goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: chum1 on August 31, 2013, 04:59:00 PM

Title: Targeting rule
Post by: chum1 on August 31, 2013, 04:59:00 PM
If this leads to NBA style flopping, it will be horrible.
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 31, 2013, 07:31:31 PM
I think it's a good rule. I mean it's not that hard to not hit somebody with the crown of your helmet.
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: BobBarker on August 31, 2013, 07:56:08 PM
yeah, but this is how they get everything started and it will eventually lead to them taking away all of our guns.
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: ednksu on August 31, 2013, 08:40:17 PM
I thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 31, 2013, 09:37:32 PM
I thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?

Seriously?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.sbnation.com%2Fassets%2F3135383%2Ftamuwhammo.gif&hash=f3899f881637c07fbe0607d407796a45c09c70e8)

I mean there is absolutely nothing wrong with this being called targeting.
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: ednksu on August 31, 2013, 09:48:52 PM
I thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?

Seriously?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.sbnation.com%2Fassets%2F3135383%2Ftamuwhammo.gif&hash=f3899f881637c07fbe0607d407796a45c09c70e8)

I mean there is absolutely nothing wrong with this being called targeting.
Well that replay makes the hit look better than other views.  I guess the kid did get tossed and has to sit the first half of the next game. 
Other views make it look a lot worse.  I think the refs were thinking there was more of a launching component to the rule, but I think the ejection only occurs if the crown is used.    :dunno: could be wrong though.
Title: Re: Targeting rule
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 31, 2013, 09:59:13 PM
I thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?

Seriously?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.sbnation.com%2Fassets%2F3135383%2Ftamuwhammo.gif&hash=f3899f881637c07fbe0607d407796a45c09c70e8)

I mean there is absolutely nothing wrong with this being called targeting.
Well that replay makes the hit look better than other views.  I guess the kid did get tossed and has to sit the first half of the next game. 
Other views make it look a lot worse.  I think the refs were thinking there was more of a launching component to the rule, but I think the ejection only occurs if the crown is used.    :dunno: could be wrong though.

The ball was about 15 feet away from the receiver, who had stopped running before the defender even set up for launch. It was the type of douchey "big hit" that absolutely needs to go away if football is going to have any sort of future.