goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: wabash909 on September 15, 2013, 12:27:49 PM
-
The Cats are -2 in TO margin after the non-con.
Last time KSU was negative after non-con? 2008.
Last Snyder team? 2004.
:emawkid:
-
it won't be if sams starts.
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
-
Making the right qb move would resolve this.
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.
But the rest of the team was better. Quite a bit better.
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.
But the rest of the team was better. Quite a bit better.
Uh, no... (http://nationalchamps.net/2004/sub/previews/kansasstate.htm) (see depth charts)
This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2004_Big_12_football_standings)
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.
But the rest of the team was better. Quite a bit better.
Uh, no... (http://nationalchamps.net/2004/sub/previews/kansasstate.htm) (see depth charts)
This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2004_Big_12_football_standings)
Jeff Schwinn listed as a key loss at QB :lol:
-
2004 team was better than this one imo
QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.
But the rest of the team was better. Quite a bit better.
Uh, no... (http://nationalchamps.net/2004/sub/previews/kansasstate.htm) (see depth charts)
This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2004_Big_12_football_standings)
Fan, it's 2004. Deal with it.
-
Bump.
-
Yeah, I might have to deal with it.
-
Guys....this is the 2004 A&M game :horrorsurprise:
Think about it, Big 12 opener on the road....we had dumb TO's that resulted in a ten point loss (or around iirc). Lots of yards put up in the air but still the L
-
Guys....this is the 2004 A&M game :horrorsurprise:
Think about it, w had dumb TO's that resulted in a ten point loss (or around iirc). Lots of yards put up in the air but still the L
I was thinking the same thing.
-
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
-
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
We aren't losing to WVU at home.
-
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
We aren't losing to WVU at home.
It would be good for the long term future of the program if we did though.
-
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.
-
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.
That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year
-
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
no isu scored like 4 tds in the 4th quarter to ruin Sproles senior day.
We beat mu because Pinkle hadn't copied Southlak Carroll's offense yet
-
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
We aren't losing to WVU at home.
And I don't think we'll lose to ISU or KU, FWIW. And those wins may not be worth anything in the final bowl analysis...they, alone, won't get us to a bowl.
-
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.
That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year
Goddamnit. That's right.
-
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.
That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year
It's 5:29 am, I'm still drunk and this made me lol