goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: CHONGS on December 01, 2013, 03:16:03 PM
-
| # | Team | Adj Off Eff | Off Drives | Adj Def Eff | Def Drives | Δ Eff | SOS |
| 1 | Florida State | 3.56 | 10.53 | 1. | 10.71 | 2.56 | 6.52 |
| 2 | Alabama | 3.34 | 11.35 | 1.53 | 11.71 | 1.82 | 3.61 |
| 3 | Ohio State | 3.77 | 11.41 | 2.17 | 11.41 | 1.6 | 4.72 |
| 4 | Baylor | 3.35 | 14.65 | 1.8 | 14.82 | 1.55 | 4.55 |
| 5 | Oklahoma State | 2.74 | 14.06 | 1.34 | 13.94 | 1.39 | 5.42 |
| 6 | Stanford | 2.86 | 11.41 | 1.56 | 11.65 | 1.3 | 2.22 |
| 7 | Michigan State | 2.41 | 12.12 | 1.11 | 12.41 | 1.3 | 6.09 |
| 8 | Louisville | 2.87 | 10.29 | 1.6 | 11.06 | 1.27 | 8.06 |
| 9 | Missouri | 2.91 | 12.06 | 1.66 | 12.24 | 1.25 | 4.27 |
| 10 | Arizona State | 3.17 | 14.59 | 2.01 | 14.24 | 1.16 | 1.75 |
| 11 | Oregon | 3.2 | 12.06 | 2.22 | 12.18 | 0.98 | 4.05 |
| 12 | BYU | 2.42 | 14.29 | 1.44 | 14.59 | 0.98 | 1.96 |
| 13 | Auburn | 2.87 | 13.24 | 1.93 | 12.94 | 0.94 | 2.9 |
| 14 | LSU | 3.15 | 10.88 | 2.23 | 11.18 | 0.92 | 2.91 |
| 15 | Wisconsin | 2.33 | 12.82 | 1.43 | 12.82 | 0.9 | 4.01 |
| 16 | South Carolina | 2.63 | 12. | 1.74 | 11.65 | 0.89 | 2.71 |
| 17 | UCF | 3. | 10.71 | 2.16 | 11. | 0.84 | 5.31 |
| 18 | Fresno State | 3.22 | 12.82 | 2.42 | 14.24 | 0.8 | 9.36 |
| 19 | Virginia Tech | 1.94 | 13. | 1.18 | 12.71 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| 20 | Georgia | 3.4 | 12.29 | 2.64 | 12.41 | 0.76 | 0.56 |
| 21 | Northern Illinois | 2.78 | 12.82 | 2.03 | 12.94 | 0.75 | 8.56 |
| 22 | Duke | 2.59 | 12. | 1.9 | 12.29 | 0.69 | 5.29 |
| 23 | Marshall | 2.81 | 13.18 | 2.16 | 13.53 | 0.65 | 6.82 |
| 24 | Kansas State | 3.02 | 11.76 | 2.44 | 12.12 | 0.59 | 3.35 |
| 25 | Houston | 2.12 | 14.06 | 1.55 | 13.71 | 0.57 | 3.48 |
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year. Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).
| # | Team | Adj Off Eff | Off Drives | Adj Def Eff | Def Drives | Δ Eff | SOS |
| 4 | Baylor | 3.35 | 14.65 | 1.8 | 14.82 | 1.55 | 4.55 |
| 5 | Oklahoma State | 2.74 | 14.06 | 1.34 | 13.94 | 1.39 | 5.42 |
| 24 | Kansas State | 3.02 | 11.76 | 2.44 | 12.12 | 0.59 | 3.35 |
| 34 | Texas | 2.32 | 13.18 | 2.01 | 13.59 | 0.32 | 4.24 |
| 37 | Oklahoma | 2.34 | 12.53 | 2.09 | 12.35 | 0.25 | 5.26 |
| 47 | TCU | 1.91 | 14.12 | 1.84 | 14.41 | 0.07 | 2.31 |
| 71 | Texas Tech | 2.19 | 14.76 | 2.69 | 14.24 | -0.5 | 3.53 |
| 73 | West Virginia | 1.74 | 15.65 | 2.27 | 15.29 | -0.53 | 3.19 |
| 99 | Kansas | 1.18 | 14.59 | 2.44 | 14.47 | -1.26 | 2.8 |
| 106 | Iowa State | 1.47 | 14.24 | 3.01 | 14.47 | -1.54 | 2.83 |
Our defense is pretty bad....
If you want a score predicted let me know.
-
Oh, and SOS runs from 0 to 10, with 10 being the weakest. LaLa is having a good season and helped us out a lot.
-
What's Army/Navy looking like to the ChUMP?
-
Big 10 ACC and SEC title game predictos please
-
What's Army/Navy looking like to the ChUMP?
Army 29
Navy 35
-
Big 10 ACC and SEC title game predictos please
Michigan State 14
Ohio State 24
Duke 8
Florida State 50
Missouri 30
Auburn 35
-
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year. Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).
We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.
Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.
-
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year. Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).
We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.
Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.
The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams. So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore. I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to. KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them. We're nowhere near a top 25 team.
-
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year. Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).
We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.
Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.
The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams. So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore. I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to. KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them. We're nowhere near a top 25 team.
Yeah, I guess.
I'm simply talking about the season stats and all advanced indicators place this year's offense in the top 20 in college football, if not the top 15.
Defensively its more like top 50, maybe top 40.
Special teams was Top 10.
-
Chings,
OU/OSU
Stanford/Arizona St.
thanks a pantload.
-
Chings,
OU/OSU
Stanford/Arizona St.
thanks a pantload.
Oklahoma 16
Oklahoma State 41
Arizona State 31
Stanford 37
-
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
-
i hate it when people don't understand how that works.
-
also chings, what is La-La's ranking in your system?
-
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
1) this is essentially a home game for auburn
2) this scenario assumes auburn controls the pace
-
also chings, what is La-La's ranking in your system?
Somewhere in the high twenties low thirties I think. I will confirm when I get back to my computer.
-
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
1) this is essentially a home game for auburn
2) this scenario assumes auburn controls the pace
Thank you, sir... I appreciate your input. Also, sending you a PM.
-
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year. Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).
We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.
Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.
The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams. So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore. I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to. KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them. We're nowhere near a top 25 team.
I actually thought that the corners for KU were pretty decent, they got physical with lockett which no one has all year. And they bailed out a safety all day long to help over the top or at least the plays i noticed they isolated lockett with a corner, the safety was sprint back in that direction as the ball was snapped. We basically got up 21 and our OC's brains went into cruise control, it was infuriating. Thankfully the tickets were free.
*edit* It was kind of fun to see Hubert have a solid day, was good to see him abuse all big 12 Ben Heeney on multiple occasions.