goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 10:09:33 AM

Title: Snydering
Post by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 10:09:33 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75748/snyder-has-k-state-rolling-again

When boats need rowing, wood needs sawing, and days need people getting a little better, this is the guy.

 :billdance:
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: puniraptor on November 13, 2013, 10:15:20 AM
things like this remind me how much it would suck to be a fan of any other team
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: 'taterblast on November 13, 2013, 10:17:07 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: michigancat on November 13, 2013, 10:18:35 AM
Did we get better every day last season?
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 13, 2013, 10:18:39 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

I think results can change based on scheduling.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 10:20:02 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Don't care.

Did we get better every day last season?

Don't care.

 :emawkid:

Go Cats!
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: 'taterblast on November 13, 2013, 10:24:02 AM
don't care either, fwiw. just wondering what we would do with @TEX, @OSU, BAY if it started right now.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Skipper44 on November 13, 2013, 10:27:00 AM
don't care either, fwiw. just wondering what we would do with @TEX, @OSU, BAY if it started right now.
2-1 for sure
@TEX - domintate 4th qtr, win by 2 scores mimimum

@OSU - they have also improved and found an offensive identity, too close to call

BAY - Win in a close game, they still can't stop Sams
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 10:27:30 AM
don't care either, fwiw. just wondering what we would do with @TEX, @OSU, BAY if it started right now.

I think we'd go 2-1.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 13, 2013, 10:28:50 AM
DON'T CARE.



(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.makeagif.com%2Fmedia%2F11-11-2013%2Ff67ApJ.gif&hash=d86f5017c7a3ae5ce472cacb8f6366a0623324cd)
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: TownieCat on November 13, 2013, 10:29:00 AM
don't care either, fwiw. just wondering what we would do with @TEX, @OSU, BAY if it started right now.

I feel pretty confident that if we lined up against NDSU or UT this weekend we'd beat them like we've beaten TT, WV, and ISU. Not so sure about BU or OSU.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: catzacker on November 13, 2013, 10:29:41 AM
Did we get better every day last season?

not sure, but we sawed a lot of wood.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: 'taterblast on November 13, 2013, 10:31:53 AM
don't care either, fwiw. just wondering what we would do with @TEX, @OSU, BAY if it started right now.

I feel pretty confident that if we lined up against NDSU or UT this weekend we'd beat them like we've beaten TT, WV, and ISU. Not so sure about BU or OSU.

i kind of feel like we could beat OSU pretty easily. 5 turnovers, man. i'm also probably just being a stupid fan.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Cire on November 13, 2013, 10:32:41 AM
I don't think we sawed wood last year.  We battered it to pieces with a 6-5 235 pound other piece of wood.

I think we beat texas and OSU the last 2 weeks.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: SEK_EMAW on November 13, 2013, 10:33:00 AM
Like my grandpa always says: If if's and but's were candy and nuts, we'd all have a very Merry Christmas
AND
Go Cats!
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 10:37:25 AM
You are either in or out, lazy people sit on the fence. I even brought some extra gear if any of you guys need any:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Frapgenius%2Foar.jpg&hash=9bd795ac04dfe7e40eb1c53d52b45e205a541870)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-SiRaUwhT12o%2FT6wpOa8iz_I%2FAAAAAAAAAMY%2FfPQbY2Wnq7M%2Fs1600%2FWood%252520Saw.jpg&hash=e95cfd2a5e8e481e6480d12f6047006528b7d0e2)
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 13, 2013, 10:48:30 AM
Defensive players benefitted from experience, WRs got healthy, schedule got easier, and Sams has played more lately. Bill is still a dumbass.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Steffy08 on November 13, 2013, 10:57:07 AM
I think we might be Big 12 champs if we played the schedule in reverse.

This raises a bigger issue, which is the way in which the Big 12 schedules the season.  This year-by-year method is BS.  There are certain types of factors (returning starters/returning QB/who your opponent played the week before/starting season at home) that can be used to set up a more favorable for different teams.  Doing it year by year only increases the ability of the conference to manipulate the schedule.  But, hey, maybe us starting on the road every f'n year is just an accident.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: TownieCat on November 13, 2013, 11:37:39 AM
I think we might be Big 12 champs if we played the schedule in reverse.

This raises a bigger issue, which is the way in which the Big 12 schedules the season.  This year-by-year method is BS.  There are certain types of factors (returning starters/returning QB/who your opponent played the week before/starting season at home) that can be used to set up a more favorable for different teams.  Doing it year by year only increases the ability of the conference to manipulate the schedule.  But, hey, maybe us starting on the road every f'n year is just an accident.

I think the B12's goal in scheduling is to have meaningful matchups late in the season. It's not a coincidence that most of the games involving the league's top 6 teams didn't happen until November. BU vs. OSU has a lot more weight on Nov. 23 than it does on Oct. 5.

FWIW...The big 10 has already released its 2018 schedule.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: scottwildcat on November 13, 2013, 11:39:46 AM
next year is going to be fun guys.



also the feeling with in the AD is it will be the last for FHOFLHCBS
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 13, 2013, 11:41:41 AM
next year is going to be fun guys.



also the feeling with in the AD is it will be the last for FHOFLHCBS
It will probably be his last year too.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 13, 2013, 11:52:36 AM
Damn it feels good to be a gangster.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 13, 2013, 11:53:34 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Maybe we wouldv'e beaten TX.  OSU and Baylor are probably still losses but, then again, I don't know if Sams makes the mistakes he made against OSU and Baylor with 4 other conference games under his belt.  Who knows. 
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: scottwildcat on November 13, 2013, 11:54:43 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Maybe we wouldv'e beaten TX.  OSU and Baylor are probably still losses but, then again, I don't know if Sams makes the mistakes he made against OSU and Baylor with 4 other conference games under his belt.  Who knows.

we beat both OSU and Baylor if it is later in the year.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Unruly on November 13, 2013, 11:55:49 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Maybe we wouldv'e beaten TX.  OSU and Baylor are probably still losses but, then again, I don't know if Sams makes the mistakes he made against OSU and Baylor with 4 other conference games under his belt.  Who knows.

we beat both OSU and Baylor if it is later in the year.

Just like we would beat baylor if it were earlier last year?
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: scottwildcat on November 13, 2013, 11:59:05 AM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Maybe we wouldv'e beaten TX.  OSU and Baylor are probably still losses but, then again, I don't know if Sams makes the mistakes he made against OSU and Baylor with 4 other conference games under his belt.  Who knows.

we beat both OSU and Baylor if it is later in the year.

Just like we would beat baylor if it were earlier last year?

yup
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: EMAWmeister on November 13, 2013, 12:18:06 PM
We played about as well as we could have against baylor and came up short.  They're also as hot now as they've ever been.

I think we beat UT and OSU though.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: kso_FAN on November 13, 2013, 12:19:40 PM
We played about as well as we could have against baylor and came up short.  They're also as hot now as they've ever been.

I think we beat UT and OSU though.

Lockett/Thompson tho
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: TownieCat on November 13, 2013, 02:51:02 PM
We played about as well as we could have against baylor and came up short.  They're also as hot now as they've ever been.

I think we beat UT and OSU though.

Lockett/Thompson tho

Tevin Reese tho. Baylor is pretty banged up right now. A lot of '12 K-State parallels with those guys..
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Frankenklein on November 13, 2013, 03:14:32 PM
  I bet Snyder just goes nuts wondering about this.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Steffy08 on November 13, 2013, 03:19:44 PM
I think we might be Big 12 champs if we played the schedule in reverse.

This raises a bigger issue, which is the way in which the Big 12 schedules the season.  This year-by-year method is BS.  There are certain types of factors (returning starters/returning QB/who your opponent played the week before/starting season at home) that can be used to set up a more favorable for different teams.  Doing it year by year only increases the ability of the conference to manipulate the schedule.  But, hey, maybe us starting on the road every f'n year is just an accident.

I think the B12's goal in scheduling is to have meaningful matchups late in the season. It's not a coincidence that most of the games involving the league's top 6 teams didn't happen until November. BU vs. OSU has a lot more weight on Nov. 23 than it does on Oct. 5.

FWIW...The big 10 has already released its 2018 schedule.

I disagree.  The Big 12 just lucked into that this year.  (If that was the strategy, why did OU and KSU play in the first conference game of the season last year?)  And, in any event, I don't like that "strategy" because it can become a self-fulfilling prophesy, with agendas within the Big 12 office to boot.  I bet when end up with a better or equivalent record to OU and either OSU/UT.......our game would be the "big game" against Baylor if we were sitting at 7-1 heading into that game.  I think it is much more likely that the powers-that-be (UT, OU) get a schedule that suits them than it is that the conference tries to "create" marquee games at the end of the season.  Either way, I don't like it, and wish that they would come out with a schedule years in advance.  That precludes the conference from even attempting to rig things one way or another.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: ben ji on November 13, 2013, 04:09:25 PM
I think we might be Big 12 champs if we played the schedule in reverse.

This raises a bigger issue, which is the way in which the Big 12 schedules the season.  This year-by-year method is BS.  There are certain types of factors (returning starters/returning QB/who your opponent played the week before/starting season at home) that can be used to set up a more favorable for different teams.  Doing it year by year only increases the ability of the conference to manipulate the schedule.  But, hey, maybe us starting on the road every f'n year is just an accident.

I think the B12's goal in scheduling is to have meaningful matchups late in the season. It's not a coincidence that most of the games involving the league's top 6 teams didn't happen until November. BU vs. OSU has a lot more weight on Nov. 23 than it does on Oct. 5.

FWIW...The big 10 has already released its 2018 schedule.

I disagree.  The Big 12 just lucked into that this year.  (If that was the strategy, why did OU and KSU play in the first conference game of the season last year?)  And, in any event, I don't like that "strategy" because it can become a self-fulfilling prophesy, with agendas within the Big 12 office to boot.  I bet when end up with a better or equivalent record to OU and either OSU/UT.......our game would be the "big game" against Baylor if we were sitting at 7-1 heading into that game.  I think it is much more likely that the powers-that-be (UT, OU) get a schedule that suits them than it is that the conference tries to "create" marquee games at the end of the season.  Either way, I don't like it, and wish that they would come out with a schedule years in advance.  That precludes the conference from even attempting to rig things one way or another.

People who blame others for their own personal shortcoming's are the worst.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on November 13, 2013, 04:26:01 PM
When boats need rowing, wood needs sawing, and days need people getting a little better, this is the guy.

I liked this.

Let's make "Snydering" into a thing where you pose like this

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgrfx.cstv.com%2Fphotos%2Fschools%2Filsu%2Fsports%2Fgenrel%2Fauto_action%2F2419416.jpeg&hash=f5e36bd46ac94468dabed2460cffce0a221923ad)

or this

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.athlonsports.com%2Fd%2F16429-1%2FBillSnyder.jpg&hash=c6a90202b181e20674df28dee19b5074897238db)

or this

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.cdn.turner.com%2Fsi%2F2012%2Fwriters%2Fstewart_mandel%2F09%2F26%2Fbill-snyder-kansas-state%2Fbill-snyder-p11.jpg&hash=4284f1a86d62e43645a6d4382923221ee6407df8)
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 13, 2013, 04:30:05 PM
teach me how to snyder
teach me, teach me how to snyder
all my 2-stars love me
all my, all my 2-stars love me
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Skipper44 on November 13, 2013, 04:39:35 PM
teach me how to snyder
teach me, teach me how to snyder
all my 2-stars love me
all my, all my 2-stars love me
sniff, sniff - I smell another Grammy for one of gE's talented musicians
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: hornedfrog86 on November 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
improvement paired with a schedule that set up perfect for this talking point.

we've beaten WVU, ISU, and TTU.

if you switched those games around with when we played TEX, OSU, and BAY, where would we be?

Maybe we wouldv'e beaten TX.  OSU and Baylor are probably still losses but, then again, I don't know if Sams makes the mistakes he made against OSU and Baylor with 4 other conference games under his belt.  Who knows.

we beat both OSU and Baylor if it is later in the year.

Just like we would beat baylor if it were earlier last year?


Maybe, we did.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Fill My Bill on November 13, 2013, 11:19:39 PM
It would be so awesome if a story broke about Snyder sleeping with like 70 hot college girls
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: MakeItRain on November 13, 2013, 11:37:23 PM
I think we might be Big 12 champs if we played the schedule in reverse.

This raises a bigger issue, which is the way in which the Big 12 schedules the season.  This year-by-year method is BS.  There are certain types of factors (returning starters/returning QB/who your opponent played the week before/starting season at home) that can be used to set up a more favorable for different teams.  Doing it year by year only increases the ability of the conference to manipulate the schedule.  But, hey, maybe us starting on the road every f'n year is just an accident.

First of all I'm pretty sure they don't do it year by year and if they do that only started the last two seasons after conference realignment.  When the Big 12 actually had 12 teams the schedules were done 8 years at a time. They had/have a computer program that they input certain info into like number of home games per team and certain weekends when teams must play and the computer gives them lots and lots of schedules, then the conference football officials poured over the schedules and picked the best one. Not 100% sure on this last part but I believe after a schedule was selected it was voted on by the university presidents.
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: mocat on November 14, 2013, 06:50:33 AM
Hey idiots bitching about the schedule, TCU was supposed to win the conference and oSu was supposed to have a down year. There's no way to schedule it fairly or unfairly. Its just the schedule
Title: Re: Snydering
Post by: Mr Bread on November 14, 2013, 09:26:34 AM
Hey idiots bitching about the schedule, TCU was supposed to win the conference and oSu was supposed to have a down year. There's no way to schedule it fairly or unfairly. Its just the schedule

Wrong.  Steffy is correct when she says that the cats had to play some teams earlier and some teams later and that it isn't fair.  The cats should only have to play teams later, but not too much later.  The Big 12 is so corrupt.