goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: 420seriouscat69 on October 31, 2014, 04:07:31 PM

Title: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 31, 2014, 04:07:31 PM
I'm sure this is luked, but I find it funny that my mass comm professor/head of the department, felt the need to post this on his facebook page today, after Snyder came out supporting Roberts. He posts daily smear crap on Brownback and Roberts, so I'm sure he wasn't pleased about the ad.

http://www.k-state.edu/today/announcement.php?id=16619&category=from_the_president&referredBy=email#.VFOMUJ5syxw.twitter

http://www.hutchnews.com/news/local_state_news/ksu-president-reacts-to-snyder-video/article_50646a13-d0b9-5a22-aeca-414d01891a8b.html
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 31, 2014, 04:10:53 PM
Yes, luked. Also, Snyder is a stud, also luked.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 31, 2014, 04:12:01 PM
Can we merge it? I find it ironic that my journalism teacher is sharing this on his facebook page when he writes daily updates about how shitty our republicans are in this state.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 31, 2014, 09:10:02 PM
Can we merge it? I find it ironic that my journalism teacher is sharing this on his facebook page when he writes daily updates about how shitty our republicans are in this state.

Well the endorsement of LHCBS has obviously changed his mind, as it should. Hopefully he didn't vote already.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: OK_Cat on October 31, 2014, 09:47:04 PM
Because when I think of local politics, I rely heavily on the words of a guy who hasn't followed politics or voted since eisenhower
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: waks on October 31, 2014, 10:25:50 PM
Can we merge it? I find it ironic that my journalism teacher is sharing this on his facebook page when he writes daily updates about how shitty our republicans are in this state.
Lol. Your journalism teacher and LHC Bill Snyder aren't even close to the same person.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 31, 2014, 10:29:43 PM
Because when I think of local politics, I rely heavily on the words of a guy who hasn't followed politics or voted since eisenhower

Hey big surprise - OK Cat thinks he's smarter than LHC Bill Snyder.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: OK_Cat on October 31, 2014, 10:33:00 PM
Of course I'm smarter than a 75 year old with dinkmentia
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: brandochav on October 31, 2014, 10:59:54 PM
Can we merge it? I find it ironic that my journalism teacher is sharing this on his facebook page when he writes daily updates about how shitty our republicans are in this state.

Well the endorsement of LHCBS has obviously changed his mind, as it should. Hopefully he didn't vote already.




I love Snyder, but do not blindly follow his politics. That is an area that requires better judgments.



Sent using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: steve dave on October 31, 2014, 11:33:26 PM
as someone who knows LHC Bill Snyder intimately I'm very comfortable saying I'm a much better judge of politicians than LHC Bill Snyder. and better judge of almost everything in the world. not football stuff though. except uniforms.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Tobias on November 01, 2014, 12:24:09 AM
snyder would be terrible at bbs'n, but he'd be especially bad at pit'n
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 01, 2014, 03:31:50 AM
I feel like snyder is renocat maybe
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 01, 2014, 03:35:49 AM
https://www.change.org/p/pat-roberts-honor-k-state-and-coach-snyder-s-request-to-pull-the-illegal-and-unauthorized-political-advertisement
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 01, 2014, 03:48:00 AM
Mentoring
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 01, 2014, 04:10:12 AM
LOL at anyone who thinks Snyder didn't know exactly what he was doing. 

LOL at the up-in-arms profs who regularly get on social media forums to get their political views across and to retweet/re-post official political campaign information from various candidates and political parties . . . and shockingly (to no one) they're usually predominately liberal and everyone knows that they are employees of K-State.     

LOL at anyone who says that Snyder is bigger than K-State and can do whatever he wants.    The same crap that's been going on for years and ultimately leads to reports about how (for example) certain individuals were using K-State, and in one series of cases the athletic department specifically, as their personal bank and taxation avoidance mechanism.   
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Kat Kid on November 01, 2014, 07:44:11 AM
I thought it was funny that LHC Bill Snyder appeared to say to the crew: "I'll be at my SUV at Vanier at 11:05 pm to go home.  Have a camera and the lights set up.  You get 5 minutes."
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 01, 2014, 07:48:46 AM
I thought it was funny that LHC Bill Snyder appeared to say to the crew: "I'll be at my SUV at Vanier at 11:05 pm to go home.  Have a camera and the lights set up.  You get 5 minutes."

I'd be surprised and disappointed if he really gave them five whole minutes.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 07:49:59 AM
I think it's funny that leftists are in love with a 1%er, heir of a bankrupt furniture store in olathe, independent who has spent all his money on a smear campaign and who may not have a single thing in common with democrats, because he's not pat roberts.

I've said this before, leftists would elect a child molester so long as he had a (d) next to his name on the ballot.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 8manpick on November 01, 2014, 09:31:47 AM
I think it's funny that leftists are in love with a 1%er, heir of a bankrupt furniture store in olathe, independent who has spent all his money on a smear campaign and who may not have a single thing in common with democrats, because he's not pat roberts.

I've said this before, leftists would elect a child molester so long as he had a (d) next to his name on the ballot.
Rightists would do the same for an (R)
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 10:12:22 AM
I think it's funny that leftists are in love with a 1%er, heir of a bankrupt furniture store in olathe, independent who has spent all his money on a smear campaign and who may not have a single thing in common with democrats, because he's not pat roberts.

I've said this before, leftists would elect a child molester so long as he had a (d) next to his name on the ballot.
Rightists would do the same for an (R)

This actually isn't true.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: steve dave on November 01, 2014, 10:20:31 AM
lol
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 10:22:25 AM
lol

Libtard

Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 10:33:36 AM
The rush to denigrate the man most responsible for the success of the university just because he supports someone labeled republican is the most libtarded thing I've seen in the pit in a while. What a tremendous collection of butthurt, narrow minded, nitwits.

It almost as stupid as replacing the state's most powerful representative with the son of a bankrupt furniture salesman.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 01, 2014, 12:45:11 PM
Greg Orman isn't running a smear campaign, pat Roberts is
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: CNS on November 01, 2014, 01:02:33 PM
I receive one or two pieces of mail a day, for the last several weeks, telling me to not vote for the obama democrat in hiding.  How many have I recieved mudding up Pat?  None.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 01, 2014, 01:13:22 PM
I don't get why he's not allowed to endorse people. Seems like a weird standard. Shouldn't anyone, who works anywhere, be able to endorse any candidate? JMHO
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: kso_FAN on November 01, 2014, 01:17:20 PM
I don't get why he's not allowed to endorse people. Seems like a weird standard. Shouldn't anyone, who works anywhere, be able to endorse any candidate? JMHO

Yeah, they even tried to blur out the Powercats (even though they missed one).
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Kat Kid on November 01, 2014, 01:20:36 PM

I don't get why he's not allowed to endorse people. Seems like a weird standard. Shouldn't anyone, who works anywhere, be able to endorse any candidate? JMHO

He can, he just can't use his position at Kansas State as part of his endorsement lest it be construed as an endorsement by Kansas State.  This is standard policy for nearly every public or private business.  you of course may endorse as a private citizen, but not as a representative of your employer.  I don't know how much of this has to do with the new social media requirements that were initiated but if Bill was in his living room I don't think it would have been as big a problem.  The pic of Bill on the football field and in the Vanier parking lot are both problematic.

Also, allegedly, Bill did not know this was going to be used in a Pat Roberts commercial.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Panjandrum on November 01, 2014, 01:23:12 PM
I receive one or two pieces of mail a day, for the last several weeks, telling me to not vote for the obama democrat in hiding.  How many have I recieved mudding up Pat?  None.

I get at least three calls a day from the Roberts campaign.

I haven't received one from Orman.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: kso_FAN on November 01, 2014, 01:24:03 PM

I don't get why he's not allowed to endorse people. Seems like a weird standard. Shouldn't anyone, who works anywhere, be able to endorse any candidate? JMHO

He can, he just can't use his position at Kansas State as part of his endorsement lest it be construed as an endorsement by Kansas State.  This is standard policy for nearly every public or private business.  you of course may endorse as a private citizen, but not as a representative of your employer.  I don't know how much of this has to do with the new social media requirements that were initiated but if Bill was in his living room I don't think it would have been as big a problem.  The pic of Bill on the football field and in the Vanier parking lot are both problematic.

Also, allegedly, Bill did not know this was going to be used in a Pat Roberts commercial.

That makes sense, I wasn't sure if being on the field would be an issue.

I don't buy that Bill didn't know what he was doing.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 01, 2014, 01:28:32 PM

I don't get why he's not allowed to endorse people. Seems like a weird standard. Shouldn't anyone, who works anywhere, be able to endorse any candidate? JMHO

He can, he just can't use his position at Kansas State as part of his endorsement lest it be construed as an endorsement by Kansas State.  This is standard policy for nearly every public or private business.  you of course may endorse as a private citizen, but not as a representative of your employer.  I don't know how much of this has to do with the new social media requirements that were initiated but if Bill was in his living room I don't think it would have been as big a problem.  The pic of Bill on the football field and in the Vanier parking lot are both problematic.

Also, allegedly, Bill did not know this was going to be used in a Pat Roberts commercial.

Got it. Makes sense. Go Cats.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 01:31:12 PM
Didn't realize the pit had so many people without tv.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2014, 01:32:56 PM
 :billdance:
I think it's funny that leftists are in love with a 1%er, heir of a bankrupt furniture store in olathe, independent who has spent all his money on a smear campaign and who may not have a single thing in common with democrats, because he's not pat roberts.

I've said this before, leftists would elect a child molester so long as he had a (d) next to his name on the ballot.

Orman doesn't even have a D next to his name. Sad, really . . .
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 01:36:25 PM
I've not seen one Orman add that's about Orman at all, just crap about roberts living in dc. The only thing I know about Orman is that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) statement about caucus in with whoever is in the majority (which will be pubs) and that his dad owns a shitty furniture store.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ChiComCat on November 01, 2014, 01:40:23 PM
I've not seen one Orman add that's about Orman at all, just crap about roberts living in dc. The only thing I know about Orman is that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) statement about caucus in with whoever is in the majority (which will be pubs) and that his dad owns a shitty furniture store.

With so much money being spent on these campaigns, one would think FSD would realize how important it is to educate yourself on the candidates.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 01, 2014, 01:41:07 PM
70 yr old fsd is confused and thinking of milton wolf. Deterioration of the mind is so sad  :frown:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2014, 01:43:52 PM
My wife's 80 year old grandmother was telling me last week that I shouldn't vote for Orman because he's Obama's cousin. I hope it's not dementia.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Jabeez on November 01, 2014, 01:48:44 PM
God people regurgitating political ads are they worst.  Neither candidates stances are as polar as advertised, except like gay marriage and abortions, but that stuff is out of legislators hands now.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 04:13:39 PM
Thanks, Jabeez
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2014, 04:27:35 PM
Classic case of smear the smeared from the resident libtards.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 02, 2014, 07:25:23 AM
The butthurt over Snyd's endorsement is palpable.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 02, 2014, 07:55:31 AM
The butthurt over Snyd's endorsement is palpable.

It's quite epic.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ChiComCat on November 02, 2014, 10:17:07 AM
They played the endorsement on the radio during the game.  Apparently they give no fucks what K-State wants.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: chum1 on November 02, 2014, 10:52:24 AM
Snyder should just negate the ad by also doing an ad for Roberts' opponent.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2014, 11:28:43 AM
They played the endorsement on the radio during the game.  Apparently they give no fucks what K-State wants.

I'm stunned that they turned Snyder's endorsement into an attack ad for the radio spot. That's what friends are for, I guess. It's pathetically desperate that Roberts is willing to make his friend look like a fool for personal gain.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 02, 2014, 11:49:54 AM
They played the endorsement on the radio during the game.  Apparently they give no fucks what K-State wants.

What makes you think this isn't what kstate wants?  Stud move imho
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 02, 2014, 11:51:50 AM
They played the endorsement on the radio during the game.  Apparently they give no fucks what K-State wants.

I'm stunned that they turned Snyder's endorsement into an attack ad for the radio spot. That's what friends are for, I guess. It's pathetically desperate that Roberts is willing to make his friend look like a fool for personal gain.

If you meant to say  "stud" I agree.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ednksu on November 02, 2014, 12:04:19 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ednksu on November 02, 2014, 12:05:18 PM
The butthurt over Snyd's endorsement is palpable.

It's quite epic.
Add Snyder to that list of people who are "butthurt".
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 02, 2014, 12:58:32 PM
Pat Roberts should be endorsing LHC Bill Snyder, not the other way around.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: puniraptor on November 02, 2014, 01:13:26 PM
Desperation is a stinky cologne
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 02, 2014, 01:33:12 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

 :lol: :rolleyes: :lol: (that's two lols and an eye roll for good measure). Yes, I'm sure Snyds just feels betrayed over this. He's probably losing sleep over it. Why Pat? Whyyyyyyy?! :lol:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Asteriskhead on November 02, 2014, 02:31:05 PM
lol
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 02, 2014, 02:41:59 PM
Snyder is at least as unethical as your average politician. He knew exactly what he was doing and is lying about being surprised about how his image is being used.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2014, 03:52:16 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

FSD and ksuw are nothing more than slackjawed dittoheads incapable of independent thought, this isn't a surprise at all. This isn't a partisan issue but they can't see out of their assess because they think it helps the guy with the R next to his name.

For the record if I lived in Kansas I would not vote for Greg Orman.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 02, 2014, 04:08:47 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

FSD and ksuw are nothing more than slackjawed dittoheads incapable of independent thought, this isn't a surprise at all. This isn't a partisan issue but they can't see out of their assess because they think it helps the guy with the R next to his name.

For the record if I lived in Kansas I would not vote for Greg Orman.

For the record, I think this endorsement is pretty insignificant, but just find the libtard anguish hilarious. They're either really miffed that their hero supports Roberts, or they actually think this matters.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 02, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
I don't know a single person in anguish over this
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 02, 2014, 04:18:39 PM
And I exclusively associate with libtards and moderates  because I enjoy the company of non-piece-of-crap humans
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ednksu on November 02, 2014, 05:59:26 PM
http://cjonline.com/news/state/2014-11-02/snyder-roberts-ad-vacate-airwaves-questions-remain
Roberts campaign now calling Schulz, Snyder, admin libs because they want policies followed.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 02, 2014, 06:19:06 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

We're trolling you, dumbass
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 02, 2014, 06:20:59 PM
The butthurt and anger on display is pretty great. Libtards are subhumans.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ednksu on November 02, 2014, 06:31:53 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

We're trolling you, dumbass
:lol:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 02, 2014, 06:41:52 PM
Pretty awesome how the libtards have found ethics with a couple power cats compared to the voter id thread and Obama appeals to his base thread.

It's like they actually don't know what ethics are. . .
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 02, 2014, 08:27:51 PM
And I exclusively associate with libtards and moderates  because I enjoy the company of non-piece-of-crap humans

Please don't contribute to the "if someone believes different than me, they are a piece of crap human" rhetoric that makes real grown up discussion around here difficult to achieve. I know you don't mean it.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 02, 2014, 09:34:59 PM
And I exclusively associate with libtards and moderates  because I enjoy the company of non-piece-of-crap humans

Please don't contribute to the "if someone believes different than me, they are a piece of crap human" rhetoric that makes real grown up discussion around here difficult to achieve. I know you don't mean it.
Yeah, pretty lame and dumb to be so simple minded.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 02, 2014, 09:44:52 PM
And I exclusively associate with libtards and moderates  because I enjoy the company of non-piece-of-crap humans

Please don't contribute to the "if someone believes different than me, they are a piece of crap human" rhetoric that makes real grown up discussion around here difficult to achieve. I know you don't mean it.
Yeah, pretty lame and dumb to be so simple minded.

Great point wacky, neocons are lame and dumb and simple-minded. It's very sad but just how it is
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2014, 11:20:17 PM
And I exclusively associate with libtards and moderates  because I enjoy the company of non-piece-of-crap humans

Please don't contribute to the "if someone believes different than me, they are a piece of crap human" rhetoric that makes real grown up discussion around here difficult to achieve. I know you don't mean it.
Yeah, pretty lame and dumb to be so simple minded.

Worth noting that L7 said "neocons." I don't care what judgment rains down on me but I also consider neocons terrible people that I would never associate with.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: ksupamplemousse on November 02, 2014, 11:25:44 PM
That mother rough rider keeps calling me even though I've been a registered voter in Missouri for several years now. Also, I can't remember being more annoyed by an ad campaign before. I'm feeling pretty inclined to believe that he had Snyder kidnapped and forced him to do that video spot at gunpoint in front of a picture of the Vanier complex. eff that guy.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 03, 2014, 09:14:31 AM
Liberals seem to have a very narrow outlook on life. I think Obama has this same affliction.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 03, 2014, 09:30:03 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.



Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 03, 2014, 09:41:19 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 03, 2014, 09:46:29 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.

Neocon is actually a real term that refers to specific views on foreign policy, not conservativism in general. I've tried to explain to the resident libtards that they're not using the term accurately in the context of domestic issues, but oh well... I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word. Libtards are pretty lazy, as a general rule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism)
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 03, 2014, 10:16:20 AM
I know what it actually means . . . and I do find it funny that the resident ProgLibs throw it around because I think about how Glen Greenwald (and others) have written and spoken extensively about how this administration has done the work that PNAC (aka the modern definition of NeoCon) couldn't get finished insofar is propagating U.S. Hegemony/U.S. favorable destabilization throughout the world, particularly in the Middle East.

They did do a flank maneuver recently in allowing the creation of the new "bogey man" and Somalia II (aka Libya).

But I digress.





Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 03, 2014, 10:33:43 AM
Neocons have some very sore bottoms today  :frown:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 03, 2014, 10:45:06 AM
A neocon is a Democrat who believes in god and perpetual war.

The libtards here use it incorrectly constantly and as a defense mechanism to their idiocy, because they can't understand how regular people are able to formulate coherent positions on issues.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 03, 2014, 11:07:42 AM
Once again it doesn't take the resident proglibs long to start tossing about their usual tap out catch phrases.

Sad how limited they are . . . just, sad.

Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 03, 2014, 11:10:03 AM
A neocon is a Democrat who believes in god and perpetual war.

This is pretty much true! :D
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 03, 2014, 11:32:39 AM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 03, 2014, 11:45:51 AM
I feel sad for anyone who is so far extreme on either side. That includes my dad as well. You guys can't even have a normal conversation without having your eyes pop out in rage. Sad, so sad.  :frown:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 03, 2014, 11:46:48 AM
lib's post ignited a firestorm
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 03, 2014, 12:25:17 PM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

Very easy to do this when those beliefs/thoughts make you a piece of crap
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 03, 2014, 12:36:06 PM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

Very easy to do this when those beliefs/thoughts make you a piece of crap
:facepalm:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 03, 2014, 12:41:32 PM
I'm going to assume that since you think all neo-cons are pieces of crap human beings, that you're a dope smoking, living off wellfare, lazy piece of crap then. It's science.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: CNS on November 03, 2014, 12:44:24 PM
Its either one or the other.  Get in line.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 03, 2014, 12:55:58 PM
What's even more sad is the resident proglib support of an administration that in many ways has put the so called neocons to shame . . . at least for a global hegemony perspective.   
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: chuckjames on November 03, 2014, 12:58:42 PM
What's even more sad is the resident proglib support of an administration that in many ways has put the so called neocons to shame . . . at least for a global hegemony perspective.   

A GLOBAL HEGEMONY  :love: It worked in the Ender's Shadow series, why not in real life?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: CNS on November 03, 2014, 01:04:16 PM
Sometimes, early in the morning, when it is dark and cold deep in my voting booth, I find myself wishing that they would stop putting names on the ballot and just let me select Perpetual War, NeoCon, or something.  It would be much easier, imo.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: chuckjames on November 03, 2014, 01:04:45 PM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

FSD and ksuw are nothing more than slackjawed dittoheads incapable of independent thought, this isn't a surprise at all. This isn't a partisan issue but they can't see out of their assess because they think it helps the guy with the R next to his name.

For the record if I lived in Kansas I would not vote for Greg Orman.

Just wondering why you wouldnt vote for Orman?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: kso_FAN on November 03, 2014, 01:07:36 PM
There might not be a person whose political opinions would matter less to me than Coach Snyder's. Its not like that guy has any time to pay attention to anything political anyway; neither Orman nor Roberts are going to help him exploit TCU's defense. Since its in his contract any endorsement was dumb, but other than that I don't really care about this.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: slucat on November 03, 2014, 03:06:58 PM
There might not be a person whose political opinions would matter less to me than Coach Snyder's. Its not like that guy has any time to pay attention to anything political anyway; neither Orman nor Roberts are going to help him exploit TCU's defense. Since its in his contract any endorsement was dumb, but other than that I don't really care about this.

It's basically crummy of Roberts to keep running the ad after KSU and Snyder asked them to stop.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 03, 2014, 03:12:28 PM
Snyder pays attention to politics just like he pays attention to his contracts.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: kso_FAN on November 03, 2014, 03:13:35 PM
There might not be a person whose political opinions would matter less to me than Coach Snyder's. Its not like that guy has any time to pay attention to anything political anyway; neither Orman nor Roberts are going to help him exploit TCU's defense. Since its in his contract any endorsement was dumb, but other than that I don't really care about this.

It's basically crummy of Roberts to keep running the ad after KSU and Snyder asked them to stop.

Probably, but I'd guess 99.9% of politicians would do the same thing.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: RickRampus on November 03, 2014, 03:14:49 PM
yes, I'm sure KSU wishes to remain impartial to this race.  On a different note, Pat Roberts Hall looks pretty amazeballs
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 03, 2014, 06:56:10 PM
I still haven't seen the Snyder Roberts ad.

What a stud combo though  :love:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 03, 2014, 07:31:28 PM
I'm going to assume that since you think all neo-cons are pieces of crap human beings, that you're a dope smoking, living off wellfare, lazy piece of crap then. It's science.

You're going to get the Stone Cold Stunner the next time I see you for talking about my close personal friend, lib^7, like that.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 03, 2014, 07:34:05 PM
I'm going to assume that since you think all neo-cons are pieces of crap human beings, that you're a dope smoking, living off wellfare, lazy piece of crap then. It's science.

You're going to get the Stone Cold Stunner the next time I see you for talking about my close personal friend, lib^7, like that.
:fatty:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 'taterblast on November 03, 2014, 07:38:57 PM
somebody burn this thread. god damnit.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: jmlynch1 on November 03, 2014, 07:42:04 PM
yes, I'm sure KSU wishes to remain impartial to this race.  On a different note, Pat Roberts Hall looks pretty amazeballs
"liberal administration"
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 03, 2014, 08:08:40 PM
If we lose to TCU I'm blaming this distraction. Let me tell you.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 02:54:06 AM
Why am I not shocked that our resident neo-conservative fools are comfortable with the Roberts campaign doing something extremely unprofessional and personally offensive to Coach Snyder. Its clear that the Roberts campaign and our neo-cons here don't value personal integrity.

FSD and ksuw are nothing more than slackjawed dittoheads incapable of independent thought, this isn't a surprise at all. This isn't a partisan issue but they can't see out of their assess because they think it helps the guy with the R next to his name.

For the record if I lived in Kansas I would not vote for Greg Orman.

Just wondering why you wouldnt vote for Orman?

Not a liberal. His views on amnesty are an absolute non-starter for me.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 03:06:30 AM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

This is pretty simple wacky. I'm guessing most people that hate or dislike someone doesn't share the beliefs and values of the person they don't like. Are you willing to befriend a skinhead, because I'm not. Pretty easy to try to climb up on a high horse but people dislike other people for a variety of reasons all of which would be considered silly by someone else.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 03:08:25 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.

It's odd that you think that being a liberal goes hand-in-hand with supporting Obama. I'm guessing you don't talk to very many liberals.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 03:11:30 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.

Neocon is actually a real term that refers to specific views on foreign policy, not conservativism in general. I've tried to explain to the resident libtards that they're not using the term accurately in the context of domestic issues, but oh well... I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word. Libtards are pretty lazy, as a general rule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism)

Hmm thanks for that, I learned something today. The lesson doesn't have the full effect when you do this though

Quote
I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word
Quote
libtards
Quote
libtards
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 04, 2014, 07:16:13 AM
I never said ALL liberals support Obama.

Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 04, 2014, 07:48:11 AM
MIR is such a self righteous ass clown. :zzz:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 04, 2014, 09:01:30 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.

Neocon is actually a real term that refers to specific views on foreign policy, not conservativism in general. I've tried to explain to the resident libtards that they're not using the term accurately in the context of domestic issues, but oh well... I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word. Libtards are pretty lazy, as a general rule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism)

Hmm thanks for that, I learned something today. The lesson doesn't have the full effect when you do this though

Quote
I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word
Quote
libtards
Quote
libtards

You're not understanding the difference, MIR. "Neocon" is a defined term that the libtards on this board routinely misapply. By contrast - the word "libtard" was invented after careful deliberation because it perfectly describes the libtards such as you that inhabit this board. See, it combines the words "liberal" and "tard", because liberals are 'tarded (not "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" which is, of course, offensive). I don't believe there has been a better pairing since the invention of the spork.

This isn't about calling people names. If you call someone a name, don't sound like a dumbass by using the wrong name.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 11:50:50 AM
Neo-Con: (definition)   Anyway who isn't a jack boot zealot supporter of all Obama/ProgLib ideals, policies and proposals.

Neocon is actually a real term that refers to specific views on foreign policy, not conservativism in general. I've tried to explain to the resident libtards that they're not using the term accurately in the context of domestic issues, but oh well... I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word. Libtards are pretty lazy, as a general rule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism)

Hmm thanks for that, I learned something today. The lesson doesn't have the full effect when you do this though

Quote
I guess they just think "neocon" is sufficiently insulting and are too lazy to come up with a different word
Quote
libtards
Quote
libtards

You're not understanding the difference, MIR. "Neocon" is a defined term that the libtards on this board routinely misapply. By contrast - the word "libtard" was invented after careful deliberation because it perfectly describes the libtards such as you that inhabit this board. See, it combines the words "liberal" and "tard", because liberals are 'tarded (not "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" which is, of course, offensive). I don't believe there has been a better pairing since the invention of the spork.

This isn't about calling people names. If you call someone a name, don't sound like a dumbass by using the wrong name.

I was being sincere when I thanked you for the neocon link, I didn't know that. I'm also sincere when laughing at you for calling someone lazy but at the same time thinking you are clever for calling anyone a tard. It's the things like this who make you, you; never change.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 11:53:48 AM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

Add people who think it is clever to call another human a tard to my list of humans who should be sterilized and eventually exterminated.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 04, 2014, 11:54:19 AM
In the getting a good laugh around the office department.   

When the discussion of PedoState came up and part of the discussion was how many in the K-State contingent would react if something like that happened at K-State.   Well, I think you found your answer in the outrage directed at everyone else besides LHC Bill Snyder.

I along with several in the office are most amused by the reaction towards Currie and Schulz.   A clear and direct violation (not to mention extremely public, prolific and potentially damaging) of an employment contract and university policy by the highest profile employee of K-State must be met with an immediate and very public response.   

Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:08:33 PM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

This is pretty simple wacky. I'm guessing most people that hate or dislike someone doesn't share the beliefs and values of the person they don't like. Are you willing to befriend a skinhead, because I'm not. Pretty easy to try to climb up on a high horse but people dislike other people for a variety of reasons all of which would be considered silly by someone else.
Fair. I just hate ppl who are dick heads. Everyone else is usually ok in my book. Oh and lazy pieces of crap that live off the government. I hate those guys too.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2014, 01:25:10 PM
Pretty sad existence to immediately hate someone based off seperate beliefs/thoughts.  :frown:

This is pretty simple wacky. I'm guessing most people that hate or dislike someone doesn't share the beliefs and values of the person they don't like. Are you willing to befriend a skinhead, because I'm not. Pretty easy to try to climb up on a high horse but people dislike other people for a variety of reasons all of which would be considered silly by someone else.
Fair. I just hate ppl who are dick heads. Everyone else is usually ok in my book. Oh and lazy pieces of crap that live off the government. I hate those guys too.

Weren't you living in subsidized housing not long ago?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Tobias on November 04, 2014, 01:29:58 PM
I'm moving into my friends loft in City Market :excited: and I love her loft. My window seal leads to a roof that over looks city market and any concerts that go on down there. Also, it's rent controlled so I claimed my KC sport and social side job and got it for super cheap. :lol:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:32:42 PM
Half the ppl down there do the same thing. The owner of Antons lives there. I don't care. I pay $700 in student loans. It evens up and i was only there for 10 months.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2014, 01:34:55 PM
Half the ppl down there do the same thing. The owner of Antons lives there. I don't care. I pay $700 in student loans. It evens up and i was only there for 10 months.

Half the people scam the system. Half the people are just too poor to live elsewhere. All of them are living off the government.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:36:14 PM
Half the ppl down there do the same thing. The owner of Antons lives there. I don't care. I pay $700 in student loans. It evens up and i was only there for 10 months.

Half the people scam the system. Half the people are just too poor to live elsewhere. All of them are living off the government.
There's a difference between some pot head, food stamper, who doesn't try and get a job vs. someone trying to save a little $, working two jobs, and paying down student loan debt.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Kat Kid on November 04, 2014, 01:42:14 PM
Half the ppl down there do the same thing. The owner of Antons lives there. I don't care. I pay $700 in student loans. It evens up and i was only there for 10 months.

Half the people scam the system. Half the people are just too poor to live elsewhere. All of them are living off the government.
There's a difference between some pot head, food stamper, who doesn't try and get a job vs. someone trying to save a little $.

Actually I don't think there is any difference other than one might be more premeditated.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:42:57 PM
Half the ppl down there do the same thing. The owner of Antons lives there. I don't care. I pay $700 in student loans. It evens up and i was only there for 10 months.

Half the people scam the system. Half the people are just too poor to live elsewhere. All of them are living off the government.
There's a difference between some pot head, food stamper, who doesn't try and get a job vs. someone trying to save a little $.

Actually I don't think there is any difference other than one might be more premeditated.
Well that's how crazy libtards think.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2014, 01:43:15 PM
The food stamper is more honest (possibly also high).
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:44:20 PM
The food stamper is more honest (possibly also high).
What's he doing for society?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Kat Kid on November 04, 2014, 01:53:59 PM
The food stamper is more honest (possibly also high).
What's he doing for society?

You acted unethically.  Own it and move on.  Pointing fingers at other people just makes you look like a sociopath.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2014, 01:54:51 PM
LOL, I thought wacky was saying that bit about freeloaders tongue-in-cheek
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:56:04 PM
LOL, I thought wacky was saying that bit about freeloaders tongue-in-cheek
I wish I had.  :curse:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 01:57:12 PM
This is why I stay out of the pit. I'm not good with politics. Also, i'm really good at tapping out.  :)
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 04, 2014, 01:59:23 PM
The food stamper is more honest (possibly also high).
What's he doing for society?

The point is neither of you deserve subsidized housing, which is correct
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2014, 01:59:43 PM
LOL, I thought wacky was saying that bit about freeloaders tongue-in-cheek

Self-loather.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:04:46 PM
LOL, I thought wacky was saying that bit about freeloaders tongue-in-cheek

Self-loather.
Meh.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:07:41 PM
Seriously, the only reason why I look at lazy pieces of crap in a bad way is because of my roommate in college. I mean, he'd smoke pot, drop out of school, miss work, get fired, sleep in, and wouldn't pay the bills. He would then go on rants about conservatives all the time. He still goes on these rants and blames others for not being successful with his life. He really does shine a bad light for liberals.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2014, 02:12:14 PM
Judging a massive group of people based on one guy you knew in college is a great idea. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2014, 02:12:46 PM
Seriously, the only reason why I look at lazy pieces of crap in a bad way is because of my roommate in college. I mean, he'd smoke pot, drop out of school, miss work, get fired, sleep in, and wouldn't pay the bills. He would then go on rants about conservatives all the time. He still goes on these rants and blames others for not being successful with his life. He really does shine a bad light for liberals.

Is this the guy who took donations for a trip he didn't end up taking?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:13:14 PM
Seriously, the only reason why I look at lazy pieces of crap in a bad way is because of my roommate in college. I mean, he'd smoke pot, drop out of school, miss work, get fired, sleep in, and wouldn't pay the bills. He would then go on rants about conservatives all the time. He still goes on these rants and blames others for not being successful with his life. He really does shine a bad light for liberals.

Is this the guy who took donations for a trip he didn't end up taking?
Yes.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:13:47 PM
Judging a massive group of people based on one guy you knew in college is a great idea.
I've had other experiences. He just takes the cake.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2014, 02:16:45 PM
Judging a massive group of people based on one guy you knew in college is a great idea.
I've had other experiences. He just takes the cake.

I don't personally know anyone on government aid.  Though according to sd some farmers I've met might have been. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:20:39 PM
Judging a massive group of people based on one guy you knew in college is a great idea.
I've had other experiences. He just takes the cake.

I don't personally know anyone on government aid.  Though according to sd some farmers I've met might have been.
I have a side of my family that i'm not big fans of. They're literally waiting for my grandma to die so they can go picket her farm and they live off the government on their crap farms. Obviously, i'm not perfect either, but I was really good at telling myself I deserved it cause of my situation.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2014, 02:22:30 PM
I mean I just don't have the personal experiences necessary to really stoke my rage furnace on this issue.  I need to get out there and mix it up I guess. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:23:15 PM
Fair enough.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:26:11 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2014, 02:27:30 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

That doesn't sound like a good point at all.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Tobias on November 04, 2014, 02:28:08 PM
yes, sounds like a horrible point as presented
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Spracne on November 04, 2014, 02:29:13 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

I haven't seen the tweets.  Who is he saying people should vote for?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2014, 02:29:35 PM
Fair enough.

Like I see people in my daily life that are on public aid and their lives are absolute crap.  So it doesn't really make me all that mad at them.  I'd much rather have to work.  They aren't really "winning" if that's what they're choosing, assuming they are in fact choosing. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 02:30:49 PM
I guess you had to hear it.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 02:45:05 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

That's really dumb.

Kietzman is letting his feelings about Roberts/Orman cloud his judgment with his issue. Last week he mocked Orman on air.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2014, 02:57:29 PM
Consciously or unconsciously, he has been transitioning to a more old balsey and white midwesterney personality for some time.  I don't find him entertaining anymore.  He plays a poor troll anymore. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Kat Kid on November 04, 2014, 02:58:28 PM
BITB still applies because of the second B, but Keitz is on notice.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2014, 03:05:33 PM
He isn't even the BITBuilding anymore, imo.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2014, 03:08:43 PM
I know who BITB's mom votes for. The KC Royals. Same as me.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 04, 2014, 03:16:02 PM
He isn't even the BITBuilding anymore, imo.

He has become horrible.  I've listened to more 610 lately than I ever thought I would.  Sometimes I want to stab my eyes when I listen to him. 
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 03:22:58 PM
He isn't even the BITBuilding anymore, imo.

He has become horrible.  I've listened to more 610 lately than I ever thought I would.  Sometimes I want to stab my eyes when I listen to him.
I've started listening to 810 commercials over flipping back to 610 cause I can't stand all the herpa derping they've got going on in the morning.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2014, 06:55:25 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

Very interesting
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 04, 2014, 07:25:51 PM
People that like 610 have dinkmentia
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Asteriskhead on November 04, 2014, 09:27:19 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

Are you really not able to figure out the difference?
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Spracne on November 04, 2014, 09:28:57 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

Are you really not able to figure out the difference?
Interesting stuff, if tru
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: chum1 on November 04, 2014, 10:01:18 PM
Of course, a forum full of democratards isn't going to have any issues with an endorsement of voting.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2014, 10:18:54 PM
Roberts won Riley county, because of Bill.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 04, 2014, 10:21:56 PM
Roberts won Riley county, because of Bill.

Power Move
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 04, 2014, 10:46:50 PM
Our coach decided the whole damn thing.

Btw, this had better guarangoddamtee that NBAF is fully and finally funded
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 11:07:21 PM
BITB is making a really good point that our school president shouldn't be allowed to tweet ppl to vote if Snyder can't speak his mind on a party either. Interesting stuff.

Are you really not able to figure out the difference?
Uh ya. I know the difference. It was good radio tho. Cause he was trolling hard. Smartass.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2014, 11:09:37 PM
Our coach decided the whole damn thing.

Btw, this had better guarangoddamtee that NBAF is fully and finally funded

I bet he votes against it at least one more time.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2014, 11:10:42 PM
I still think the head of the journalism school/professor is a hypacrite. He can tweet/Facebook his agendas on display for his students, but bitches about Bill making a stance? Uh, OK!
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2014, 11:19:59 PM
Guys I just googled Pat Roberts. If you had asked me who is older, Snyder or Roberts, I would've said Snyder. Turns out its Roberts. Wow. Roberts is older than old.


That dude is old with a capital O-L-D
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 04, 2014, 11:48:06 PM
Our coach decided the whole damn thing.

Btw, this had better guarangoddamtee that NBAF is fully and finally funded

I bet he votes against it at least one more time.

He wouldn't dare.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Cire on November 05, 2014, 05:40:51 AM
Our coach decided the whole damn thing.

Btw, this had better guarangoddamtee that NBAF is fully and finally funded


More likely that it gets cut
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 05, 2014, 08:41:29 AM
Our coach decided the whole damn thing.

Btw, this had better guarangoddamtee that NBAF is fully and finally funded


More likely that it gets cut

No. No need now that they don't have to attach broad cuts to shitty dem bills just to get a crumb.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: EMAWican on November 05, 2014, 10:32:56 AM
Guys I just googled Pat Roberts. If you had asked me who is older, Snyder or Roberts, I would've said Snyder. Turns out its Roberts. Wow. Roberts is older than old.


That dude is old with a capital O-L-D

Once O-L-D Balls dies the 1st District will go back to being pud and the 2nd will become a monster.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: chunkles on November 20, 2014, 12:23:52 AM
There might not be a person whose political opinions would matter less to me than Coach Snyder's. Its not like that guy has any time to pay attention to anything political anyway; neither Orman nor Roberts are going to help him exploit TCU's defense. Since its in his contract any endorsement was dumb, but other than that I don't really care about this.

yeah, about that...

can confirm the dude rocks out to some 'fair and balanced' while scheming.
Title: Re: Snyder endorses Roberts
Post by: Trim on November 23, 2014, 12:25:12 PM
Well, our guy won't get hoodwinked again.

http://youtu.be/O-oag-Gw2q8