goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 05:32:20 PM

Title: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 05:32:20 PM
 :cheese:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 05:35:38 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: wetwillie on September 21, 2014, 05:56:17 PM
UT at -16 feels like a suckers bet. 
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 06:07:10 PM
UT at -16 feels like a suckers bet.

Agreed. I don't think they can set the total low enough either. 16 points is a ton in a 20-10 game
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 21, 2014, 06:08:30 PM
Is UTEP really shitty again?
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: kslim on September 21, 2014, 07:22:30 PM
Is UTEP really shitty again?
my question as well, 31 points is a ton vs a d1 school
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: star seed 7 on September 21, 2014, 07:27:10 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

utep
have no idea on tech/osu
ut
smu
baylor
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 08:28:16 PM
Yes, UTEP is that bad. With that said, I doubt we cover that.

Also, don't underestimate how truly awful SMU is. They lost to UNT 43-6

Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Big Sam on September 21, 2014, 08:38:02 PM
Is UTEP really shitty again?

Edged New Mexico and New Mexico State.  Barely lost to Texas Tech.

Either UTEP has plummeted a lot in the past week, or KSU's performance vs. Auburn actually gained some respect from the betting community and thus they have to set a high line to get action on the Miners.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: eastcat on September 21, 2014, 09:05:03 PM
The Baylor line is money
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 21, 2014, 09:32:24 PM
The Baylor line is money

We will play ISU if we play it at all.  Night game in Ames, on grass, potentially shitty weather and Bear has UT on deck.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: catzacker on September 21, 2014, 09:44:07 PM
no f'ing way we cover that spread.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 21, 2014, 10:49:55 PM
Apparently UTEP really sucks at passing and defense.  They have a guy averaging about 180 yards rushing per game though.

Auburn ultra - lite?
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 21, 2014, 11:06:14 PM
would not bet, but if i did it would be on kstate.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: SdK on September 21, 2014, 11:23:35 PM
KSU covers.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bookcat on September 22, 2014, 10:15:52 AM
making a phone call for the Baylor game RIGHT NOW...!!
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Pete on September 22, 2014, 11:56:30 AM
I like that KU to cover.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 22, 2014, 12:19:41 PM
I'd bet on ISU and SMU but I never bet on games so its not like I know what I'm talking about
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2014, 12:21:15 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2014, 12:32:12 PM
I'd bet on ISU and SMU but I never bet on games so its not like I know what I'm talking about

If you're judging by this seasons results only SMU is the worst team in the FBS.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 22, 2014, 12:46:33 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2014, 01:02:07 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 22, 2014, 01:05:04 PM
I don't like Texas -16 because I think Texas is a pretty bad football team. They are going to be looking past KU and they aren't good enough to be looking past anybody. It's the Kansas Jayhawks and they are coached by Chuck Weis, so it wouldn't be surprising to see them lose by 50, but if they play a good game, I think they are capable of beating Texas.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 22, 2014, 01:05:07 PM
yeah UTEP is not that bad at all, and just had a bye week, and we just got our hearts ripped out by that guy with the sweater vest
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 22, 2014, 01:09:34 PM


ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+

Maybe they will... I haven't bet it yet but IF I do, I'm taking ISU.   Strange crap happens up there at night.  I was stunned that they hung with us the last two times, I was stunned when they upset oSu 3 yrs ago, I was stunned when they took UT to the wire last fall, etc., etc., etc.

You might very well be right, however with Baylor in a look-ahead spot on natural grass in front of a bunch of drunk corn-farmers is not the ideal spot to give 3TD's IMHO.

Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: kslim on September 22, 2014, 01:56:14 PM
looks like they have a stud circa 2010 lance dunbar (unt)

Aaron Jones   69   549   8.0   73 (TD)   7
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Gooch on September 22, 2014, 05:08:08 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+
Maybe Baylors WBB coach dies in a plane crash and the team will be all distracted.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2014, 06:13:18 PM
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+
Maybe Baylors WBB coach dies in a plane crash and the team will be all distracted.

That would be a much bigger deal than when it happened to Kurt Budke. Sorry people who know the Budke's, just speaking the truth here.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 22, 2014, 07:44:47 PM
I find MiR's irrational bias against ISU bizarre. They suck, but they aren't KU terrible. I think they're clearly better than KU and Ttech, both who have far worse defenses.

Also, UT is not nearly as bad as you mongoloids make them out to be. They lost to BYU and UCLA with a new QB and a first year coach. They'll improve as the year moves along. Their game against KU isn't going to be competitive. KU's offense is LOL terrible.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on September 22, 2014, 08:04:16 PM
Do you dumbasses realize the talent gap between Texas and KU? KU isn't going to cover.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Tobias on September 22, 2014, 08:08:57 PM
last game in lawrence was 21-17 - this could be one of the more compelling games of the weekend
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2014, 08:28:45 PM
I find MiR's irrational bias against ISU bizarre. They suck, but they aren't KU terrible. I think they're clearly better than KU and Ttech, both who have far worse defenses.

Also, UT is not nearly as bad as you mongoloids make them out to be. They lost to BYU and UCLA with a new QB and a first year coach. They'll improve as the year moves along. Their game against KU isn't going to be competitive. KU's offense is LOL terrible.

They're better than KU, they aren't better than Tech. I wouldn't pick UT to cover -16 against ISU either, I'm not confident that UT's offense can score enough against any Big 12 defense to cover that. Baylor has the best offense in the country, I'll pick them to cover every spread until they don't.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on September 22, 2014, 08:50:10 PM


ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+

Maybe they will... I haven't bet it yet but IF I do, I'm taking ISU.   Strange crap happens up there at night.  I was stunned that they hung with us the last two times, I was stunned when they upset oSu 3 yrs ago, I was stunned when they took UT to the wire last fall, etc., etc., etc.

You might very well be right, however with Baylor in a look-ahead spot on natural grass in front of a bunch of drunk corn-farmers is not the ideal spot to give 3TD's IMHO.
I agree with this. ISU grass is going to be long as crap and it fucks we everybody. Nobody can make a cut on that shitty field.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 22, 2014, 10:15:47 PM
Do you dumbasses realize the talent gap between Texas and KU? KU isn't going to cover.

What about the decided schematic advantage that Mr. Superbowlrings brings to the table?

 :dunno:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Prince McJunkins on September 22, 2014, 10:52:08 PM
It's already down to 26.5
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 08:54:32 AM
should have got it at -31 (-26.5 is still LOL tho)
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 23, 2014, 09:36:12 AM
should have got it at -31 (-26.5 is still LOL tho)

You're not laying the points are you?!?!   :sdeek:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 09:52:43 AM
oh hale library no
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 09:53:40 AM
It will be a close game. -31 is hilarious. i was saying -26.5 is still hilarious
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 23, 2014, 09:59:04 AM
It will be a close game. -31 is hilarious. i was saying -26.5 is still hilarious

Gotcha.  your flip/flopped use of the +/- threw me off. 

I grabbed it at 30.5 before the real free fall began.  If it continues to fall, I may look to middle half of it.

 :dunno:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 10:01:55 AM
oh yes, i see how that would be confusing
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: The1BigWillie on September 23, 2014, 10:29:47 AM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: TownieCat on September 23, 2014, 10:35:12 AM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

KU is pretty bad, but UT shouldn't be favored by that much vs. anybody on the road.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 23, 2014, 10:56:36 AM
I think Duke is better than UT.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 23, 2014, 11:39:28 AM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

Looking ahead to their game with Baylor during ku's "super bowl" can't be beneficial I wouldn't think...
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: meow meow on September 23, 2014, 11:43:39 AM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

Looking ahead to their game with Baylor during ku's "super bowl" can't be beneficial I wouldn't think...

pretty sure ku's super bowl is played on Thanksgiving weekend now.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: kslim on September 23, 2014, 11:44:10 AM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

Looking ahead to their game with Baylor during ku's "super bowl" can't be beneficial I wouldn't think...

pretty sure ku's super bowl is played on Thanksgiving weekend now.
yep. texas just has to show up and they cover
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 12:31:25 PM
what if texas doesn't show up?
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: kslim on September 23, 2014, 12:57:45 PM
what if texas doesn't show up?
they forfeit??
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on September 23, 2014, 01:06:56 PM
Duke would be the 2nd best team in the Big 12 and they'd smash Texas.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on September 23, 2014, 01:56:12 PM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

Looking ahead to their game with Baylor during ku's "super bowl" can't be beneficial I wouldn't think...

pretty sure ku's super bowl is played on Thanksgiving weekend now.

I'll retract to "ku's AFC championship game".

 :Carl:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Panjandrum on September 23, 2014, 02:00:30 PM
Duke would be the 2nd best team in the Big 12 and they'd smash Texas.

I know you're trolling, but it would have been better if you would have said 3rd.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 23, 2014, 02:05:06 PM
How does UT not cover at least 20 vs KU?  Could Duke really beat UT?

Looking ahead to their game with Baylor during ku's "super bowl" can't be beneficial I wouldn't think...

pretty sure ku's super bowl is played on Thanksgiving weekend now.

I'll retract to "ku's AFC championship game".

 :Carl:

It's their Orange Bowl.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: TownieCat on September 23, 2014, 02:29:24 PM
Duke would be the 2nd best team in the Big 12 and they'd smash Texas.

I know you're trolling, but it would have been better if you would have said 3rd.

It's ERiI so shitty posting should be expected.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: mocat on September 23, 2014, 02:32:27 PM
Ell To Pay was way better
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: SdK on September 23, 2014, 02:33:57 PM
I'm starting to think Ell was guilty guys :frown:
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: meow meow on September 23, 2014, 02:34:37 PM
Ell Toupee was the best
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: SleepFighter on September 27, 2014, 03:46:22 PM
Oh man. That last dropped punt sure had the potential to affect the status of some farms.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: ChiComCat on September 27, 2014, 06:30:49 PM
Oh man. That last dropped punt sure had the potential to affect the status of some farms.

Cantele was paid off
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: CHONGS on September 27, 2014, 06:53:48 PM
You know we just might drop out of the top 25 this weekend. (serious).
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: CHONGS on September 27, 2014, 06:56:53 PM
Might need Illinois to win to  keep us in.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: wetwillie on September 27, 2014, 07:16:04 PM
Doesn't matter.  We will be ushered out in two weeks when Oklahoma gives it to us with no lube in norman.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2014, 10:51:42 PM
Art Briles has no interest in making sure Baylor covers this spread. Not sure who quit harder the 4th quarter, he or Snydes.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Katpappy on September 27, 2014, 11:04:21 PM
Art Briles has no interest in making sure Baylor covers this spread. Not sure who quit harder the 4th quarter, he or Snydes.
The bad person had his team driving for a TD in the last minute of the game, when they are up by 21.  Do you really want to compare him to "Snydes"
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2014, 11:14:42 PM
Art Briles has no interest in making sure Baylor covers this spread. Not sure who quit harder the 4th quarter, he or Snydes.
The bad person had his team driving for a TD in the last minute of the game, when they are up by 21.  Do you really want to compare him to "Snydes"

He ran the ball on every play with backups and didn't use his timeouts you dimwitted ignoramus. You know who else did that today? If he wanted to score he would have. Keep your dumbassedry to that other thread you're browning up.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Katpappy on September 27, 2014, 11:19:48 PM
Art Briles has no interest in making sure Baylor covers this spread. Not sure who quit harder the 4th quarter, he or Snydes.
The bad person had his team driving for a TD in the last minute of the game, when they are up by 21.  Do you really want to compare him to "Snydes"

He ran the ball on every play with backups and didn't use his timeouts you dimwitted ignoramus. You know who else did that today? If he wanted to score he would have. Keep your dumbassedry to that other thread you're browning up.
The fucks could haved knelled like good sportsmanship dictates. Dumbass.
Title: Re: UTEP +31
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2014, 11:22:57 PM
browning up.

:lol: