goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:10:26 AM

Title: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:10:26 AM
 :dubious:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:13:17 AM
UT closed -7.5 and -2 against BYU and Ole Miss respectively, fwiw
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MakeItRain on September 15, 2013, 10:14:19 AM
 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: lopakman on September 15, 2013, 10:15:54 AM
Texas is horrible but this is an accurate line considering who our starting qb is.  If Snyder would declare Sams the starter this would change to -7 because everyone knows that #life would rush for 400 yards against Texas.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Tobias on September 15, 2013, 10:16:35 AM
love it
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:22:56 AM
Texas is horrible but this is an accurate line considering who our starting qb is.  If Snyder would declare Sams the starter this would change to -7 because everyone knows that #life would rush for 400 yards against Texas.

Goddamnit, don't eff this thread up with this moronic bullshit.  Get the eff out of here now.

Mods, move this post to the self-depricating loser cat zacker thread
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 15, 2013, 10:26:39 AM
I think it is an accurate line.  What would our record be if we played UT's schedule?  I mean, sorry, no one wants to talk reality.  Hey KU sucks.  The media hates us.  That line is so stupid.  Does vegas know LHC Bill Snyder is our coach?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:35:05 AM
I think it is an accurate line.  What would our record be if we played UT's schedule?  I mean, sorry, no one wants to talk reality.  Hey KU sucks.  The media hates us.  That line is so stupid.  Does vegas know LHC Bill Snyder is our coach?

eff off Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Your use of the word "reality" is sad, depressing and perverse.  Take a zoloft or something
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 15, 2013, 10:42:27 AM
Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: ChiComCat on September 15, 2013, 10:45:57 AM
Snyder knew Texas couldn't stop the run before we knew what Klein was.  He may have Waters start just to emphasize he is still the starting QB, but I can't imagine Sams getting less than 50% of the snaps.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 10:47:10 AM
Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

I'm so rough ridin' glad I'm not you.  I bet you cant even piss in public.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: wabash909 on September 15, 2013, 10:49:11 AM
Our defense is complete garbage and we're in the midst of QB controversy limiting our offensive production.  Nobody that has watched this team play this year should be suprised by this line at all.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: scottwildcat on September 15, 2013, 10:50:04 AM
Hmm betting the farm  :Carl:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: lopakman on September 15, 2013, 10:50:49 AM
Our defense is complete garbage.  Nobody that has watched this team play this year should be suprised by this line at all.

Unless you're a rough ridin' idiot like FSD.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Panjandrum on September 15, 2013, 10:52:31 AM
Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

In all fairness, NDSU was the best team we played so far.  They'd could win most lower divisions like the Sun Belt, MAC, etc.

We don't give them the credit they deserve.

That said, it's a fair line for a road game when you look at all of the factors.  I'd think +5.5 or something feels better, but it may get there eventually.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Tobias on September 15, 2013, 10:53:29 AM
I can't even imagine the things zacker would say about this matchup if he actually went all zacker on it
Title: Re: +7
Post by: PowercatPat on September 15, 2013, 10:56:44 AM
If we don't beat UT we are mumped guys. We sure as hell aren't beating OSU and Baylor.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 11:00:54 AM

I feel like a lot of don't know how bad byu is.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Panjandrum on September 15, 2013, 11:02:07 AM
If we don't beat UT we are mumped guys. We sure as hell aren't beating OSU and Baylor.

I don't think it's fair to make definitive statements until Sams plays a full game.

I think the team looks completely different if that happens.  Maybe not enough to beat them, but you never know.  Sams has home run potential every play.  That would make those games pretty unpredictable.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 11:09:28 AM
Louisiana dropped 70 last night
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 15, 2013, 11:17:35 AM
Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

In all fairness, NDSU was the best team we played so far.  They'd could win most lower divisions like the Sun Belt, MAC, etc.

We don't give them the credit they deserve.

That said, it's a fair line for a road game when you look at all of the factors.  I'd think +5.5 or something feels better, but it may get there eventually.

Great, we lost to the best team we faced....at home...and that team is an fcs team that could win a crap conference.  And that is supposed to make us feel better?  My god.  We just won the fcking league last year and this is where we are at?  Explaining away a loss to a FCS program?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: wabash909 on September 15, 2013, 11:17:49 AM

I feel like a lot of don't know how bad byu is.

I feel like a lot of people don't know how bad we are.  I mean, this defense is seriously as bad as the worst Tibesar years.

Ole Miss would have skull effed last night on our home field.


Title: Re: +7
Post by: Panjandrum on September 15, 2013, 11:23:04 AM
Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

In all fairness, NDSU was the best team we played so far.  They'd could win most lower divisions like the Sun Belt, MAC, etc.

We don't give them the credit they deserve.

That said, it's a fair line for a road game when you look at all of the factors.  I'd think +5.5 or something feels better, but it may get there eventually.

Great, we lost to the best team we faced....at home...and that team is an fcs team that could win a crap conference.  And that is supposed to make us feel better?  My god.  We just won the fcking league last year and this is where we are at?  Explaining away a loss to a FCS program?

I didn't say that it was okay or that we shouldn't have won.

I also don't think it has any bearing on whether or not we beat Texas.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 11:24:21 AM

I feel like a lot of don't know how bad byu is.

I feel like a lot of people don't know how bad we are.  I mean, this defense is seriously as bad as the worst Tibesar years.

Ole Miss would have skull effed last night on our home field.
You've lost all credibility by comparing any defense to a tibs defense
Title: Re: +7
Post by: wabash909 on September 15, 2013, 11:28:08 AM

I feel like a lot of don't know how bad byu is.

I feel like a lot of people don't know how bad we are.  I mean, this defense is seriously as bad as the worst Tibesar years.

Ole Miss would have skull effed last night on our home field.
You've lost all credibility by comparing any defense to a tibs defense

It's shitty, dude.  Real shitty.


Title: Re: +7
Post by: MakeItRain on September 15, 2013, 11:34:36 AM

I feel like a lot of don't know how bad byu is.
I mean, this defense is seriously as bad as the worst Tibesar years.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi949.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fad339%2Fcaptainkirk666999%2FLaugh%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif&hash=cd7bfbde598af1ef89ed5194bf4910686b382c63)
Title: Re: +7
Post by: DQ12 on September 15, 2013, 11:35:41 AM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: steve dave on September 15, 2013, 11:37:43 AM

Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

fwiw jake has thrown 4 TDs and 5 INTs
Title: +7
Post by: steve dave on September 15, 2013, 11:38:39 AM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night.

UMass had only scored 14 in their first two games combined, tho
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 15, 2013, 11:40:56 AM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night.

UMass had only scored 14 in their first two games combined, tho

Texas can't stop read option tho
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 11:41:34 AM
We have 9 new starters on defense, have played what is likely 2 top 50 teams and managed to hold everyone under 400 yards. The big 12 offenses, outside of OSU and Baylor, appear to be the worst they've been in years.

I think our defense ends up being an average big 12 defense and we end up being an average big 12 team. Comparisons to tibesar and Ku have to either be thinly-veiled trolls or the rantings of a collection of mindless retards, because the ignorance is that astounding.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: wabash909 on September 15, 2013, 11:43:28 AM
Our third and long defense is very Tibesarish.

Title: Re: +7
Post by: hemmy on September 15, 2013, 11:45:43 AM
Louisiana dropped 70 last night

That's more than Oregon scored vs Nichols St. We are actually amazing! Hooray!
Title: Re: +7
Post by: DQ12 on September 15, 2013, 11:46:32 AM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night.

UMass had only scored 14 in their first two games combined, tho
Still, 7 points isn't very many.  Only 1 score, as it turns out.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 11:49:58 AM
Our third and long defense is very Tibesarish.

Agree 3rd down defense is really bad
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on September 15, 2013, 12:08:40 PM
Catzacker(@?) really needs to chill out, NDSU happened, time to get over it.  Everyone should've expected a huge step down.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kim carnes on September 15, 2013, 12:11:33 PM
Catzacker(@?) really needs to chill out, NDSU happened, time to get over it.  Everyone should've expected a huge step down.

Yeah everyone, just accept that we suck and that's the way it's going to be.  Snyder has earned it.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on September 15, 2013, 02:37:02 PM
Not touching this line but give me the Over on anything under 70
Title: Re: +7
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 15, 2013, 02:42:06 PM
Catzacker(@?) really needs to chill out, NDSU happened, time to get over it.  Everyone should've expected a huge step down.

Yeah everyone, just accept that we suck and that's the way it's going to be.  Snyder has earned it.
Jesus Christ, Carnes. Take a day off. Woof!
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 15, 2013, 03:49:58 PM

Are you rough ridin' kidding me? You wach our dogshit team and UT's dogshit team and we play on the road for the first time with a QB who has 5 TDs and 5 INTs against crap competition with a crap defense and u rough ridin' question a 7 point line?

fwiw jake has thrown 4 TDs and 5 INTs

50% few interceptions than his avg.  Getting a little better each day.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: felix rex on September 15, 2013, 03:56:29 PM
I feel like our defense really turned a corner last night whey they started snuffing out the long time-consuming drives FCS-caliber teams put together against us with blocked field goals and interceptions in the red zone.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on September 15, 2013, 03:58:06 PM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night.

UMass had only scored 14 in their first two games combined, tho

Jakie gave them the ball at our 30 tho
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Panjandrum on September 15, 2013, 04:11:44 PM
I feel like our defense really turned a corner last night whey they started snuffing out the long time-consuming drives FCS-caliber teams put together against us with blocked field goals and interceptions in the red zone.

Well, if you're looking at simple stats, that's really the only the only major difference between last year and this year.  As hard to believe as it is.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: felix rex on September 15, 2013, 04:17:31 PM
I expected our defense to be depressing, but Waters has legitimately made me sad about the cats. He just seems like that perfect kind of losery that a segment of our fans (and apparently our coaches) will defend. That easy 19-yard run was my least favorite play of the entire season.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: p1k3 on September 15, 2013, 04:19:50 PM
I expected our defense to be depressing, but Waters has legitimately made me sad about the cats. He just seems like that perfect kind of losery that a segment of our fans (and apparently our coaches) will defend. That easy 19-yard run was my least favorite play of the entire season.

I was heckling the entire game and man the Tucks let me have it after that.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 15, 2013, 04:21:17 PM
He found his legs!  Watch out now.  Sams better get comfy handing out water and being one of those guys that make decoy outlandish sideline signals.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 15, 2013, 07:30:37 PM
Yeah the defense is bad and all, but we only gave up 7 points last night.

UMass had only scored 14 in their first two games combined, tho

Jakie gave them the ball at our 30 tho

Yeah. Jake has been our defense's worst enemy all year long. I just don't see the point in criticizing them after a performance where they scored a TD and only allowed points on a single 30 yard drive.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 15, 2013, 11:02:57 PM
Guys, our defense let UMass put together quite a few long sustained drives. Quite a few long third down conversions. If you want to be proud of our "bend but don't break" D for only giving up 7 points, fine, but they bent plenty against rough ridin' UMass. Quality teams won't just break our D, they're going to do unspeakably horrible things to it.

Anyway, against UT the formula has to be run run run. Does Snyder start Sams?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 15, 2013, 11:49:14 PM
Our defense isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but I haven't seen anything to suggest that they are that much worse than last year's team, who gave up 21 points to North Texas. They are mediocre, which is better than I feared they would be coming into this season.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: bones129 on September 15, 2013, 11:54:18 PM
Guys, our defense let UMass put together quite a few long sustained drives. Quite a few long third down conversions. If you want to be proud of our "bend but don't break" D for only giving up 7 points, fine, but they bent plenty against rough ridin' UMass. Quality teams won't just break our D, they're going to do unspeakably horrible things to it.

Anyway, against UT the formula has to be run run run. Does Snyder start Sams?

Possibly.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MeatGeeKSU on September 16, 2013, 12:04:41 AM
Our defense isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but I haven't seen anything to suggest that they are that much worse than last year's team, who gave up 21 points to North Texas. They are mediocre, which is better than I feared they would be coming into this season.

This.  Up until they become what I expected they'd be before the season and completely just fall apart and allow 500 yards to some completely garbage RB or something, I'll be actually kinda pleased.  They're not any good tho.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: DQ12 on September 16, 2013, 12:09:01 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 16, 2013, 12:13:21 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.

Like, in say, 2011, did you predict the outcomes of games very well?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 16, 2013, 12:14:25 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.

Maybe you were good at predicting outcomes, but NO ONE predicted Landry Jones being an unconfident loser. No one saw it coming DLew
Title: Re: +7
Post by: DQ12 on September 16, 2013, 12:14:46 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.

Like, in say, 2011, did you predict the outcomes of games very well?
That's right.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 16, 2013, 12:18:17 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.

Like, in say, 2011, did you predict the outcomes of games very well?
That's right.

Well, I guess I'll have to trust you here. Go Cats guys!
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kslim on September 16, 2013, 07:55:57 AM
I think we're going to steamroll Texas.  And I'm good at predicting these sorts of things so you guys better listen up.

Maybe you were good at predicting outcomes, but NO ONE predicted Landry Jones being an unconfident loser. No one saw it coming DLew
cough cough
Title: Re: +7
Post by: XocolateThundarr on September 16, 2013, 08:00:18 AM
I feel like our defense really turned a corner last night whey they started snuffing out the long time-consuming drives FCS-caliber teams put together against us with blocked field goals and interceptions in the red zone.

Title: Re: +7
Post by: MakeItRain on September 16, 2013, 10:26:51 AM
Guys, our defense let UMass put together quite a few long sustained drives. Quite a few long third down conversions. If you want to be proud of our "bend but don't break" D for only giving up 7 points, fine, but they bent plenty against rough ridin' UMass. Quality teams won't just break our D, they're going to do unspeakably horrible things to it.

Anyway, against UT the formula has to be run run run. Does Snyder start Sams?

How many years have we seen bend but don't break defense from this staff? This isn't new, man.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MadCat on September 16, 2013, 11:17:06 AM
Scheme Doctor just letting the other team run out the clock for him.  :bigtoke:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: 'taterblast on September 16, 2013, 11:47:45 AM
line is +3.5 at sportsbetting.ag
Title: Re: +7
Post by: OregonSmock on September 16, 2013, 12:01:00 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: XocolateThundarr on September 16, 2013, 12:02:20 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Pete on September 16, 2013, 12:02:28 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

I like this idea
Title: Re: +7
Post by: 'taterblast on September 16, 2013, 12:05:09 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: pissclams on September 16, 2013, 12:08:08 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 

i'll throw $25 towards the cause
Title: Re: +7
Post by: OregonSmock on September 16, 2013, 12:10:31 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.


The wrong team is favored to win, tho.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 16, 2013, 12:11:08 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.


I know exactly what you are doing and I don't like it.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: wetwillie on September 16, 2013, 12:12:53 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 

Ok, but i think maybe lopakman should hedge hard against the cats with a sizable bet just in case?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 16, 2013, 12:22:02 PM
Guys, if we are going to start a slush fund, I would recommend that we donate half to fattyfund and half to another acct that Winters uses to contact recruits and persuade them to come to KSU.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MadCat on September 16, 2013, 12:59:41 PM
FWIW:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile)
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 01:19:28 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if we can limit turnovers.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kso_FAN on September 16, 2013, 01:20:50 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 01:22:50 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp

Yeah. We need to limit turnovers, too, though. Realistically, a shut out is probably not going to happen because these guys are so bad at defense that Sams is going to have multiple very long runs that really put a dent in our TOP.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MadCat on September 16, 2013, 01:26:45 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp

Yeah. We need to limit turnovers, too, though. Realistically, a shut out is probably not going to happen because these guys are so bad at defense that Sams is going to have multiple very long runs that really put a dent in our TOP.
  It's like 2 problems, 1 solution.  :impatient:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 16, 2013, 01:27:13 PM
FWIW:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile)

Didn't Case play most of the game against us last yr and seem much better suited to our D than Ash?  Maybe I am remembering some other time that I watched them and Case seemed less inadequate than Ash? 

Anyway, Mack has to be having a huge pity party either that or he is already resigned himself to what is happening/has happened and is in full fledged Welp mode. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kslim on September 16, 2013, 01:28:14 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp

Yeah. We need to limit turnovers, too, though. Realistically, a shut out is probably not going to happen because these guys are so bad at defense that Sams is going to have multiple very long runs that really put a dent in our TOP.
  It's like 2 problems, 1 solution.  :impatient:

and our rb's have more space and look a crap ton better when #life is in. I had a full blown melt down saturday
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MadCat on September 16, 2013, 01:30:56 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp

Yeah. We need to limit turnovers, too, though. Realistically, a shut out is probably not going to happen because these guys are so bad at defense that Sams is going to have multiple very long runs that really put a dent in our TOP.
  It's like 2 problems, 1 solution.  :impatient:

and our rb's have more space and look a crap ton better when #life is in. I had a full blown melt down saturday
  The RB thing...is it because the defenses respect #life a crap-ton or are the RBs just more motivated when Sams is in charge?

However

or both?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kslim on September 16, 2013, 01:34:06 PM
i think its more of stacking the box when jake is in because....you know.....he is terrible
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 01:38:57 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest.

call me crazy but i think texas scores a lot of points against us. so i'm not that confident.

Texas is the second worst offense we have faced to date. We could potentially shut them out if Sams plays more snaps and we can control the clock on offense.

fyp

Yeah. We need to limit turnovers, too, though. Realistically, a shut out is probably not going to happen because these guys are so bad at defense that Sams is going to have multiple very long runs that really put a dent in our TOP.
  It's like 2 problems, 1 solution.  :impatient:

and our rb's have more space and look a crap ton better when #life is in. I had a full blown melt down saturday
  The RB thing...is it because the defenses respect #life a crap-ton or are the RBs just more motivated when Sams is in charge?

However

or both?

Linebackers are much slower to react to a handoff when Sams is in the game because if they make one wrong step, they have probably just given up 7 points.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: ChiComCat on September 16, 2013, 01:42:10 PM
FWIW:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9681273/texas-longhorns-qb-david-ash-questionable-vs-kansas-state?src=mobile)

Didn't Case play most of the game against us last yr and seem much better suited to our D than Ash?  Maybe I am remembering some other time that I watched them and Case seemed less inadequate than Ash? 

Anyway, Mack has to be having a huge pity party either that or he is already resigned himself to what is happening/has happened and is in full fledged Welp mode. 


Case has played us the last two years and was pretty terrible in both. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: WildcatNkilt on September 16, 2013, 01:57:49 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.247sports.com%2FUploads%2FAssets%2F148%2F770%2F770148.gif&hash=e610168bbf631fa6afcf06db90e083e5589e75c0)
Title: Re: +7
Post by: steve dave on September 16, 2013, 01:58:54 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: mocat on September 16, 2013, 02:10:47 PM
kinda looks like braveheart king's son guy

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmos.totalfilm.com%2Fimages%2Ft%2Fthe-story-behind-braveheart-03-420-75.jpg&hash=c18ccefc9f719ad058999f5556ac1d4268ff2289)
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 02:13:26 PM
His hair looks like my pubes would if I were to grow them out and then give them a perm. He is the ugliest QB I have ever seen, which is amazing because his older bro is such a stud.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Mr Bread on September 16, 2013, 02:57:47 PM
His hair looks like my pubes would if I were to grow them out and then give them a perm. He is the ugliest QB I have ever seen, which is amazing because his older bro is such a stud.

He has some sort of childhood face disease. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kostakio on September 16, 2013, 03:02:51 PM
I think Texas is going to beat us about 35-21 or so.  Sams will play a total of three series in the game hence the predicted 21 points.   After the game Snyder will say Sams should have played more but then he'll play roughly the same amount in our loss to OSU. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 16, 2013, 03:18:07 PM
His hair looks like my pubes would if I were to grow them out and then give them a perm. He is the ugliest QB I have ever seen, which is amazing because his older bro is such a stud.

He has some sort of childhood face disease.

Yes.  Seems partially Mask'ey
Title: Re: +7
Post by: lopakman on September 16, 2013, 03:42:51 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 

Ok, but i think maybe lopakman should hedge hard against the cats with a sizable bet just in case?


 :nono:  K-State wins big.  I sabotaged their stadium.   :gocho:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Tobias on September 16, 2013, 04:03:10 PM
K-State is going to stomp Texas.  We should start a goEMAW slush fund and invest it all on this game, then donate all of the winnings to fattyfest. 

Ok, but i think maybe lopakman should hedge hard against the cats with a sizable bet just in case?


 :nono:  K-State wins big.  I sabotaged their stadium.   :gocho:

what do you call a forklift that doesn't lift :lol:
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 16, 2013, 08:06:22 PM
The line already moved to +4.

I'm just going to go ahead and take the position that anyone who said +7 was about right is a rough ridin' mongoloid.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kim carnes on September 16, 2013, 08:12:28 PM
Bet the farm on UT ladies and gents.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: timhawk on September 16, 2013, 08:13:47 PM
if snyder is smart he will start Sams, texas cant stop a crawling baby right now
Title: Re: +7
Post by: kslim on September 16, 2013, 08:19:05 PM
if snyder is smart he will start Sams, texas cant stop a crawling baby right now

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fmlpfanart%2Fimages%2F3%2F30%2FYou_don%2527t_say.png&hash=a29f1bbe78a6c00b583277c23fa0475630a2d0f2)
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 16, 2013, 08:57:25 PM
The line already moved to +4.

I'm just going to go ahead and take the position that anyone who said +7 was about right is a rough ridin' mongoloid.

Yeah.  Vegas, what's a bunch of morons. 
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 16, 2013, 09:01:54 PM
And UT has played us well the last two times.  It has been turnovers that hurt them.  McCoy, while not great, is a worse matchup for us than ash.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: michigancat on September 16, 2013, 09:36:24 PM
If we play Waters, I won't be sad when we lose.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 16, 2013, 09:40:04 PM
If we play Waters, I won't be sad when we lose.
I won't either. I'll also throw toilet paper at Snyder as well. I'll probably throw on a Texas shirt and party on 6th st too.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: HerrSonntag on September 16, 2013, 10:21:05 PM
If we play Waters, I won't be sad when we lose.
I won't either. I'll also throw toilet paper at Snyder as well. I'll probably throw on a Texas shirt and party on 6th st too.
How many Jake Waters snaps are we talking about here?  Like one snap and its 6th street and burnt orange?
Title: Re: +7
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 16, 2013, 10:23:12 PM
Yes! He shouldn't even make the road trip for this game.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 11:37:16 PM
Waters should be out there getting reps when the game gets out of hand. He shouldn't be getting any reps before that, though. We can't afford turnovers.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: CNS on September 17, 2013, 08:50:17 AM
We should start Waters for a series to eff with Greg Robinson, then just Sams them to death after that.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: MadCat on September 17, 2013, 09:30:36 AM
If we play Waters, I won't be sad when we lose.
I won't either. I'll also throw toilet paper at Snyder as well. I'll probably throw on a Texas shirt and party on 6th st too.
If you wear a Texas shirt on 6th street they will know you aren't a Texas fan, or so I've been told.
Title: Re: +7
Post by: Skipper44 on September 17, 2013, 09:38:14 AM
If we play Waters, I won't be sad when we lose.
I won't either. I'll also throw toilet paper at Snyder as well. I'll probably throw on a Texas shirt and party on 6th st too.
If you wear a Texas shirt on 6th street they will know you aren't a Texas fan, or so I've been told.
Also, 6th isn't really the spot for 6 figga types
Title: Re: +7
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2013, 08:24:06 AM
yeah, so FSD, maybe stick to the Birther Pit and let the big boys talk football.