goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: hemmy on October 12, 2013, 10:45:30 PM
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FThemes%2Fchemical_light%2Fimages%2Fpost%2Fangry.gif&hash=f43feb67b9c4560171a52e07e26e214e65179218)
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FThemes%2Fchemical_light%2Fimages%2Fpost%2Fangry.gif&hash=f43feb67b9c4560171a52e07e26e214e65179218)
:thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs:
Hemmy, I :love: this kid, and before it's over, I think he will be the best QB KSU ever had. :emawkid:
-
SAMs has the most upside. Let him get the experience this year and lead us for the next 2 years.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
lol you put your decimal in the wrong place mocat :lol:
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
:thumbs:
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
I seen Lopakman, and I can tell you he isn't that lucky. :fatty:
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
I seen Lopakman, and I can tell you he isn't that lucky. :fatty:
Oh, wow. Now I feel bad for ripping on him. Please accept my apologies, Lopakman. :frown:
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
I'm not saying those didn't cost us the game as well, but the fact remains we had a chance to win and he threw a bad interception. You can't just dismiss that. Sams is the QB of this team and will get better, but do not put him on a pedestal and say that he is above criticism. If you do that then you are no better than those dumbasses at GPC who think that Snyder is above criticism.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
OT, but did you really think that was a fair call?
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
OT, but did you really think that was a fair call?
It was. Evans could have and should have pulled off.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
OT, but did you really think that was a fair call?
It was. Evans could have and should have pulled off.
Does he have a set of brakes to stop that train he was driving. NO DENIED.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
bro without sams this offense would be 2.35 times worse
Yes, but without that interception we would have won the game and this board would be exactly 4.54 times more fun.
what about that crap show first drive with Waters going for it on 4th down? Or the missed FG? Or the 2 failed 2pt conversions? Or the late hit to keep their drive alive? The int was bad but it did not decide the game.
OT, but did you really think that was a fair call?
It was. Evans could have and should have pulled off.
Does he have a set of brakes to stop that train he was driving. NO DENIED.
It wasn't about stopping. He shoved the guy when he didn't have to. He could have just wrapped his arms around him to help stop himself, but instead he shoved the guy, hard, when he was out of bounds. It was a stupid rough ridin' play that cost us four points.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
I seen Lopakman, and I can tell you he isn't that lucky. :fatty:
Didn't know we've met but perhaps you can elaborate.
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
I seen Lopakman, and I can tell you he isn't that lucky. :fatty:
Didn't know we've met but perhaps you can elaborate.
Maybe it was the pic with the forklift in Austin. :dunno:
-
He is partially responsible. You can't dismiss a terrible interception when we had a chance to win it, even if he was majorly responsible for that chance.
eff you, you south park watching wanna be douchebag.
Shouldn't you be watching Nascar right now, or beating your GF or something?
I seen Lopakman, and I can tell you he isn't that lucky. :fatty:
Didn't know we've met but perhaps you can elaborate.
Maybe it was the pic with the forklift in Austin. :dunno:
winner, winner, chicken dinner! :driving:
-
Sams - best runner
Waters - best passer.
-
Sams - best runner
Waters - best passer.
Waters is a better passer, but he is worse at everything else.
Sams - better person
Sams - better player
Sams - better looking
-
Sams - best runner
Waters - best passer.
Waters is a better passer, but he is worse at everything else.
Sams - better person
Sams - better player
Sams - better looking
Best flow, Most consistent, Realest stories
Most charisma, I set the most trends
And my interviews are hotter
-
Sams - best runner
Waters - best passer.
Waters is a better passer, but he is worse at everything else.
Sams - better person
Sams - better player
Sams - better looking
Better player, yes. But Sams isn't better looking. I've been told by mine and my friends girlfriends. Waters is the better looking QB. And don't start with the dumbass racist crap. Water apparently is just a good looking guy. And he deserves it. It's all he's got.
-
waters needs a new haircut. the one he has now makes him look like a total dweeb.
-
waters needs a new haircut. the one he has now makes him look like a total dweeb.
I think he is a dweeb. It probably fits.
-
his arm hair and eyebrows are longer than his head hair.
-
mrs. dave says waters is disgusting and looks like he should play for iowa state
-
Eh, he's like a 6.5. Maybe like a 7 in Iowa. (Gross)
-
Anyone else think Waters comes in to give Sams a rest? 57 carries in two weeks is a ton... :dunno:
-
Anyone else think Waters comes in to give Sams a rest? 57 carries in two weeks is a ton... :dunno:
57 carries in 3 weeks isn't that bad, though, and that is what he will have coming into the WVU game.