 PM
possible line up on the field offensively this fall.

QB - Klein 6-5 235
RB - Thomas 6-2 228
FB - Wilson 6-3 245
WR - Harper 6-1 230
WR - Smith 6-2 210
TE - McDonald 6-8 282
OT - Foteki 6-5 340
OG - Kendall 6-2 312
C - Weibert 6-4 303
OG - Mayfield 6-4 338
OT - Aufner 6-5 300

somebody tell that half-pint Aufner to do some more eating. He's letting us down when we're trying to go big.  ;)





Is that Mayonaise guy really starting at LT, or is he just the fattest guy you could find?  I figured it would be Hanson, who's also 300+

I guess I was right  :users: