goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: EMAWzified on November 08, 2014, 09:38:38 PM

Title: Running game
Post by: EMAWzified on November 08, 2014, 09:38:38 PM
Lots of problems tonight, but the total lack of a running game was a killer.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: smith1051 on November 08, 2014, 10:10:42 PM
Or maybe the lack of defense that could stop a run game
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: bones129 on November 08, 2014, 10:16:56 PM
Both.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: smith1051 on November 08, 2014, 10:17:51 PM
334
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: EMAWzified on November 08, 2014, 10:19:12 PM
Time of rough ridin' possession.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: bucket on November 08, 2014, 10:19:23 PM
I guess bad Bill was right about Demarcus. Demarcus sucks. I mean, I thought that before but, he really sucks.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2014, 10:20:19 PM
Both.

Yes.

Our inability to run the ball destroyed our offense. Put us in 2nd and 3rd and long all night. Made us one dimensional.

Our inability to stop the run progressed as the game went along. Early it was mainly Boykin breaking contain and running for first downs. Then their back got going and they absolutely destroyed us, but that was mainly in the 2nd half.

But it was bad on both sides of the ball which is a major reason why we got thumped tonight.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: smith1051 on November 08, 2014, 10:20:50 PM
Most yards TCU has rushed for this season which includes games against Samford and SMU for fucks sake
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: Katpappy on November 08, 2014, 10:23:09 PM
Both.

Yes.

Our inability to run the ball destroyed our offense. Put us in 2nd and 3rd and long all night. Made us one dimensional.

Our inability to stop the run progressed as the game went along. Early it was mainly Boykin breaking contain and running for first downs. Then their back got going and they absolutely destroyed us, but that was mainly in the 2nd half.

But it was bad on both sides of the ball which is a major reason why we got thumped tonight.
They played our typical style of offense.  They ruled the T.O.P.  No hurry up tonight.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: CHONGS on November 08, 2014, 10:27:31 PM
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: Katpappy on November 08, 2014, 10:29:19 PM
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: CHONGS on November 08, 2014, 10:30:22 PM
i think we can pass block OK enough, but not run block.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: EMAWzified on November 08, 2014, 10:30:51 PM
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
And he typically wanted 8
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: Katpappy on November 08, 2014, 10:38:55 PM
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
And he typically wanted 8
Yes, that's the problem.
Title: Re: Running game
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on November 08, 2014, 10:39:31 PM
I agree with everything posted in this thread