goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 07:48:35 AM

Title: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 07:48:35 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: HELLHAMMER on November 04, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
Good ... eff'em.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: IPA4Me on November 04, 2013, 08:08:06 AM
Every little bit helps.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: my troll name ... Koppe22 on November 04, 2013, 08:12:59 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)
And one dreamy head coach..  :love:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.lastangryfan.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FKliff-Kingsbury.jpg&hash=c31e5fb4c4b6b13391c54e061a3934c5f58ae05d)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2013, 08:15:01 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)
And one dreamy head coach..  :love:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.lastangryfan.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FKliff-Kingsbury.jpg&hash=c31e5fb4c4b6b13391c54e061a3934c5f58ae05d)

Dreamy smeamy.

Bill is going to scheme him into oblivion. Next week fawning over his looks and swagger can continue, but this week the pretty boy goes down.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: #LIFE on November 04, 2013, 08:19:40 AM
What is the proper time to start getting pak'd for an 11 am roadie?  I usually start about 9 with some hard liquor  :drink: and start throwing the drinks down pretty good.  Usually end up snoozing for an hour or so after the game.  I may be doing it wrong, what does everyone else usually do?  :cheers:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 08:21:16 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)

Porter has the 2nd most tackles and Porter has the most passes defended and is tied for most INTs.  :Woot:

http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF (http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 08:23:16 AM
I think they ended up pulling the RS off a true frosh Safety to finish out the OSU game. So, that could be good for us?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 08:24:41 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)

Porter has the 2nd most tackles and Porter has the most passes defended and is tied for most INTs.  :Woot:

http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF (http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF)

And Bullitt has the most passes defended. I think he plays that rover position which I'm sure TTech has some dumb name for.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: puniraptor on November 04, 2013, 08:25:17 AM
What is the proper time to start getting pak'd for an 11 am roadie?  I usually start about 9 with some hard liquor  :drink: and start throwing the drinks down pretty good.  Usually end up snoozing for an hour or so after the game.  I may be doing it wrong, what does everyone else usually do?  :cheers:

I will crawl out of bed at 1055, pour an enormous mixing bowl full of cocoa dino bites, sit on the couch in my pj's and practice some intrinsic values
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: MadCat on November 04, 2013, 08:27:19 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)

Porter has the 2nd most tackles and Porter has the most passes defended and is tied for most INTs.  :Woot:

http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF (http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF)

And Bullitt has the most passes defended. I think he plays that rover position which I'm sure TTech has some dumb name for.

If I were in charge of dumb names it would be Red Rover.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Pett on November 04, 2013, 08:27:36 AM
As long as Kliff's flawless face is uninjured then they are going to be just fine
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 08:30:27 AM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)

Porter has the 2nd most tackles and Porter has the most passes defended and is tied for most INTs.  :Woot:

http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF (http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF)

And Bullitt has the most passes defended. I think he plays that rover position which I'm sure TTech has some dumb name for.

If I were in charge of dumb names it would be Red Rover.

well guess what mad cat, you are now in charge of dumb names.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 08:32:08 AM
just looked it up. they actually have two dumb named positions. Bandit and Raider (Bullitt was the Raider). notice how madcat's "red rover" is superior to both. They apparently play some stupid 3-4 or something so I'm guessing one of these dorks lines up on the LOS most snaps. anyway, wallerstedt so....
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: MadCat on November 04, 2013, 08:33:19 AM
Woot
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 08:37:00 AM
confidence/self-esteem/morale rising.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 04, 2013, 08:38:36 AM
Kingsbury will force them to play.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2013, 09:22:05 AM
just looked it up. they actually have two dumb named positions. Bandit and Raider (Bullitt was the Raider). notice how madcat's "red rover" is superior to both. They apparently play some stupid 3-4 or something so I'm guessing one of these dorks lines up on the LOS most snaps. anyway, wallerstedt so....

Was almost a K-State defense thing for a short time.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg508%2F1754%2Fbanditcopy.jpg&hash=2ba661b611c4ae31e00ab610334fb6f1ebd87a5d)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2013, 09:25:59 AM
too bad for tech, really want to face these guys with both teams at 100% and just let the best team win.  but really i wish a nuclear bomb would go off in that piece of crap town and we'd have to play against their vaporized skeletons, thoughts?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: ben ji on November 04, 2013, 09:27:03 AM
What is the proper time to start getting pak'd for an 11 am roadie?  I usually start about 9 with some hard liquor  :drink: and start throwing the drinks down pretty good.  Usually end up snoozing for an hour or so after the game.  I may be doing it wrong, what does everyone else usually do?  :cheers:

I will crawl out of bed at 1055, pour an enormous mixing bowl full of cocoa dino bites, sit on the couch in my pj's and practice some intrinsic values

I enjoyed this post
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on November 04, 2013, 09:27:42 AM
just looked it up. they actually have two dumb named positions. Bandit and Raider (Bullitt was the Raider). notice how madcat's "red rover" is superior to both. They apparently play some stupid 3-4 or something so I'm guessing one of these dorks lines up on the LOS most snaps. anyway, wallerstedt so....
Was it the Bandit or the Raider that almost tore off Allen Everidge's head?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2013, 09:28:29 AM
The injuries guarantee Jake plays 90% of this game and that we bomb the crap out of them.  Or try to, anyway.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KITNfury on November 04, 2013, 09:33:03 AM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 09:54:59 AM
The injuries guarantee Jake plays 90% of this game and that we bomb the crap out of them.  Or try to, anyway.
I think Porter plays in the box like Evans. (Evans also has the most passes defended of any Cat, fwiw) With an LB and a Red Rover missing we should try to run the crap out of them, imho.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: XocolateThundarr on November 04, 2013, 09:57:16 AM
CONFIDENCE RISING!!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: eastcat on November 04, 2013, 09:59:00 AM
I don't think TT's defense is that good period. WVU's garbage hung 27 on them.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: #LIFE on November 04, 2013, 10:01:52 AM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4 (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4)

Quote
6. Kansas State (4-4, 2-3 Big 12, last week: 6): Since the return of receivers Tyler Lockett and Tramaine Thompson, the Wildcats have featured an efficiently balanced offensive attack. K-State threw for 221 yards and ran for 227 while picking apart Iowa State’s defense. The K-State run defense has been excellent the past month, too. This is not a team anyone will want to face this last month of the season.


 :Wha:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2013, 10:04:52 AM
The injuries guarantee Jake plays 90% of this game and that we bomb the crap out of them.  Or try to, anyway.
I think Porter plays in the box like Evans. (Evans also has the most passes defended of any Cat, fwiw) With an LB and a Red Rover missing we should try to run the crap out of them, imho.

This is definitely what we should do.  Hold the ball as much as absolutely possible. 
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on November 04, 2013, 10:05:52 AM
Has anybody looked at the Big 12 confy schedule for the week of Nov. 16 to see who Tech is matched up with... 

Somebody might be peeking ahead a bit, too.


 :peek:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2013, 10:06:54 AM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Quote
6. Kansas State (4-4, 2-3 Big 12, last week: 6): Since the return of receivers Tyler Lockett and Tramaine Thompson, the Wildcats have featured an efficiently balanced offensive attack. K-State threw for 221 yards and ran for 227 while picking apart Iowa State’s defense. The K-State run defense has been excellent the past month, too. This is not a team anyone will want to face this last month of the season.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 04, 2013, 10:09:04 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: ben ji on November 04, 2013, 10:09:56 AM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Quote
6. Kansas State (4-4, 2-3 Big 12, last week: 6): Since the return of receivers Tyler Lockett and Tramaine Thompson, the Wildcats have featured an efficiently balanced offensive attack. K-State threw for 221 yards and ran for 227 while picking apart Iowa State’s defense. The K-State run defense has been excellent the past month, too. This is not a team anyone will want to face this last month of the season.

Thanks KSU_Luke
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 10:12:04 AM
_FAN, what the heck were you thinking!

OT: did i see you in section 8 mocking the ISU band near the end of the game?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KITNfury on November 04, 2013, 10:29:47 AM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4 (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4)

Quote
6. Kansas State (4-4, 2-3 Big 12, last week: 6): Since the return of receivers Tyler Lockett and Tramaine Thompson, the Wildcats have featured an efficiently balanced offensive attack. K-State threw for 221 yards and ran for 227 while picking apart Iowa State’s defense. The K-State run defense has been excellent the past month, too. This is not a team anyone will want to face this last month of the season.


 :Wha:
CHRISTMAS CAME EARLY FOR ME!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2013, 11:45:28 AM
_FAN, what the heck were you thinking!

OT: did i see you in section 8 mocking the ISU band near the end of the game?

that ISU band was annoying as crap. I hope _FAN mushed their faces.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: unleashthemob on November 04, 2013, 12:01:21 PM
Every team seems to have injuries after playing okie st.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 04, 2013, 01:32:08 PM
It's a classic battle of Schemey vs. Dreamy. WHO WILL WIN!?!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 02:05:35 PM
3 starters injured v. OSU
Terrance Bullitt, LB, broke his hand (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Tre Porter, DB, ankle (Sr, HM All B12 last year)
Beau Carpetener, OL, possible concussion (Jr, started 9 games last year)

http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF (http://www.texastech.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2013-2014/teamcume.html#TEAM.DEF)

Dartwan Bush, DT, knee

Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 04, 2013, 02:07:29 PM
they are out three defensive starters who play in the box? better call #ourguy #baylorgame #billwilloutschemehimself #dementia

 :Wha:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2013, 02:11:20 PM
It's a classic battle of Schemey vs. Dreamy. WHO WILL WIN!?!

this isn't a god damn fashion show, this is football.  :bang:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2013, 02:14:51 PM
Tell that to the inventor of the camo powercat!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2013, 02:15:27 PM
they are out three defensive starters who play in the box? better call #ourguy #baylorgame #billwilloutschemehimself #dementia

 :Wha:

 :surprised:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2013, 02:20:38 PM
_FAN, what the heck were you thinking!

OT: did i see you in section 8 mocking the ISU band near the end of the game?

that ISU band was annoying as crap. I hope _FAN mushed their faces.

Darn. Everyone's gotta luke sometime I guess.

No, I wasn't in section 8.

I did tweet during the game that ISU's highlight of the day was probably their band's rendition of "What does the fox say?"
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2013, 02:45:49 PM
We're going to stomp their faces in.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 04, 2013, 02:46:00 PM
they are out three defensive starters who play in the box? better call #ourguy #baylorgame #billwilloutschemehimself #dementia

 :Wha:

#nextmanup
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Pett on November 04, 2013, 04:00:06 PM
"Kliff....you may be sexy, but so is my defense."

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FcC3CFMC8yQk%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&hash=e3206f16a9607d2c97555ae48f3314f54d2e6a59)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Mr Bread on November 04, 2013, 04:24:56 PM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: chemhawk on November 04, 2013, 08:48:29 PM
What's the injury sitch for the Cats?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2013, 08:49:32 PM
What's the injury sitch for the Cats?
We're invincible

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: TTech
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 04, 2013, 08:51:04 PM
What's the injury sitch for the Cats?
Chem, I'm loving your butthurt K-State threads on game day. Keep up the great work! :D
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Demo158 on November 04, 2013, 09:09:03 PM
I'm looking forward to shellacking TT and TCU and the talking heads start saying stuff like "I don't think any teams wants to face this KSU Wildcat team right now"....

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4 (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/75099/big-12-power-rankings-week-10-4)

Quote
6. Kansas State (4-4, 2-3 Big 12, last week: 6): Since the return of receivers Tyler Lockett and Tramaine Thompson, the Wildcats have featured an efficiently balanced offensive attack. K-State threw for 221 yards and ran for 227 while picking apart Iowa State’s defense. The K-State run defense has been excellent the past month, too. This is not a team anyone will want to face this last month of the season.


 :Wha:
CHRISTMAS CAME EARLY FOR ME!
:thumbs:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Benja on November 04, 2013, 09:16:41 PM
Man, I don't even know what to think about this game. I don't even really feel like talking about it because I have no idea what to expect. I really want to win.


Title: Re: TTech
Post by: chunkles on November 04, 2013, 09:38:28 PM
"Kliff....you may be sexy, but so is my defense."

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FcC3CFMC8yQk%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&hash=e3206f16a9607d2c97555ae48f3314f54d2e6a59)

I saw this and was all "OMG look at his face it would be awesome if he had a mask"

So I was like,
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1141.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn590%2Fchunkles22%2Fsuper%2Fbatcathayes.png&hash=d33c4c55582083d223fc3f22a54754f015bf7c4a)

and then I thought our other defensive guys need superhero street cred too and was just


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1141.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn590%2Fchunkles22%2Fsuper%2Fgoblakeseilerbot.png&hash=ab5c7e3571ee1ef172452d31e5462bbc7625ff08)
go blake seiler botting

and then so magneto lattimore gets all
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1141.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn590%2Fchunkles22%2Fsuper%2Fmagnetolattimore.png&hash=b418872d83a16184f1f95c752050fe28fa03a144)
will you have this rose mother rough rider and

thanos douchebury was like
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1141.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn590%2Fchunkles22%2Fsuper%2Fthanosdouchebury.png&hash=5de0998a168d82c572a1427b2431c77d6e23a99d)
NOOOO!!!!!   and :shakesfist: 'ing lots at us. and then scoreboard we win.  boom.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2013, 09:42:38 PM
Catman is fantastic

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Tobias on November 04, 2013, 11:11:39 PM
chunkles.  holy crap.  i love you.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2013, 08:52:50 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: TownieCat on November 05, 2013, 09:04:47 AM
Tom Hayes > Val Kilmer
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2013, 09:09:57 AM
Tom Hayes > Val Kilmer

I'm certain Val would be terrible at running a bar and grill. Point Hayes.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: XocolateThundarr on November 05, 2013, 09:11:15 AM
Tom Hayes > Val Kilmer

I'm certain Val would be terrible at running a bar and grill. Point Hayes.

:lol:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: pissclams on November 05, 2013, 09:38:24 AM
"chunkles, a talented poster on gE"
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: IHateSQUAWKS on November 05, 2013, 12:47:46 PM
What is the proper time to start getting pak'd for an 11 am roadie?  I usually start about 9 with some hard liquor  :drink: and start throwing the drinks down pretty good.  Usually end up snoozing for an hour or so after the game.  I may be doing it wrong, what does everyone else usually do?  :cheers:
Tailgating 6 am.
Road game 8am.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: steve dave on November 08, 2013, 09:37:06 AM
Quote
Thunder_Cat
Post #6804
MyFanPage
Add Buddy

All KC Star writers pick KSU over T-Tech except..U guessed it..... Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Robbinettee......LOL...BTW he is dead last too.  He and our own debbie downer negative nancy grace Wallace should clean the pee out of their coffee cup and catch on how good this team is getting and will be in 2014/15.


good run of slams here from this stud
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Tobias on November 08, 2013, 09:38:46 AM
Quote
Thunder_Cat
Post #6804
MyFanPage
Add Buddy

All KC Star writers pick KSU over T-Tech except..U guessed it..... Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Robbinettee......LOL...BTW he is dead last too.  He and our own debbie downer negative nancy grace Wallace should clean the pee out of their coffee cup and catch on how good this team is getting and will be in 2014/15.


good run of slams here from this stud

Thunder_Cat just murk'n 'em :surprised:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Fill My Bill on November 08, 2013, 09:58:36 AM
KSU has done much better against all 3 common opponents (ISU, WVU, OSU). Same overall results of the games of course (W/L), but we looked sexier.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: mocat on November 08, 2013, 10:00:59 AM
i love how he worked nancy grace into his barrage of cannon fire there. nancy grace is the worst!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Brock Landers on November 08, 2013, 10:09:41 AM
Clean the pee out of their cofffee cup  Lol, what in the world??
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Michiganisstillgood on November 08, 2013, 10:18:19 AM
Clean the pee out of their cofffee cup  Lol, what in the world??

