goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:33:34 PM

Title: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:33:34 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 04:34:06 PM
keep posting new threads kougz!  :excited:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:36:27 PM
keep posting new threads kougz!  :excited:

Good opinion on 3-point shooting and its importance, steve! :excited:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: meow meow on March 09, 2013, 04:41:23 PM
You can take kougs out of kstatefans.com, but you can't take the kstatefans.com out of kougs
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:42:12 PM
You can take kougs out of kstatefans.com, but you can't take the kstatefans.com out of kougs

It would be more fun to be stalked like this if I didn't know you were chingon's sock. Yawn.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 04:43:58 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

Wonder what it would have been had we shot 16 fts as well
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:45:08 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

Wonder what it would have been had we shot 16 fts as well

Leave your ref bitching at the door, k thx.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 09, 2013, 04:46:27 PM
Why is Fake Sugar Dick trying to derail a perfectly good meltdown  :dunno:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:50:21 PM
Why is Fake Sugar Dick trying to derail a perfectly good meltdown  :dunno:

I'm not even melting down. Pretty sure the original post in this thread is valid statistical analysis.

Besides, zacker melts down better than I ever could.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

nice observo, good thread title
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 09, 2013, 04:53:03 PM
Why is Fake Sugar Dick trying to derail a perfectly good meltdown  :dunno:

I'm not even melting down. Pretty sure the original post in this thread is valid statistical analysis.

Besides, zacker melts down better than I ever could.

I meant on the board in general, not just this thread. Conspiracy theories can really take away from the self hatred in moments of great anger.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 04:56:38 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

Wonder what it would have been had we shot 16 fts as well

Leave your ref bitching at the door, k thx.

Do you not get points for fts?  How does fta otherwise damage your lolanalysis




Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 04:57:51 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

Wonder what it would have been had we shot 16 fts as well

Leave your ref bitching at the door, k thx.

Do you not get points for fts?  How does fta otherwise damage your lolanalysis






What's lol about the analysis? It's incontrovertible.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: michigancat on March 09, 2013, 04:58:54 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 09, 2013, 04:59:41 PM
In the first 8:53 of the 2nd half, we shot 7 3-pointers, making 3 of them. At that point we led 53-45, having outscored OSU 23-9 in the half.

For the next 10:20, we shot 2 3s, missing them both, and got outscored 24-9 on the way to the game being all but over.

The minute we stopped launching from outside, we were dead men walking.

Wonder what it would have been had we shot 16 fts as well

Leave your ref bitching at the door, k thx.

Do you not get points for fts?  How does fta otherwise damage your lolanalysis






What's lol about the analysis? It's incontrovertible.

The Big XII should buy all K-State fans a convertible  :driving: for putting up with their evil conspiracy theories, right FSD  :jerk:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2013, 05:00:34 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

it looks as if OSU extended the d leaving driving lanes
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:01:56 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

it looks as if OSU extended the d leaving driving lanes

they did. we couldn't take advantage. angel should have but fell apart.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: sys on March 09, 2013, 05:02:20 PM
good stats, good thread.  kougs is a good poster.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:03:36 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

They did adjust and extend, but we passed up a ton of open (enough) looks still. It was clear we weren't getting crap done in the lane against their athleticism, and we failed to recognize and do whatever it took to get outside shots.

Keep launching.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:05:23 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

They did adjust and extend, but we passed up a ton of open (enough) looks still. It was clear we weren't getting crap done in the lane against their athleticism, and we failed to recognize and do whatever it took to get outside shots.

Keep launching.

they were out on some players but not all. Will, of all people, had plenty of good looks that he didn't shoot. I wonder if something was said to emphasize the inside game.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:09:43 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

They did adjust and extend, but we passed up a ton of open (enough) looks still. It was clear we weren't getting crap done in the lane against their athleticism, and we failed to recognize and do whatever it took to get outside shots.

Keep launching.

they were out on some players but not all. Will, of all people, had plenty of good looks that he didn't shoot. I wonder if something was said to emphasize the inside game.

Sure seemed like that was the case. Looked like we were inadvertently playing right into OSU's hands by focusing on driving ourselves. Like oscar wanted to get to the line more.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:10:36 PM
Had nothing to do with Shane sitting with 4 lolz or osu grabbing and chucking through the lane all game.

Why take a 3 when you can get to the lane and draw contact and [shot zero fts] get credit for a to while the other team does nothing and shoots fts all rough ridin' game.

I'm sure we just abandoned shooting open 3s down the stretch you rough ridin' simpleton masses.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2013, 05:10:44 PM
37% 3PTA. Could've been more. I agree, after we got the lead our offense and looks were pretty terrible.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:10:59 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

They did adjust and extend, but we passed up a ton of open (enough) looks still. It was clear we weren't getting crap done in the lane against their athleticism, and we failed to recognize and do whatever it took to get outside shots.

Keep launching.

they were out on some players but not all. Will, of all people, had plenty of good looks that he didn't shoot. I wonder if something was said to emphasize the inside game.

Sure seemed like that was the case. Looked like we were inadvertently playing right into OSU's hands by focusing on driving ourselves. Like oscar wanted to get to the line more.

I love bombing threes so I'm partial to them
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:12:36 PM
Did we intentionally stop shooting them, or did osu make adjustments to keep us from shooting them?

They did adjust and extend, but we passed up a ton of open (enough) looks still. It was clear we weren't getting crap done in the lane against their athleticism, and we failed to recognize and do whatever it took to get outside shots.

Keep launching.

they were out on some players but not all. Will, of all people, had plenty of good looks that he didn't shoot. I wonder if something was said to emphasize the inside game.

Sure seemed like that was the case. Looked like we were inadvertently playing right into OSU's hands by focusing on driving ourselves. Like oscar wanted to get to the line more.

I love bombing threes so I'm partial to them

Same here. Also, it was clear we weren't going to help our FTR because they were way too athletic for us to get into the bodies of.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ChiComCat on March 09, 2013, 05:14:33 PM
Had nothing to do with Shane sitting with 4 lolz or osu grabbing and chucking through the lane all game.

Why take a 3 when you can get to the lane and draw contact and [shot zero fts] get credit for a to while the other team does nothing and shoots fts all rough ridin' game.

I'm sure we just abandoned shooting open 3s down the stretch you rough ridin' simpleton masses.

Lets turn every thread into bitching about officiating.  Holy crap these are terrible posts.

Also, if oscar decided to focus on driving and forget about 3s, he's an idiot.  3/4s of the way through a game deciding the championship, you don't change game plan to something you've done basically none of all year.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:18:06 PM
Had nothing to do with Shane sitting with 4 lolz or osu grabbing and chucking through the lane all game.

Why take a 3 when you can get to the lane and draw contact and [shot zero fts] get credit for a to while the other team does nothing and shoots fts all rough ridin' game.

I'm sure we just abandoned shooting open 3s down the stretch you rough ridin' simpleton masses.

Lets turn every thread into bitching about officiating.  Holy crap these are terrible posts.

Also, if oscar decided to focus on driving and forget about 3s, he's an idiot.  3/4s of the way through a game deciding the championship, you don't change game plan to something you've done basically none of all year.

Isn't that what it looked like though?
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ChiComCat on March 09, 2013, 05:21:32 PM
Had nothing to do with Shane sitting with 4 lolz or osu grabbing and chucking through the lane all game.

Why take a 3 when you can get to the lane and draw contact and [shot zero fts] get credit for a to while the other team does nothing and shoots fts all rough ridin' game.

I'm sure we just abandoned shooting open 3s down the stretch you rough ridin' simpleton masses.

Lets turn every thread into bitching about officiating.  Holy crap these are terrible posts.

Also, if oscar decided to focus on driving and forget about 3s, he's an idiot.  3/4s of the way through a game deciding the championship, you don't change game plan to something you've done basically none of all year.

Isn't that what it looked like though?

I'm at work and was coming/going too much to tell for sure but it seems that way.  The numbers seem to indicate it as well.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:24:54 PM
It's Bruces fault the team didn't shoot more 3s is a hilarious way to explain away the dogshit officiating.

Goetard!
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: ChiComCat on March 09, 2013, 05:29:00 PM
It's Bruces fault the team didn't shoot more 3s is a hilarious way to explain away the dogshit officiating.

Goetard!
FSD is a democrat at heart.  If everything doesn't go his way, he just bitches and wines and expects a handout.  rough ridin' Obamabot.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: michigancat on March 09, 2013, 05:35:52 PM
 he had us abandon threes at the ku game in Lawrence.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:36:05 PM
It's Bruces fault the team didn't shoot more 3s is a hilarious way to explain away the dogshit officiating.

Goetard!
FSD is a democrat at heart.  If everything doesn't go his way, he just bitches and wines and expects a handout.  rough ridin' Obamabot.

lol
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:36:51 PM
he had us abandon threes at the ku game in Lawrence.

great point. there is precedence.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:39:24 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:41:26 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: sys on March 09, 2013, 05:42:36 PM
I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

remember how good the original sugar dick was?  fsd reminds me a little of him today.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:43:36 PM
I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

remember how good the original sugar dick was?  fsd reminds me a little of him today.

no, but I wish I did
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:44:39 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

Your obsession with me is sad AND pathetic.  I assume its bbsenvy, but could be a slightly more homosexualaphobic thing. Either way, not interested
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: sys on March 09, 2013, 05:48:16 PM
no, but I wish I did

he was really good, but he may have been a chingon sock.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 05:49:21 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

Your obsession with me is sad AND pathetic.  I assume its bbsenvy, but could be a slightly more homosexualaphobic thing. Either way, not interested

I was just paying a compliment bro  :frown:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: kougar24 on March 09, 2013, 05:49:52 PM
no, but I wish I did

he was really good, but he may have been a chingon sock.

the original meow meow, if you will.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Headinjun on March 09, 2013, 05:51:32 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

Your obsession with me is sad AND pathetic.  I assume its bbsenvy, but could be a slightly more homosexualaphobic thing. Either way, not interested


Only FSD would worry about things being homosexual like. I mean if those boys out in Grinnell thought he and a boy were exchanging compliments they might think......?
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:55:42 PM
The mods know that sd = fsd

  #freesd
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: wetwillie on March 09, 2013, 05:57:26 PM
The mods know that sd = fsd

  #freesd

Steve Dave shits better socks than this, not even a chance.
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:58:06 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

Your obsession with me is sad AND pathetic.  I assume its bbsenvy, but could be a slightly more homosexualaphobic thing. Either way, not interested


Only FSD would worry about things being homosexual like. I mean if those boys out in Grinnell thought he and a boy were exchanging compliments they might think......?

LOL @ sugar Dick "worrying" I mean, L Ofucking L

Backup youngin

Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 05:59:38 PM
The mods know that sd = fsd

  #freesd

Steve Dave shits better socks than this, not even a chance.

Oh look, another one of sd's detractors. Hey detractor, I replied to you insignificance. Now eff off
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2013, 06:00:52 PM
The mods know that sd = fsd

  #freesd

Steve Dave shits better socks than this, not even a chance.

Oh look, another one of sd's detractors. Hey detractor, I replied to you insignificance. Now eff off

you can be "sd" too if you want :dunno:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: DQ12 on March 09, 2013, 06:01:20 PM
:popcorn:
Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2013, 06:03:07 PM
The mods know that sd = fsd

  #freesd

Steve Dave shits better socks than this, not even a chance.

Oh look, another one of sd's detractors. Hey detractor, I replied to you insignificance. Now eff off

you can be "sd" too if you want :dunno:

That's not really how this works Steve Dave.  Cute though


Title: Re: Fool's gold
Post by: Headinjun on March 09, 2013, 06:26:23 PM
Boom, Sugar Dick is vindicated

I have no idea what you are talking about but I want you to know that I appreciate the crap out of your posts today  :D

Your obsession with me is sad AND pathetic.  I assume its bbsenvy, but could be a slightly more homosexualaphobic thing. Either way, not interested


Only FSD would worry about things being homosexual like. I mean if those boys out in Grinnell thought he and a boy were exchanging compliments they might think......?

LOL @ sugar Dick "worrying" I mean, L Ofucking L

Backup youngin

Backup?  :sdeek: