goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:19:30 PM

Title: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:19:30 PM
Mark it down negative nancys', wildcat faithful, goetards, and sqwaks, the cats are dine losing for the year.

Seriously, whose going to beat us?  Ttech? OU?  That's who I would guess.  Not seeing it happening.

The conference appears to be coagulating as follows:

Top:  UT, Baylor
Mid: Cats, OU, tbsU, TTech
Low: WVU, TCU, ISU
Canine Fecal Matter: Ku

I really like how the schedule lines up for us.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: AppleJack on October 14, 2013, 08:20:32 PM
 :bill:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: hemmy on October 14, 2013, 08:21:40 PM
i would go nuts if that happened, but it won't
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: DQ12 on October 14, 2013, 08:22:07 PM
i'd bet we lose to OU and TT.  i think we're better than all the others.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: PIPE on October 14, 2013, 08:22:50 PM
Wut?

There is optimism......then there is retardedness   :sdeek:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 14, 2013, 08:23:52 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:24:37 PM
i'd bet we lose to OU and TT.  i think we're better than all the others.

You must have been tailgating during the ou and ttech games this week then.  OU is incompetent on offense and ttech can't stop the run
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2013, 08:25:37 PM
i'm in FSD, where do i sign your blog guestbook?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:26:59 PM
I mean, we've basically given away these last two games, and you'll never convince me north Dakota had any business beating us.

We're ostensibly 3 plays from being 5-1
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:27:44 PM
i'm in FSD, where do i sign your blog guestbook?

You just did, nephew!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: DQ12 on October 14, 2013, 08:29:02 PM
We're ostensibly 3 plays from being 5-1
that's odd because i could've sworn we lost 4 games already, 2 of which were by more than 2 scores. so by my count that's at least 6 plays.

Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 14, 2013, 08:34:10 PM
lol
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spaces on October 14, 2013, 08:35:13 PM
Better chance of winning out than missing out on a bowl game in my imo  :excited:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:36:29 PM
We're ostensibly 3 plays from being 5-1
that's odd because i could've sworn we lost 4 games already, 2 of which were by more than 2 scores. so by my count that's at least 6 plays.

Doesn't have to be the last play of the game, boy genius.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 14, 2013, 08:40:29 PM
Guys, it could happen.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: DQ12 on October 14, 2013, 08:43:36 PM
We're ostensibly 3 plays from being 5-1
that's odd because i could've sworn we lost 4 games already, 2 of which were by more than 2 scores. so by my count that's at least 6 plays.

Doesn't have to be the last play of the game, boy genius.
ok
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 08:45:01 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Validation :Woot:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kim carnes on October 14, 2013, 08:47:59 PM
This fsd guy oozes zeal.  This dlew guy has no zeal.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Katpappy on October 14, 2013, 08:48:09 PM
Guys, it could happen.
yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!!!!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 14, 2013, 08:50:05 PM
This fsd guy oozes zeal.  This dlew guy has no zeal.
Weird post by, Carnes. Is he trolling his usual style of trolling. :dunno:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 09:02:27 PM
This fsd guy oozes zeal.  This dlew guy has no zeal.
Weird post by, Carnes. Is he trolling his usual style of trolling. :dunno:

KC knows what's she's doing all the time.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on October 14, 2013, 09:09:04 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2013, 09:13:02 PM
I'm all in for this mother rough rider rough rider
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 14, 2013, 09:24:27 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on October 14, 2013, 09:47:20 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 14, 2013, 09:50:51 PM
We'll likely be favored in 4, maybe 5, or our last six.

WVU - win by a bunch
ISU - win by a bunch
TCU - win because they can't score
OU - win by some (maybe underdog)
KU - win by a million
TTech - win by some (underdog)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 14, 2013, 09:59:40 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:

Why would one even eat cake?  I eat only vegetables and fruit, and some lean proteins.  Just sayin', a real fan enjoys the success of her team.  To even suggest that enjoying the jealousy of one's rival is MORE enjoyable than enjoying the success of one's team is, on its face, a disgrace.  Furthermore, your squawktard-on-a-k-state-blog comment is unwarranted and, frankly, uninspired.  I don't come here to revel in your sorrow.  I come here because I have found the general intelligence and overall BBS acumen to be exceptional - no doubt despite your dragging down of the mean.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on October 14, 2013, 10:07:38 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:

Why would one even eat cake?  I eat only vegetables and fruit, and some lean proteins.  Just sayin', a real fan enjoys the success of her team.  To even suggest that enjoying the jealousy of one's rival is MORE enjoyable than enjoying the success of one's team is, on its face, a disgrace.  Furthermore, your squawktard-on-a-k-state-blog comment is unwarranted and, frankly, uninspired.  I don't come here to revel in your sorrow.  I come here because I have found the general intelligence and overall BBS acumen to be exceptional - no doubt despite your dragging down of the mean.

You really aren't very good at this.  Although you're generally relatively rational for a squawk, you swallowed the entirety of timmy and beems bait.

 :lol:

Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 14, 2013, 10:10:38 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:

Why would one even eat cake?  I eat only vegetables and fruit, and some lean proteins.  Just sayin', a real fan enjoys the success of her team.  To even suggest that enjoying the jealousy of one's rival is MORE enjoyable than enjoying the success of one's team is, on its face, a disgrace.  Furthermore, your squawktard-on-a-k-state-blog comment is unwarranted and, frankly, uninspired.  I don't come here to revel in your sorrow.  I come here because I have found the general intelligence and overall BBS acumen to be exceptional - no doubt despite your dragging down of the mean.

You really aren't very good at this.  Although you're generally relatively rational for a squawk, you swallowed the entirety of timmy and beems bait.

 :lol:

And you totally fell for my double-double-cross  :Woohoo:  Wait, ole' Spracs wasn't all serious in his post?  He actually enjoys a good steak every now and then?  :Wha: :Wha:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 14, 2013, 10:11:30 PM
I enjoy Spracne as a poster
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on October 14, 2013, 10:22:50 PM
Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:

Why would one even eat cake?  I eat only vegetables and fruit, and some lean proteins.  Just sayin', a real fan enjoys the success of her team.  To even suggest that enjoying the jealousy of one's rival is MORE enjoyable than enjoying the success of one's team is, on its face, a disgrace.  Furthermore, your squawktard-on-a-k-state-blog comment is unwarranted and, frankly, uninspired.  I don't come here to revel in your sorrow.  I come here because I have found the general intelligence and overall BBS acumen to be exceptional - no doubt despite your dragging down of the mean.

You really aren't very good at this.  Although you're generally relatively rational for a squawk, you swallowed the entirety of timmy and beems bait.

 :lol:

And you totally fell for my double-double-cross  :Woohoo:  Wait, ole' Spracs wasn't all serious in his post?  He actually enjoys a good steak every now and then?  :Wha: :Wha:

I stand in awe of your physical fitness and internet acumen, Spracne.   We are truly blessed by your presence.  Please further pad your post count.



Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Hurricane Cat on October 14, 2013, 10:30:34 PM
I'm all in for this mother rough rider rough rider

absofuckinglutely punifuckingraptor!   I'm all in too...  :thumbs:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 14, 2013, 10:32:36 PM
before i thought 8 wins was my minimum to be happy.

now i know that with 8 wins i will blow my rough ridin' lid with purple joy.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 14, 2013, 11:50:11 PM
oh, we're going 8-4 alright. I assumed that was a universally accepted fact at this point.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 15, 2013, 12:09:57 AM

Guys, it could happen.

Agreed, brotha.

Not sure what would be more enjoyable, tho.... Watching the Qhatz win six straight, or the excessive butthurt that would come outta squawkville.

 :emawkid:

Wow, you're a pretty shitty fan, then.  Guess the jealousy of your enemy is worth more than your success?

Says the squawktard on a K-State blog...

Riddle me this, shitstain:  Why would one eat their cake sans frosting?

 :buh-bye:

Why would one even eat cake?  I eat only vegetables and fruit, and some lean proteins.  Just sayin', a real fan enjoys the success of her team.  To even suggest that enjoying the jealousy of one's rival is MORE enjoyable than enjoying the success of one's team is, on its face, a disgrace.  Furthermore, your squawktard-on-a-k-state-blog comment is unwarranted and, frankly, uninspired.  I don't come here to revel in your sorrow.  I come here because I have found the general intelligence and overall BBS acumen to be exceptional - no doubt despite your dragging down of the mean.

You really aren't very good at this.  Although you're generally relatively rational for a squawk, you swallowed the entirety of timmy and beems bait.

 :lol:

And you totally fell for my double-double-cross  :Woohoo:  Wait, ole' Spracs wasn't all serious in his post?  He actually enjoys a good steak every now and then?  :Wha: :Wha:

I stand in awe of your physical fitness and internet acumen, Spracne.   We are truly blessed by your presence.  Please further pad your post count.

Thanks for noticing my post count. When I get to 1,000, we'll hold a special bonfire. You Aggies can dance around it like wild injuns.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: star seed 7 on October 15, 2013, 12:12:50 AM
they'll see the flames for miles!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Demo158 on October 15, 2013, 12:18:17 AM
i'd bet we lose to OU and TT.  i think we're better than all the others.

You must have been tailgating during the ou and ttech games this week then.  OU is incompetent on offense and ttech can't stop the run
OU lost their best defensive player for the season, there's no way they beat us!  :gocho:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 15, 2013, 02:36:05 AM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: catzacker on October 15, 2013, 11:23:33 AM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5

This is the most realistic optimistic view, imo.  I’m not sure how you could pick us to run the table when we have found way after way of losing ball games for the first half of the season.  For the first half of the year when a play needed to be made, we did not make it – from a plethora of plays on NDSU’s drive, to the kicker not falling on UT’s fumble on the opening kickoff, to the variety of turnovers during the OSU game, to Evan’s personal foul penalty on Baylor’s opening drive……unlike 2011, this team finds ways to not make the play.

I mean, this team should probably go 4-2 the rest of the way.  But it probably should have beaten NDSU.  It probably should have beaten OSU.  You could make the case it should have beaten Baylor.  But it refused to.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 15, 2013, 12:27:19 PM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5

This is the most realistic optimistic view, imo.

Of course it is.

BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO STOP ME FROM BEING #team8-4!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 15, 2013, 12:29:42 PM
going to go ahead and start #team9-4 with our bowl win, any band wagon jumpers are welcome but we depart in one week
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: catzacker on October 15, 2013, 12:55:40 PM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5

This is the most realistic optimistic view, imo.

Of course it is.

BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO STOP ME FROM BEING #team8-4!

#teamIBelieveInSanta
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 15, 2013, 12:58:56 PM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5

This is the most realistic optimistic view, imo.

Of course it is.

BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO STOP ME FROM BEING #team8-4!

#teamIBelieveInSanta

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.outblush.com%2Fwomen%2Fimages%2F2011%2F10%2Fmr-potato-head-claus-lg.jpg&hash=489368b9e477274e7dc3b63c51218a8cca4c0d12)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: SEK_EMAW on October 15, 2013, 01:07:05 PM
We split drop one to either OU or TT, win the rest. 7-5

This is the most realistic optimistic view, imo.

Of course it is.

BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO STOP ME FROM BEING #team8-4!

#teamIBelieveInSanta

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.outblush.com%2Fwomen%2Fimages%2F2011%2F10%2Fmr-potato-head-claus-lg.jpg&hash=489368b9e477274e7dc3b63c51218a8cca4c0d12)

 :love: #Team'TaterSanta
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 15, 2013, 01:53:44 PM
going to go ahead and start #team9-4 with our bowl win, any band wagon jumpers are welcome but we depart in one week

shotgun!

 :emawkid: :emawkid: <-- me and kslim partying on the 9-4 bandwagon!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 15, 2013, 01:55:18 PM
pump 8-4 and dump 7-5. let's do this you guys.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 15, 2013, 01:55:34 PM
going to go ahead and start #team9-4 with our bowl win, any band wagon jumpers are welcome but we depart in one week

shotgun!

 :emawkid: :emawkid: <-- me and kslim partying on the 9-4 bandwagon!

no government or gE.com shutdown will ever stop this bandwagon
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 15, 2013, 01:57:09 PM
going to go ahead and start #team9-4 with our bowl win, any band wagon jumpers are welcome but we depart in one week

shotgun!

 :emawkid: :emawkid: <-- me and kslim partying on the 9-4 bandwagon!

I'm all in on #team9-4  :ksu:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 15, 2013, 02:00:15 PM
going to go ahead and start #team9-4 with our bowl win, any band wagon jumpers are welcome but we depart in one week

shotgun!

 :emawkid: :emawkid: <-- me and kslim partying on the 9-4 bandwagon!

I'm all in on #team9-4  :ksu:

which is nice, i know you are an expert at forging the river
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: mocat on October 15, 2013, 02:03:37 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: scottwildcat on October 15, 2013, 02:04:00 PM
If our guy Daniel bosses it (like we know he will) I see no reason why we can't end up winning out and then winning our bowl game.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 15, 2013, 02:07:25 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoolrain44.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmr_potato_head.jpg&hash=90b6977e9b2a55942018aeee6aede22acafa6431)

AND

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DnwXE37KDbc%2FUH4OOAJmZFI%2FAAAAAAAAAUY%2Fz9fo8dmGGMY%2Fs1600%2FPotato.png&hash=9529226b7fa4f689a1672a827b92b7c63637bb56)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DnwXE37KDbc%2FUH4OOAJmZFI%2FAAAAAAAAAUY%2Fz9fo8dmGGMY%2Fs1600%2FPotato.png&hash=9529226b7fa4f689a1672a827b92b7c63637bb56)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DnwXE37KDbc%2FUH4OOAJmZFI%2FAAAAAAAAAUY%2Fz9fo8dmGGMY%2Fs1600%2FPotato.png&hash=9529226b7fa4f689a1672a827b92b7c63637bb56)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DnwXE37KDbc%2FUH4OOAJmZFI%2FAAAAAAAAAUY%2Fz9fo8dmGGMY%2Fs1600%2FPotato.png&hash=9529226b7fa4f689a1672a827b92b7c63637bb56)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 02:14:37 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 15, 2013, 02:15:20 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcjonline.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fsuperphoto%2Fphotos%2FDylan-Meier090206filephoto.jpg&hash=48a726f683abd0dc792c20eb7202abf21be15676)

AND

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.kansas.com%2Fkstated%2Ffiles%2F2012%2F09%2FSAMS.jpeg&hash=a2f38a4f35b3c8b16f653528bdb17aa916700016)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 15, 2013, 02:18:13 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

Denied. TCU has had the luxury of padding its schedule with puds like KU.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: mocat on October 15, 2013, 02:33:14 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 02:36:50 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: mocat on October 15, 2013, 02:42:20 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 02:46:11 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:

Baylor is better than LSU??? lmao, do u really think ksu would stay within 10 of lsu?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: mocat on October 15, 2013, 02:53:39 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:

Baylor is better than LSU??? lmao, do u really think ksu would stay within 10 of lsu?

well, TCU did
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Tobias on October 15, 2013, 03:01:10 PM
is this dumbass really questioning SNOWBRAG? :lol:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 15, 2013, 03:03:16 PM
show your algorithms, tim. I bet the acronym you chose is horrible also.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 15, 2013, 03:47:28 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifninja.com%2Fanimatedgifs%2F119474%2Fhitler.gif&hash=492e553488abb0ac5cb4cff7ef8f3b5dc0e0bbb5)

&

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcommentisfree.theguardian.com%2Ffore%21.jpg&hash=7fbaad5d006be11672987af2be7124ca26c94b66)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on October 15, 2013, 03:54:10 PM
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I'll defer to Mr. Sagarin who has K-State SOS at 14 and TCU's SOS at 21.  Thanks for playing.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: PowercatPat on October 15, 2013, 05:24:37 PM
We're going to finish 6-6.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: CyberToothCat on October 15, 2013, 05:49:14 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 15, 2013, 06:06:58 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable.

stopped reading after this.  welcome to #team9&4 CTC!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 06:21:44 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 15, 2013, 06:35:42 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 06:41:24 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 15, 2013, 06:43:44 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

Oh my God, tim doesn't know what math is! :lol:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 15, 2013, 06:50:03 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm really glad you're posting in this thread, tim
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 15, 2013, 07:05:23 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm sorry but this guy has to be someone's sock. I mean, there is just no way anyone can be as dumb as this guy. He spent nearly an entire page arguing about a Big 12 record that is not up for interpretation, and now this? Please ban, TIA.

Also, Team9-4 or burn this mother down!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 07:27:57 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm sorry but this guy has to be someone's sock. I mean, there is just no way anyone can be as dumb as this guy. He spent nearly an entire page arguing about a Big 12 record that is not up for interpretation, and now this? Please ban, TIA.

Also, Team9-4 or burn this mother down!

 :dunno:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 15, 2013, 07:49:08 PM
:slowclap: Well said, MB!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 15, 2013, 07:53:36 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

Really strange thinking coming from a self-professed professional gambler.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 15, 2013, 08:11:50 PM
Even Spracne is dunking Tim's ass in water. Clock is ticking for Tim on gE.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 15, 2013, 08:32:53 PM
I enjoy ljmhawk as a poster.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 15, 2013, 08:35:02 PM
I enjoy ljmhawk as a poster.

Would you like to join him on his KSU v. KU bet for gE life?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Spracne on October 15, 2013, 08:38:01 PM
I enjoy ljmhawk as a poster.

Would you like to join him on his KSU v. KU bet for gE life?

What's the wager?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 15, 2013, 08:56:30 PM
#ourguy: "Everybody in practice was really talking about, 'We need to win out, I wasn't really expecting to hear that coming from a team. I really thought that myself -- 'We need to win out.' I'm just not the type of guy to just say that because I don't know if people will just think I'm just saying that. But when I heard my teammates saying that, I felt like we could do that."
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 15, 2013, 09:05:26 PM
#OURGUY!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 15, 2013, 09:09:40 PM
 :billdance:

Does life know about #ourguy yet??
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2013, 09:11:05 PM
Here's what my cyber tooth 2000 computed:

WVU 100%
ISU 100%
Tech79%
TCU 100%
OU 83%
KU "PC LOAD LETTER does not compute the improbability of ku winning game"

Overall chance of winning out: 100%

Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: timhawk on October 15, 2013, 09:34:07 PM
I enjoy ljmhawk as a poster.

Would you like to join him on his KSU v. KU bet for gE life?

dont do it, they make up their own terms after you agreed to money only
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2013, 09:38:34 PM
I enjoy ljmhawk as a poster.

Would you like to join him on his KSU v. KU bet for gE life?

dont do it, they make up their own terms after you agreed to money only

50% chance this is true. Right, Tim?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 15, 2013, 09:40:09 PM
Tim is feeling the heat to his times with gE. Btw, Tim are you like the rest of the phogets that get bent out of shape when tuck K-Stater's show up to the phog and you request a ban? I mean beems and chemhawk do it all the time. Why do you get a pass?
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 15, 2013, 09:45:46 PM
#team9and4 growing even stronger with the addition of #ourguy himself
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Pett on October 15, 2013, 09:51:32 PM
#ourguy: "Everybody in practice was really talking about, 'We need to win out, I wasn't really expecting to hear that coming from a team. I really thought that myself -- 'We need to win out.' I'm just not the type of guy to just say that because I don't know if people will just think I'm just saying that. But when I heard my teammates saying that, I felt like we could do that."
I exhaled a deep breath after reading this :thumbs:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: wetwillie on October 15, 2013, 10:32:25 PM
Gonna need two healthy starting receivers to win 8 boys.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kstofer on October 15, 2013, 10:33:50 PM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

Pretty sure you are simply referring to the fact that all probabilities must add up to 1 (100%). Since we are talking about neither soccer nor the NFL, it is 100% likely that K-State will either win or lose each of its remaining games. Doesn't mean the odds of the Cats winning each individual game are 50/50.

Edit: if I am wrong please PM me ASAP so I can start buying lottery tickets right meow.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: scottwildcat on October 16, 2013, 10:15:33 AM
#ourguy: "Everybody in practice was really talking about, 'We need to win out, I wasn't really expecting to hear that coming from a team. I really thought that myself -- 'We need to win out.' I'm just not the type of guy to just say that because I don't know if people will just think I'm just saying that. But when I heard my teammates saying that, I felt like we could do that."

 :love:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on October 16, 2013, 10:44:31 AM
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

Pretty sure you are simply referring to the fact that all probabilities must add up to 1 (100%). Since we are talking about neither soccer nor the NFL, it is 100% likely that K-State will either win or lose each of its remaining games. Doesn't mean the odds of the Cats winning each individual game are 50/50.

Edit: if I am wrong please PM me ASAP so I can start buying lottery tickets right meow.

Amen.  I suppose Timmy is single handedly keeping the state of kansas government well funded.  Who wouldn't buy a crap ton of lottery tickets?  50/50 right? 
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2013, 10:07:57 AM
After watching the big 12 games yesterday, my 8-4 belief is galvanised

 OU is trash and TTech is meh.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kim carnes on October 20, 2013, 10:22:39 AM
After watching the big 12 games yesterday, my 8-4 belief is galvanised

 OU is trash and TTech is meh.

We're pretty meh and the game is at tech.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on October 20, 2013, 10:31:19 AM
KC a question for you from team 9-4

What stock would you put in next years team if we win out?

Thanks

Kslim
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: pvegs on October 22, 2013, 07:37:00 PM
KC a question for you from team 9-4

What stock would you put in next years team if we win out?

Thanks

Kslim

If we finished 9-4 I'd have us picked for 2nd in the 2014 Big 12/top 15 nationally with an eye toward being NC contenders in '15.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Cannoncat on October 22, 2013, 07:50:45 PM
#Life just gets better and better once you have a bowl of #life :emawkid:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: ksupamplemousse on October 22, 2013, 07:59:07 PM
#Life just gets better and better once you have a bowl of #life :emawkid:

I bought a box of cinnamon Life the other day, but it was gross so I threw it away. Am I worse than Bill  :ohno:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 22, 2013, 08:55:16 PM
I'm gonna ban the next rookie fuckwad that uses the conjunction "if" before the the phrase "we go 8-4" or "we go 9-4"

#teamwinout
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kim carnes on October 22, 2013, 09:15:10 PM
i'd put the odds of us winning out at somewhere around 0%
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 22, 2013, 10:10:23 PM

i'd put the odds of us winning out at somewhere around 0%

Obviously I agree that we will win out in conference, but it's absurd to think that bill will try to win a bowl game.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Pete on October 22, 2013, 11:42:23 PM
LALA looks decent, BTW.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2013, 12:14:10 AM
Go Chiefs.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 23, 2013, 09:31:49 AM
LALA looks decent, BTW.

5 of our 6 opponents haven't lost since we played them. And the 6th is UMass, who is absolute dog crap. Apparently after playing the Cats everyone else seems to be a step down in competition.

#team9and4
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kso_FAN on October 23, 2013, 10:58:24 AM
LALA looks decent, BTW.

5 of our 6 opponents haven't lost since we played them. And the 6th is UMass, who is absolute dog crap. Apparently after playing the Cats everyone else seems to be a step down in competition.

#team9and4

We've played a pretty decent schedule, but UMass is on pace to have the worst offense in at least that last 12 years, and its not even close.

They currently sit at .103 points per possession, the worst I can find in the last dozen years is Buffalo with .145 ppp.

Another advanced stat is yards per point. Michigan currently leads the country at 10.5 yards per point. UMass is at 40.8 yards per point. The next worst team nationally is La Monroe at 24.1.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 23, 2013, 11:30:21 AM
yards per point is an interesting stat

fun to think about
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 23, 2013, 11:46:17 AM
yards per point is an interesting stat

fun to think about


Another advanced stat is yards per point. Michigan currently leads the country at 10.5 yards per point.

FWIW...Last year we led the country at 10.4 and this year we are 35th at 13.0.

Obviously this has as much to do with field position and non-offensive TDs as it does the offense.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: puniraptor on October 23, 2013, 11:47:53 AM
man its fun to think about how we were the best ever for a little while  :thumbs:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: mocat on October 23, 2013, 12:13:38 PM
i mean yards per point by itself does not tell you how good an offense is, but more how much does D/ST help the offense
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Functianalyst on October 23, 2013, 08:29:56 PM
Unlike some of you who thought the world was ending after losing to UT, K-State to me as been as solid as anyone on defense and as bipolar as anyone on offense. They played as undisciplined of football have seen in Stillwater. I have to see what TTU does this weekend, but it is not out of the realm of possibility that the Cats win the remaining games.

 If OU wins handily then I agree K-State can go 8-4. But if TTU hands the Sooners their ass which I expect to happen, then the Big XII championship will be decided in Waco on November 16.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: #LIFE on October 23, 2013, 08:33:29 PM
Isn't the Tech-Baylor game at a neutral site this year?  :dunno:
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: wetwillie on October 23, 2013, 08:36:43 PM
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: TownieCat on October 24, 2013, 09:05:37 AM
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.

The title will be decided on Dec. 7 in Waco. Doubtful that Texas has more than 1 B12 loss before then.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Functianalyst on October 24, 2013, 09:46:21 AM
Isn't the Tech-Baylor game at a neutral site this year?  :dunno:
That sounds right for some reason.  It just indicated Baylor will be the hometeam.  That will make it even better.  But again there is a lot of football left to be played.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Functianalyst on October 24, 2013, 09:50:04 AM
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.

The title will be decided on Dec. 7 in Waco. Doubtful that Texas has more than 1 B12 loss before then.
I question whether UT beats TCU this weekend, but doubt if they get passed WVU in Morgantown.
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2013, 10:04:21 PM
Saturday afternoon is likely (based on chirp) to make #8-4 look bright, and #dickweed look stupid
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kougar24 on November 06, 2013, 11:57:41 PM
I just realized FSD is Thunder_Cat!
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kim carnes on November 07, 2013, 12:07:28 AM
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 07, 2013, 12:08:28 AM
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech

weird, no one on #team9and4 sees that happening (I took a poll)
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: kslim on November 07, 2013, 07:42:23 AM
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech

weird, no one on #team9and4 sees that happening (I took a poll)

crunched some numbers and they match up, keep up the good work gfa
Title: Re: 8-4
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 09, 2013, 09:25:32 PM
Whoever started this thread is looking prophetic as eff

 :emawkid: