goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: p1k3 on January 09, 2014, 10:46:10 PM

Title: Christie
Post by: p1k3 on January 09, 2014, 10:46:10 PM
I said this dude was a POS like 20 years ago. What a sack of crap tho, amirite?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2014, 10:48:46 PM
The worst
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: p1k3 on January 09, 2014, 10:51:15 PM
He personifies the problem with the GOP. Like, all the R's at my Thxgiving and xmas family get togethers were saying that Christie was "the man" because he knows how to get elected. That may or may not be true, until now. He's a fat rough ridin' slob that personifies the entire Republican party.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2014, 10:58:36 PM
This is bigger and more repugnant than any scandal since watergate.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: sys on January 09, 2014, 11:21:19 PM
great at making fun of people in town hall meetings.  i'll always love him for that.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Headinjun on January 09, 2014, 11:21:40 PM
It sucks. I was really starting to like the guy.

I had actually daydreamed of voting for the guy, and I ain't no rightie.

Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 09, 2014, 11:24:43 PM
This is bigger and more repugnant than any scandal since watergate.

Wow. Really? Worse than, say, using the IRS to target your political enemies? Worse than repeatedly lying and bribing senators to ram through your crap sandwich signature legislation? I could go through a whole litany of thuggish political moves Obama has made - but obstructing a bridge is "the worst." :lol:

Anyway, can't disagree that what Christie did was thuggish - and he's full of crap trying to blame his aide - just like Obama's Sergeant Schultz routine.

Most republicans, however, got tired of Christie a long time ago. He's a self-aggrandizing RINO who's unelectable to boot. It was fun when he was trashing the unions, but a serious presidential contender? 
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 09, 2014, 11:25:46 PM
It sucks. I was really starting to like the guy.

I had actually daydreamed of voting for the guy, and I ain't no rightie.

Thank you for making my point. Quite a "conservative." :lol:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Headinjun on January 09, 2014, 11:44:19 PM
It sucks. I was really starting to like the guy.

I had actually daydreamed of voting for the guy, and I ain't no rightie.

Thank you for making my point. Quite a "conservative." :lol:

Probably your only chance.

How you gonna spend the eight years after Obama?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 09, 2014, 11:58:51 PM
It sucks. I was really starting to like the guy.

I had actually daydreamed of voting for the guy, and I ain't no rightie.

Thank you for making my point. Quite a "conservative." :lol:

Probably your only chance.

How you gonna spend the eight years after Obama?

Hopefully recovering from the previous eight years. :babywillie:

LOL that this is even a scandal. The "investigative reporters" have already spent more time on this than the IRS political targeting. Oh my, a traffic jam!  :lol:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 12:07:27 AM
This actually affected people.

Lol at all the gE neorepublicons thinking this is a-ok.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 12:14:09 AM
This actually affected people.

Lol at all the gE neorepublicons thinking this is a-ok.

Rogue employee. At least Christie fired the responsible party. Obama puts them on paid leave then elevates them to a better job as a reward.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 12:54:48 AM
Fwiw, I don't think he actually ordered this. Smells like an underling trying to impress the boss in a stupid way.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: sys on January 10, 2014, 02:06:36 AM
Lol at all the gE neorepublicons thinking this is a-ok.

it's ok because it's what i would do, if i could.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: steve dave on January 10, 2014, 04:56:44 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2014, 08:54:15 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Otherwise it's Hillary city.   :frown:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: p1k3 on January 10, 2014, 09:06:45 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Otherwise it's Hillary city.   :frown:

She'll ruin us for good. Finish off Barry's work.   :frown:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 09:26:05 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Unless it's proven that he knew, this will go away, and could be an asset for the way he handled it.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: steve dave on January 10, 2014, 09:45:44 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Unless it's proven that he knew, this will go away, and could be an asset for the way he handled it.

HOPE SO
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 10, 2014, 09:51:51 AM
Fwiw, I don't think he actually ordered this. Smells like an underling trying to impress the boss in a stupid way.

Yes. If not for the whole 91 year old dying thing (and I mean, let's be real), this would be a stud prank to pull.

"Oh, you're not going to support us? Hmm. warm up the traffic jam motherfuckers"
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2014, 10:52:36 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Unless it's proven that he knew, this will go away, and could be an asset for the way he handled it.

Extremely courageous to crap can everyone, deny knowledge. 
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on January 10, 2014, 11:02:35 AM
Has it been said how incredibly stupid his team is for ordering this through email?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: mocat on January 10, 2014, 11:21:47 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fwww.theminorityreportblog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2FBenghzi-vs.-Christie-Sacndel.jpg%3Fw%3D700&hash=b5230be76c63cb009269de82a7089162c26576dc)
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: mocat on January 10, 2014, 11:22:15 AM
steve dave, that's ^ from the dark knight (a movie that is not up in the air)
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 11:26:33 AM
The right is going to have to find someone electable ASAP :(

Unless it's proven that he knew, this will go away, and could be an asset for the way he handled it.

Extremely courageous to crap can everyone, deny knowledge.

Should he take full responsibility and resign?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: 8manpick on January 10, 2014, 11:28:07 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 11:30:50 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 11:36:36 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 11:39:34 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

Being delayed at an airport where you can go to the bar to pound some suds is a whole lot different than having to sit in your car.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2014, 11:40:52 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

One is necessary, the other is a political dick move that fucks the citizens of his own state.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 11:45:10 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

Being delayed at an airport where you can go to the bar to pound some suds is a whole lot different than having to sit in your car.

Freeways too NK.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 11:49:36 AM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

One is necessary, the other is a political dick move that fucks the citizens of his own state.

I agree with you.

I'm waiting for proof that he issued the order or even knew about it after the fact. After watching some of his press conference, I'm convinced he had no idea.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 11:51:57 AM
Fwiw, I don't think he actually ordered this. Smells like an underling trying to impress the boss in a stupid way.

I can't believe I'm more skeptical than you on this. Don't be naive. Christie absolutely knew what was going on. It was petty thugishness, plain and simple. And yet, it still doesn't rise to the level of some of the crap Obama has done.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 11:54:07 AM
Maybe there's a level-headed republican somewhere out there that is actually better than Obama. :dunno:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 01:15:26 PM
Maybe there's a level-headed republican somewhere out there that is actually better than Obama. :dunno:

There is. His name is Mitt Romney. Oh yeah, apparently he's got a car elevator, put his dog on the roof of his car, and only managed to save the majority of the businesses he took over while at Bain Capital, so he's the devil.

Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio would also be tremendous improvements. I could go on.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Unruly on January 10, 2014, 01:16:28 PM
Maybe there's a level-headed republican somewhere out there that is actually better than Obama. :dunno:

There is. His name is Mitt Romney. Oh yeah, apparently he's got a car elevator, put his dog on the roof of his car, and only managed to save the majority of the businesses he took over while at Bain Capital, so he's the devil.

Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio would also be tremendous improvements. I could go on.

He also wanted to spend 5 trillion on a new armada when the navy wasn't asking for it.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: steve dave on January 10, 2014, 01:19:30 PM

Maybe there's a level-headed republican somewhere out there that is actually better than Obama. :dunno:

There is. His name is Mitt Romney. Oh yeah, apparently he's got a car elevator, put his dog on the roof of his car, and only managed to save the majority of the businesses he took over while at Bain Capital, so he's the devil.

Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio would also be tremendous improvements. I could go on.

You're gonna have to go on until you find a viable candidate because those losers are dead in the water :(
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 01:23:05 PM

Maybe there's a level-headed republican somewhere out there that is actually better than Obama. :dunno:

There is. His name is Mitt Romney. Oh yeah, apparently he's got a car elevator, put his dog on the roof of his car, and only managed to save the majority of the businesses he took over while at Bain Capital, so he's the devil.

Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio would also be tremendous improvements. I could go on.

You're gonna have to go on until you find a viable candidate because those losers are dead in the water :(

That wasn't the question. After Romney overwhelmingly carried independents but still lost the election, I'm not really sure what a "viable candidate" is anymore.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2014, 01:29:52 PM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

One is necessary, the other is a political dick move that fucks the citizens of his own state.

I agree with you.

I'm waiting for proof that he issued the order or even knew about it after the fact. After watching some of his press conference, I'm convinced he had no idea.

Not being able to manage or control his own staff is not very Presidential.  No thanks.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 01:48:22 PM
I guess I'm pretty desensitized at this point, don't think this is that big or surprising a deal

Traffic was delayed 4 hours. If I had to go through that, I would be ready to judge his ass.

Every time the president lands his plane this happens.

One is necessary, the other is a political dick move that fucks the citizens of his own state.

I agree with you.

I'm waiting for proof that he issued the order or even knew about it after the fact. After watching some of his press conference, I'm convinced he had no idea.

Not being able to manage or control his own staff is not very Presidential.  No thanks.

Agree. He obviously gave her too much authority. She was like his Valerie Jarrett.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: ChiComCat on January 10, 2014, 02:46:36 PM
This doesn't eliminate him from the Presidency.  Plenty of politicians come back from much worse than this
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 02:48:22 PM
This doesn't eliminate him from the Presidency.  Plenty of politicians come back from much worse than this

Who?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: ChiComCat on January 10, 2014, 02:52:26 PM
This doesn't eliminate him from the Presidency.  Plenty of politicians come back from much worse than this

Who?

Bill Clinton kept rolling like a stud boss.  Who was the guy cheating on his wife with the South American and then getting elected to congress?  That guy.  Marion Barry did crack and nobody GAF.  A little tougher when its the presidency, but Christie just needs to fire some people.  Blame them but also say thats no excuse and pretend to take responsibility.  In 2 years anybody still bitching about it will come across every bit as stupid and partisan as the Benghazi/IRS crowd.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
none of those things actually affected voters.  most people are able to separate sex scandals or drug scandals from "the job" because it doesn't affect policy.  actively rough ridin' over thousands of innocent people because of a slight so small as a mayor not endorsing the governor is pretty rough ridin' hard to separate from "the job".
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: ChiComCat on January 10, 2014, 03:04:23 PM
none of those things actually affected voters.  most people are able to separate sex scandals or drug scandals from "the job" because it doesn't affect policy.  actively rough ridin' over thousands of innocent people because of a slight so small as a mayor not endorsing the governor is pretty rough ridin' hard to separate from "the job".

Ted Kennedy rough ridin' killed someone.  Granted, that doesn't effect policy but he came back from that.  Pretty unreal what you can come back from.  Don't get me wrong, this hurts Christie, but its not a career ender.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 03:04:36 PM
I think Christie was already going to have some trouble getting out of the primary. He could still become president, but I'm not sure if there is enough time for him to shake this before the next election. I also think Bill Clinton would have struggled mightily if he had to run for president immediately after the Lewinsky affair was made public.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 03:06:57 PM
I'd still vote for Christie if I had to because I'm a pragmatist, but I wouldn't like it. I'd rather vote for a decent human being. But that's just me.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 03:09:36 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 03:16:50 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

yup.  as you grow up, you realize that the way our government is set up, nothing really gets done, so might as well have good people in office.  would be interesting if the neocons introduced a candidate that was a good human.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 03:21:17 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

Huh, from your posts I would have thought you voted for Obama.  :surprised:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 03:21:31 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

yup.  as you grow up, you realize that the way our government is set up, nothing really gets done, so might as well have good people in office.  would be interesting if the neocons introduced a candidate that was a good human.

We did. You obviously didn't vote for him. Not sure what else to tell you.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 03:24:42 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

Huh, from your posts I would have thought you voted for Obama.  :surprised:

I voted for Gary Johnson.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 03:27:25 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

yup.  as you grow up, you realize that the way our government is set up, nothing really gets done, so might as well have good people in office.  would be interesting if the neocons introduced a candidate that was a good human.

We did. You obviously didn't vote for him. Not sure what else to tell you.

who?

neocon philosophy kind of goes against the good human thing, so i'm not sure if it's possible.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 03:29:27 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

yup.  as you grow up, you realize that the way our government is set up, nothing really gets done, so might as well have good people in office.  would be interesting if the neocons introduced a candidate that was a good human.

We did. You obviously didn't vote for him. Not sure what else to tell you.

I really liked Mitt at first, before he started saying things that made me believe him to be an elitist prick. He was hands down the best person out of the republican candidates. It was sort of a tossup between him and Obama.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 10, 2014, 03:30:44 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

yup.  as you grow up, you realize that the way our government is set up, nothing really gets done, so might as well have good people in office.  would be interesting if the neocons introduced a candidate that was a good human.

We did. You obviously didn't vote for him. Not sure what else to tell you.

who?

neocon philosophy kind of goes against the good human thing, so i'm not sure if it's possible.

Seriously man, you need to stop using the "neocon" label. Makes you sound like a dumbass (well, more so). And I would argue (but I'm just an evil conservative) that liberalism has been far more harmful to poor people than conservatism.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on January 10, 2014, 03:32:47 PM
I voted for Gary Johnson.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 03:35:41 PM
I voted for Gary Johnson.

 :thumbs:

i can get on that train.  very good human.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 03:41:59 PM
I always just vote for whoever I believe is the best human being.

Huh, from your posts I would have thought you voted for Obama.  :surprised:

I voted for Gary Johnson.

Well, that makes sense for the way you voted, but not for the way you post. You seem very anti-Johnson with your liberal views.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 03:46:27 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 04:10:37 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 04:18:55 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.

What does any of that have to do with which candidate is the better person?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 04:28:27 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.

What does any of that have to do with which candidate is the better person?

So you will vote for a politician that would destroy the economy just because you think he's a good person?

People with Down syndrome are good people, but I don't want one running the country.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: mocat on January 10, 2014, 04:31:51 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.

What does any of that have to do with which candidate is the better person?

So you will vote for a politician that would destroy the economy just because you think he's a good person?

People with Down syndrome are good people, but I don't want one running the country.

well that's kind of an umbrella statement, don't you think?
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: 0.42 on January 10, 2014, 04:32:25 PM
i started a fatty4prez thread back in 08 but did any of you dummies listen noooooooooo
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 10, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.

What does any of that have to do with which candidate is the better person?

People with Down syndrome are good people

I'm sure some of them are. If somebody with Downs Syndrome was able to function well enough in society to put him/herself in the running for President of the United States, I would certainly give that person my consideration.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2014, 04:49:49 PM
People with Down syndrome black skin are good people, but I don't want one running the country.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: ChiComCat on January 10, 2014, 04:50:07 PM
how far to the right do you have to be to think NK is a super lefty?

You can't be pro big government and a libertarian. Only libs and neocons are big gov advocates.

What does any of that have to do with which candidate is the better person?

So you will vote for a politician that would destroy the economy just because you think he's a good person?

People with Down syndrome are good people, but I don't want one running the country.

If he came out and said he would destroy the economy, I just can't believe that he is a good person.
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 10, 2014, 05:07:42 PM
People with Down syndrome black skin are good people, but I don't want one running the country.

I'm on record supporting a black president, seven. A lesbian also (not Hillary).
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 11, 2014, 09:36:34 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1-ps.googleusercontent.com%2Fh%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Fadmin%2Fed-assets%2F2014%2F01%2F418x346xChristie-Bridge-copy.jpg.pagespeed.ic.vDhZSVA-uV.webp&hash=44e04e52eb0c2a2532d9b26b94494ddb30b9610f)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3-ps.googleusercontent.com%2Fh%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Fadmin%2Fed-assets%2F2014%2F01%2F462x372xChristie-Obama-copy.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Ak3F82SIt-.webp&hash=a575716a274f492eb9d2ea81447140ce8ecba3ff)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4-ps.googleusercontent.com%2Fh%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Fadmin%2Fed-assets%2F2014%2F01%2F473x600xChristie-Bias-copy-473x600.jpg.pagespeed.ic.XnnQy_1bv1.webp&hash=52f472805318116ce58dcea0bc2a2b28c4527dae)
Title: Re: Christie
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 27, 2014, 10:58:10 AM
Quote
The Associated Press ?@AP  ยท 4m 
Law firm hired by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie concludes he had no role in bridge lane closures: http://apne.ws/1pcdVia

 :lol: Oh, OK!