goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: sys on December 01, 2013, 07:20:45 PM

Title: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 01, 2013, 07:20:45 PM
ol miss, gonzaga and g. washington.  all at home or near home.

i think 1-2.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: catzacker on December 01, 2013, 07:27:17 PM
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Asteriskhead on December 01, 2013, 07:31:25 PM
Tell ya what, I'm hoping for a record with a three and a zero in it. I'll probably still get that, but the opposite of the one I wanted, and it will make me  pretty sad.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Trim on December 01, 2013, 07:35:13 PM
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: CNS on December 01, 2013, 07:35:20 PM
Who is the 1, Sys.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 01, 2013, 07:43:56 PM
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?

i prolly just don't know how to make polls.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 01, 2013, 07:44:53 PM
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?

did you vote, zacker?  it doesn't look like you did.  you aren't allowed to post if you don't vote.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ksupamplemousse on December 01, 2013, 07:45:30 PM
Lizard lips won't have his team ready to play against Ole Miss and George Washington, but we'll be amped up to play vs. Gonzaga and we'll still get destroyed: 0-3  :th_twocents:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 01, 2013, 07:45:50 PM
Who is the 1, Sys.

doesn't matter, it's probabilistic.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kso_FAN on December 01, 2013, 07:50:31 PM
I went optimistic. We beat Henderson and the president.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Trim on December 01, 2013, 07:59:36 PM
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?

i prolly just don't know how to make polls.

Fixed it.

Everyone now, choose wisely.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2013, 08:08:42 PM
Didn't know GW was "good"
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: CNS on December 01, 2013, 08:11:46 PM
I would totally vote but tapatalk and polls evidently don't get along. 
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Tobias on December 01, 2013, 08:12:36 PM
Didn't know GW was "good"

i think it's a relative term
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: pissclams on December 01, 2013, 08:19:08 PM

Didn't know GW was "good"
beat creighton tonight, doesn't have to equal good, but def strongly capable
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 01, 2013, 08:19:59 PM
Didn't know GW was "good"

they're ok.  better kenpom # than kstate.


i watched part of their win over creighton today.  couple of physical bigs that can score if they have room (did kstate recruit armwood, way back when?).  good rebounding team.  not v. good defensively.  pg doesn't shoot.  wings shoot.  euro big that shoots, hates the interior.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: catzacker on December 02, 2013, 06:42:01 AM
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?

did you vote, zacker?  it doesn't look like you did.  you aren't allowed to post if you don't vote.

I did not vote because the option I would choose is not up there.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2013, 08:52:28 AM
2-1, just a hunch nothing I've seen on the court leads me to think this is going to happen though.

We are really small. Are we also getting a mysbig at the semester :fingerscrossed:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: pissclams on December 02, 2013, 08:58:29 AM
here's the clams calcs as per clams-

on offense:  no bigs = no presence in paint = out rebounded = fewer shots = relying on freshman guards to shoot high percentage every night = losing a lot

on defense:  no bigs = out rebounded = more offense for opponent = more fouls on our freshman guards x will spradling factor =  losing a lot

including the comment "all at home or near home" makes no difference.  there's a whole shitload that needs to go right for this team to win against a decent team.

we're going to lose a lot this season, 0-3 against these 3 teams is the most probable outcome
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: puniraptor on December 02, 2013, 09:39:10 AM
great epi of clams click clack calcs. will tune in next week.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 02, 2013, 09:46:22 AM
I think 1-2 is most likely, but my gut is telling my 0-3 so I went with that.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: joaks01 on December 03, 2013, 01:21:07 PM
Heart says 2-1, but brain says 1-2.
Went with the heart :eye:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ltrain on December 03, 2013, 03:38:12 PM
We're really bad (see losses to Northern Colorado, Charlotte **not the pro team** and to G-Town by almost 30).  0-3.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Pete on December 03, 2013, 03:46:46 PM
We're really bad (see losses to Northern Colorado, Charlotte **not the pro team** and to G-Town by almost 30).  0-3.

I cannot argue with this logic.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ChiComCat on December 03, 2013, 03:53:10 PM
I'm surprised at the number of people still in denial over just how bad this team is.  0-3 with one loss by less than 15 (moral victory)
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2013, 04:52:54 PM
I'm surprised at the number of people still in denial over just how bad this team is.  0-3 with one loss by less than 15 (moral victory)

Yup. Head and heart in agreement.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 05, 2013, 10:21:34 PM
0-3 is now impossible.  sorry 0-3ers.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: 0.42 on December 05, 2013, 10:27:20 PM
point of order

ole miss is not a "good" team

still feels good tho
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ChiComCat on December 05, 2013, 10:31:57 PM
Couldn't be happier to be wrong!
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 05, 2013, 10:34:30 PM
point of order

ole miss is not a "good" team

still feels good tho

"good" was in quotation marks, even though i wasn't quoting anyone.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: fun muffin on December 22, 2013, 01:57:22 PM
3-0 is there for the taking.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kso_FAN on December 22, 2013, 02:01:04 PM
oscar is making this thread into a clown show.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: pvegs on December 22, 2013, 02:03:00 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kso_FAN on December 22, 2013, 02:06:59 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?

No its not. And I think the committee would like that the team got better as the year progressed.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Tobias on December 22, 2013, 02:23:37 PM
isu, @osu, bay to close before the p66.  going to need to grab some wins in that mix i would think
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ChiComCat on December 22, 2013, 02:51:19 PM
I think 9-9 would require some work in the B12 tourney, barring a win against KU or OSU.  19-12 can possibly get a team in but no team can feel good about their chances at 19-12.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kim carnes on December 22, 2013, 02:51:57 PM
they don't call this place dumbasscity.com for nothing
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: TownieCat on December 22, 2013, 03:20:36 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kim carnes on December 22, 2013, 03:23:44 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

have you ever heard the name javon thomas?
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: MakeItRain on December 22, 2013, 03:41:13 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

We played a NYE game against Hampton a couple of years ago and it was sold out and very loud.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: MakeItRain on December 22, 2013, 04:13:26 PM
I think 9-9 would require some work in the B12 tourney, barring a win against KU or OSU.  19-12 can possibly get a team in but no team can feel good about their chances at 19-12.

I was preparing to rebut this post then I did a little research. Last season Iowa was .500 in the Big 10, the #1 conference last season, they had 5 top 50 wins and a win in the Big 10 conference; they were 21-12 and winners of their last 7 of 10 and they were left home.

Got this stuff from warrennolan.com btw a great cbb reference site.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: 0.42 on December 22, 2013, 04:21:02 PM
oscar is making this thread into a clown show.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesportsbank.net%2Fcore%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2Foscar-weber.jpg&hash=1c447563e8a6b37dfe7b36694c835280f97d30b1)
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: EMAWzified on December 22, 2013, 04:25:39 PM
I would think it would depend who the nine wins are against. A win against OSU or KU would probably get us in at 9-9. A road win against either would be huge, not that that is going to happen.
But if we get swept by KU, OSU and flood aggies, there's now way we finish 9-9. Cats will probably beat someone they shouldn't on the road (OU, Texas, Baylor) but will likely get upended by someone at home, too. Too many freshmen to be consistent.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: wetwillie on December 22, 2013, 04:36:03 PM
I would think it would depend who the nine wins are against. A win against OSU or KU would probably get us in at 9-9. A road win against either would be huge, not that that is going to happen.
But if we get swept by KU, OSU and flood aggies, there's now way we finish 9-9. Cats will probably beat someone they shouldn't on the road (OU, Texas, Baylor) but will likely get upended by someone at home, too. Too many freshmen to be consistent.

This team will probably beat KU in Allen or some stupid crap like that. 
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 22, 2013, 04:36:55 PM
they don't call this place dumbasscity.com for nothing

This
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 22, 2013, 04:43:01 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

I thought we played Tulane in BKN?   GW is NYE in the Bram and anyone that bets on the road team on NYE is a tard.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 22, 2013, 04:51:42 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

I thought we played Tulane in BKN?   GW is NYE in the Bram and anyone that bets on the road team on NYE is a tard.

I would imagine that Townie predicting a 3000 person turn out for our home game one NYE.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: fun muffin on December 22, 2013, 04:52:27 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?

No its not. And I think the committee would like that the team got better as the year progressed.

i was at the game, but rewatched it anyways (stud fan) and the announcers made a good point that since Gip didn't play because of "injury" against Northern Colorado the committee would factor that into their decision.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 22, 2013, 04:54:53 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

I thought we played Tulane in BKN?   GW is NYE in the Bram and anyone that bets on the road team on NYE is a tard.

I would imagine that Townie predicting a 3000 person turn out for our home game one NYE.

The last time we had <3000 for a home game we played at Nichols Hall.  What a tard
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: nicname on December 22, 2013, 05:05:15 PM
1-2

It's fun when oscar proves me wrong. 
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 22, 2013, 05:06:03 PM
I know you're trolling, but I still feel the need to respond. No, we've had about three thousand 3-4 times already this year, and against Central Arkansas I bet it was closer to 2000.



Edit: Well shucks, FSD caught me before I edited it.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 22, 2013, 05:10:55 PM
I know you're trolling, but I still feel the need to respond. No, we've had about a thousand 3-4 times already this year, and against Central Arkansas I bet it was closer to 2000.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 22, 2013, 05:15:59 PM
while at the troy game, my guess was 3k.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ltrain on December 23, 2013, 01:16:32 PM
We're really bad (see losses to Northern Colorado, Charlotte **not the pro team** and to G-Town by almost 30).  0-3.

What a dumbass
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: michigancat on December 23, 2013, 01:32:10 PM
I voted 1-2. Still seems pretty reasonable.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: TownieCat on December 23, 2013, 01:50:43 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

We played a NYE game against Hampton a couple of years ago and it was sold out and very loud.

That was also a Saturday, not a Tuesday. I'll be surprised if the crowd is anything above average for this season.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: CNS on December 23, 2013, 02:02:19 PM
I voted 1-2. Still seems pretty reasonable.

The OP listed three specific teams, of which we are 2-0 against as of Sat. 
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: michigancat on December 23, 2013, 02:17:10 PM
I voted 1-2. Still seems pretty reasonable.

The OP listed three specific teams, of which we are 2-0 against as of Sat.

yeah I know. We weren't that far from 1-1.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Mr Bread on December 23, 2013, 02:20:35 PM
I said 2-1. :th_twocents:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: HerrSonntag on December 23, 2013, 02:22:49 PM
So did I, but I think GW is the most sure-fire win of the 3.

TEAM 3-0 converts baby!
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 23, 2013, 02:32:10 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?

No its not. And I think the committee would like that the team got better as the year progressed.

i was at the game, but rewatched it anyways (stud fan) and the announcers made a good point that since Gip didn't play because of "injury" against Northern Colorado the committee would factor that into their decision.

Yeah. Also, Thomas hasn't been in the lineup for any of our horrible losses. oscar should put him in the starting lineup and play him a bunch if he want to get a good seed.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 23, 2013, 02:40:47 PM
A lot of dumbasses outed in this thread.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: Dub on December 23, 2013, 02:48:38 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?

No its not. And I think the committee would like that the team got better as the year progressed.

i was at the game, but rewatched it anyways (stud fan) and the announcers made a good point that since Gip didn't play because of "injury" against Northern Colorado the committee would factor that into their decision.

Yeah. Also, Thomas hasn't been in the lineup for any of our horrible losses. oscar should put him in the starting lineup and play him a bunch if he want to get a good seed.

