goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 03:23:57 PM

Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 03:23:57 PM
i mean, wtf oscar?  come on dude, you have king's blood in your veins, act like it. 

 :curse:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: OK_Cat on June 06, 2013, 03:29:19 PM
someone needs to have a red wedding at the BTF
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: rob mccolley on June 06, 2013, 03:41:39 PM
Have Currie give him a vote of confidence and you'll be just fine. Probably the best run in program history.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: steve dave on June 06, 2013, 03:42:02 PM
yeah, we are kinda mumped
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 06, 2013, 03:43:48 PM
We haven't been this mumped in quite sometime.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sys on June 06, 2013, 03:44:17 PM
why are we mumped, pissclams?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mr Bread on June 06, 2013, 03:50:38 PM
it seems like it was just yesterday that 'clams was talking about honed gun blades and machined pipelines.  man those were the days. 
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Pett on June 06, 2013, 03:51:32 PM
Fincher? More like Sphincter
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mr Bread on June 06, 2013, 03:53:23 PM
nicely done Pett, but let's face facts here, you're no PIPE and that's okay
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: bubbles4ksu on June 06, 2013, 04:02:13 PM
thank god we are a football school cause we are so, so deeply mumped in bball.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 04:09:26 PM
why are we mumped, pissclams?

HAVE YOU NOT BEEN PAYING ATTN:  ?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 04:13:50 PM
if we aren't mumped then good.   ok?  but man, i just got a bad feeling. 
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 'taterblast on June 06, 2013, 04:15:48 PM
oscar has effectively turned this program into a rebuilding project
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pvegs on June 06, 2013, 04:15:58 PM
I for one am looking forward to when Gip and DJamer get into foul trouble and Shane gets his shot at the "stretch" 5.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 04:16:54 PM
shane can't play the five!  shane is mumped!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 06, 2013, 04:20:32 PM
shane can't play the five!  shane is mumped!
screw torches, we need massive blow torches for this project.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 06, 2013, 04:24:13 PM
oscar has effectively turned this program into a rebuilding project

Any coach that doesn't have a 5 yr plan is one that I don't want at KSU.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pvegs on June 06, 2013, 04:25:49 PM
Shane Southwell: From PG to C all in one career.  It'll be like little league where the best player can play every position.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 06, 2013, 04:29:02 PM
Shane Southwell: From PG to C all in one career.  It'll be like little league where the best player can play every position.

Pretty sure Kim did this at Mizz.  So it makes sense that Shane will do this with us since Kim is going to replace ABIII and Brad MotherFucking Corn on staff as an Assit Coach Super Operator.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: puniraptor on June 06, 2013, 04:30:24 PM
tell kim there are a few jobs open at ksu mbb and maybe oscar will hire him and we will be all emaw and  :party:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 04:33:37 PM
eff MAN, oscar LIKES chicken nuggets!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pvegs on June 06, 2013, 04:34:31 PM
Kim's Piston's salary was only 470k this year.  It's not like we haven't spent that kind of money on an assistant coach in the past.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 04:35:12 PM
HOLY crap KIM ENGLISH PLAYS FOR THE PISTONS, WE ARE mumped
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 06, 2013, 04:41:58 PM
I am more concerned about the loss of Brad Korn as DOBO(assuming Kim doesn't sign up).  Who do we have that can get this all figured out?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mr Bread on June 06, 2013, 05:08:39 PM
'clams is tearing this board apart
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: PIPE on June 06, 2013, 05:32:14 PM
Guys......Shane playing the "5" isn't so bad............

All he has to do is grow his fro out 3-4" and then he will be listed at 6'9 or 6'10"........

Haven't you guys seen Chevy Chase in the movie Fletch were he plays for the Lakers?????


Now, that doesn't help his weight issue......what is he, 150lbs or so?  I'll have to think about this one.....
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mr Bread on June 06, 2013, 05:52:22 PM
hey PIPE did you see where I told Pett he was no you?  oh man, burned him right up on that one. :lol:
Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pissclams on June 06, 2013, 06:04:38 PM
hey PIPE did you see where I told Pett he was no you?  oh man, burned him right up on that one. :lol:
PIPE rough ridin' PIPED PETT'S PUNK ASS
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Pett on June 06, 2013, 06:28:07 PM
hey PIPE did you see where I told Pett he was no you?  oh man, burned him right up on that one. :lol:
PIPE rough ridin' PIPED PETT'S PUNK ASS
What is happening? :embarrassed:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mr Bread on June 06, 2013, 06:40:08 PM
hey PIPE did you see where I told Pett he was no you?  oh man, burned him right up on that one. :lol:
PIPE rough ridin' PIPED PETT'S PUNK ASS
What is happening? :embarrassed:

alliteration :lol:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sys on June 06, 2013, 07:59:29 PM
HAVE YOU NOT BEEN PAYING ATTN:  ?

maybe not!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: orangerocket on June 06, 2013, 08:01:56 PM
I am so so sorry you have to go through this.  This proud school deserves better, dont worry guys, there's light at the end of the oscar Weber derailment tunnel.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 06, 2013, 08:08:58 PM
I am so so sorry you have to go through this.  This proud school deserves better, dont worry guys, there's light at the end of the oscar Weber derailment tunnel.

It's another train
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: HerrSonntag on June 06, 2013, 08:10:00 PM
did further misfortune befall the cats or is this a general acknowledgement of the our inevitable implosion?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on June 06, 2013, 08:43:33 PM
1. Neville Fincher will not be attending K-State due to grades.

2. Alvin Brooks III is being rumored to be heading for SMU because Larry Brown is better.

I think some of us are not surprised by the fact that this seems to be going to crap but we are surprised at how fast it seems to be going to crap. Perhaps #BurnitDown is having an effect. I am somewhat hopeful we can get a new coach after year 3. 

I would really rather be wrong and that Foster and Westicles are NBA Superstars and my face turns red like this :blush:.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: scottwildcat on June 06, 2013, 08:59:05 PM
atleast we got that trophy! that was a lot of fun!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: bones129 on June 06, 2013, 09:17:00 PM
atleast we got that trophy! that was a lot of fun!

Good point, scott. Will be awhile before we even sniff another.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Cartierfor3 on June 06, 2013, 09:19:20 PM
Hey 'clams,































walk the plank
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscrapetv.com%2FNews%2FNews%2520Pages%2FEntertainment%2Fimages-2%2Fwalking-the-plank.jpg&hash=0687be700f6374374e1abebb63a6baacb54258ea)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: ksupamplemousse on June 06, 2013, 09:22:37 PM
Oh snap, Clams!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EMAWzified on June 06, 2013, 11:57:42 PM
It's the death from a 1,000 cuts scenario I feared from the beginning, although I, too, am stunned by how fast the slices are coming.
Just how long can Weber suck before the "he won a league championship, which is something Frank could never do" Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) tuck crowd gets on board with those of use with the wisdom to see this from the start? I just have this premonition Weber is going to play to the nastiest of his supporters, even while completely incapable of moving the program forward and accepting his own ineptness and resigning.
It's going to tear the fanbase apart before we all arrive at the inevitable messy conclusion. Nice job Curry.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: rob mccolley on June 07, 2013, 12:25:30 AM
Funny you should say that.

It's the death from a 1,000 cuts scenario I feared

http://www.smilepolitely.com/sports/a_thousand_cuts/ (http://www.smilepolitely.com/sports/a_thousand_cuts/)
Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Tobias on June 07, 2013, 12:30:46 AM
clams, time of death?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: PIPE on June 07, 2013, 09:27:18 AM
hey PIPE did you see where I told Pett he was no you?  oh man, burned him right up on that one. :lol:

I saw that......
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 07, 2013, 10:26:02 AM
SO mumped!!!
Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: felix rex on June 07, 2013, 10:27:54 AM
Just when you thought faux meltdowns were passé...
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 07, 2013, 10:33:26 AM
SO SO mumped!!!!
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sys on June 07, 2013, 11:07:34 AM
Just when you thought faux meltdowns were passé...

shut up, weber hater.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Cire on June 07, 2013, 11:11:07 AM
what happened
Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: felix rex on June 07, 2013, 11:19:47 AM
Just when you thought faux meltdowns were passé...

shut up, weber hater.

I wondered about using "meta meltdown" instead of faux meltdown. Guess that was warranted.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sys on June 07, 2013, 11:44:02 AM
I wondered about using "meta meltdown" instead of faux meltdown.

death by a thousand meltdowns.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EMAWzified on June 07, 2013, 08:55:33 PM
I'm proud to be a Weber hater (I really don't hate him; I just hate that he's our coach).
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Ilovedgrowltowels... on June 07, 2013, 09:12:43 PM
I see a one win conference season this year!  TCU is going to shove it up our rears!  Weber completely effed the crap out of us on this one!  #BurnItDown
Heres to first to worst...  :drink:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 0.42 on June 08, 2013, 01:25:45 AM
I see a one win conference season this year!  TCU is going to shove it up our rears!  Weber completely effed the crap out of us on this one!  #BurnItDown
Heres to first to worst...  :drink:

Goddamnit, we deserve better interneting than this.

Right? :cry:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EMAWesome on June 08, 2013, 05:01:55 AM
KSU 2013-2014 Theme Song?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0DTHEQgses (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0DTHEQgses)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EMAWzified on June 08, 2013, 11:29:15 AM
At least we have realistic expectations. It's amazing what some on other boards are setting themselves up for.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 08, 2013, 12:11:01 PM
KSU 2013-2014 Theme Song?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0DTHEQgses (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0DTHEQgses)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi34.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fd101%2Fds43fan%2Fmumped.png&hash=fdff64691daa2d9ac43d52b5d44d582d34137ac3)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sys on June 08, 2013, 12:43:41 PM
Goddamnit, we deserve better interneting than this.

Right? :cry:

absolutely not.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 0.42 on June 08, 2013, 03:43:03 PM
Goddamnit, we deserve better interneting than this.

Right? :cry:

absolutely not.

 :frown:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: SdK on June 09, 2013, 01:26:14 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F13%2F06%2F10%2Fa4y6a3uq.jpg&hash=c48638c1228b19035d33f27b58032d53a9ec6230)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on June 09, 2013, 02:58:20 PM
Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Winters on June 09, 2013, 03:17:56 PM
 :barf:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Trim on June 09, 2013, 03:24:00 PM
You're missing centers ("pivots").
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: ChiComCat on June 09, 2013, 03:27:14 PM
You're missing centers ("pivots").

That's on oscar
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 09, 2013, 03:40:20 PM
Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes

See title of thread  :dubious:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 09, 2013, 05:07:11 PM
Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
:combofan:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: BackPayne on June 09, 2013, 08:40:50 PM
Will with the most minutes...someone shoot me now. Watching will be just painful.  Poor Shane. :(
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: illBisonYourdele on June 18, 2013, 02:44:45 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNEPCG4CYAE3b1-.jpg:large)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on June 18, 2013, 04:14:21 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNEPCG4CYAE3b1-.jpg:large)

no thanks
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Asteriskhead on June 18, 2013, 04:15:37 PM
Why was Shane mean to us?  :cry:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 18, 2013, 04:28:28 PM
Why was Shane mean to us?  :cry:
He blocked me on twitter for no reason. I don't think he has much of a sense of humor from my estimates, but he's still dreamy in my book.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 18, 2013, 05:13:01 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNEPCG4CYAE3b1-.jpg:large)
The banner obviously covering up #teamangel  :lol: ...  :frown:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Spracne on June 18, 2013, 06:19:15 PM
You can't make record profit without being creative in minimizing expenditures.  Why take a new photo when an old one will suffice?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: meow meow on June 18, 2013, 07:04:07 PM
You can't make record profit without being creative in minimizing expenditures.  Why take a new photo when an old one will suffice?

Titletown tho
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Spracne on June 18, 2013, 07:07:49 PM
You can't make record profit without being creative in minimizing expenditures.  Why take a new photo when an old one will suffice?

Titletown tho

I don't understand.  I was referencing another feather in the Cat Cap (record profits).  Your usage of "tho" suggests a contraposition between Titletown and profits.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 18, 2013, 08:03:59 PM
You can't make record profit without being creative in minimizing expenditures.  Why take a new photo when an old one will suffice?

_FAN, fire up the printing press. Currie's silhouette on the front, Spracne's quote on the back.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kso_FAN on June 18, 2013, 09:03:40 PM
"Why use a new photo when a banner is available."

Currie wins again.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 18, 2013, 09:09:55 PM
my hope is that the banner isn't actually part of the poster and that it's just a sticker that was printed out a week after art said he was leaving. like if you peel the sticker off really carefully then you see art.
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kso_FAN on June 18, 2013, 09:44:06 PM
my hope is that the banner isn't actually part of the poster and that it's just a sticker that was printed out a week after art said he was leaving. like if you peel the sticker off really carefully then you see art.

Or Diaz...

You never know...
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 18, 2013, 09:56:37 PM
my hope is that the banner isn't actually part of the poster and that it's just a sticker that was printed out a week after art said he was leaving. like if you peel the sticker off really carefully then you see art.

Or Diaz...

You never know...

maybe it could be a collectable series of like 1-5 with people that should still be here but aren't and then you try to collect all five.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 18, 2013, 10:09:59 PM
my hope is that the banner isn't actually part of the poster and that it's just a sticker that was printed out a week after art said he was leaving. like if you peel the sticker off really carefully then you see art.

Or Diaz...

You never know...

maybe it could be a collectable series of like 1-5 with people that should still be here but aren't and then you try to collect all five.  :dunno:
:love: this would be the best marketing by K-State since K-State0, possibly the EMAW poster.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 19, 2013, 04:31:19 AM
You can't make record profit without being creative in minimizing expenditures.  Why take a new photo when an old one will suffice?

Titletown tho

I don't understand.  I was referencing another feather in the Cat Cap (record profits).  Your usage of "tho" suggests a contraposition between Titletown and profits.

Hmm, record operating revenues, or record operating losses? 

It's just a picture.




Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: PIPE on June 19, 2013, 11:32:21 AM
Man, I need to stay off these boards today.....my negativity is at an all time high today.....

Who, seriously, gets excited for basketball when looking at that poster... :sdeek:

Remember all those games last year....when we were in the middle of a big 12 championship.....and we had 2 marquee names in McGruder and Rodriguez......and we had all of those empty seats in the OOD???????

It's going to be crickets this year.....crickets I tell ya :ohno:
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 8manpick on June 19, 2013, 01:35:16 PM
Man, I need to stay off these boards

Good observo
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 02:51:45 PM
Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 19, 2013, 03:09:13 PM
Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.

So our really really good point guard isn't going to be able to play throughout all of the OCC and will be playing his first collegiate minutes ever at the start of big 12 play? See thread title  :dubious:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: EMAWzified on June 19, 2013, 03:13:02 PM
I don't think that's the case. Thomas should be able to play as soon as the first semester's over, or sometime in mid-December. Remember Walker?

Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.

So our really really good point guard isn't going to be able to play throughout all of the OCC and will be playing his first collegiate minutes ever at the start of big 12 play? See thread title  :dubious:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: illBisonYourdele on June 19, 2013, 04:03:39 PM
Spradling, who will slide back over to point guard after the departure of Angel Rodriquez, said he’s already looking to become more comfortable as a leader.




http://cjonline.com/sports/2013-06-18/k-states-spradling-ready-become-vocal-leader

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcjo-cdn.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fsuperphoto%2F12349698.jpg&hash=bfdeb2bdbfd1587fa47770c3a0c7f91689a48f51)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 19, 2013, 04:05:20 PM
If Nino and/or DJamer don't improve enough to play more than 10-15 minutes it's gonna be a long season...
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Skipper44 on June 19, 2013, 04:11:35 PM
I don't think that's the case. Thomas should be able to play as soon as the first semester's over, or sometime in mid-December. Remember Walker?

[

Walker and most mid year guys are transfers that are in good academic standing.  This is not the situation Thomas is in and I can't recall a similar mid year "prop 48" player, I am prepared for him to not play until the 2nd semester begins.  This past Spring semester began on 1/22, the day of our 5th conference game.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 19, 2013, 04:17:24 PM
Spradling, who will slide back over to point guard after the departure of Angel Rodriquez, said he’s already looking to become more comfortable as a leader.




http://cjonline.com/sports/2013-06-18/k-states-spradling-ready-become-vocal-leader

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcjo-cdn.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fsuperphoto%2F12349698.jpg&hash=bfdeb2bdbfd1587fa47770c3a0c7f91689a48f51)

Schooling those fools, son
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: PowercatPat on June 19, 2013, 04:43:19 PM
If we get in any foul trouble down low we are mumped.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 04:46:19 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 04:57:10 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game. He gets bang up too much. I expect oscar to protect will a little more.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 04:59:47 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 19, 2013, 05:07:44 PM
How is oscar supposed to protect his Sr guard?  With who?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 19, 2013, 05:08:21 PM
I don't think that's the case. Thomas should be able to play as soon as the first semester's over, or sometime in mid-December. Remember Walker?

Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.

So our really really good point guard isn't going to be able to play throughout all of the OCC and will be playing his first collegiate minutes ever at the start of big 12 play? See thread title  :dubious:

So you're saying that our 3 star freshman point guard, with no real offers, is going to be able to adjust to the college game as quick as a player that at the time was considered a lottery pick and one of the best players in the country?  :eye:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 19, 2013, 05:09:37 PM
Spradling, who will slide back over to point guard after the departure of Angel Rodriquez, said he’s already looking to become more comfortable as a leader.




http://cjonline.com/sports/2013-06-18/k-states-spradling-ready-become-vocal-leader

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcjo-cdn.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fsuperphoto%2F12349698.jpg&hash=bfdeb2bdbfd1587fa47770c3a0c7f91689a48f51)

Schooling those fools, son

Plus side: Will finally found opposing players who are both similar in skill level and voice octave.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 05:11:28 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 05:17:12 PM
I don't think that's the case. Thomas should be able to play as soon as the first semester's over, or sometime in mid-December. Remember Walker?

Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.

So our really really good point guard isn't going to be able to play throughout all of the OCC and will be playing his first collegiate minutes ever at the start of big 12 play? See thread title  :dubious:

So you're saying that our 3 star freshman point guard, with no real offers, is going to be able to adjust to the college game as quick as a player that at the time was considered a lottery pick and one of the best players in the country?  :eye:
Jevon's will have been on campus for a year and you need to understand Jevon is a lot better than a no offer 3 star. Their is a good chance Jevon is the best player on the team next year, it is either him or Shane.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 05:26:32 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 05:41:07 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
If your over exert a player their quality of play will deteriorate. Right?

I am just saying it was obvious at the end of the last 2 years Will has crossed that line. Just look at how he closed out each season. Because of this I doubt Weber will use Will at the same rate.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 19, 2013, 06:04:24 PM
 :bill:
I don't think that's the case. Thomas should be able to play as soon as the first semester's over, or sometime in mid-December. Remember Walker?

Updated Depth Chart with minutes
 
The lineup is really starting to clear up for me.    :popcorn:

PG       Will Spradling      25 Minutes     Nigel Johnson    15 minutes  and Thomas may take Nigel's minutes in the 2nd semester and Shane may see action here as well per oscar Weber.

SG       Omari Lawrence   30 minutes     Will Spradling     10 minutes   Shane Southwell in reserve

SG       Foster                 25 Minutes     Shane Southwell  15 minutes

SF        Shane Southwell 20 minutes     Williams          15 Minutes          Westicles   5Minutes

PF       Gipson     25 minutes               DJamer 15 Minutes     Shane in Reserve


By minutes it would look like

Will Spradling        35 Minutes
Shane Southwell    35 Minutes
Omari Lawrence     30 Minutes
Marcus Foster       25 Minutes
Thomas Gipson     25 Minutes
Nigel/Thomas        15 Minutes
DJamer                        15 Minutes
Nino Williams        15 Minutes
Westicles                 5 Minutes
It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.

So our really really good point guard isn't going to be able to play throughout all of the OCC and will be playing his first collegiate minutes ever at the start of big 12 play? See thread title  :dubious:

So you're saying that our 3 star freshman point guard, with no real offers, is going to be able to adjust to the college game as quick as a player that at the time was considered a lottery pick and one of the best players in the country?  :eye:
Jevon's will have been on campus for a year and you need to understand Jevon is a lot better than a no offer 3 star. Their is a good chance Jevon is the best player on the team next year, it is either him or Shane.

I mean I don't think it's likely you're right here, but I would love to be wrong
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 06:09:22 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
If your over exert a player their quality of play will deteriorate. Right?

I am just saying it was obvious at the end of the last 2 years Will has crossed that line. Just look at how he closed out each season. Because of this I doubt Weber will use Will at the same rate.

i just look at every ksu year for will and can't discern much of a different from the first half of the year to the second half aside from the caliber of teams and players that he was playing against. but if you want to delude yourself into thinking that it was because he played 28 minutes a game instead of 25 then by all means. just don't do it here, dumbass.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 06:22:36 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
If your over exert a player their quality of play will deteriorate. Right?

I am just saying it was obvious at the end of the last 2 years Will has crossed that line. Just look at how he closed out each season. Because of this I doubt Weber will use Will at the same rate.

i just look at every ksu year for will and can't discern much of a different from the first half of the year to the second half aside from the caliber of teams and players that he was playing against. but if you want to delude yourself into thinking that it was because he played 28 minutes a game instead of 25 then by all means. just don't do it here, dumbass.
His performance has tanked late Febuary the last 2 years.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 06:31:22 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
If your over exert a player their quality of play will deteriorate. Right?

I am just saying it was obvious at the end of the last 2 years Will has crossed that line. Just look at how he closed out each season. Because of this I doubt Weber will use Will at the same rate.

i just look at every ksu year for will and can't discern much of a different from the first half of the year to the second half aside from the caliber of teams and players that he was playing against. but if you want to delude yourself into thinking that it was because he played 28 minutes a game instead of 25 then by all means. just don't do it here, dumbass.
His performance has tanked late Febuary the last 2 years.

no rough ridin' crap, jackass? i mean, will looks worse in feb and march than in november and december? duh rough ridin' duh? i mean, will's numbers are worse in months that he has to play ku, osu and baylor multiple times as opposed to the months where he plays north dakota, lamar and uc upton? i mean this is brain explosion stuff you're breaking. if only will would've played 20 minutes against umkc last year instead of 38. we probably would've been elite 8 or better.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 06:43:15 PM


It will be closer to this

1. Jevon 30 mins, Will 5 mins, Nigel 5 mins
2. Will 20 mins, Omari 10 mins, Nigel 10 mins
3. Foster 25 mins, Southwell 10 mins, Omari 5 mins 
4. Southwell 20 mins, Niño 15 mins, Wesley 5 mins
5. Gipson 30 mins, DJamer 10 mins

Jevon is really really good, foster has also been far better than projected. Westicles seems to be solid, but is behind Shane. Nigel hasn't got to play yet due to injury.



jfc. so you think will spradling is going to play less minutes this year than he did last year and his sophomore year? my god son.  :flush:
Do you think he can play more? Will's body can't handle playing 30 mins a game.

he played 31 as a sophomore so you tell me.
And was complete crap the second half of the season.

so will sucked because he played 31 minutes a game instead of 25? seems like a pretty fine line you are drawing in the imaginary basketball court sand. 25 minutes a game? great. 31? horrible. what if they play him 29? 28.7? i mean honestly i'd just play him 10 if those ten are a lebron 10. thoughts? or would that be not enough? like he needs to play exactly 24.7 a game to be maximum will spradling? like if he's playing in a game and he's already played 24.7 minutes in that game, should weber call a timeout and pull him?
If your over exert a player their quality of play will deteriorate. Right?

I am just saying it was obvious at the end of the last 2 years Will has crossed that line. Just look at how he closed out each season. Because of this I doubt Weber will use Will at the same rate.

i just look at every ksu year for will and can't discern much of a different from the first half of the year to the second half aside from the caliber of teams and players that he was playing against. but if you want to delude yourself into thinking that it was because he played 28 minutes a game instead of 25 then by all means. just don't do it here, dumbass.
His performance has tanked late Febuary the last 2 years.

no rough ridin' crap, jackass? i mean, will looks worse in feb and march than in november and december? duh rough ridin' duh? i mean, will's numbers are worse in months that he has to play ku, osu and baylor multiple times as opposed to the months where he plays north dakota, lamar and uc upton? i mean this is brain explosion stuff you're breaking. if only will would've played 20 minutes against umkc last year instead of 38. we probably would've been elite 8 or better.
Big 12 plays starts in January and he has performed better in January and early Febuary. It would also not be the first time a coach restricteds a players minutes in effort to keep the player fresher.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 19, 2013, 06:55:35 PM

Big 12 plays starts in January and he has performed better in January and early Febuary.

no he hasn't and you're horrible. just a horrible poster. and apparently a liar as well.
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 8manpick on June 19, 2013, 07:09:19 PM

Big 12 plays starts in January and he has performed better in January and early Febuary.

no he hasn't and you're horrible. just a horrible poster. and apparently a liar as well.
Qft.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on June 19, 2013, 07:20:43 PM
There is a lot to talk about here.

1. I think there is some truth to the fact that non 1st or 2nd team Big 12 players probably shouldn't play more than 30 minutes a game.  Will, Omari and Gipson probably shouldn't be playing over 30 but in many games (for Will probably most) they will probably be called upon to do that because of a lack of depth, injury, grades, foul trouble etc.  You can probably get more energy and efficient production from these guys by getting them to play harder for shorter periods.  In some games I thought oscar did a good job with this but then I watched the LaSalle game and now I am uncertain about what the hell oscar is thinking and whether he just accidentally wore some teams out like the first OSU game, TCU, and Texas games.

2. Generally freshman are not good players, particularly 3 star freshman. Angel's freshman year is a pretty typical example of a great college player messing up a lot and rapidly getting better but still with significant flaws. If you look at Chester Frazier's first years at Illinois it wasn't too impressive but he did grow into a really good college player.

Frazier
shot 20.8% from the field in 2006        :flush:
35% in 2007                                      :)
33% in 08 and                                    :)
44% in 09.                                         :drool:

If we only get 20.8% shooting from the point guard position, this will not be fun.




Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 07:25:13 PM

Big 12 plays starts in January and he has performed better in January and early Febuary.

no he hasn't and you're horrible. just a horrible poster. and apparently a liar as well.
Will
2012-2013
Jan 5 - Feb 18
Reb - 2.615
Ast - 1.846
Blk - .0769
Stl - .6153
PTS - 8.0

Feb 23 - March 16
Reb - 1.86
Ast - 1.71
Blk - .142
Stl - .71
PTS - 3.14

2011-2012
Jan 4 - Feb 18
Reb  - 2.38
Ast - 2.71
Blk - .0714
Stl - .714
PTS - 8.785

Feb 21 - March 8
Reb - 1.2
Ast - 3.8
Blk - .2
Stl - .8
PTS - 5.8

  :thumbsup:
Title: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: LickNeckey on June 19, 2013, 07:34:14 PM
looks like he sucks all the time

Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Winters on June 19, 2013, 08:02:45 PM
looks like he sucks all the time
he does.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 19, 2013, 08:36:51 PM
Was obvs that it was a conditioning and over exertion issue.  Maybe if will was started under a decent trainer or strength coach he wouldn't hit that physical wall.   Sounds like frank and greenawalt caused all this in not making will get in better shape.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kslim on June 20, 2013, 06:49:35 AM
i think the point is to not use proactive from mid febuary to late march, apparently it causes muscle tremors
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 20, 2013, 09:04:16 AM
I get as frustrated with Will's inconsistency as the next guy, but he also didn't practice the last month of the season due to a nagging injury. Probably more of a case of rust than overuse. Although the Proactive theory could have legs to it...
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: lopakman on June 20, 2013, 09:11:35 AM
I get as frustrated with Will's inconsistency as the next guy, but he also didn't practice the last month of the season due to a nagging injury. Probably more of a case of rust than overuse. Although the Proactive theory could have legs to it...

 :facepalm:

It wasn't rust. He just sucks and your first two posts here have sucked too.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: AbeFroman on June 20, 2013, 09:57:33 AM
This is what Bruceketball has become, arguing about whether or not Will Spradling is worse in February or January and if he'll get 25 or 35 minutes a game

FYWS
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 20, 2013, 10:15:43 AM
Guys, that is like two or three yrs in a row that we have heard will's lacking performance is due to a severe nagging injury that he courageously fought through. 

Sounds like a sustainability problem.  We are in KS.....

Again, this goes back to the extremely lacking conditioning that Will was brought up with for the first 2/3rds of his career.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Skipper44 on June 20, 2013, 10:49:58 AM
Guys, that is like two or three yrs in a row that we have heard will's lacking performance is due to a severe nagging injury that he courageously fought through. 

Sounds like a sustainability problem.  We are in KS.....

Again, this goes back to the extremely lacking conditioning that Will was brought up with for the first 2/3rds of his career.
Fr - elbow bursa sac
Soph - hand
Jr - the chest thing from the UT game?

I predict the Sr excuse will be something like mono

Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Stevesie60 on June 20, 2013, 11:28:03 AM
I get as frustrated with Will's inconsistency as the next guy, but he also didn't practice the last month of the season due to a nagging injury. Probably more of a case of rust than overuse. Although the Proactive theory could have legs to it...

 :facepalm:

It wasn't rust. He just sucks and your first two posts here have sucked too.

Shut up, lopakman.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: illBisonYourdele on June 20, 2013, 02:11:38 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kstate4life on June 20, 2013, 02:26:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

 :barf:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Spracne on June 20, 2013, 02:33:30 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18
  oh god.  I'm so sorry, guys.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Super PurpleCat on June 20, 2013, 02:33:52 PM
House of the Rising Sun in basic MIDI format, it sounds like the "Demo" button on those old '80s Casio keyboards.   :blindfold:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kslim on June 20, 2013, 02:37:54 PM
jesus christ ksu wait until the best (and most adrobs) player is here to do the promo's
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 20, 2013, 02:44:47 PM
Gip and the BTF were rough ridin'  :love:

Also, I don't do bench with chains on the bar.  Should I be???  :confused:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 20, 2013, 02:59:43 PM
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD THIS IS BAD.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 20, 2013, 03:02:01 PM
Guys, it's cool.  Iirc, they always release the role-player-hype vids before the real high energy star player vid comes out.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kslim on June 20, 2013, 03:19:06 PM
Guys, it's cool.  Iirc, they always release the role-player-hype vids before the real high energy star player vid comes out.

No, no its not
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 20, 2013, 03:33:46 PM
 :bawl:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 20, 2013, 03:40:20 PM
Guys, it's cool.  Iirc, they always release the role-player-hype vids before the real high energy star player vid comes out.

No, no its not

No, seriously, we should expect a vid of all of the projected all-conf types doing their all-conf type stuff set to that scottish/irish music, like ASAP.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: illBisonYourdele on June 20, 2013, 03:51:08 PM
would have been nice to see WS working on lateral quickness and footspeed rather than the jumpshot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7vaKijPiZs
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Stevesie60 on June 20, 2013, 05:10:37 PM
I kind of chuckle everytime I see this thread because it's funny to imagine 'clams freaking out like that.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 0.42 on June 20, 2013, 06:19:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

Kansas State basketball. We'll be ready.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: kso_FAN on June 20, 2013, 06:32:46 PM
#bruceketball
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: scottwildcat on June 20, 2013, 06:36:17 PM
the banner keeps looking like it is covering up a player lol
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: wabash909 on June 20, 2013, 07:23:45 PM
Damn, how hot does that BTF look though.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 20, 2013, 07:23:57 PM
the banner keeps looking like it is covering up a player lol

maybe the banner is a player. that banner could prob get double digit minutes on this team.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Fimages3%2Fi%2F2004%2F11%2F3%2Fe%2FRim_Shot_emoticon.gif&hash=eaeb9114fe4e3ef1d39f0ec432330f0c6df73e77)
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: scottwildcat on June 20, 2013, 08:06:03 PM
the banner keeps looking like it is covering up a player lol

maybe the banner is a player. that banner could prob get double digit minutes on this team.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Fimages3%2Fi%2F2004%2F11%2F3%2Fe%2FRim_Shot_emoticon.gif&hash=eaeb9114fe4e3ef1d39f0ec432330f0c6df73e77)

ha
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: The Whale on June 20, 2013, 08:49:05 PM
the banner keeps looking like it is covering up a player lol

maybe the banner is a player. that banner could prob get double digit minutes on this team.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Fimages3%2Fi%2F2004%2F11%2F3%2Fe%2FRim_Shot_emoticon.gif&hash=eaeb9114fe4e3ef1d39f0ec432330f0c6df73e77)

But only through January, then it will start to wear down.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: timhawk on June 20, 2013, 09:25:14 PM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on June 20, 2013, 09:26:41 PM
the banner keeps looking like it is covering up a player lol

maybe the banner is a player. that banner could prob get double digit minutes on this team.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Fimages3%2Fi%2F2004%2F11%2F3%2Fe%2FRim_Shot_emoticon.gif&hash=eaeb9114fe4e3ef1d39f0ec432330f0c6df73e77)

But only through January, then it will start to wear down.

just play the banner 25 minutes a game instead of 28. problem solved.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: puniraptor on June 20, 2013, 09:27:09 PM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

join the club, jimhawk. the club being the preceeding 6 pages.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: meow meow on June 20, 2013, 09:28:56 PM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

Can't tell if serious
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Cannoncat on June 20, 2013, 09:31:02 PM
The talent pool for kstate cat basketball is the opposite of the water levels at Tuttle creek right now.  :cry: :flush:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on June 20, 2013, 10:29:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

Kansas State basketball. We'll be ready.
Good Lord, I can't believe those guys are the face of the program..
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: MakeItRain on June 20, 2013, 10:55:26 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

Kansas State basketball. We'll be ready.

elite and hilarious reference
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: pvegs on June 20, 2013, 11:03:50 PM
Pretty bad when a video consisting of our incoming DITRs would have excited me more than our returning players. 
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: yoman on June 21, 2013, 08:04:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

Kansas State basketball. We'll be ready.
Good Lord, I can't believe those guys are the face of the program..

*insert obligatory Will Spradling acne reference here*
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: OK_Cat on June 21, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

osu is going to smoke ku, fool.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 21, 2013, 09:59:18 AM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

osu is going to smoke ku, fool.

Oh man.  Those are going to be good games. 

I can't wait to see how worked up Self and Ford get.  They both kinda get that red faced constipated look.  Ford is going to stomp has ass off.

Seriously though, OSU should win that first one, but the second one will be can't miss TV.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 21, 2013, 09:59:55 AM
<--------Instantly pumped for BB season, you guys!



Note: bb in general, not our highlight vid.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: steve dave on June 21, 2013, 10:00:40 AM
yeah, we are really mumped. titletown tho.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: WildcatNkilt on June 21, 2013, 10:19:43 AM
Wiggins is going to dickslap our entire team, and then smile for the camera. 
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 21, 2013, 10:34:11 AM
I get as frustrated with Will's inconsistency as the next guy, but he also didn't practice the last month of the season due to a nagging injury. Probably more of a case of rust than overuse. Although the Proactive theory could have legs to it...

 :facepalm:

It wasn't rust. He just sucks and your first two posts here have sucked too.

Still working my way into game shape here... I'm sure your first few posts were pure gold.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Tobias on June 21, 2013, 10:36:46 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 8manpick on June 21, 2013, 10:38:22 AM
TownieCat, how come you never joined the likes of KK, stevesie, daris, y-l_a, _FAN, myself, and others for townie basketball paks?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Stevesie60 on June 21, 2013, 11:17:34 AM
TownieCat, how come you never joined the likes of KK, stevesie, daris, y-l_a, _FAN, myself, and others for townie basketball paks?

 :peek:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 21, 2013, 11:36:06 AM
My invitation must've got lost in the mail  :dunno: I'll be at the next one.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Tobias on June 21, 2013, 11:40:52 AM
wow jerks, how come you never invited towniecat? :curse:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 21, 2013, 12:04:46 PM
wow jerks, how come you never invited towniecat? :curse:

It's cool, you guys. I'm used to it...Happened all the time in grade school.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: lopakman on June 21, 2013, 12:17:06 PM
I get as frustrated with Will's inconsistency as the next guy, but he also didn't practice the last month of the season due to a nagging injury. Probably more of a case of rust than overuse. Although the Proactive theory could have legs to it...

 :facepalm:

It wasn't rust. He just sucks and your first two posts here have sucked too.

Still working my way into game shape here... I'm sure your first few posts were pure gold.

Had to go back to check.  Yep, my first two posts were pretty good, probably my best ones ever.  It's been down hill since then. 

I don't like that we have any white players on the team that aren't walk ons.

I'm thinking next year we pull Spradlings scholarship and give it to someone with talent.  Spradling walks on, problem solved.

Thanks for using your first post to quote me.  :blush:

I thought I'd start off small and work my way up.

Yeah I just got owned. Thats the problem with lurkers, they can watch posting habits anonymously and come out of the gates swinging.

I will remember this day! :shakesfist:
[/quote
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: TownieCat on June 21, 2013, 12:41:10 PM
Wow...Your hate for Will runs deep. I should've done a better job of lurking before I logged on.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: timhawk on June 21, 2013, 12:41:30 PM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

osu is going to smoke ku, fool.

Oh man.  Those are going to be good games. 

I can't wait to see how worked up Self and Ford get.  They both kinda get that red faced constipated look.  Ford is going to stomp has ass off.

Seriously though, OSU should win that first one, but the second one will be can't miss TV.

anyone want to wager a friendly bet?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: OK_Cat on June 21, 2013, 12:43:50 PM
nobody here is your friend, tim.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: _33 on June 21, 2013, 12:50:59 PM
honestly I don't see Kstate finishing top 5 next year...it'll be KU at the top followed by everyone else.

osu is going to smoke ku, fool.

Oh man.  Those are going to be good games. 

I can't wait to see how worked up Self and Ford get.  They both kinda get that red faced constipated look.  Ford is going to stomp has ass off.

Seriously though, OSU should win that first one, but the second one will be can't miss TV.

anyone want to wager a friendly bet?

Shut up stupid.



Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: timhawk on June 21, 2013, 01:01:31 PM
nobody here is your friend, tim.

lol ok then how about a non-friendly bet?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: CNS on June 21, 2013, 01:08:25 PM
When I say that Ford is going to stomp his ass off, you need to understand that I am not saying he is going to stomp bill.  I am saying he is going to stand further on the court than he should and, looking all red faced and constipated, clap his hands and stomp his loafer on the floor to complain about something.

Edit: there should be no references to "stop" all should be "stomp".  Thanks, emo.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Emo EMAW on June 21, 2013, 01:10:55 PM
Stop or stomp CNS?  I'm confused here.  I think I know ole Travvy Ford pretty well and I'm betting he's going to stomp his red little ass off, but maybe he's got a new tactic next year?  If so,  :horrorsurprise:.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: star seed 7 on June 21, 2013, 01:54:06 PM
towniecat posts > loshitaman posts.
Title: Re: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: 8manpick on June 21, 2013, 02:09:52 PM
towniecat posts > loshitaman posts.

Hard to say. Lopak started strong. They aren't really on the same path, but if TC keeps sawing wood, he'll get a little bit better every day until he is the poster we need him to be.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: timhawk on June 21, 2013, 03:48:28 PM
When I say that Ford is going to stomp his ass off, you need to understand that I am not saying he is going to stomp bill.  I am saying he is going to stand further on the court than he should and, looking all red faced and constipated, clap his hands and stomp his loafer on the floor to complain about something.

Edit: there should be no references to "stop" all should be "stomp".  Thanks, emo.


I'd rather have ford stomping his loafers compared to oscar standing there with his arms crossed with that stupid look on his face.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 21, 2013, 04:03:26 PM
I picture tim as "that guy" at the sports bar, particularly if ku is losing.   

I just can't help but thinking it's meltdown city, as in "sir we're going to have to ask you to leave . . . ",   I could be wrong.   

It's just that whole t-shirt nation vibe.   Many of them live in the KC metro, most of them didn't go to college, or went to some "nobody cares" college, so they migrate to ku basketball.    The Chiefs blow, the Royals blow and will likely blow it this year . . . the guy two cubicles down who went to ku has brainwashed them.   So everything hinges on ku hoops and it turns oh-so-very-ugly when things don't work out.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe tim has posted his bio on here, I don't know, maybe Tim has 3 degree's from ku and is a 4th generation ku alum   
Sorry in advance if I'm wrong tim . . . oh no, not really, but, well, you know.

Oh yeah, we're gonna suck . . . but come on, that dunk by Wiggins was nice, but dunks like that from guys who can jump are dime a dozen in slop ball pick up games, I mean really.

 



Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Cartierfor3 on June 21, 2013, 04:07:59 PM
I picture tim as "that guy" at the sports bar, particularly if ku is losing.   

I just can't help but thinking it's meltdown city, as in "sir we're going to have to ask you to leave . . . ",   I could be wrong.   

It's just that whole t-shirt nation vibe.   Many of them live in the KC metro, most of them didn't go to college, or went to some "nobody cares" college, so they migrate to ku basketball.    The Chiefs blow, the Royals blow and will likely blow it this year . . . the guy two cubicles down who went to ku has brainwashed them.   So everything hinges on ku hoops and it turns oh-so-very-ugly when things don't work out.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe tim has posted his bio on here, I don't know, maybe Tim has 3 degree's from ku and is a 4th generation ku alum   
Sorry in advance if I'm wrong tim . . . oh no, not really, but, well, you know.

Oh yeah, we're gonna suck . . . but come on, that dunk by Wiggins was nice, but dunks like that from guys who can jump are dime a dozen in slop ball pick up games, I mean really.

 

I doubt he has a cubicle.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: timhawk on June 21, 2013, 04:34:20 PM
I picture tim as "that guy" at the sports bar, particularly if ku is losing.   

I just can't help but thinking it's meltdown city, as in "sir we're going to have to ask you to leave . . . ",   I could be wrong.   

It's just that whole t-shirt nation vibe.   Many of them live in the KC metro, most of them didn't go to college, or went to some "nobody cares" college, so they migrate to ku basketball.    The Chiefs blow, the Royals blow and will likely blow it this year . . . the guy two cubicles down who went to ku has brainwashed them.   So everything hinges on ku hoops and it turns oh-so-very-ugly when things don't work out.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe tim has posted his bio on here, I don't know, maybe Tim has 3 degree's from ku and is a 4th generation ku alum   
Sorry in advance if I'm wrong tim . . . oh no, not really, but, well, you know.

Oh yeah, we're gonna suck . . . but come on, that dunk by Wiggins was nice, but dunks like that from guys who can jump are dime a dozen in slop ball pick up games, I mean really.

 

did I say anything about the wiggins dunk?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: lopakman on June 21, 2013, 04:37:11 PM
towniecat posts > loshitaman posts.

Did you come up with that all by yourself?  rough ridin' brilliant man, :thumbs:  Do another one! 

Lopakman, more like Lopakass amirite?   :runaway:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: puniraptor on June 22, 2013, 12:27:43 AM
who can't admire loapakaman for his resiliency?

noone.
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Trim on June 22, 2013, 03:06:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZVfAWNuc1Q&hq_e=el&hq_m=487301&hq_l=5&hq_v=4cd68d0b18

 :blank:
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: star seed 7 on June 22, 2013, 05:28:14 PM
I picture tim as "that guy" at the sports bar, particularly if ku is losing.   

I just can't help but thinking it's meltdown city, as in "sir we're going to have to ask you to leave . . . ",   I could be wrong.   

It's just that whole t-shirt nation vibe.   Many of them live in the KC metro, most of them didn't go to college, or went to some "nobody cares" college, so they migrate to ku basketball.    The Chiefs blow, the Royals blow and will likely blow it this year . . . the guy two cubicles down who went to ku has brainwashed them.   So everything hinges on ku hoops and it turns oh-so-very-ugly when things don't work out.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe tim has posted his bio on here, I don't know, maybe Tim has 3 degree's from ku and is a 4th generation ku alum   
Sorry in advance if I'm wrong tim . . . oh no, not really, but, well, you know.

Oh yeah, we're gonna suck . . . but come on, that dunk by Wiggins was nice, but dunks like that from guys who can jump are dime a dozen in slop ball pick up games, I mean really.

 

I doubt he has a cubicle.

does the basket of a man lift count as a cubicle?
Title: Re: HOLY crap WE ARE mumped
Post by: Winters on June 22, 2013, 08:57:56 PM
towniecat posts > loshitaman posts.
  :block: