goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Trogdor on January 06, 2014, 11:26:33 PM
-
:Woohoo:
-
Good rough ridin' Bye BCS and ESPN ass kissing. :party:
-
Yeah, it'll definitely stop the ESPN hype.
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
Probably take a few years for people to accept it seeing they wont have a choice but to do so
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
Depends on who has the network contract for the CFP.
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
Depends on who has the network contract for the CFP.
Ill give you 3 guesses
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
Depends on who has the network contract for the CFP.
Ill give you 3 guesses
Disney, ABC, & ESPN. :surprised:
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
I already hate it. What a farce.
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
I already hate it. What a farce.
You mean you don't want to watch Alabama, LSU, Auburn, Florida, FSU, Clemson, Michigan, OSU, USC, Oregon, Texas, OU or some other Blue Chip School in the CFP. Because you aren't going to see any no names, unless they have a perfect record and play somebody good to get it.
-
I honestly hope there are 5 teams that deserve to get in so that there is major controversy.
-
I honestly hope there are 5 teams that deserve to get in so that there is major controversy.
Would take.
-
There will be a huge melt down when two SEC teams get in. It will happen. I've accepted that college football will always lack fundamental fairness in determining a champion.
-
The football playoff will have more controversy than the BCS
-
yeah there will be 4 x the teams super duper butthurt now.
-
The first time a #12 Michigan gets a four seed, the conflagration will be visible from space.
-
Will we ever be a top 5 ranking team come year end? And did we are how pissed is everyone going to be when we get passed over? Will be fun times.
-
The BCS was awesome and matched up #1 and #2 more times than this stupid playoff will. Farewell BCS... :frown:
-
The BCS was awesome and matched up #1 and #2 more times than this stupid playoff will. Farewell BCS... :frown:
Have to agree with this. :shakesfist:
-
Saw someone talking about how the NCAA said it'd be extra difficult to bump it to 6+ teams because it will run into the NFL playoffs.
-
Saw someone talking about how the NCAA said it'd be extra difficult to bump it to 6+ teams because it will run into the NFL playoffs.
Play on Fridays and Mondays. Boom.
-
Saw someone talking about how the NCAA said it'd be extra difficult to bump it to 6+ teams because it will run into the NFL playoffs.
Don't they currently play the championship game 6 weeks after the conference championships?
-
How long will it take fans to start bashing the 4-team playoff? Not long, I'd say. Probably as soon as the first playoff teams are selected.
I already hate it. What a farce.
You mean you don't want to watch Alabama, LSU, Auburn, Florida, FSU, Clemson, Michigan, OSU, USC, Oregon, Texas, OU or some other Blue Chip School in the CFP. Because you aren't going to see any no names, unless they have a perfect record and play somebody good to get it.
You didn't put Kansas State on that list.
-
Saw someone talking about how the NCAA said it'd be extra difficult to bump it to 6+ teams because it will run into the NFL playoffs.
Play on Fridays and Mondays. Boom.
Or get rid of the month long break between the team's last game and the championship
-
winnner of SEC, winner of big 10 Winner of Pac 12 and winner of big 12 if it is OU or Texas other wise winner of ACC.
big 12/ACC snub will be nuclear butthurt next year.
could be us!
:Woohoo: :Woohoo:
-
we won't get snubbed
-
But I do wish they let computers choose the participants.
-
But I do wish they let computers choose the participants.
They don't like computers because it doesn't take into account the number of eyes factor. This is a very important consideration, due to the money involved.
-
But I do wish they let computers choose the participants.
They don't like computers because it doesn't take into account the number of eyes factor. This is a very important consideration, due to the money involved.
no, it won't
-
But I do wish they let computers choose the participants.
They don't like computers because it doesn't take into account the number of eyes factor. This is a very important consideration, due to the money involved.
no, it won't
who, what, when? :confused:
-
we have to go 12-0 to get in. Other "name" schools can afford to lose a game or two.
-
Michigan State or Baylor would have been in this year.
Oregon would have been in 2012
OKlahoma State and Stanford would have been in 2011
TCU, Stanford, or Wisconsin would have been in 2010.
All but TCU had at least one loss.
Bottom line don't be friggin idiots.
-
Michigan State or Baylor would have been in this year.
Oregon would have been in 2012
OKlahoma State and Stanford would have been in 2011
TCU, Stanford, or Wisconsin would have been in 2010.
All but TCU had at least one loss.
Bottom line don't be friggin idiots.
I know you mean well, but the majority of sports fans know how this works.
-
Michigan State or Baylor would have been in this year.
Oregon would have been in 2012
OKlahoma State and Stanford would have been in 2011
TCU, Stanford, or Wisconsin would have been in 2010.
All but TCU had at least one loss.
Bottom line don't be friggin idiots.
I know you mean well, but the majority of sports fans know how this works.
Are you disputing what I posted or just being a moron? Or both?
-
Michigan State or Baylor would have been in this year.
Oregon would have been in 2012
OKlahoma State and Stanford would have been in 2011
TCU, Stanford, or Wisconsin would have been in 2010.
All but TCU had at least one loss.
Bottom line don't be friggin idiots.
I know you mean well, but the majority of sports fans know how this works.
Are you disputing what I posted or just being a moron? Or both?
Oh, I get it. Anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion is a moron. :dubious:
-
This guy gets it.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmsn.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffsdigital%2Ffscom%2Fmlb%2Fstory%2F2014%2F01%2F09%2Fdan-le-batard-loses-hall-of-fame-vote-suspended-from-bbwaa%2Fjcr%3Acontent%2FarticleContent%2FmarqueeInline%2Fphoto%2Fimage.adapt.955.medium.jpg&hash=3886b7c7fdaf7f4a603f72a75ce0d00d9c4474c7)
'Our flawed voting process needs remodeling in a new media world. ...' — Dan Le Batard
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
Weren't you upset that the computers were out of it? Do you really think they will put a team in that doesn't have a national following, unless they are forced too. Who went to BCS bowls this year.
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
Weren't you upset that the computers were out of it? Do you really think they will put a team in that doesn't have a national following, unless they are forced too. Who went to BCS bowls this year.
The playoff isn't the BCS.
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
Weren't you upset that the computers were out of it? Do you really think they will put a team in that doesn't have a national following, unless they are forced too. Who went to BCS bowls this year.
The playoff isn't the BCS.
How many smalls schools played in the MNC during the BCS period?
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
Weren't you upset that the computers were out of it? Do you really think they will put a team in that doesn't have a national following, unless they are forced too. Who went to BCS bowls this year.
The playoff isn't the BCS.
How many smalls schools played in the MNC during the BCS period?
4 teams vs. 2
-
I agree that is flawed, but i disagree that it will eff over the "have nots" or whatever you losers want to label us.
Weren't you upset that the computers were out of it? Do you really think they will put a team in that doesn't have a national following, unless they are forced too. Who went to BCS bowls this year.
The playoff isn't the BCS.
How many smalls schools played in the MNC during the BCS period?
4 teams vs. 2
It will be four big schools though.
-
Katdaddy, what the eff is a big school. Did you not see my goddam post about who would have been in the last four years.
-
Katdaddy, what the eff is a big school. Did you not see my goddam post about who would have been in the last four years.
OK, we're not getting anywhere with our opinions. How about we make a bet. If a small school gets in the playoff, I'll post a minimum of one post per day for one month telling anyone who will listen how good you smell. If you should lose this bet, you will do likewise. What do you say to this?
-
Michigan State or Baylor would have been in this year.
Michigan State maybe, but baylor was ranked 6th after they got drilled by Ostate.
Doubt they're Top 4 in the playoff pecking order....but i'm not sure what system is being used to find the Top 4 in the new "playoff" system.
Its like hoops now,, if you're gonna lose...do it early and the shot at the NC is still a possibility even in if you lose a game. Basically, the "alabama rule" only applied to a great number of college football teams.
-
The four that would have been in, this year were (likely)
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Michigan State
Next year it will be (almost solely due to how the schedules work out and the likely initial rankings next year)
SEC Winner
next highest ranked SEC team
Florida State
*
IMHO there is really only one open slot. In order the likely candidates are: Winner of the Big 10, Pac 12, Big 12, Undefeated non BCS school which has been successfull lately.
-
The four that would have been in, this year were (likely)
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Michigan State
Next year it will be (almost solely due to how the schedules work out and the likely initial rankings next year)
This is my biggest problem with letting humans choose the teams. Whether they know it or not, each team's ranking is primed based on a completely made up and worthless preseason poll. The only way to get in without winning the conference is by getting a high preseason ranking - this applies to everyone outside the SEC in my opinion.
-
we have to go 12-0 to get in. Other "name" schools can afford to lose a game or two.
Been saying this for awhile in a couple threads.
-
The four that would have been in, this year were (likely)
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Michigan State
Next year it will be (almost solely due to how the schedules work out and the likely initial rankings next year)
This is my biggest problem with letting humans choose the teams. Whether they know it or not, each team's ranking is primed based on a completely made up and worthless preseason poll. The only way to get in without winning the conference is by getting a high preseason ranking - this applies to everyone outside the SEC in my opinion.
Then you agree. :cool:
-
The four that would have been in, this year were (likely)
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Michigan State
Next year it will be (almost solely due to how the schedules work out and the likely initial rankings next year)
This is my biggest problem with letting humans choose the teams. Whether they know it or not, each team's ranking is primed based on a completely made up and worthless preseason poll. The only way to get in without winning the conference is by getting a high preseason ranking - this applies to everyone outside the SEC in my opinion.
Then you agree. :cool:
completely different from what you are saying
-
The four that would have been in, this year were (likely)
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Michigan State
Next year it will be (almost solely due to how the schedules work out and the likely initial rankings next year)
This is my biggest problem with letting humans choose the teams. Whether they know it or not, each team's ranking is primed based on a completely made up and worthless preseason poll. The only way to get in without winning the conference is by getting a high preseason ranking - this applies to everyone outside the SEC in my opinion.
Then you agree. :cool:
completely different from what you are saying
Looks like every has predicted the big(name) schools will be in the CFP, so how is that completely different.
-
@davidubben
The amount of non-love K-State is getting in early 2014 top 25s is baffling.
Point well taken.