goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: 420seriouscat69 on October 18, 2014, 02:37:56 PM
-
Line up boys! :)
-
This should go well, I'm half :facepalm: and half :popcorn:
-
:confused:
-
So happy for you and Jake
-
WATERS, D' BLOCKER AND SEXY CURRY WON THIS GAME. :dance:
-
Waters for heisman :driving:
-
WATERS, D' BLOCKER AND SEXY CURRY WON THIS GAME. :dance:
D was great KD so happy for you and your guy too
-
GET THEM FANNING!!!!
-
Wonder why #crap isn't posting. :whistle1:
-
I would love for jake to apologize
-
GET THEM FANNING!!!!
Two peas in a $ rough ridin' pos!
-
WC don't be mad at me bud. Its a #1Cat day.
We just beat OU. Lets party.
-
It's hard to party on a board that is against our #1 QB, and has little faith in our team.
-
WC don't be mad at me bud. Its a #1Cat day.
We just beat OU. Lets party.
I agree bud. :driving: #1stinthebig12
-
he threw for 225 yards. that's pretty good.
-
But as you so keenly observed in the past, Knight's better, right?
he threw for 225 yards. that's pretty good.
-
Line up boys! :)
:cheers:
EMAW is so blessed to have Jake.
-
But as you so keenly observed in the past, Knight's better, right?
he threw for 225 yards. that's pretty good.
well he did go 26/32 for 318 yards and 3 TDs with 1 int and put his team in position to win the game so i would say he might be better yes.
-
Dumbass
-
The eff are we apologizing for? Good performances do not negate previous poor performances. Does your brain even work?
-
Dumbass
You got to forgive Kimmy; it's hard to think straight when you're chewing on a shitstick. :D
-
But as you so keenly observed in the past, Knight's better, right?
he threw for 225 yards. that's pretty good.
well he did go 26/32 for 318 yards and 3 TDs with 1 int and put his team in position to win the game so i would say he might be better yes.
Just a product of us respecting their run game.O and that int lost the game for them
-
The eff are we apologizing for? Good performances do not negate previous poor performances. Does your brain even work?
when it means beating OU they sure the eff do
-
i want an apology from everyone who clogs my social media with sams/waters crap.
-
The eff are we apologizing for? Good performances do not negate previous poor performances. Does your brain even work?
when it means beating OU they sure the eff do
Please don't ever procreate.
-
i mean, if their kicker makes that FG we probably lose. more than anything, we got incredibly lucky which has nothing to do with jake. we scored 10 rough ridin' points in the second half and 0 points in the fourth quarter with jake as our QB. not exactly a clutch performance.
-
i mean, if their kicker makes that FG we probably lose. more than anything, we got incredibly lucky which has nothing to do with jake. we scored 10 rough ridin' points in the second half and 0 points in the fourth quarter with jake as our QB. not exactly a clutch performance.
So we could have won this game with Hubener?
-
Seek psychiatric help wacky
-
i mean, if their kicker makes that FG we probably lose. more than anything, we got incredibly lucky which has nothing to do with jake. we scored 10 rough ridin' points in the second half and 0 points in the fourth quarter with jake as our QB. not exactly a clutch performance.
So we should have beat Auburn. Good to know.
-
i mean, if their kicker makes that FG we probably lose. more than anything, we got incredibly lucky which has nothing to do with jake. we scored 10 rough ridin' points in the second half and 0 points in the fourth quarter with jake as our QB. not exactly a clutch performance.
So we should have beat Auburn. Good to know.
ksu_FAN, Kimmy doesn't even know he stepped on his dick. :whistle1:
-
Jake wasn't good 1st half of last year. He deserved some criticism.
He is comp 66.3%, has 1048 total yds 10 TDs and Zero TOs in our 3-0 Big12 start. He didn't win this game by himself, but he's been pretty darn good and pretty damn gritty
-
Jake wasn't good 1st half of last year. He deserved some criticism.
He is comp 66.3%, has 1048 total yds 10 TDs and Zero TOs in our 3-0 Big12 start. He didn't win this game by himself, but he's been pretty darn good and pretty damn gritty
Jake isn't always very pretty, but he's pretty damn good. IMHO.
-
The eff are we apologizing for? Good performances do not negate previous poor performances. Does your brain even work?
Dumbass response by a handicap. :love: Go Jake, Go!!!
-
i mean, if their kicker makes that FG we probably lose. more than anything, we got incredibly lucky which has nothing to do with jake. we scored 10 rough ridin' points in the second half and 0 points in the fourth quarter with jake as our QB. not exactly a clutch performance.
So we should have beat Auburn. Good to know.
my argument is that jake didn't do anything spectacular today and that this thread is weird
-
this thread is weird
True.
-
The eff are we apologizing for? Good performances do not negate previous poor performances. Does your brain even work?
Dumbass response by a handicap. :love: Go Jake, Go!!!
you're not making any sense.
-
Jake is s beast
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.fjcdn.com%2Fgifs%2FHaters_bdc86a_1591976.gif&hash=abdbdb446fc968d0310afb454c976c7ee2c80da2)
-
my argument is that jake didn't do anything spectacular today and that this thread is weird
He played really well. That's about it.
-
i think he's saying you're a respect, metalhead
-
Is there a different thread for people who thought Waters was the best choice and is a decent QB and all the haters are a bunch of dumbshits? Maybe I'll just lurk here for a while. :gocho:
-
Jake wasn't good 1st half of last year. He deserved some criticism.
He is comp 66.3%, has 1048 total yds 10 TDs and Zero TOs in our 3-0 Big12 start. He didn't win this game by himself, but he's been pretty darn good and pretty damn gritty
Jake isn't always very pretty, but he's pretty damn good. IMHO.
:thumbs:
-
i want an apology from everyone who clogs my social media with sams/waters crap.