ESPN talking heads are saying 7 get in from big 12..  :pray:
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: scottwildcat on December 23, 2013, 02:59:41 PM
starting to extrapolate, but if we beat tulane and gw, what's it gonna take in confy to make the tourney? not crazy to think that 9-9 (19-12 overall) would make the dance since we''re in the #1 rpi conference, is it?

No its not. And I think the committee would like that the team got better as the year progressed.

i was at the game, but rewatched it anyways (stud fan) and the announcers made a good point that since Gip didn't play because of "injury" against Northern Colorado the committee would factor that into their decision.

Yeah. Also, Thomas hasn't been in the lineup for any of our horrible losses. oscar should put him in the starting lineup and play him a bunch if he want to get a good seed.

ESPN talking heads are saying 7 get in from big 12..  :pray:

7?!??  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: CNS on December 23, 2013, 03:02:03 PM
Employing
Stupid
People
Now
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: scottwildcat on December 23, 2013, 05:05:49 PM
Employing
Stupid
People
Now

Ha
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on December 23, 2013, 09:12:04 PM
7 in the Big 12 is possible (after the Gonzaga win) but not likely.

For this to occur we need to have 3 teams be punching bags for the rest of the conference.

TCU, West Virginia and Tech would pretty much have to get shut out by the rest of the conference for 7 teams to happen.

Expect 6 Big 12 teams in the Dance.

Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: wetwillie on December 23, 2013, 09:38:53 PM
I might tweet @ gary parrish to put us in the top 25+1 if we beat gw. He will mush my face but it will plant a seed.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: scottwildcat on December 24, 2013, 07:58:34 AM
I might tweet @ gary parrish to put us in the top 25+1 if we beat gw. He will mush my face but it will plant a seed.

Meh I don't think we would be too far off.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Demo158 on December 24, 2013, 09:03:47 AM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

We played a NYE game against Hampton a couple of years ago and it was sold out and very loud.

That was also a Saturday, not a Tuesday. I'll be surprised if the crowd is anything above average for this season.
After Foster's dunk and a Gonzaga win?!? There are alot of fair-weather fans coming out of the woodwork now. Facebook alone can prove this
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: scottwildcat on December 24, 2013, 09:10:10 AM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

We played a NYE game against Hampton a couple of years ago and it was sold out and very loud.

That was also a Saturday, not a Tuesday. I'll be surprised if the crowd is anything above average for this season.
After Foster's dunk and a Gonzaga win?!? There are alot of fair-weather fans coming out of the woodwork now. Facebook alone can prove this

NYE game will be well attended.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 25, 2013, 08:33:49 PM
I voted 3-0 as soon as this thread started!   :D
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 31, 2013, 03:30:01 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

I thought we played Tulane in BKN?   GW is NYE in the Bram and anyone that bets on the road team on NYE is a tard.


I would imagine that Townie predicting a 3000 person turn out for our home game one NYE.

What a couple of tards. LOL
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: PowercatPat on December 31, 2013, 03:42:26 PM
This thread turned out to be quite entertaining.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: steve dave on December 31, 2013, 04:10:09 PM
Proud to be an OG 3-0
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: michigancat on December 31, 2013, 04:13:03 PM
I'm proud of my original 1-2 prediction.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ChiComCat on December 31, 2013, 04:22:36 PM
I haven't been this wrong since my first post on ksufans.  I think it was something about how Bennett would average 10 points
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 31, 2013, 04:24:49 PM
i swung and missed. get a little better every day.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Pete on December 31, 2013, 04:28:58 PM
I voted for 0-3.  :Stretcher:
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: CNS on December 31, 2013, 04:31:17 PM
Love being wrong like this. 
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Powercat Posse on December 31, 2013, 04:37:27 PM
I wonder how many of the people who voted 3-0 acutally believed we would do that?   I voted 2-1 and was hopeful we would just get that
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on December 31, 2013, 04:39:01 PM
Def an impressive turnaround by Bruceketball, hope it continues.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Pete on December 31, 2013, 04:40:17 PM
Someone do a January record thread.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: ksupamplemousse on December 31, 2013, 04:41:19 PM
oscar is laughing his Franking face off at idiots like me right now. Rub it in oscar, it feels good  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 31, 2013, 04:47:59 PM
congratulations to the 3-0 predictors.  only 32.2% of the overall sample, but 100% of the correct posters.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: 'taterblast on December 31, 2013, 04:48:31 PM
i had legitimate reasons for my 1-2 prediction. so happy to be wrong! go cats!
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: michigancat on December 31, 2013, 04:49:20 PM
I just don't feel like my 1-2 prediction was outlandish, even in hindsight. It is statistically pretty close.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Pete on December 31, 2013, 04:52:50 PM
Well, I stand by the fact that we looked like dog crap when I made my prediction.  I simply didn't think we'd improve, which is pretty silly I guess, given they were freshmen and that oscar improved the team during December last year.

Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sys on December 31, 2013, 04:54:12 PM
hey!

it appears some people are still voting, even though the contest is over.  that isn't allowed and those votes will be stricken from the record.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Pete on December 31, 2013, 04:55:46 PM
hey!

it appears some people are still voting, even though the contest is over.  that isn't allowed and those votes will be stricken from the record.

I locked the voting for you.  I agree that we need to preserve the integrity of the december record v "good" teams thread.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on December 31, 2013, 05:00:31 PM
i had legitimate reasons for my 1-2 prediction. so happy to be wrong! go cats!
Me too!  :bball:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: TownieCat on December 31, 2013, 07:55:44 PM
GW could be the toughest game of the 3. Ole Miss and Gonzaga both had pretty good crowds for our guys to play in front of. There may be < 3,000 people at the game on Dec 31 at 2pm...

I thought we played Tulane in BKN?   GW is NYE in the Bram and anyone that bets on the road team on NYE is a tard.


I would imagine that Townie predicting a 3000 person turn out for our home game one NYE.

What a couple of tards. LOL

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: CyberToothCat on January 01, 2014, 12:35:31 AM
I voted 1-2.

I love being so wrong!
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 01, 2014, 12:38:47 PM
I think it's hilarious that people are making excuses for why they voted 1-2. We were all watching the same team, you dorks.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: schreds21 on January 01, 2014, 03:24:41 PM
0-3 here.   :facepalm:
oscar is mushing and  :billdance: all over my face.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: EMAWzified on January 01, 2014, 03:43:09 PM
I seriously can't remember if I voted 0-3 or 1-2. Either way, I was wrong. In my defense, the two of the three teams  sucked worse than thought.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 01, 2014, 03:45:38 PM
Well if you scroll up to the top of the page, the one you choose will be bolded.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2014, 03:48:56 PM
I thought we'd lose a competitive game to the Zags. Ole Miss went about how I thought and I thought GW would play us closer. 1 (possibly 2) will be NCAA teams and if not will be in the NIT. At least 2 will likely be Top 50 RPI teams and thus "quality wins" when it comes to the Tournament.

Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: sunny_cat on January 01, 2014, 04:13:56 PM
I voted 3-0.  :Woohoo:
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 01, 2014, 04:25:03 PM
i didn't vote. i probably would have voted 1-2.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: star seed 7 on January 01, 2014, 04:26:26 PM
i didn't vote. i would have voted 1-2.

Ofc. Daris with a little thing called integrity.
Title: Re: december record v &quot;good&quot; teams
Post by: puniraptor on January 01, 2014, 04:26:52 PM
I apparently voted 3-0 and have a huge brain
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 01, 2014, 07:19:24 PM
I picked 3-0, because I'm way smarter than about everyone here at dumbasscity.  Also, I understand Weber is a good coach and he would get his team to improve with lots of practice time.
Title: Re: december record v "good" teams
Post by: 0.42 on January 02, 2014, 01:21:25 PM
I voted 0-3 and am in no way embarrassed about this