goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: pvegs on September 07, 2013, 09:12:35 PM

Title: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on September 07, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
1) Baylor
2) Oklahoma State
3) OU
4) TCU
5) Texas Tech
6) Texas
7) K-State
8) WVU
9) ISU/KU

This conference is rough ridin' terrible.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 07, 2013, 09:13:20 PM
Baylor might just run away with thing by a couple games.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pendergast on September 07, 2013, 09:13:45 PM
No one is any where near Baylor.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 07, 2013, 09:14:39 PM
baylor would beat all of the teams from last years big 12
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Frankenklein on September 07, 2013, 09:16:06 PM
Better than the Big East
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on September 07, 2013, 09:18:19 PM
"Next on ABC regional action, Kansas State vs Texas in the battle for the Big 12's 6th bowl tie in (whatever the eff that is!)"
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 07, 2013, 09:18:45 PM
by how much does baylor beat us?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 07, 2013, 09:19:02 PM
When will Texas just stop rough ridin' around and hire Art Briles?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 07, 2013, 09:19:39 PM
When will Texas just stop rough ridin' around and hire Art Briles?

yeah, can you  rough ridin' imagine?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pendergast on September 07, 2013, 09:20:05 PM
1) Baylor



2) OSU
3) TCU
4) OU
5) TT
6) UT
7) KSU
8) WVU
9) ISU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on September 07, 2013, 09:21:13 PM
by how much does baylor beat us?

I'll say 51-30, and I'd be very happy with that score.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: EMAWzified on September 07, 2013, 09:22:39 PM
K-State with Sams playing most of the snaps is 3-4 spots higher than Waters at QB.

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: EMAWzified on September 07, 2013, 09:23:52 PM
Is Baylor this year's WVA?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 07, 2013, 09:24:25 PM
Texas looks bad. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on September 07, 2013, 09:27:23 PM
Baylor will lose 4 games and finish middle of the pack.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on September 07, 2013, 09:33:22 PM
Baylor will lose 4 games and finish middle of the pack.

It's possible, but they look better on D, no other team looks great on offense, Petty looks better than Florence, and Seastrunk is firmly established. I think they'll be right there.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: PoetWarrior on September 07, 2013, 09:53:51 PM
1. OU
2. Texas
3. K-State
4. Colorado
5. aTm
6. Nebraska
7. Ok. St.
8. Missouri
9. Tech
10. Baylor
11. Iowa St.
12. KU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Havs on September 08, 2013, 09:04:36 AM
Beyond thankful ISU isn't 10th on any confy predictions. Hope you guys are correct!
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: PowercatPat on September 08, 2013, 11:34:45 AM
1) Baylor
2) Oklahoma State
3) OU
4) TCU
5) Texas Tech
6) Texas
7) K-State
8) WVU
9) ISU/KU

This conference is rough ridin' terrible.

Texas ahead of us? LOL
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 08, 2013, 11:49:47 AM
1. OU
2. Texas
3. K-State
4. Colorado
5. aTm
6. Nebraska
7. Ok. St.
8. Missouri
9. Tech
10. Baylor
11. Iowa St.
12. KU


Hmmmm, your Baylor ranking makes me think you are a giant rough ridin' moron dumbass stupid eff sack of hair brain poop sniffing idiot, FWIW.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 08, 2013, 11:51:51 AM
I bet Baylor wins this rough ridin' conference by two games.


WVU's dog crap defense held OU to under 20 on their own field last night.  WOOF.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 08, 2013, 11:53:40 AM
Nope, not two games for Baylor....the more I think about it, the more  I think it will be a two team race between OSU and Baylor, but BOTH will be two games ahead of the rest of the pack.

TWO HORSE RACE!  :ridinghorse:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 08, 2013, 11:55:03 AM
ALSO,

Fourth is available guys!  FOURTH IS AVAILABLE!  DO NOT SETTLE FOR FIFTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1  :lynchmob:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on September 08, 2013, 12:00:47 PM
by how much does baylor beat us?

have you seen A Serbian Film?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 08, 2013, 12:09:38 PM
ALSO,

Fourth is available guys!  FOURTH IS AVAILABLE!  DO NOT SETTLE FOR FIFTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1  :lynchmob:

fourth is definitely ripe for the taking, but i'm not sure we have it in us.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: AST on September 08, 2013, 12:17:22 PM
Baptists
.
.
.
.
40's
.
Patterson's
Swag
Boomer, Emaw
Shaggy's
Moonshine
Lil Bro
John Boat's
Title: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 08, 2013, 12:28:04 PM
Baylor
Oklahoma State
TCU
K-State
OU
Tech
Texas
WVU
Iowa State
KU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Functianalyst on September 08, 2013, 01:15:53 PM
Better than the Big East
Whether the overall league is good is always up for debate, but I ask come bowl time who will win BCS games.  I don't think anyone in the Big XII can hang with Teddy Bridgewarter and Louisville, Ohio State(?), Oregon/Stanford, Clemson/Miami/possibly FSU and a slew of SEC teams right now.  So I see the Big XII being no better than the 6th best conference after the first two weeks. 

But back to the thread, after the first week I still had no doubt that K-State remained a contender for the Big XII championship since I don't think the league winner has probably less a chance at a national championship this year.

I agree with everyone that Baylor is looking pretty good.  But Wofford (never really heard of them until last week) and Buffalo have a combined 1-3 record.  Today I see it as a toss up between Baylor, OSU, TCU, OU and KSU.  UT and T-Tech may end up in the mix, but I don't see KU, WVU or ISU being contenders.  However there is always next week.
 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: wetwillie on September 08, 2013, 01:28:17 PM
It's a rough ridin' shame that we have a dynamic leader world class athlete that could be spearheading our offense and 5 home games against a woefully enept league and we will likely squander it.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Big Sam on September 08, 2013, 01:59:04 PM
by how much does baylor beat us?

have you seen A Serbian Film?

Is that like a snuff film?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on September 08, 2013, 02:32:21 PM
by how much does baylor beat us?

have you seen A Serbian Film?

Is that like a snuff film?

and rape.  don't forget the RAPE.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: PoetWarrior on September 08, 2013, 03:36:02 PM

10. Baylor
11. Iowa St.
12. KU


Hmmmm, your Baylor ranking makes me think you are a giant _____ moron dumb***** stupid eff sack of hair brain poop sniffing idiot, FWIW.

This is a hateful place.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 08, 2013, 08:11:07 PM
This week will mostly be a crap slate for the Big 12, but there are a couple fun ones.  I really am interested to see if TCU's backup QB is any good against Tech.  And, Ole Miss at Texas will be fun.  KU at Rice should be illuminating as well.

  * Thu, Sep 12     Texas Tech          TCU         Lubbock, Texas      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma          Tulsa         Norman, Okla.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     West Virginia          Georgia State         Morgantown, W. Va.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Iowa State          Iowa         Ames, Iowa      5:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Kansas State          Massachusetts         Manhattan, Kan.      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma State          Lamar         Stillwater, Okla.      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Rice          Kansas         Houston, Texas      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Texas          Ole Miss         Austin, Texas      7:00 p.m.   
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: AST on September 08, 2013, 08:15:26 PM
This week will mostly be a crap slate for the Big 12, but there are a couple fun ones.  I really am interested to see if TCU's backup QB is any good against Tech.  And, Ole Miss at Texas will be fun.  KU at Rice should be illuminating as well.

  * Thu, Sep 12     Texas Tech          TCU         Lubbock, Texas      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma          Tulsa         Norman, Okla.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     West Virginia          Georgia State         Morgantown, W. Va.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Iowa State          Iowa         Ames, Iowa      5:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Kansas State          Massachusetts         Manhattan, Kan.      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma State          Lamar         Stillwater, Okla.      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Rice          Kansas         Houston, Texas      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Texas          Ole Miss         Austin, Texas      7:00 p.m.

i'm pretty sure tcu's back-up is the same guy that played all last year when Pachall was out getting rehabbed

but i'm no the best sports guys so screw me
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 08, 2013, 08:18:37 PM
Is Baylor this year's WVA?

Their swing won't be that wild but yeah, kinda
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 08, 2013, 08:25:04 PM
Yes, Boykin is TCUs other QB, they were running a 2 QB system this season before CP broke his arm.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 08, 2013, 08:31:06 PM

10. Baylor
11. Iowa St.
12. KU


Hmmmm, your Baylor ranking makes me think you are a giant _____ moron dumb***** stupid eff sack of hair brain poop sniffing idiot, FWIW.

This is a hateful place.

:lol:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: AST on September 08, 2013, 08:35:00 PM
Yes, Boykin is TCUs other QB, they were running a 2 QB system this season before CP broke his arm.

yeah i didn't follow tcu closely last season except for our game where Boykin either ran or threw 42 times against us

don't know who qb'd the rest of the year

like i said, screw me
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Skipper44 on September 08, 2013, 08:45:05 PM
Boykin is a nice player and a better fit  for  the  make up of TCUs roster -  he is kind of a poor man's Sams
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 08, 2013, 09:29:36 PM
PW posting more.  Sad

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: PoetWarrior on September 08, 2013, 09:37:31 PM
PW posting more.  Sad

 :buh-bye:
sonofdaxjones, you are one of the posters I can distinguish from the others.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 08, 2013, 09:46:26 PM
PW posting more.  Sad

 :buh-bye:

There certainly seems to be a reinvigoration or an invigoration as the case may be.  I like it. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 08, 2013, 09:53:06 PM
Okay
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 08, 2013, 09:59:23 PM
Fine, it's sad.  Sadness for everybody. :frown: :frown: :frown:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 08, 2013, 10:15:14 PM
waters is tearing this place apart
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Panjandrum on September 08, 2013, 10:21:46 PM
I bet Baylor wins this rough ridin' conference by two games.


WVU's dog crap defense held OU to under 20 on their own field last night.  WOOF.

If I'm OU, I'm throwing up due to the fact that Jake Heaps' QB rating is almost 20 points higher than their QB combo.

And Jake Heaps played like dogcrap this week.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Panjandrum on September 08, 2013, 10:23:33 PM
This week will mostly be a crap slate for the Big 12, but there are a couple fun ones.  I really am interested to see if TCU's backup QB is any good against Tech.  And, Ole Miss at Texas will be fun.  KU at Rice should be illuminating as well.

  * Thu, Sep 12     Texas Tech          TCU         Lubbock, Texas      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma          Tulsa         Norman, Okla.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     West Virginia          Georgia State         Morgantown, W. Va.      11:00 a.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Iowa State          Iowa         Ames, Iowa      5:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Kansas State          Massachusetts         Manhattan, Kan.      6:00 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Oklahoma State          Lamar         Stillwater, Okla.      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Rice          Kansas         Houston, Texas      6:30 p.m.   

  Sat, Sep 14     Texas          Ole Miss         Austin, Texas      7:00 p.m.

i'm pretty sure tcu's back-up is the same guy that played all last year when Pachall was out getting rehabbed

but i'm no the best sports guys so screw me

Yes, that's correct, and no, he's not very good.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 08, 2013, 10:54:02 PM
Boynkin is a fine qb. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Panjandrum on September 08, 2013, 11:18:27 PM
Boynkin is a fine qb.

He's okay.  Granted, I haven't watched a lot of TCU this year (I skipped the game against LSU and watched some of the SELU game), but he doesn't seem much better than what we have or what anyone else has.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: bones129 on September 08, 2013, 11:23:14 PM

He's serviceable.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: p1k3 on September 08, 2013, 11:25:24 PM
Boynkin is a fine qb.

He's okay.  Granted, I haven't watched a lot of TCU this year (I skipped the game against LSU and watched some of the SELU game), but he doesn't seem much better than what we have or what anyone else has.

He's no Daniel Sams, is what you're saying.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: slackcat on September 09, 2013, 06:16:33 AM
When will Texas K-State just stop rough ridin' around and hire Art Briles?

 :lynchmob:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: cas4ksu on September 09, 2013, 06:34:28 AM
I'm excited to see the TCU-Tech game this thursday.

I like Tech in a little upset.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: deputy dawg on September 09, 2013, 09:01:11 AM
Sorry if this respects up this thread/board, but does anyone else wonder if Tech will master both Leach's offense via Kliff's tutelage, and have the benefit of Tubberville's rebuild on defense?  If so, then Tech is underrated in most of these rankings.  TIA.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Spracne on September 09, 2013, 09:45:35 AM
ESPN's later power rankings are out.  An excerpt is presented below:

7. Texas (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 3): The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire.

8. Kansas State (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 8): LHC Bill Snyder’s bunch bounced back with a nice performance over one of the Sun Belt’s better teams in Louisiana-Lafayette. Maybe the Wildcats are better off using two quarterbacks, as Jake Waters (278 yards passing) and Daniel Sams (63 yards rushing) got the offense moving in different ways.

9. Kansas (1-0, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 10): Justin McCay made good on his vow to end the Kansas receiver scoreless catch streak, and the Jayhawks handled South Dakota after a shaky first quarter. Next up? A tricky road trip to Rice, which figures to reveal where exactly this Kansas defense is.

10. Iowa State (0-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 9): Kansas won its FCS opener. Iowa State did not. But the Cyclones could jump-start their season next weekend. Take home the Cy-Hawk Trophy for a third straight season, and nobody in Ames will be talking about Northern Iowa.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Panjandrum on September 09, 2013, 09:48:07 AM
ESPN's later power rankings are out.  An excerpt is presented below:

7. Texas (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 3): The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire.

8. Kansas State (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 8): LHC LHC Bill Snyder’s bunch bounced back with a nice performance over one of the Sun Belt’s better teams in Louisiana-Lafayette. Maybe the Wildcats are better off using two quarterbacks, as Jake Waters (278 yards passing) and Daniel Sams (63 yards rushing) got the offense moving in different ways.

9. Kansas (1-0, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 10): Justin McCay made good on his vow to end the Kansas receiver scoreless catch streak, and the Jayhawks handled South Dakota after a shaky first quarter. Next up? A tricky road trip to Rice, which figures to reveal where exactly this Kansas defense is.

10. Iowa State (0-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 9): Kansas won its FCS opener. Iowa State did not. But the Cyclones could jump-start their season next weekend. Take home the Cy-Hawk Trophy for a third straight season, and nobody in Ames will be talking about Northern Iowa.

Jesus, the ISU/Iowa game is going to be so horrible to watch.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Spracne on September 09, 2013, 09:50:52 AM
Not dead last in some type of ranking! :Woohoo:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kslim on September 09, 2013, 10:01:21 AM
Not dead last in some type of ranking! :Woohoo:

'grats bro you earned it
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 09, 2013, 10:04:05 AM
Not dead last in some type of ranking! :Woohoo:

Yes!  New goal to shoot for: embarrass Rice by more points in a whole game than Manziel could in one half! They can do it!  :cheers:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kslim on September 09, 2013, 10:04:53 AM
Not dead last in some type of ranking! :Woohoo:

Yes!  New goal to shoot for: embarrass Rice by more points in a whole game than Manziel could in one half! They can do it!  :cheers:

gonna be a tough game for our hawks bros imo
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 09, 2013, 10:06:09 AM
ESPN's later power rankings are out.  An excerpt is presented below:

7. Texas (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 3): The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire.

8. Kansas State (1-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 8): LHC LHC Bill Snyder’s bunch bounced back with a nice performance over one of the Sun Belt’s better teams in Louisiana-Lafayette. Maybe the Wildcats are better off using two quarterbacks, as Jake Waters (278 yards passing) and Daniel Sams (63 yards rushing) got the offense moving in different ways.

9. Kansas (1-0, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 10): Justin McCay made good on his vow to end the Kansas receiver scoreless catch streak, and the Jayhawks handled South Dakota after a shaky first quarter. Next up? A tricky road trip to Rice, which figures to reveal where exactly this Kansas defense is.

10. Iowa State (0-1, 0-0 Big 12, last week: 9): Kansas won its FCS opener. Iowa State did not. But the Cyclones could jump-start their season next weekend. Take home the Cy-Hawk Trophy for a third straight season, and nobody in Ames will be talking about Northern Iowa.

Jesus, the ISU/Iowa game is going to be so horrible to watch.

Yeah, Iowa is rough ridin' terrible.  Man do those guys hate Ferentz now. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: deputy dawg on September 09, 2013, 10:16:41 AM
Quote
Yeah, Iowa is rough ridin' terrible.  Man do those guys hate Ferentz now.

Wow, waiting for Iowa to fire him so Currie can make that his marquis football hire.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Spracne on September 09, 2013, 10:17:52 AM
Not dead last in some type of ranking! :Woohoo:

Yes!  New goal to shoot for: embarrass Rice by more points in a whole game than Manziel could in one half! They can do it!  :cheers:

gonna be a tough game for our hawks bros imo

Yup, Rice is favored by 4-5 pts.  Also, we haven't won a road game since Reesing's Jayhawks beat UTEP in 2009, I believe.  But this is a year to cap those damning statistics.  We already have a WR touchdown after going all of last year without one.  Those nerds better be ready on Saturday, because they're gonna be smarting when it's said and done.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 09, 2013, 10:19:27 AM
Quote
Yeah, Iowa is rough ridin' terrible.  Man do those guys hate Ferentz now.

Wow, waiting for Iowa to fire him so Currie can make that his marquis football hire.

I bet Currie goes after Mack. I really wouldn't even be upset with that.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pissclams on September 09, 2013, 10:21:05 AM
they named it the cy-hawk trophy.  man. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Skipper44 on September 09, 2013, 10:21:38 AM
Quote
Yeah, Iowa is rough ridin' terrible.  Man do those guys hate Ferentz now.

Wow, waiting for Iowa to fire him so Currie can make that his marquis football hire.

I bet Currie goes after Mack. I really wouldn't even be upset with that.
How freaking awesome would it be for Snyder to bring Mack on the staff next year  :love:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: WildcatNkilt on September 09, 2013, 10:23:16 AM
Is OU's defense that horrible or is WVU's defense that much improved?  Or is it a combo of both being average?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Skipper44 on September 09, 2013, 11:24:40 AM
Is OU's defense that horrible or is WVU's defense that much improved?  Or is it a combo of both being average?
OU's Offense may be that bad - Knight was a %50 passer in HS and it is pretty well established Bell is not a great fit for the Bradford/Jones style of offense.  They have good talent at the skill positions but I am not sure Huepel can maximize what they have. 

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Havs on September 09, 2013, 11:28:21 AM
Will this be a place of comfort after losing to Iowa, or will I be bombarded with hatred and laughter? Planning ahead now.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Skipper44 on September 09, 2013, 11:29:54 AM
Will this be a place of comfort after losing to Iowa, or will I be bombarded with hatred and laughter? Planning ahead now.
depends on how much Sams plays
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Tobias on September 09, 2013, 11:30:11 AM
Will this be a place of comfort after losing to Iowa, or will I be bombarded with hatred and laughter? Planning ahead now.

i don't really think anyone will care, TBH
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 09, 2013, 11:39:46 AM
I don't know about you guys, but I'm excited to play in a crappy conference for once. Out of all the years to do it, this is the one.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 09, 2013, 11:46:14 AM
Will this be a place of comfort after losing to Iowa, or will I be bombarded with hatred and laughter? Planning ahead now.

This matchup has no winners for us, this game is as relevant as Bowling Green vs. Akron.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: cDubya on September 09, 2013, 11:54:10 AM
Is OU's defense that horrible or is WVU's defense that much improved?  Or is it a combo of both being average?

Combo of so many things that night it would be impossible to judge yet. Most turnovers by OU in like 12 years, some were WVU's D, some were just bad OU (Knight) choices. WVU actually looks to have improved the secondary, but I mean, what else could they do?

OU will have a great running game against average D-lines, of which WVU does not have at the moment. If they have to resort to a passing game, though, they won't win more than 7 games.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 09, 2013, 11:54:44 AM
I don't know about you guys, but I'm excited to play in a crappy conference for once. Out of all the years to do it, this is the one.

I agree. Baylor is the only team who looks good and they haven't played anybody yet. If they can't stop the run, we might have an outside chance at winning this thing.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 09, 2013, 12:03:15 PM
Would be glorious for a team that lost to FCS to win the conference.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 09, 2013, 12:06:30 PM
After week one (and two):

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 09, 2013, 12:07:16 PM
After week one:

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
Week 2 tho
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Frankenklein on September 09, 2013, 12:07:55 PM
After week one:

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
When's your week 2 ranking coming out
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 09, 2013, 12:10:23 PM
After week one:

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
Texas should prolly be ranked higher after week 1.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 09, 2013, 12:11:51 PM
Would be glorious for a team that lost to FCS to win the conference.
Virginia Tech did it after losing to James Madison. :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Spaces on September 09, 2013, 12:13:58 PM
After week one (and two):

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
BITB
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 09, 2013, 12:15:07 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_24_t640.jpg&hash=5290a9df3161f3fabd629bb68dac2e9bf4f188a7)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_11_t640.jpg&hash=8d683591ec47ddc374190a0a127fbb7aaceca3d1)


 :love:  :love:  :love:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: cDubya on September 09, 2013, 12:15:36 PM
After week one:

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.
When's your week 2 ranking coming out

December.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 09, 2013, 12:16:22 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_11_t640.jpg&hash=8d683591ec47ddc374190a0a127fbb7aaceca3d1)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_24_t640.jpg&hash=5290a9df3161f3fabd629bb68dac2e9bf4f188a7)


 :love:  :love:  :love:
Which one is Combs?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 09, 2013, 12:18:36 PM
Hey Beems! How'd the game go this last week? I didn't see much of it, just the first half when you guys were struggling against a 1 win FCS team from a year ago. 'Grats on those pics tho. :cheers:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: bws on September 09, 2013, 12:18:59 PM
Those new KU unis aren't bad. Shouldn't of put the jayhawk on the helmet but otherwise they are sharp.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 09, 2013, 12:23:21 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_11_t640.jpg&hash=8d683591ec47ddc374190a0a127fbb7aaceca3d1)

Is #23 doing the chicken dance?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 09, 2013, 12:25:50 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_27_t640.jpg&hash=6dbb42d4f9ff2b455f60ef110ec410e302438ded)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_mly_01_t640.jpg&hash=d70deae63641d6fd843bea73943757f0e25cadf4)


 :love:  :love:  :love:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 09, 2013, 12:27:47 PM
The Jackrabbits aren't doing so good this year?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: CHONGS on September 09, 2013, 12:32:29 PM
After week 2 (according to ChUMP):

                                                                                                                                                         
#   Team    Off Drives Adj Off Eff  Def Drives   Adj Def EffΔ Eff
9Baylor14.3.9914.51.922.07
15Oklahoma State11.53.3512.1.631.72
22Oklahoma14.2.4113.0.951.46
32Texas Tech14.53.1615.2.141.02
40Kansas State12.3.0111.52.070.94
54TCU12.2.5511.51.950.6
63West Virginia12.2.3513.2.040.31
67Texas14.52.5614.52.320.24
80Kansas11.2.6911.2.71-0.02
102Iowa State11.2.3910.2.98-0.59

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Frankenklein on September 09, 2013, 12:46:42 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_11_t640.jpg&hash=8d683591ec47ddc374190a0a127fbb7aaceca3d1)

Is #23 doing the chicken dance?
Has to pee ?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: EMAWzified on September 09, 2013, 12:51:37 PM
Smart move to make the Kansas real, real small on the unis. That way they don't show up as well on opponents' high light vids.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: wabash909 on September 09, 2013, 01:00:03 PM
I like it when Beems does the picture posts.   
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 09, 2013, 01:12:22 PM
After week one (and two):

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.

 :D
Why is Tech lower than KU though?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: deputy dawg on September 09, 2013, 01:25:01 PM
After week one (and two):

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.

 :D
Why is Tech lower than KU though?

'Cuz ku played Tech close last year, and ain't putting up with that crap (playing close and losing) this year.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 09, 2013, 01:29:34 PM
After week one (and two):

1.  Oklahoma
2.  Baylor
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  TCU
5.  Kansas
6.  Texas Tech
7.  West Virginia
8.  K-State
9.  Texas
10.  Iowa St.

 :D
Why is Tech lower than KU though?

'Cuz ku played Tech close last year, and ain't putting up with that crap (playing close and losing) this year.

Alright cool. Celebrate good times, come on!
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: WildcatNkilt on September 09, 2013, 03:11:03 PM
Maybe Luked but Knight is out for 2 weeks with bruised knee.  Time for Belldozer to show his true potential. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 09, 2013, 05:05:31 PM
Maybe Luked but Knight is out for 2 weeks with bruised knee.  Time for Belldozer to show his true potential. 
eff Blake Bell. I hope he gets AIDS.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 09, 2013, 05:16:25 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 09, 2013, 05:18:05 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.
History would say this is very likely.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 09, 2013, 05:19:25 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.
History would say this is very likely.
HISTORY AWAITS!
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: Spracne on September 09, 2013, 05:22:47 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.

Is that a figure of speech?  Or would you actually bet money on it?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 09, 2013, 05:23:26 PM
Then again, KU bros are saying the program is lightyears ahead of where Gill had them so who knows?  Depending on how they do this week, they might be favored at home against LTU.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 09, 2013, 05:24:19 PM
Louisiana Tech is really, really shitty this year.  I realize the jaychokes are just terrible rough ridin' awful this year, but still.  Maybe one more.  TSC guys. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 09, 2013, 05:26:34 PM
Louisiana Tech is really, really shitty this year.  I realize the jaychokes are just terrible rough ridin' awful this year, but still.  Maybe one more.  TSC guys.
Yeah, you're right.  I remember thinking before the season that LTU was going to be pretty good, but that was based on how well they did last year (including against our Beckmans  :shakesfist:) but they've been getting roughed up pretty bad.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rams on September 09, 2013, 05:29:49 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fworldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2013%2F09%2F07%2Fku_fbc_usd_nk_11_t640.jpg&hash=8d683591ec47ddc374190a0a127fbb7aaceca3d1)

Is #23 doing the chicken dance?
he's tired. football is really hard you guys.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 09, 2013, 05:30:39 PM
Louisiana Tech is really, really shitty this year.  I realize the jaychokes are just terrible rough ridin' awful this year, but still.  Maybe one more.  TSC guys.
Yeah, you're right.  I remember thinking before the season that LTU was going to be pretty good, but that was based on how well they did last year (including against our Beckmans  :shakesfist:) but they've been getting roughed up pretty bad.

If Cubit is for us, who can be against us?  We'd kick their dicks off their bodies this year.  Just ask chings.   
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: star seed 7 on September 09, 2013, 05:32:26 PM
if ku doesn't beat lou-tech, then weis should be immediately fired.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 09, 2013, 06:19:16 PM
if ku doesn't beat lou-tech, then weis should be immediately fired.
He got a raise a week ago after the NDSU win. Not gonna happen.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: CHONGS on September 09, 2013, 06:51:01 PM
I dunno, The KU - Rice game should be close:

Kansas   36
Rice   39

KU should beat La Tech (close again though)

Louisiana Tech   30
Kansas   34

Close against ISU too!

Kansas   30
Iowa State   32

and for kicks (for Mr Bread):
Illinois   32
Louisiana Tech   35






Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 09, 2013, 06:56:07 PM
and for kicks (for Mr Bread):
Illinois   32
Louisiana Tech   35
lmao.  look at the look at how bitter chump is that the Breads spanked its beloved Tubberville

 :lol:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 09, 2013, 06:58:59 PM
ChUMP didn't say that.  How could it?  They beat the dick off the man that sets the standard.  Fishy. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rams on September 09, 2013, 07:10:42 PM
if ku doesn't beat lou-tech, then weis should be immediately fired.
He got a raise a week ago after the NDSU win. Not gonna happen.
I'm beginning to think his compensation is tied directly to our success or lack thereof, regardless of how much he has to do with it. not very tsc. :frown:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rams on September 09, 2013, 07:13:19 PM
you guys.  baylor might be the best team in our conference.

just rough ridin' let that marinate for a little while.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: wetwillie on September 09, 2013, 08:46:13 PM
you guys.  baylor might be the best team in our conference.

just rough ridin' let that marinate for a little while.

Art Briles tho.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: kim carnes on September 09, 2013, 09:44:47 PM
you guys.  baylor might be the best team in our conference.

just rough ridin' let that marinate for a little while.

um, they were the best team in the conference last year.  they beat our dicks off.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: yoga-like_abana on September 09, 2013, 09:47:06 PM
If kansas doesn't win the north this year they are never going to win it
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: Katpappy on September 09, 2013, 09:47:41 PM
you guys.  baylor might be the best team in our conference.

just rough ridin' let that marinate for a little while.

um, they were the best team in the conference last year.  they beat our dicks off.
That why some ppl say you're dickless.  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 09, 2013, 10:23:10 PM
1. tbpSU - flag football offense, only conf team with good win to date
2. Jesuit - beating the crap out of bad teams
3. Paperclip - defense good, offense bad
4. BettyFord QB - see OU, only slightly worse
5. WWWildcats - finding rhythm
6. Blindfold Cowboy - not sure where else to put them
7. Flat Top Mountain - see OU only bad at defense too
8. Bevo - MichiganCat wanted kstate to hire Manny Diaz  :ROFL:
9. McDonalds - Rebuilding the perpetual 5-6 win season, ouch
10. Women's Track - no talent, bad coach, losers, would finish 6th in the MVC
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Bloodfart on September 09, 2013, 11:13:48 PM
crap fellas, it's in the bag.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: OregonSmock on September 10, 2013, 01:17:00 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.


I bet you're wrong. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: DQ12 on September 10, 2013, 02:30:08 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.


I bet you're wrong.
Yeah.  Forgot about LTU.  We'll see though!
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: OregonSmock on September 10, 2013, 02:33:58 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.


I bet you're wrong.
Yeah.  Forgot about LTU.  We'll see though!


KU also has a couple pud teams that lost to FCS schools on our schedule.   
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: DQ12 on September 10, 2013, 02:36:47 PM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.


I bet you're wrong.
Yeah.  Forgot about LTU.  We'll see though!


KU also has a couple pud teams that lost to FCS schools on our schedule.
yeah but those are conference teams and Weis has a proven track record of being absolutely 100% incapable of beating big 12 conference teams so we might be at an impasse.  what will happen?  who knows for sure?

get your tickets today by calling 1-800-34-HAWKS.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Asteriskhead on September 10, 2013, 03:10:07 PM
Maybe Luked but Knight is out for 2 weeks with bruised knee.  Time for Belldozer to show his true potential. 
eff Blake Bell. I hope he gets AIDS.

He's from your city. You could have kneecapped him before he ever reported to his first day of freshman camp.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2013, 10:38:14 PM
Mixing his toot with rat poison would have been a much easier way to incapacitate Bell.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: KITNfury on September 11, 2013, 08:29:21 AM
I bet KU is done winning for the season.


I bet you're wrong.
Yeah.  Forgot about LTU.  We'll see though!


KU also has a couple pud teams that lost to FCS schools on our schedule.
yeah but those are conference teams and Weis has a proven track record of being absolutely 100% incapable of beating big 12 conference teams so we might be at an impasse.  what will happen?  who knows for sure?

get your tickets today by calling 1-800-34-HAWKS.
(785) 842-2942 is a good place as well.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 15, 2013, 08:36:28 AM
Bump for the relative suck that is the Big 12 Conference.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: ksutrumpet on September 15, 2013, 08:46:02 AM
I just don't even know anymore. I had TCU as a dark horse to win, but now? Whoever does come out on top of the :bs: is going to get fisted by some PAC 12 team in the Fiesta Bowl.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 09:02:47 AM
1. OSU
2. Baylor
3. OU
4. K-State
5. TTech
6. WVU
7. TCU
8. UT
9. ISU
THE WORST BY A MILLION MILES. KU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: WildcatNkilt on September 15, 2013, 09:12:05 AM
1. OSU
2. Baylor
3. OU
4. K-State
5. TTech
6. WVU
7. TCU
8. UT
9. ISU
THE WORST BY A MILLION MILES. KU

Really?  I feel like flood Aggie is down there with them.  Both horrible.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2013, 09:16:13 AM
Flood Aggie (stupid moniker) is really shitty, but they are 3 TDs better than KU.

WVU, UT and TCU are also really shitty.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: kim carnes on September 15, 2013, 09:16:58 AM
I just don't even know anymore. I had TCU as a dark horse to win, but now? Whoever does come out on top of the :bs: is going to get fisted by some PAC fizz team in the Fiesta Bowl.

no, that was last year.  baylor might actually beat their pac12 opponent.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big fizz
Post by: mocat on September 16, 2013, 12:07:59 PM
I just don't even know anymore. I had TCU as a dark horse to win, but now? Whoever does come out on top of the :bs: is going to get fisted by some PAC fizz team in the Fiesta Bowl.

no, that was last year.  baylor might actually beat their pac12 opponent.

that was last year too  :lol:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OK_Cat on September 16, 2013, 12:16:34 PM
1. OSU
2. Baylor
3. OU
4. K-State
5. TTech
6. WVU
7. TCU
8. UT
9. ISU
THE WORST BY A MILLION MILES. KU

kliff would beat us by 20+
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Havs on September 16, 2013, 12:19:24 PM
KU should drop football if they lose to Iowa State. This is the worst team I have seen at ISU. That says something.

Hoiball time boys, Hoiball.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: ChiComCat on September 16, 2013, 12:25:55 PM
1. OSU
2. Baylor
3. OU
4. K-State
5. TTech
6. WVU
7. TCU
8. UT
9. ISU
THE WORST BY A MILLION MILES. KU

kliff would beat us by 20+

A first year head coach going against Snyder seems like a prime candidate to get schemed.  That said, he learned from the Pirate so who knows
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 16, 2013, 12:29:41 PM
Guys, Baylor is going to boat race Louisville in the Fiesta.  They have the last pick in the BCS at-large this year.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Panjandrum on September 16, 2013, 12:32:35 PM
KU should drop football if they lose to Iowa State. This is the worst team I have seen at ISU. That says something.

Hoiball time boys, Hoiball.

They're really terrible, Havs.  I think ISU pulls that one out.

KU may be a 1-11 team again.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 16, 2013, 02:05:06 PM
KU should drop football if they lose to Iowa State. This is the worst team I have seen at ISU. That says something.

Hoiball time boys, Hoiball.

Is Rhodes getting fired after this year, or are Iowans still impressed enough with his lack of accomplishments to give him another year to right the ship?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on September 16, 2013, 02:24:12 PM
Hey, with the death of the Big East, someone had to become the new worst BCS conference!

Why not us?  Why not us!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbusinessofcollegesports.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F10%2Fbig-east-big-121.jpg&hash=32aaf9b7a30bf87e85cca95ea1c4c60eb187c985)
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 16, 2013, 03:16:05 PM
Change name to Big SEXII (sexy) Conference 

B-S-C
B-S-C
B-S-C
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 16, 2013, 03:41:30 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.


Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 16, 2013, 03:44:53 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 16, 2013, 05:29:52 PM
1. OSU
2. Baylor
3. OU
4. Tech
5. TCU
6. KSU
7. WVU
8. UT
9. KU
10. ISU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: thewildcat on September 16, 2013, 05:54:18 PM
1.OU
2.Baylor
3.OSU
4.TT
5.TCU
6.TX
7.WV
8.KSU
9.ISU
10.KU

Our defense is pretty bad guys, The offense hopefully keeps us in some games. We'll win some games because of the special teams.#imonteamsams
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: CyberToothCat on September 16, 2013, 06:09:59 PM
1. OU
2. BU
3. OSU



4. TT
5. TCU


6. WVU
7. UT
8. KSU



9. KU
10. ISU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MadCat on September 17, 2013, 08:31:17 AM
1.) Baylor
2.) OSU
3.) OU
4.) TT
5.) TCU
6.) WVU
7.) KSU
8.) UT
9.) KU
10.) ISU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: deputy dawg on September 17, 2013, 09:15:33 AM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 17, 2013, 11:31:41 AM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Shooter Jones on September 17, 2013, 12:05:06 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2013, 12:21:08 PM
This is really going to suck when they run all over us in Lawrence.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Havs on September 17, 2013, 01:35:05 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because USD went 1-10 in FCS last year.

Why am I bothering arguing this??  :'bye cruel world:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: deputy dawg on September 17, 2013, 05:03:28 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?
Start with a coach that actually seems to care.  Pro tip:  It's not Chaz
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: bubbles4ksu on September 17, 2013, 05:23:15 PM
1. OSU
2. BU
3. TTU
4. KSU*
5. OU
6. TCU
7. UT*
8. WVU
9. ISU
10. KU

*KSU flips with UT if Sams doesn't get 80% or more of the snaps going forward.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: AST on September 17, 2013, 08:42:07 PM
Baylor
.
.
.
.
OSU
.
Tech,OU
TCU, KSU
UT
WVU
KU
ISU

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2013, 02:07:14 AM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to

Absurd. Using this logic shouldn't everyone have KSU or OSU 1st? I'm guessing like none of you have seen ISU play, Iowa pounded them. They have a fair number of fans who rightfully think they won't win a game this season.

Havs, UNI beat South Dakota by a whole 3 points last season, chill.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Shooter Jones on September 18, 2013, 01:54:59 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to

Absurd. Using this logic shouldn't everyone have KSU or OSU 1st? I'm guessing like none of you have seen ISU play, Iowa pounded them. They have a fair number of fans who rightfully think they won't win a game this season.

Havs, UNI beat South Dakota by a whole 3 points last season, chill.

Since KU last won a conference game:
1. OU = 18 + 1 Big 12 Champ game win
2. K-State = 15
3. OSU = 14
4. Baylor = 10
5. Texas = 9
6. Tech = 7
7. ISU = 6
8. KU = 0

For this year, switch Baylor/K-State and Texas/Tech with TCU between and WV behind. 1-3 seem like they're the top, 4-6 in the middle, then Texas and 8-10 at the bottom.

1-3. OU, OSU, Baylor
4. K-State complete homer pick hoping S4ms saves us
5. Tech
6. TCU
7. Texas
8. WV
9. ISU
10. KU

*Edit: Texas has 9 wins, not sure why I put 10
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2013, 06:20:28 PM
so
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: DQ12 on September 18, 2013, 07:08:39 PM
I think ISU will beat KU this year, but only because it's in Ames.  And I think it'll be close.  If it was Lawrence, I'd have KU by 10+. 

That said, ISU is the worst team in the conference.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2013, 08:18:00 PM
iowa state looks terrible, maybe tulsa is great? 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: meow meow on September 26, 2013, 08:28:32 PM
iowa state looks terrible, maybe tulsa is great?

Tulsas press box is three times bigger than flood aggie, maybe eight times
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: meow meow on September 26, 2013, 08:32:26 PM
Lmao Cody green
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 26, 2013, 08:34:30 PM
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma State
4.  Texas Tech
5.  Texas
6.  TCU
7.  K-State
8.  Kansas
9.  West Virginia
10.  Iowa St.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: timhawk on September 26, 2013, 08:36:12 PM
Lmao Cody green

has he really fumbled 4 times already?
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: meow meow on September 26, 2013, 08:52:54 PM
Lmao Cody green

has he really fumbled 4 times already?

Not sure just tuned in and on his first play he drops back to pass and the ball falls out of his hand on his way back to throw.  Flood aggie should be winning easily, but they arent
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2013, 09:11:16 PM
ISU up 28-14 under 2 to go in the 3rd

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on September 28, 2013, 12:55:49 PM
Just unspeakably bad.  We are the new ACC.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: OregonSmock on September 28, 2013, 12:56:56 PM
The impending big 10 invite can't come soon enough.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: star seed 7 on September 28, 2013, 06:52:26 PM
The impending big 10 invite can't come soon enough.

keep waiting.   :impatient:  <----- beems.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 28, 2013, 07:07:57 PM
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: kim carnes on September 28, 2013, 07:10:39 PM
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

i doubt they'll take ku.  they didn't even want mizzou (who draws a lot more tv sets).  i know they took NU, but that was and still is a headscratcher.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 28, 2013, 07:13:13 PM
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

I don't buy KU as a legitimate big 10 candidate at all.  They don't need or even care about KU's basketball and they bring absolutely nothing else to the table. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 28, 2013, 07:15:01 PM
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

i doubt they'll take ku.  they didn't even want mizzou (who draws a lot more tv sets).  i know they took NU, but that was and still is a headscratcher.

I think that the Big 10 is working to create a "balanced scorecard."

Each school they have grabbed has at least one great feature.  Now, NU may (probably) prove to be a huge mistake.

KU is a great add for them, if they want to bolster basketball.  That is the only reason to even consider KU.  They bring nothing else. 

If big 10 want to diversify across sports, KU is a great add.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: cDubya on September 28, 2013, 07:17:05 PM
Hey Bread, I'm in your neck of the woods this weekend, Carmi, Illinois to be exact.

Nice weather up here!  :cheers:
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 28, 2013, 07:18:45 PM
Nothing the big 10 has done to date makes me think they want to diversify across sports.  They want access to more TV sets and good football in that order.  Basketball doesn't register for them IMO.   
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Pete on September 28, 2013, 07:24:03 PM
Nothing the big 10 has done to date makes me think they want to diversify across sports.  They want access to more TV sets and good football in that order.  Basketball doesn't register for them IMO.   

I agree that they haven't seemed to value basketball thus far, but that is the ONLY thing KU can hope for...otherwise there is no reason to give KU your revenue.

Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 28, 2013, 07:26:16 PM
Hey Bread, I'm in your neck of the woods this weekend, Carmi, Illinois to be exact.

Nice weather up here!  :cheers:

I had to look it up.  That's the part of Illinois that is basically rural Kentucky/Indiana. That's whereabouts the Mask is from.  :frown: 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Mr Bread on September 28, 2013, 07:31:24 PM
Nothing the big 10 has done to date makes me think they want to diversify across sports.  They want access to more TV sets and good football in that order.  Basketball doesn't register for them IMO.   

I agree that they haven't seemed to value basketball thus far, but that is the ONLY thing KU can hope for...otherwise there is no reason to give KU your revenue.

There isn't a basketball school in the big 10 that wouldn't love to see KU turn into Memphis if the Big 12 crumbles.  They'll never get an invite.  Them separate, but becoming irrelevant is better for big 10 basketball programs than them added to the conference.  They'll gladly be allowed to slowly die IMO. 
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: cDubya on September 28, 2013, 07:31:41 PM
Hey Bread, I'm in your neck of the woods this weekend, Carmi, Illinois to be exact.

Nice weather up here!  :cheers:

I had to look it up.  That's the part of Illinois that is basically rural Kentucky/Indiana. That's whereabouts the Mask is from.  :frown:

Lol, yeah. It's pretty bad. Grandparents' 60th anniversary, tho.
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: pvegs on October 12, 2013, 02:08:54 PM
1) Baylor


2-10) Dogshit
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: wetwillie on November 03, 2013, 03:55:56 PM
1. Baylor
2. Oklahoma State
3. Texas
4. KSU
5. OU
6. TTU
7. WVU
8. TCU
9. KU
10. ISU
Title: Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 03, 2013, 04:14:44 PM
1. Baylor
2. Oklahoma State
3. Texas
4. KSU
5. OU
6. TTU
7. WVU
8. TCU
9. KU
10. ISU

This is what I have, only flip KU and ISU. KU has more talent at just about every position, but Weis is so bad that it just won't matter, even against Paul Rhoads.