goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 08:14:12 AM

Title: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 08:14:12 AM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Panjandrum on November 15, 2013, 08:24:22 AM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

 :bracketmouse:  <----NIT Bracket
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: wabash909 on November 15, 2013, 08:26:57 AM
We're not winning 9 games in league.  6 tops.

Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: #LIFE on November 15, 2013, 08:28:22 AM
I just really don't care anymore...and it's the middle of November  :frown:

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: kso_FAN on November 15, 2013, 08:31:58 AM
Hey, it could happen.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 15, 2013, 08:36:40 AM
Would not take. That is terrible.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sunny_cat on November 15, 2013, 08:42:11 AM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

sad
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 08:44:07 AM
that's why i put a frowny face on there
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: TownieCat on November 15, 2013, 08:44:34 AM
We're not winning 9 games in league.  6 tops.

I really think you're overestimating the quality of the B12. The bottom 7 teams are not good. And two of our best 4 players have yet to play...

17-12, 9-9 seems about right except that we play more than 29 games. This must not include the 2 games in PR that still have a TBD opponent.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sunny_cat on November 15, 2013, 08:44:50 AM
that's why i put a frowny face on there

yes, mocat. i know.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 08:45:08 AM
 :frown:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sunny_cat on November 15, 2013, 08:46:39 AM
:frown:

sorry. I'm in pain too.  :cry:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: scottwildcat on November 15, 2013, 08:47:02 AM
I would take it, and I would be in the fOOD for the home NIT game.  :gocho:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 08:48:29 AM
TCU and TTU are garbage so we might split with them if we are lucky  :frown:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: kso_FAN on November 15, 2013, 08:48:40 AM
I would take it, and I would be in the fOOD for the home NIT game.  :gocho:

:cheers:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: scottwildcat on November 15, 2013, 08:49:31 AM
I would take it, and I would be in the fOOD for the home NIT game.  :gocho:

:cheers:

_FAN I really want to watch a basketball game with you sometime.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Cire on November 15, 2013, 09:18:51 AM
THat would be a Fantastic Year.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: pvegs on November 15, 2013, 09:24:51 AM
Townie's right.  This conference is terrible:

Awesome
KU

Very good
OSU

Coached by Scott Drew
Baylor

OK
Iowa State

Dogshit
OU
K-State
TT
TCU
UT
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Havs on November 15, 2013, 09:44:28 AM
Townie's right.  This conference is terrible:

Awesome
KU

Very good
OSU

Coached by Scott Drew
Baylor

OK
Iowa State

Dogshit
OU
K-State
TT
TCU
UT

Gotta hope the league gets 4 teams in this year.  :crossfingers:

Also, where is WVU?
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 10:26:53 AM
top of the dogshit pile, imo
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: wetwillie on November 15, 2013, 10:30:56 AM
WOULD NOT TAKE
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: pvegs on November 15, 2013, 10:43:38 AM
Townie's right.  This conference is terrible:

Awesome
KU

Very good
OSU

Coached by Scott Drew
Baylor

OK
Iowa State

Dogshit
OU
K-State
TT
TCU
UT

Gotta hope the league gets 4 teams in this year.  :crossfingers:

Also, where is WVU?

Good pt, Havs.  My fault for the oversight. WVU is also somewhere in the dogshit pile.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sunny_cat on November 15, 2013, 10:53:18 AM
top of the dogshit pile, imo

New board name? Mods?
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: EMAWzified on November 15, 2013, 10:59:23 AM
Really have to wait to see what Thomas brings. OU is the fresh dogshit looking down as the old whitened dogshit, IMO.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: The Whale on November 15, 2013, 11:11:36 AM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

 :frown:

Too good of a record for #BiD to get any traction, but bad enough that we stop getting any national pub.

 :frown:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: TownieCat on November 15, 2013, 11:15:33 AM
top of the dogshit pile, imo

New board name? Mods?

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Havs on November 15, 2013, 11:32:24 AM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

 :frown:

Too good of a record for #BiD to get any traction, but bad enough that we stop getting any national pub.

 :frown:

So you're saying Doc McWeberNeck is your head coach right now? Not good but not bad?
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: kougar24 on November 15, 2013, 12:19:14 PM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

Would take? No, I would not rough ridin' take. That's like the worst possible outcome to this season.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: The Whale on November 15, 2013, 12:53:29 PM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

 :frown:

Too good of a record for #BiD to get any traction, but bad enough that we stop getting any national pub.

 :frown:

So you're saying Doc McWeberNeck is your head coach right now? Not good but not bad?

Not nearly as much fun for bbsing as the Doc would be with that record   :frown:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 15, 2013, 12:57:15 PM
Does kenpom take into account that we're missing two of our starters?
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2013, 01:40:29 PM
Does kenpom take into account that we're missing two of our starters?

i don't know but that might drop us from top of the dogshit pile to middle of the dogshit pile
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 15, 2013, 01:43:03 PM
We'll get 20 wins this season.   :comeatme:
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: TownieCat on November 15, 2013, 02:37:01 PM
Until Northern Colorado loses a game I'm not going to be convinced that we lost to the best team in the country last Friday.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on November 19, 2013, 01:48:13 PM
Until Northern Colorado loses a game I'm not going to be convinced that we didn't lose to the best team in the country last Friday.

2-0.  Playing New Mexico State tomorrow night.

When college basketball fans say "UNC" this year, they'll mean Northern Colorado!
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: OKclone on November 19, 2013, 04:13:19 PM
Baylor below Iowa State in the Scott Drew can't coach section please.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on November 21, 2013, 08:14:16 AM
Until Northern Colorado loses a game I'm not going to be convinced that we didn't lose to the best team in the country last Friday.

2-0.  Playing New Mexico State tomorrow night.

When college basketball fans say "UNC" this year, they'll mean Northern Colorado!

 :frown:

UNC 63
NMSU 67
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sys on November 23, 2013, 11:27:51 AM
dropped from 64 to 107 based on the pr trip results (to date).
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sys on November 23, 2013, 11:52:19 AM
might be as much from the removal of last year's data as from the games.  not sure when he fades out the data from the previous year.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: chemhawk on November 23, 2013, 06:07:36 PM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

Would take? No, I would not rough ridin' take. That's like the worst possible outcome to this season.
 
Quoted for you know.
Quoted for you kno
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: ChiComCat on November 23, 2013, 07:35:33 PM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

Would take? No, I would not rough ridin' take. That's like the worst possible outcome to this season.
 
Quoted for you know.
Quoted for you kno

I think he meant it as in that record would suck and yet not bad enough to convert anyone to hating oscar who doesn't already.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: sys on November 23, 2013, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: kenpom
Projected record:   17-12   9-9

would take? yeah, would take. i mean i would take. you guys? would you guys take? i would i think. yeah i would. i would take.  :frown:

Would take? No, I would not rough ridin' take. That's like the worst possible outcome to this season.
 
Quoted for you know.
Quoted for you kno

I think he meant it as in that record would suck and yet not bad enough to convert anyone to hating oscar who doesn't already.

everyone knew what kougs meant.  but i had no idea what in the hell chemhawk was trying to say until chicat posted.
Title: Re: kenpom
Post by: CNS on November 23, 2013, 08:42:10 PM
top of the dogshit pile, imo

Nope. OU

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2