Have you ever drank pee in your morning coffee? It's actually not that bad, but yeah you should at least give it a cursory rinse.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Brock Landers on November 08, 2013, 10:27:02 AM
Clean the pee out of their cofffee cup  Lol, what in the world??

Have you ever drank pee in your morning coffee? It's actually not that bad, but yeah you should at least give it a cursory rinse.


Need some help on this one......if someone is pissing in your coffee cup at work, is that considered bullying or hazing?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: MadCat on November 08, 2013, 10:45:42 AM
Clean the pee out of their cofffee cup  Lol, what in the world??

Have you ever drank pee in your morning coffee? It's actually not that bad, but yeah you should at least give it a cursory rinse.


Need some help on this one......if someone is pissing in your coffee cup at work, is that considered bullying or hazing?
Only if you choose to be offended.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: AbeFroman on November 08, 2013, 10:51:12 AM
Quote
Thunder_Cat
Post #6804
MyFanPage
Add Buddy

All KC Star writers pick KSU over T-Tech except..U guessed it..... Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Robbinettee......LOL...BTW he is dead last too.  He and our own debbie downer negative nancy grace Wallace should clean the pee out of their coffee cup and catch on how good this team is getting and will be in 2014/15.


good run of slams here from this stud

 :lol:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 08, 2013, 10:53:19 AM
_FAN, what the heck were you thinking!

OT: did i see you in section 8 mocking the ISU band near the end of the game?

that ISU band was annoying as crap. I hope _FAN mushed their faces.

Darn. Everyone's gotta luke sometime I guess.

No, I wasn't in section 8.

I did tweet during the game that ISU's highlight of the day was probably their band's rendition of "What does the fox say?"

yeah that was sweet
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Panjandrum on November 08, 2013, 10:57:34 AM
I hated Thunder_Cat when I was on GPC.  Absolutely hated him.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 08, 2013, 11:22:39 AM
Clean the pee out of their cofffee cup  Lol, what in the world??

Have you ever drank pee in your morning coffee? It's actually not that bad, but yeah you should at least give it a cursory rinse.

They pee in each other's coffee at GPC?   :sdeek:


Need some help on this one......if someone is pissing in your coffee cup at work, is that considered bullying or hazing?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 08, 2013, 11:41:42 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA 
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 11:42:16 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA 

Why not? Of course we can beat them.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 08, 2013, 11:43:31 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA 

Why not? Of course we can beat them.

Of course.  but will we?   
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 11:44:08 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA 

Why not? Of course we can beat them.

Of course.  but will we?   

My score prediction is posted on this blog. Somewhere.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 08, 2013, 11:45:00 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

We win this game by double digits.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 08, 2013, 11:48:37 AM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

We win this game by double digits.

It'll certainly make for a much more enjoyable afternoon of football watching/boozcating. 
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: mocat on November 08, 2013, 11:59:13 AM
i sure as crap do not think we are going to lose or win

29-29  :lynchmob:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: XocolateThundarr on November 08, 2013, 12:02:25 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA 

Yep...by at least 10.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KanSt43 on November 08, 2013, 12:04:50 PM
CAN we beat Tech? Of course. WILL we? I honestly doubt it. But regardless,  :ksu:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: XocolateThundarr on November 08, 2013, 12:08:18 PM
CAN we beat Tech? Of course. WILL we? I honestly doubt it. But regardless,  :ksu:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvjarmy.com%2Fjunkbin%2Fgtfo.gif&hash=6421e234d8e3ea6da6042ab933c1194303c0b430)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KITNfury on November 08, 2013, 12:13:23 PM
Statistics say it's 50/50 chance.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KanSt43 on November 08, 2013, 12:14:04 PM
CAN we beat Tech? Of course. WILL we? I honestly doubt it. But regardless,  :ksu:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvjarmy.com%2Fjunkbin%2Fgtfo.gif&hash=6421e234d8e3ea6da6042ab933c1194303c0b430)

Clever.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: yoEMAW on November 08, 2013, 12:20:36 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

Let me tell you something, Belvis. If I knew the outcome of tomorrow's game between the fighting purple cats and the highfalutin red raiders, I wouldn't be sitting here bbs'n with you right now I can tell you that much.

But I will say this...I like our chances.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: catzacker on November 08, 2013, 12:51:22 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: ChiComCat on November 08, 2013, 12:52:50 PM
I think we're going to win.  This close to game time, I've usually convinced myself.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 12:53:23 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 

Not me.

38-30 Cats.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kslim on November 08, 2013, 12:53:58 PM
CAN we beat Tech? Of course. WILL we? I honestly doubt it. But regardless,  :ksu:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvjarmy.com%2Fjunkbin%2Fgtfo.gif&hash=6421e234d8e3ea6da6042ab933c1194303c0b430)

Clever.
what is lynn dickey hearing?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: catzacker on November 08, 2013, 12:55:11 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 

Not me.

38-30 Cats.

i don't get the 38 points.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 12:55:57 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 

Not me.

38-30 Cats.

i don't get the 38 points.

Turnovers and special teams.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 08, 2013, 12:58:29 PM
I think Tech sucks and they're a product of their schedule just like last year. Cats by 10.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: catzacker on November 08, 2013, 01:00:29 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 

Not me.

38-30 Cats.

i don't get the 38 points.

Turnovers and special teams.

does Tech have crappy kickoff and punt units?  Dreamy seems like he knows not to kick to TT and TBL (which is to say he probably watched the NDST game).  And Guidry isn't walking through that door.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 08, 2013, 01:08:00 PM
guys, none of us really think KSU is beating Tech, right?  TIA

i think deep down in places a lot of ksu cat fans don't talk about at parties, they don't think we are going to win. 

Not me.

38-30 Cats.

i don't get the 38 points.

Turnovers and special teams.

does Tech have crappy kickoff and punt units?  Dreamy seems like he knows not to kick to TT and TBL (which is to say he probably watched the NDST game).  And Guidry isn't walking through that door.

Britz tho.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 01:12:13 PM
does Tech have crappy kickoff and punt units?  Dreamy seems like he knows not to kick to TT and TBL (which is to say he probably watched the NDST game).  And Guidry isn't walking through that door.

Their coverage is average and Thompson/Lockett are due to break one.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kso_FAN on November 08, 2013, 01:16:38 PM
Also:

"We're tighter than we've been in -- forever," Finney said. "We're tighter than last year's team, for sure."

:D
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Harry Dunne on November 08, 2013, 01:24:01 PM
We will win.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: slobber on November 12, 2013, 08:17:49 AM
Some really good posting in this thread, but also, some really shitty posting in this thread.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 08:33:54 AM
i sure as crap do not think we are going to lose or win

29-29  :lynchmob:

This was way off.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KITNfury on November 12, 2013, 08:49:53 AM
Some really good posting in this thread, but also, some really shitty posting in this thread.
Weird bump.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: slobber on November 12, 2013, 10:59:00 AM
Some really good posting in this thread, but also, some really shitty posting in this thread.
Weird bump.
Too many shitty poster to call out. Plus, it gave the good posters a chance to review and say, "In your fat face you shitty posters." :dunno:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kslim on November 12, 2013, 11:12:21 AM
Some really good posting in this thread, but also, some really shitty posting in this thread.
Weird bump.
Too many shitty poster to call out. Plus, it gave the good posters a chance to review and say, "In your fat face you shitty posters." :dunno:
well chunks won the thread and basically the rest was fodder. We all knew it was an easy win
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on November 12, 2013, 04:20:35 PM
Some really good posting in this thread, but also, some really shitty posting in this thread.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fredbranchproperties.com%2Fkliffdwi.gif&hash=534d7f546623e053533984a9fc493a16882fec64)
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 12, 2013, 04:32:45 PM
people thought we were going to lose?   :lol:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: kslim on November 12, 2013, 04:33:23 PM
people thought we were going to lose?   :lol:
yep and they're currently hitch hiking
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 12, 2013, 04:54:20 PM
people thought we were going to lose?   :lol:
yep and they're currently hitch hiking
 

Meh, just wanted to make sure I had a spare tire and plenty of gas before making the road trip.  if you know what I mean. 
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 12, 2013, 05:09:40 PM
The injuries guarantee Jake plays 90% of this game and that we bomb the crap out of them.  Or try to, anyway.
I think Porter plays in the box like Evans. (Evans also has the most passes defended of any Cat, fwiw) With an LB and a Red Rover missing we should try to run the crap out of them, imho.
:gocho:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Tobias on January 09, 2014, 11:15:50 AM
is this lukefield? i mean, what on earth

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield)

Quote
Last month, in a stunning move, Baker Mayfield decided to transfer from Texas Tech despite winning the starting quarterback job in the preseason as a walk-on true freshman.

Mayfield, who also started Texas Tech’s regular-season finale against Texas, had initially vaguely cited a “miscommunication” with coach Kliff Kingsbury as the reason.

Just as stunning, Mayfield later revealed he would be enrolling at Oklahoma, which in the spring will have five scholarship quarterbacks, including freshman Trevor Knight, who was named MVP in the Allstate Sugar Bowl victory over Alabama.

Even though he was a walk-on at Texas Tech, Mayfield is still bound by NCAA transfer rules, and the Red Raiders have not granted him a release to transfer within the conference. Under Big 12 and NCAA rules, if Mayfield transferred to Oklahoma anyway, not only would he have to sit out a year, but he would lose a season of eligibility.

Mayfield, however, is hoping this week the NCAA will grant his appeal to be eligible right away.

In an interview with ESPN.com Wednesday evening, Mayfield went into more detail about why exactly he left Texas Tech; and why now he wants to go to Oklahoma, even though the Sooners seem to have their quarterback of the future in Knight:

Jake Trotter: What was the reason that you decided to leave Texas Tech after being the starting quarterback to end the regular season?

Baker Mayfield: Well, a lot of things played into it. It was over time. When I got hurt [Week 5 at Kansas], there was no communication between me and my coach [Kingsbury]. When I got healthy, I didn’t know why I wasn’t playing right away. At that time, we were losing a couple games in a row. I was still clueless as to why I wasn’t playing. That was really frustrating for me because I started the first five games and we won. So, I just didn’t really know exactly what he was thinking or what the situation was. So that happened. And then going from a week-to-week basis not knowing whether I was going to play or not and how short the leash would be if I had an average half, how quickly I would be pulled or anything like that. It was making me uncomfortable, and I just didn’t want to be there anymore. I loved Lubbock and I loved my teammates. But going through that and then them tell me they’re still working on a scholarship for next fall, and I wouldn’t have one for this semester coming up. It was all that.

Trotter: So they told you they wouldn’t have a scholarship for you in the spring, either?

Mayfield: Exactly. They said they were still working on one for next fall.

Trotter: Was that the final straw for you?

Mayfield: I mean that was kinda leading up to it, yes. Then after the Texas game on Thanksgiving, the next week we went in, I was splitting second-team reps after starting on Thanksgiving. I still had no idea what was going on. I’d just had enough at that point.

Trotter: So after the Texas game, you were splitting second-teams behind Davis Webb?

Mayfield: Michael [Brewer] was going first. I don’t know if he [Kingsbury] did that by age, but there was no explanation for why he was doing it. Right when we started our first bowl practice, right before the practice, he [Kingsbury] said it was a straight-up competition and that was how they were going to determine the starting quarterback. I didn’t think that was really fair. I’m not one to be afraid of competition at all because I’ve gone through that my whole life at Lake Travis [Mayfield’s high school], too, and when I got to Tech. But I didn’t think that was fair because I had done my job when I had gotten the opportunity. I mean, I thought I needed more of a chance, and I wasn’t getting it. And they were splitting the reps equally so that was the last straw.

Trotter: So when you told Coach Kingsbury, what was his reaction and what was that conversation like?

Mayfield: I mean, he was shocked, although he was quoted saying he knew one of the quarterbacks was going to transfer. He was shocked to think it was me leaving. And he was saying how he had been behind me the whole time. I had no idea because of the miscommunication and the lack of communication, really. And not knowing what he was thinking. I mean, if you gave me another chance to go through it again, I still wouldn’t think he was behind me, and I was his guy the whole time. I know he did give me the opportunity to start in the first place, and I’m thankful for that. I worked my butt off to get there, and I thank for him for taking a chance on me -- starting a walk-on quarterback. But after that, when he was rotating us, there was no explanation.

Trotter: So do you feel like it was a lack of communication more than a miscommunication, which is the word you had used when you first decided to transfer?

Mayfield: Yeah, I would say that.

Trotter: What was the reaction of your teammates when you told them?

Mayfield: They understood. All the guys I loved and had gone through all those tough times with, they understood completely. They supported me. And I got nothing but good wishes from them. All of them, including all of the quarterbacks, understood.

Trotter: What was it like watching the National University Holiday Bowl on TV, or did you even watch it?

Mayfield: Oh, I watched all of it. I was so proud of them. I knew Arizona State was going to be a good team, but they just blew [it] out of the water. I was jumping up and down in Austin, Texas for those guys.

Trotter: OK, so you decide to leave Tech, were there any other schools you looked at?

Mayfield: I mean, yes, there were. I got some calls from places Tech had to released me to, but I wasn’t that interested.

Who were some of those schools?

Mayfield: East Carolina, Houston -- just some other schools that kinda talked to me back in high school, but nothing I was ever really interested in.

Trotter: So it seemed like OU was the one school you had in mind when you decided you were going to transfer, correct?

Mayfield: Yes. Out of high school, I applied to three schools right off the bat: Oklahoma, TCU and I think Tech was the third. But I didn’t really want to go to Tech until late in the spring of my senior year. Oklahoma and TCU were my first two options coming out of high school. That’s where I wanted to go. And I wasn’t going to give TCU another chance after they basically screwed my whole recruiting over from the start [TCU recruited Mayfield but never offered a scholarship]. So OU was where I’ve always wanted to go. I grew up an Oklahoma fan. I used to go to all the games watching a bunch of people who are in the NFL now.
Trotter: How do you become an OU fan in Austin?

Mayfield: That’s what a lot of people ask. I never really was a big fan of Texas, and when I traveled to OU games -- because my dad used to play and old coaches would give us tickets -- me at six years old to 12 -- I used to go to like two games a year before hitting high school football. I just grew up a fan. Then one of my best friends is Garrett Gilbert. When I watched him go through all of that at Texas, it just made me just absolutely hate what they did to him and watching fans boo a 20-year-old kid off the field, it was just terrible.

Trotter: So, have you talked to any OU coaches at all?

Mayfield: Not at all.

Trotter: Have you talked to any OU players?

Mayfield: I mean I know Trevor Knight, but not really. I congratulated a couple of them after the Sugar Bowl.

Trotter: So you’re just going to show up at OU and just show up for football practice -- is that the plan?

Mayfield: Well, I’m still waiting on my appeal, which is happening this Friday.

Trotter: You’re doing the appeal on your own. OU is not handling that, correct?

Mayfield: Correct. They can’t handle it because Texas Tech has blocked my communication to any Big 12 schools. And so, that’s what we’re having to deal with. The appeal will decide whether I can join the football team and also eligibility-wise and everything that involves football.

Trotter: So if they deny your appeal, what does that mean?

Mayfield: I haven’t thought about that, because I think I have a good case, and I think I should have a chance because I walked on to Texas Tech, I didn’t have anything paid for; I was not recruited. I just knew people at Texas Tech [and said] I’m just going to go to school there and have fun and go out for the football team.’ That’s what I did, and it wound up working out perfectly for me. And so, for them to have the final say as to where I can go for my future, it’s kinda ridiculous in my mind because they didn’t pay for anything, and I didn’t even have a scholarship promised to me for this next semester. So I don’t know what’s going to happen, but I’m hoping for the best for my own sake.

Trotter: If the appeal is denied, will you look at other schools since you won’t be eligible?

Mayfield: Yeah, I probably would, but I don’t know.

Trotter: But if they do grant the appeal, you will be coming to OU?

Mayfield: Yes.

Trotter: I think people are confused by your decision to come to OU because you have somebody like Trevor Knight who seems pretty entrenched after that Sugar Bowl, and they have four other quarterbacks on scholarship. Why would you go to OU when you’d have a better chance of playing if you went somewhere else?

Mayfield: I know what they’re thinking. Trevor played phenomenal in the Sugar. He beat Alabama, which had arguably the top defense for five years in a row. Yeah, they can say that. But I’m not scared of competition at all. I like Trevor. He’s a nice guy. And I know Blake Bell is a big dude and has some good ability. I watched from the sideline [as he] beat us. He played one of his best games against Texas Tech. But I mean, I’m not scared of that at all. It’s not just about the football, too. Oklahoma is just a better academic opportunity as well. It’s just a better school. It’s just a better opportunity for me at this point.

Trotter: So this isn’t strictly a football decision for you? Is that what people don’t understand?

Mayfield: Exactly. I left Texas Tech because of the football. and that was frustrating to me. I had to get out of there as soon as possible before all of Lubbock erupted on me. I got out of there. Now it’s about finding a place to settle in and get comfortable. OU is a place that’s familiar to me.
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: MadCat on January 09, 2014, 11:23:52 AM
is this lukefield? i mean, what on earth

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield)

I wonder why he doesn't just try for Texas...?
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: mocat on January 09, 2014, 11:24:57 AM
that kid is like the prototype for a FP, TC, etc
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: mocat on January 09, 2014, 11:25:24 AM
UT fans booed a player for sucking, and so he goes to OU where they would never do that.  :flush:
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Tobias on January 09, 2014, 11:25:42 AM
that kid is like the prototype for a FP, TC, etc

pussification of america
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: KITNfury on January 09, 2014, 12:29:49 PM
is this lukefield? i mean, what on earth

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield (http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/78697/qa-former-texas-tech-qb-baker-mayfield)

Quote
Last month, in a stunning move, Baker Mayfield decided to transfer from Texas Tech despite winning the starting quarterback job in the preseason as a walk-on true freshman.

Mayfield, who also started Texas Tech’s regular-season finale against Texas, had initially vaguely cited a “miscommunication” with coach Kliff Kingsbury as the reason.

Just as stunning, Mayfield later revealed he would be enrolling at Oklahoma, which in the spring will have five scholarship quarterbacks, including freshman Trevor Knight, who was named MVP in the Allstate Sugar Bowl victory over Alabama.

Even though he was a walk-on at Texas Tech, Mayfield is still bound by NCAA transfer rules, and the Red Raiders have not granted him a release to transfer within the conference. Under Big 12 and NCAA rules, if Mayfield transferred to Oklahoma anyway, not only would he have to sit out a year, but he would lose a season of eligibility.

Mayfield, however, is hoping this week the NCAA will grant his appeal to be eligible right away.

In an interview with ESPN.com Wednesday evening, Mayfield went into more detail about why exactly he left Texas Tech; and why now he wants to go to Oklahoma, even though the Sooners seem to have their quarterback of the future in Knight:

Jake Trotter: What was the reason that you decided to leave Texas Tech after being the starting quarterback to end the regular season?

Baker Mayfield: Well, a lot of things played into it. It was over time. When I got hurt [Week 5 at Kansas], there was no communication between me and my coach [Kingsbury]. When I got healthy, I didn’t know why I wasn’t playing right away. At that time, we were losing a couple games in a row. I was still clueless as to why I wasn’t playing. That was really frustrating for me because I started the first five games and we won. So, I just didn’t really know exactly what he was thinking or what the situation was. So that happened. And then going from a week-to-week basis not knowing whether I was going to play or not and how short the leash would be if I had an average half, how quickly I would be pulled or anything like that. It was making me uncomfortable, and I just didn’t want to be there anymore. I loved Lubbock and I loved my teammates. But going through that and then them tell me they’re still working on a scholarship for next fall, and I wouldn’t have one for this semester coming up. It was all that.

Trotter: So they told you they wouldn’t have a scholarship for you in the spring, either?

Mayfield: Exactly. They said they were still working on one for next fall.

Trotter: Was that the final straw for you?

Mayfield: I mean that was kinda leading up to it, yes. Then after the Texas game on Thanksgiving, the next week we went in, I was splitting second-team reps after starting on Thanksgiving. I still had no idea what was going on. I’d just had enough at that point.

Trotter: So after the Texas game, you were splitting second-teams behind Davis Webb?

Mayfield: Michael [Brewer] was going first. I don’t know if he [Kingsbury] did that by age, but there was no explanation for why he was doing it. Right when we started our first bowl practice, right before the practice, he [Kingsbury] said it was a straight-up competition and that was how they were going to determine the starting quarterback. I didn’t think that was really fair. I’m not one to be afraid of competition at all because I’ve gone through that my whole life at Lake Travis [Mayfield’s high school], too, and when I got to Tech. But I didn’t think that was fair because I had done my job when I had gotten the opportunity. I mean, I thought I needed more of a chance, and I wasn’t getting it. And they were splitting the reps equally so that was the last straw.

Trotter: So when you told Coach Kingsbury, what was his reaction and what was that conversation like?

Mayfield: I mean, he was shocked, although he was quoted saying he knew one of the quarterbacks was going to transfer. He was shocked to think it was me leaving. And he was saying how he had been behind me the whole time. I had no idea because of the miscommunication and the lack of communication, really. And not knowing what he was thinking. I mean, if you gave me another chance to go through it again, I still wouldn’t think he was behind me, and I was his guy the whole time. I know he did give me the opportunity to start in the first place, and I’m thankful for that. I worked my butt off to get there, and I thank for him for taking a chance on me -- starting a walk-on quarterback. But after that, when he was rotating us, there was no explanation.

Trotter: So do you feel like it was a lack of communication more than a miscommunication, which is the word you had used when you first decided to transfer?

Mayfield: Yeah, I would say that.

Trotter: What was the reaction of your teammates when you told them?

Mayfield: They understood. All the guys I loved and had gone through all those tough times with, they understood completely. They supported me. And I got nothing but good wishes from them. All of them, including all of the quarterbacks, understood.

Trotter: What was it like watching the National University Holiday Bowl on TV, or did you even watch it?

Mayfield: Oh, I watched all of it. I was so proud of them. I knew Arizona State was going to be a good team, but they just blew [it] out of the water. I was jumping up and down in Austin, Texas for those guys.

Trotter: OK, so you decide to leave Tech, were there any other schools you looked at?

Mayfield: I mean, yes, there were. I got some calls from places Tech had to released me to, but I wasn’t that interested.

Who were some of those schools?

Mayfield: East Carolina, Houston -- just some other schools that kinda talked to me back in high school, but nothing I was ever really interested in.

Trotter: So it seemed like OU was the one school you had in mind when you decided you were going to transfer, correct?

Mayfield: Yes. Out of high school, I applied to three schools right off the bat: Oklahoma, TCU and I think Tech was the third. But I didn’t really want to go to Tech until late in the spring of my senior year. Oklahoma and TCU were my first two options coming out of high school. That’s where I wanted to go. And I wasn’t going to give TCU another chance after they basically screwed my whole recruiting over from the start [TCU recruited Mayfield but never offered a scholarship]. So OU was where I’ve always wanted to go. I grew up an Oklahoma fan. I used to go to all the games watching a bunch of people who are in the NFL now.
Trotter: How do you become an OU fan in Austin?

Mayfield: That’s what a lot of people ask. I never really was a big fan of Texas, and when I traveled to OU games -- because my dad used to play and old coaches would give us tickets -- me at six years old to 12 -- I used to go to like two games a year before hitting high school football. I just grew up a fan. Then one of my best friends is Garrett Gilbert. When I watched him go through all of that at Texas, it just made me just absolutely hate what they did to him and watching fans boo a 20-year-old kid off the field, it was just terrible.

Trotter: So, have you talked to any OU coaches at all?

Mayfield: Not at all.

Trotter: Have you talked to any OU players?

Mayfield: I mean I know Trevor Knight, but not really. I congratulated a couple of them after the Sugar Bowl.

Trotter: So you’re just going to show up at OU and just show up for football practice -- is that the plan?

Mayfield: Well, I’m still waiting on my appeal, which is happening this Friday.

Trotter: You’re doing the appeal on your own. OU is not handling that, correct?

Mayfield: Correct. They can’t handle it because Texas Tech has blocked my communication to any Big 12 schools. And so, that’s what we’re having to deal with. The appeal will decide whether I can join the football team and also eligibility-wise and everything that involves football.

Trotter: So if they deny your appeal, what does that mean?

Mayfield: I haven’t thought about that, because I think I have a good case, and I think I should have a chance because I walked on to Texas Tech, I didn’t have anything paid for; I was not recruited. I just knew people at Texas Tech [and said] I’m just going to go to school there and have fun and go out for the football team.’ That’s what I did, and it wound up working out perfectly for me. And so, for them to have the final say as to where I can go for my future, it’s kinda ridiculous in my mind because they didn’t pay for anything, and I didn’t even have a scholarship promised to me for this next semester. So I don’t know what’s going to happen, but I’m hoping for the best for my own sake.

Trotter: If the appeal is denied, will you look at other schools since you won’t be eligible?

Mayfield: Yeah, I probably would, but I don’t know.

Trotter: But if they do grant the appeal, you will be coming to OU?

Mayfield: Yes.

Trotter: I think people are confused by your decision to come to OU because you have somebody like Trevor Knight who seems pretty entrenched after that Sugar Bowl, and they have four other quarterbacks on scholarship. Why would you go to OU when you’d have a better chance of playing if you went somewhere else?

Mayfield: I know what they’re thinking. Trevor played phenomenal in the Sugar. He beat Alabama, which had arguably the top defense for five years in a row. Yeah, they can say that. But I’m not scared of competition at all. I like Trevor. He’s a nice guy. And I know Blake Bell is a big dude and has some good ability. I watched from the sideline [as he] beat us. He played one of his best games against Texas Tech. But I mean, I’m not scared of that at all. It’s not just about the football, too. Oklahoma is just a better academic opportunity as well. It’s just a better school. It’s just a better opportunity for me at this point.

Trotter: So this isn’t strictly a football decision for you? Is that what people don’t understand?

Mayfield: Exactly. I left Texas Tech because of the football. and that was frustrating to me. I had to get out of there as soon as possible before all of Lubbock erupted on me. I got out of there. Now it’s about finding a place to settle in and get comfortable. OU is a place that’s familiar to me.
In some ways he kinda comes off as whiner, but on the other hand, I agree that if you're a walk on, you should be able to go to whatever school you want to without repercussion cause if you like it you should have put a scholly on it!
Title: Re: TTech
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 09, 2014, 01:22:09 PM
Yeah, he should be able to transfer wherever he wants.