goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: wabash909 on January 05, 2013, 03:03:45 PM

Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 05, 2013, 03:03:45 PM
9 points and a strong, manlike defensive effort.

Damn.



Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: pissclams on January 05, 2013, 03:09:23 PM
loved when he put that bitch ass white kid from OSU in his place
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: PowercatPat on January 05, 2013, 03:10:21 PM
Looked very good with his back to the basket today.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: chum1 on January 05, 2013, 03:11:47 PM
Very proud of his masculinity today.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 05, 2013, 03:17:42 PM
I liked it after his last bucket when he abused one of their worthless players and then back pedaled down the court flexing one of his guns.

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Winters on January 05, 2013, 03:20:59 PM
I like his hook shot
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 05, 2013, 03:29:59 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 05, 2013, 03:31:57 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

he probably wishes he was in the game, maybe rues the day he helped run length-loving martin out of town.
Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: steve dave on January 05, 2013, 03:34:51 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

he probably wishes he was in the game, maybe rues the day he helped run length-loving martin out of town.

Amazing post by my friend sys
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2013, 03:43:50 PM
Love Gip, he is never going to be explosive, but I hope he can get a little better at getting to the rim. His use of his body to create space and get shots, especially when he can turn his right shoulder to the basket for his little hook shot, is really good.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: FuzzyWuzzy on January 05, 2013, 03:50:50 PM
i like when he trucked that dude coming down the floor in transition
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 05, 2013, 03:55:39 PM
T Gip deserves to be given a hard hat and a lunch box. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: michigancat on January 05, 2013, 04:01:35 PM
He's improving.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2013, 04:02:56 PM
It was frustrating to see him get the ball ripped (he had 4 TOs) and he wasn't overly efficient (3/8 shooting), but it was a solid game. He had some nice boards and hit FTs, which was nice.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Asteriskhead on January 05, 2013, 04:04:31 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kougar24 on January 05, 2013, 04:06:08 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.

:sdeek:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Spaces on January 05, 2013, 04:11:45 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.
Yes!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 05, 2013, 04:14:58 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.

:sdeek:

:sdeek:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 05, 2013, 04:19:43 PM
my friend sys

ok, fine.  i give up.  you were right about the mouse, does (did) have great ears.
Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: steve dave on January 05, 2013, 04:44:01 PM
Yes!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Hurricane Cat on January 05, 2013, 07:17:29 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.

:sdeek:

:sdeek:


 :bwpopcorn:  :users:   :ohno:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 01:30:33 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

:confused: <---- what's going through my mind when I read the post
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 06, 2013, 03:40:21 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

:confused: <---- what's going through my mind when I read the post

Don't be confused, just look at the stat line and the minutes played.

And then remember JO is a senior and that most of the time he spends on the bench watching underclassmen play his position is due to his laziness and stupidity on defense and lack of offensive awareness.





Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 04:06:27 PM
I wonder what goes through JO's mind when he watches T Gip abuse fools on the low block.

:confused: <---- what's going through my mind when I read the post

Don't be confused, just look at the stat line and the minutes played.

And then remember JO is a senior and that most of the time he spends on the bench watching underclassmen play his position is due to his laziness and stupidity on defense and lack of offensive awareness.

I guess that's one way of looking at it.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 06, 2013, 04:22:47 PM
What would be the other way of looking at it?

That JO is not a senior that has played himself out of the starting lineup and doesn't spend half the time of watching a sophomore play with more heart, defensive intensity, and offensive assertiveness than he does?

Now you've got me confused!

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 04:30:55 PM
What would be the other way of looking at it?

That JO is not a senior that has played himself out of the starting lineup and doesn't spend half the time of watching a sophomore play with more heart, defensive intensity, and offensive assertiveness than he does?

Now you've got me confused!

I hope we get the answer on tomorrow night's #oscar radio show*!

*Which is interfering with the premier of EMAW Bachelor :curse:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 04:46:47 PM
If I were to look at it differently I'd start by not looking at it as an either or proposition.  If I couldn't wrap my hands around that I'd go with they are two completely different players and the demands of this offense plays to the strengths of one guy more than the other guy.

I could see how it would be easy and ironic for someone to play the lazy card though.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: catzacker on January 06, 2013, 04:49:21 PM
yeah, JO had twice the production and minutes last year under a coach who demanded effort, intensity, and hustle to play, so I could see where people would think that's the problem this year.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 06, 2013, 04:50:15 PM
yeah, JO had twice the production and minutes last year under a coach who demanded effort, intensity, and hustle to play, so I could see where people would think that's the problem this year.

oscar doesn't demand effort?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: catzacker on January 06, 2013, 04:51:34 PM
yeah, JO had twice the production and minutes last year under a coach who demanded effort, intensity, and hustle to play, so I could see where people would think that's the problem this year.

oscar doesn't demand effort?

if you've watched our defense in transition, no.  he demands (or makes it more complicated than it should be) that JO screen his motherfuckng ass off though.
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 04:53:57 PM
If I were to look at it differently I'd start by not looking at it as an either or proposition.  If I couldn't wrap my hands around that I'd go with they are two completely different players and the demands of this offense plays to the strengths of one guy more than the other guy.

I could see how it would be easy and ironic for someone to play the lazy card though.

Yeah, it's hard to make a comparison, they just have very different bodies and skills.

I do like that for the first time since Curt, Gip is getting close to being a big we can dump the ball to if/when we need a basket. Now, he is still limited and had to catch at the correct spot and use his body correctly, but one on one he can score with his little hook shot somewhat consistently.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 06, 2013, 04:57:23 PM
If I were to look at it differently I'd start by not looking at it as an either or proposition.  If I couldn't wrap my hands around that I'd go with they are two completely different players and the demands of this offense plays to the strengths of one guy more than the other guy.

I could see how it would be easy and ironic for someone to play the lazy card though.

Their minutes are interchangeable.  That is the point he is trying to make.  Far be it from your dumbass to understand that.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 06, 2013, 05:23:08 PM
If I were to look at it differently I'd start by not looking at it as an either or proposition.  If I couldn't wrap my hands around that I'd go with they are two completely different players and the demands of this offense plays to the strengths of one guy more than the other guy.

I could see how it would be easy and ironic for someone to play the lazy card though.

JO absolutely is lazy.  Lazy on both ends of the court.  Which is why he doesn't start and has been a complete non-factor this season outside of one good effort against Florida.

This has nothing to do with a better matchup against Okie State Weber was trying to exploit.  He sat because of shitty defense, where he got beaten to the basket and made dumb fouls where he tried to settle for a block instead of getting in position.

But this is JO.  It's just nice to see a guy like Gipson, step up in a big time game and do all the things he doesn't do in the low post for us.  Hopefully he keeps up the progress.


Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on January 06, 2013, 05:25:45 PM
And damn, I love this.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-l6FFGB8ChFw/UOj1pHjuIyI/AAAAAAAABeQ/P3h1ZLxX5Bk/s355/GipShaneMuscle355.gif)

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 05:34:54 PM
You're right JO is unmotivated and/or lazy at times, no one is doubting that.  You're also right about it not being a matchup against OSU that oscar tried to exploit.  You hinted that JO is losing playing time to Gip because of effort and that's what I will continue to disagree with.

First of all even lazy JO is a better defender than Gip.  When JO is on the floor and not in foul trouble he is a difference maker.  I don't think I will ever think of Gip as an elite defender.  JO is not losing playing time because of the defensive end, anyone who thinks so is a fool including oscar Weber if this is his mindset.

Now offensively oscar needs someone who is effective with his back to the basket, that isn't JO it never will be JO and it has nothing to do with effort.  As I've mentioned a half dozen times this year, JO was effective last year because the pinch post allowed him to play the high post, he can't do this anymore.  In this offense you need to either be able to play back to the basket or hit a 15-17 foot jumpshot, neither are strengths of JO.

Yes, Gip has played well and he plays hard.  Yes JO has stretches of laziness.  Your talking point of JO getting some of Gip's minutes if he played harder is wrong.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: catzacker on January 06, 2013, 05:41:40 PM
MIR, i think it's really too much to expect a coach to try to extract the talent he has on his roster by, let's say, tweaking his offense.  That's just batshit crazy.  I mean, what coach would change his offense, especially now that we're in season. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on January 06, 2013, 05:52:10 PM
MIR, i think it's really too much to expect a coach to try to extract the talent he has on his roster by, let's say, tweaking his offense.  That's just batshit crazy.  I mean, what coach would change his offense, especially now that we're in season.
I think I remember Frank changing up the offense to get more movement.  :dunno:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 06, 2013, 05:59:14 PM
MIR, i think it's really too much to expect a coach to try to extract the talent he has on his roster by, let's say, tweaking his offense.  That's just batshit crazy.  I mean, what coach would change his offense, especially now that we're in season.
I think I remember Frank changing up the offense to get more movement.  :dunno:

oh really?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 06:17:00 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 06:20:54 PM
A few of us have pushed this unorthodox theory before, and I still believe you can play Gip and JO together as "power forward" and "center."  If McG keeps shooting the covers off balls from deep, that eliminates #oscar's concern of having too much cat bulk down in the paint and making it impossible for Rod to operate "inside the arc."
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: michigancat on January 06, 2013, 06:29:41 PM
JO was a difference maker against OSU. The only problem was that the difference favored OSU.
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 06:48:05 PM
A few of us have pushed this unorthodox theory before, and I still believe you can play Gip and JO together as "power forward" and "center."  If McG keeps shooting the covers off balls from deep, that eliminates #oscar's concern of having too much cat bulk down in the paint and making it impossible for Rod to operate "inside the arc."

He's going to have to against some teams.

It's pretty much evolved to 80 minutes available for Gip, JO, and Nino to split. Maybe DJamer and Diaz get a few scraps, occasionally Shane. Will be interesting to see if it evolves further as the season goes through conference play.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on January 06, 2013, 07:17:26 PM
The only reason he doesn't play gip and jo at 5 & 4 is because Nino can't be a productive 3, right?

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 07:19:58 PM
The only reason he doesn't play gip and jo at 5 & 4 is because Nino can't be a productive 3, right?

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Nino can't play 3 and Rod is going to play 35+ at the 3 anyway. And Rod can't play 2.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on January 06, 2013, 07:22:46 PM
That was my point.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: pissclams on January 06, 2013, 07:25:18 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
we knew we would be having this conversation. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 07:30:48 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
we knew we would be having this conversation.

There was one reference to oscar's commitment to his offense. Before we get too off the rails with a strawman, I think zackers larger point is that we have a lot more bigs who can give productive minutes but oscar hasn't and won't play 2 of them together.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 06, 2013, 07:33:22 PM
I want Rod to play the 2 so bad. Can you imagine Angle, Rod, Nino (sorry dorks), Gip and JO? Man, we'd be undefeated.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Mr Bread on January 06, 2013, 07:37:12 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
we knew we would be having this conversation.

Nostraclamus
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 07:38:39 PM
I want Rod to play the 2 so bad. Can you imagine Angle, Rod, Nino (sorry dorks), Gip and JO? Man, we'd be undefeated.

We wouldn't.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Kat Kid on January 06, 2013, 07:39:07 PM
I want Rod to play the 2 so bad. Can you imagine Angle (sorry dorks), Rod, Nino, Gip and JO? Man, we'd be undefeated.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: SdK on January 06, 2013, 07:40:51 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 06, 2013, 07:41:14 PM
I want Rod to play the 2 so bad. Can you imagine Angle (sorry dorks), Rod, Nino, Gip and JO? Man, we'd be undefeated.

Discount everything I said. Sorry to waste everyone's time.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 07:42:05 PM
Why can't Rod play 2?  Other teams use 2 small guards and it's thought he can't guard them?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: catzacker on January 06, 2013, 07:43:05 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
we knew we would be having this conversation.

There was one reference to oscar's commitment to his offense. Before we get too off the rails with a strawman, I think zackers larger point is that we have a lot more bigs who can give productive minutes but oscar hasn't and won't play 2 of them together.

This.  The idea that "ah, eff it, I only got room for one big in my offense" is bullshit.  Especially considering JO's defensive presence. 

I actually agree that oscar is runningsome sets/action for rodney which only highlights the fact that he needs to tweak it even more to utilize JO's  (and angel's) skill set.

Or we can continue to ask Nino to play out of his ass game in and game out.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 06, 2013, 07:44:40 PM
i think williams can be fine at the 3, but not with mcgruder at the 2.  can't play the both of them together unless one is the 4.  same with southie.
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 07:44:49 PM
Why can't Rod play 2?  Other teams use 2 small guards and it's thought he can't guard them?

Defense would be okay, offense would be ugly and turnovers would double. At least.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: pissclams on January 06, 2013, 07:46:23 PM
I think oscar's "commitment" to his offense is overplayed by goEMAW. He implements ball screens and its been plenty effective at creating good shots since the Gonzaga game.

JMHO
we knew we would be having this conversation.

There was one reference to oscar's commitment to his offense. Before we get too off the rails with a strawman, I think zackers larger point is that we have a lot more bigs who can give productive minutes but oscar hasn't and won't play 2 of them together.

This.  The idea that "ah, eff it, I only got room for one big in my offense" is bullshit.  Especially considering JO's defensive presence. 

I actually agree that oscar is runningsome sets/action for rodney which only highlights the fact that he needs to tweak it even more to utilize JO's  (and angel's) skill set.

Or we can continue to ask Nino to play out of his ass game in and game out.

oscar isn't asking anyone to play out of his ass game in and game out, remember?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 07:54:34 PM
Why can't Rod play 2?  Other teams use 2 small guards and it's thought he can't guard them?

Defense would be okay, offense would be ugly and turnovers would double. At least.

Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

I liked having 1.5 PGs and a smaller 3 when we had Denis & Jake, but Sprads is no Jake.  I've actually heard he's Adam James.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 08:06:44 PM
Why can't Rod play 2?  Other teams use 2 small guards and it's thought he can't guard them?

Defense would be okay, offense would be ugly and turnovers would double. At least.

Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

I liked having 1.5 PGs and a smaller 3 when we had Denis & Jake, but Sprads is no Jake.  I've actually heard he's Adam James.
)

I suppose its possible, but you, I, and every other K-State fan knows Sprads is going to play 30+ minutes (probably 35+) every game.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 06, 2013, 08:08:34 PM
Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

no.  i know it's hard to believe, but spradling is actually a better 2 than southie.  a better bball player even.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 08:14:23 PM
Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

no.  i know it's hard to believe, but spradling is actually a better 2 than southie.  a better bball player even.

I don't believe it.

Why can't Rod play 2?  Other teams use 2 small guards and it's thought he can't guard them?

Defense would be okay, offense would be ugly and turnovers would double. At least.

Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

I liked having 1.5 PGs and a smaller 3 when we had Denis & Jake, but Sprads is no Jake.  I've actually heard he's Adam James.
)

I suppose its possible, but you, I, and every other K-State fan knows Sprads is going to play 30+ minutes (probably 35+) every game.

Sprads' health is infringing on my happiness.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 06, 2013, 08:16:08 PM
I don't believe it.

it is what it is.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 08:25:51 PM
Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

no.  i know it's hard to believe, but spradling is actually a better 2 than southie.  a better bball player even.

Funny because Will was recruited as a 2 but Shane was recruited as a 1.  When Shane was a freshman his problem handling the ball was his crazy high dribble.  Wonder if he has improved his handle at all or if the thought of him handling the ball was completely abandoned by Frank at some point.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2013, 08:32:35 PM
Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

no.  i know it's hard to believe, but spradling is actually a better 2 than southie.  a better bball player even.

Funny because Will was recruited as a 2 but Shane was recruited as a 1.  When Shane was a freshman his problem handling the ball was his crazy high dribble.  Wonder if he has improved his handle at all or if the thought of him handling the ball was completely abandoned by Frank at some point.

"My style of play is versatile. I can play the point guard spot, the shooting guard spot or I can play small forward. I like to play a fast up tempo type of game."
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on January 06, 2013, 08:34:47 PM
Can Shane play 2 with Rod at 3 (semantics) and 2 real bigs at 4 & 5?

no.  i know it's hard to believe, but spradling is actually a better 2 than southie.  a better bball player even.

Funny because Will was recruited as a 2 but Shane was recruited as a 1.  When Shane was a freshman his problem handling the ball was his crazy high dribble.  Wonder if he has improved his handle at all or if the thought of him handling the ball was completely abandoned by Frank at some point.

"My style of play is versatile. I can play the point guard spot, the shooting guard spot or I can play small forward. I like to play a fast up tempo type of game."

He's perfect!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 08:37:34 PM
Since we're talking about guards now I find it funny that Will doesn't bring the ball up at all anymore, like ever.  Win for Shannon.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on January 06, 2013, 08:38:44 PM
Funny because Will was recruited as a 2 but Shane was recruited as a 1.  When Shane was a freshman his problem handling the ball was his crazy high dribble.  Wonder if he has improved his handle at all or if the thought of him handling the ball was completely abandoned by Frank at some point.

martin had a destructive love affair with tall guards.  small guards were so good to him, but he just couldn't stay away from those long sons of bitches.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kitten_mittons on January 06, 2013, 08:43:04 PM
I have dreams that we'll run out there starting a couple of 6'4"+ guards someday. I also want them to be good.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Kat Kid on January 06, 2013, 08:56:32 PM
Funny because Will was recruited as a 2 but Shane was recruited as a 1.  When Shane was a freshman his problem handling the ball was his crazy high dribble.  Wonder if he has improved his handle at all or if the thought of him handling the ball was completely abandoned by Frank at some point.

martin had a destructive love affair with tall guards.  small guards were so good to him, but he just couldn't stay away from those long sons of bitches.

 :lol:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: SwiftCat on January 07, 2013, 12:22:12 AM
And damn, I love this.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-l6FFGB8ChFw/UOj1pHjuIyI/AAAAAAAABeQ/P3h1ZLxX5Bk/s355/GipShaneMuscle355.gif)

Holy crap this is amazing.

We were driving back from Phoenix so I had to listen to the game. Bench Shane is wonderful
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 07, 2013, 03:21:29 AM
This whole time I thought Foster was an SG. ESPN and Rivals have him listed as a PG. This makes me very excited.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: yosh on January 07, 2013, 08:15:16 AM
This whole time I thought Foster was an SG. ESPN and Rivals have him listed as a PG. This makes me very excited.

He will play off the ball for us.  I see him and angel together after sprads, then Thomas into angels spot the next season.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 07, 2013, 08:52:36 AM
And damn, I love this.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-l6FFGB8ChFw/UOj1pHjuIyI/AAAAAAAABeQ/P3h1ZLxX5Bk/s355/GipShaneMuscle355.gif)

Holy crap this is amazing.

We were driving back from Phoenix so I had to listen to the game. Bench Shane is wonderful

Has this been tweeted to Gip and MrSouthwell?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on January 07, 2013, 09:24:12 AM
So fantastic
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 07, 2013, 09:30:43 AM
thats probably one of the most adorable things Ive ever seen
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 07, 2013, 08:42:48 PM
Didn't know where else to put this, but since it's gif like I'll put it here. Shane and Rod interacting with Okie Lite after this play was pretty LOLable, especially Rod's face at the 2:04 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMtYJyYuKuQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=113s
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: yosh on January 07, 2013, 09:09:26 PM
Didn't know where else to put this, but since it's gif like I'll put it here. Shane and Rod interacting with Okie Lite after this play was pretty LOLable, especially Rod's face at the 2:04 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMtYJyYuKuQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=113s

I thought is was lol when oscar was calling for the jump ball and the announcers were talking about how oscar was giving the 'thumbs up' to the effort.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Asteriskhead on January 07, 2013, 09:32:01 PM
Gooch reminded me today about the MCMW story. Sorry, I forgot. I've been getting pretty bingey lately.

NYE in Aggieville a large individual, whose name is similar to Gibson, started a verbal altercation with a couple I was standing next to while waiting for the ball to drop. Two other rather large individuals ushered "Gibson" away, as there was about to be a fight. As the three of them walked away the couple I was standing next to filled me in on why "Gibson" wanted to fight them.

Apparently "Gibson" is having relations with the roommate of the girl, henceforth referred to as Jules. "Gibson" has left many of his personal belongings at their apartment. Jules moved his belongings into the roommate's bedroom one day while cleaning the apartment. "Gibson" responded by texting Jules stating that, I'm paraphrasing here, "she wouldn't be touching his stuff anymore after he violated her" and that, "he would whoop her boyfriend's ass if he had a problem with it." Jules even showed me the text messages. I don't know if they were really from "Gibson", but he was pretty irate with the two of them on NYE.

Jules reported it to the RCPD, and showed them the text messages. I doubt anything will come of it, which was also the speculation Jules and her boyfriend, but the officer said they would follow up on it.

Anyway, it's not that great of an MCMW story. Sorry if I lead everybody on.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: michigancat on January 07, 2013, 09:45:34 PM
You and your pals sound like a bunch of real turds.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Asteriskhead on January 07, 2013, 09:47:01 PM
Don't even know the people  :dunno:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 07, 2013, 09:48:36 PM
I want "Gibson" off the team.
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: michigancat on January 07, 2013, 09:48:52 PM
Don't even know the people  :dunno:

Maybe it's just you, then. :dunno:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Asteriskhead on January 07, 2013, 09:50:57 PM
Maybe, Rusty. Maybe.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 07, 2013, 09:51:17 PM
warm up the emails to j. currie
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Asteriskhead on January 07, 2013, 09:55:37 PM
Why are we emailing Currie, Kim?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on January 07, 2013, 09:55:59 PM
John,

It has come to my attention that:

NYE in Aggieville a large individual, whose name is similar to Gibson, started a verbal altercation with a couple I was standing next to while waiting for the ball to drop. Two other rather large individuals ushered "Gibson" away, as there was about to be a fight. As the three of them walked away the couple I was standing next to filled me in on why "Gibson" wanted to fight them.

Apparently "Gibson" is having relations with the roommate of the girl, henceforth referred to as Jules. "Gibson" has left many of his personal belongings at their apartment. Jules moved his belongings into the roommate's bedroom one day while cleaning the apartment. "Gibson" responded by texting Jules stating that, I'm paraphrasing here, "she wouldn't be touching his stuff anymore after he violated her" and that, "he would whoop her boyfriend's ass if he had a problem with it." Jules even showed me the text messages. I don't know if they were really from "Gibson", but he was pretty irate with the two of them on NYE.

Jules reported it to the RCPD, and showed them the text messages. I doubt anything will come of it, which was also the speculation Jules and her boyfriend, but the officer said they would follow up on it.


Please act accordingly.

Signed,

K-state fans
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Gooch on January 07, 2013, 10:00:04 PM
Does MCMW apply to MBB, too? If so, I may have some information.

NVM
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: 8manpick on January 09, 2013, 10:45:28 AM
Gooch reminded me today about the MCMW story. Sorry, I forgot. I've been getting pretty bingey lately.

NYE in Aggieville a large individual, whose name is similar to Gibson, started a verbal altercation with a couple I was standing next to while waiting for the ball to drop. Two other rather large individuals ushered "Gibson" away, as there was about to be a fight. As the three of them walked away the couple I was standing next to filled me in on why "Gibson" wanted to fight them.

Apparently "Gibson" is having relations with the roommate of the girl, henceforth referred to as Jules. "Gibson" has left many of his personal belongings at their apartment. Jules moved his belongings into the roommate's bedroom one day while cleaning the apartment. "Gibson" responded by texting Jules stating that, I'm paraphrasing here, "she wouldn't be touching his stuff anymore after he violated her" and that, "he would whoop her boyfriend's ass if he had a problem with it." Jules even showed me the text messages. I don't know if they were really from "Gibson", but he was pretty irate with the two of them on NYE.

Jules reported it to the RCPD, and showed them the text messages. I doubt anything will come of it, which was also the speculation Jules and her boyfriend, but the officer said they would follow up on it.

Anyway, it's not that great of an MCMW story. Sorry if I lead everybody on.

Sounds like Jules is not very EMAW
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ChiComCat on January 09, 2013, 01:04:03 PM
This Jules girl sounds insufferable
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 09, 2013, 02:39:33 PM
Jules is a pretty hawt name though.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 09, 2013, 03:24:25 PM
I liked JO in Frank's slothfense better than I like Gip in oscar's motion offense. I really like them both, though.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 09, 2013, 04:57:27 PM
I bet Jules roommate has huge gozangas right?!
Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: steve dave on January 09, 2013, 05:00:52 PM
TATAS!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on February 09, 2013, 07:21:00 PM
Dunks McGipsonsmith.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 09, 2013, 07:21:18 PM
He is really coming along.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on February 09, 2013, 07:21:59 PM
thank goodness jules never got in touch with currie.
Title: Re: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2013, 07:23:29 PM
He is really coming along.

Yeah. If he improves one tenth as much, this yr to next, as he did over this last off season,  he will nge ridic.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 09, 2013, 08:00:47 PM
Gipson played like an absolute man today. ISU is a very good matchup for him on the offensive end, but he definitely took advantage. I am going to be nicer to Gip in the future. Love ya Gip!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2013, 08:02:49 PM
Cats have to make more of an attempt to attack Withey with Gip on Monday. The guy is playing well.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on February 09, 2013, 08:04:13 PM
Cats have to make more of an attempt to attack Withey with Gip on Monday. The guy is playing well.

yeah, i don't know about that
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2013, 08:06:24 PM
Cats have to make more of an attempt to attack Withey with Gip on Monday. The guy is playing well.

yeah, i don't know about that

Look, I'm not saying make it our gameplan, but you have to at least give it a chance on a few possessions. I don't think relying on 30 threes again is the answer, but we've got to find a way to shoot better than 41% on 2s.
Title: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ChiComCat on February 09, 2013, 08:11:38 PM
Gipson is a very poor mans Dejuan Blair. I like it
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 09, 2013, 08:21:21 PM
he's great.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: bones129 on February 09, 2013, 08:31:13 PM
Cats have to make more of an attempt to attack Withey with Gip on Monday. The guy is playing well.

Agreed.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: OregonSmock on February 09, 2013, 08:36:29 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: EMAWzified on February 09, 2013, 08:39:18 PM
Anyone KU fan who wouldn't first grab is in denial.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 09, 2013, 08:42:50 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would pick Gipson over Angel, even though your offense doesn't have a facilitator who can get your offense on track? Your post shows that you don't deserve either of them. Go beg on somebody else's board.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kougar24 on February 09, 2013, 09:03:06 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would choose someone not named Angel Rodriguez? That would be unwise.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wetwillie on February 09, 2013, 09:06:03 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would choose someone not named Angel Rodriguez? That would be unwise.

he's too mortified to ask angel to join the squad while wearing his "Frank Martin mows my lawn" tee
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kougar24 on February 09, 2013, 09:08:14 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would choose someone not named Angel Rodriguez? That would be unwise.

he's too mortified to ask angel to join the squad while wearing his "Frank Martin mows my lawn" tee

:thumbs:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: sys on February 09, 2013, 09:34:31 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would pick Gipson over Angel, even though your offense doesn't have a facilitator who can get your offense on track? Your post shows that you don't deserve either of them. Go beg on somebody else's board.

yeah, that's crazy.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on February 09, 2013, 10:25:38 PM
Didn't realize Gipson is such a crap human being. I'm firmly on team JO now.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: kim carnes on February 09, 2013, 10:30:17 PM
Didn't realize Gipson is such a crap human being. I'm firmly on team JO now.

what?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 10, 2013, 12:44:39 AM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

You would pick Gipson over Angel, even though your offense doesn't have a facilitator who can get your offense on track? Your post shows that you don't deserve either of them. Go beg on somebody else's board.

You're delving deep into the mind of a hispanaphobe racist piece of crap, be careful
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: wabash909 on February 10, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
You would pick basically the entire K-State team over the one you are putting on the floor.  Well, to be fair, you'd probably keep that one guy with all the tattoos.

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 10, 2013, 09:18:14 PM
Cats have to make more of an attempt to attack Withey with Gip on Monday. The guy is playing well.

yeah, i don't know about that

Look, I'm not saying make it our gameplan, but you have to at least give it a chance on a few possessions. I don't think relying on 30 threes again is the answer, but we've got to find a way to shoot better than 41% on 2s.

Yeah 30 3's is too many.   You have to hit a high % if you shoot that many because it is harder to get ORs.   The 2 games our 3PA% was high was KU and OU at home ( 53% and 48% of shots were from 3).  Of the 35 missed 3s in those 2 games, we only got 6 ORs.     And if you dont hit a good percentage from 3 then you have to hit a good % on your 2pt shots

And FAN's right. 41% on 2pt shot isnt gonna cut it, cause we will probably have more than 27 2pt shots this game. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 10, 2013, 10:22:17 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

One of your more obvious trolls.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on February 11, 2013, 11:57:21 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gannett-cdn.com%2Fmedia%2FUSATODAY%2FUSATODAY%2F2013%2F02%2F09%2Fgallery-k-state-iowa-state-4_3_rx512_c680x510.jpg%3F0f5c31de35bf4ef88a50c2e35ee3bc4da4bf3083&hash=d3823283a909a9e1b063a107c76ad3fb0769fa5b)
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Winters on February 11, 2013, 11:59:39 AM
Didn't realize Gipson is such a crap human being. I'm firmly on team JO now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVSbbEIbWsg
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: OregonSmock on February 11, 2013, 12:02:37 PM
Man, you guys really are a bunch of assholes.  I compliment Gipson, and then you turn around and bash me for it.  WTF?
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 11, 2013, 12:03:47 PM
you love it beems, shut up
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: 8manpick on February 11, 2013, 12:06:13 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/528584_10100906964308221_925391782_n.jpg)
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2013, 12:08:22 PM
 :eek:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: GCJayhawker on February 11, 2013, 12:15:52 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

I'm taking Angel hands down.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Spaces on February 11, 2013, 12:20:30 PM
Get off our balls, guys.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: OregonSmock on February 11, 2013, 12:27:16 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

I'm taking Angel hands down.


I still think KU's weakest position is the 4 spot.  Young is a nice role player, but he isn't the kind of player who should be starting at a program like KU.  Teams are able to put more pressure on our guards, because they don't respect our low post game.  Withey isn't forcing double teams like T-Rob did last season, and it's really killing our offense. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2013, 12:37:24 PM
810 had a guy call in this morning about this just to make them say that doherty is a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: GCJayhawker on February 11, 2013, 12:44:50 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

I'm taking Angel hands down.


I still think KU's weakest position is the 4 spot.  Young is a nice role player, but he isn't the kind of player who should be starting at a program like KU.  Teams are able to put more pressure on our guards, because they don't respect our low post game.  Withey isn't forcing double teams like T-Rob did last season, and it's really killing our offense.

The 4 is a weakness, but Angel brings a much needed toughness to this team.  If you have a improvement at PG, I don't think the weakness at the 4 is magnified as much.  Young and Ellis would be getting a ton more bunnies because of Angel's ability to create and distribute.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: OregonSmock on February 11, 2013, 12:50:55 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

I'm taking Angel hands down.


I still think KU's weakest position is the 4 spot.  Young is a nice role player, but he isn't the kind of player who should be starting at a program like KU.  Teams are able to put more pressure on our guards, because they don't respect our low post game.  Withey isn't forcing double teams like T-Rob did last season, and it's really killing our offense.

The 4 is a weakness, but Angel brings a much needed toughness to this team.  If you have a improvement at PG, I don't think the weakness at the 4 is magnified as much.  Young and Ellis would be getting a ton more bunnies because of Angel's ability to create and distribute.


It's the obvious answer since EJ has been playing poorly for the last month or so, but EJ was awesome last year in the NCAA tournament.  I just think he's going through a slump, and a lot of it has to do with our lack of a post game. 
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: pissclams on February 11, 2013, 12:54:58 PM
people keep saying johnson is a 2 playing a 1, when the reality is he's more of a 3 playing a 2.  regardless, this season has really taken a toll on the young bunny hopper.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 11, 2013, 01:07:56 PM
If I could have one player from K-State's team, it would be Gipson.  McGruder's great, but Gipson fills the hole on KU's roster at the 4 position.  He's playing great right now.  Congrats, guys.

I'm taking Angel hands down.


I still think KU's weakest position is the 4 spot.  Young is a nice role player, but he isn't the kind of player who should be starting at a program like KU.  Teams are able to put more pressure on our guards, because they don't respect our low post game.  Withey isn't forcing double teams like T-Rob did last season, and it's really killing our offense.

True. I mean, it's Kevin Young.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 11, 2013, 01:08:17 PM
And no offense to Kevin. He's a great hustle player.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2013, 01:45:43 PM
And no offense to Kevin. He's a great hustle player.

The Janitor

"I mean, it's Kevin Young!"

Second fav Cat quote behind Jake and the Nit.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Bloodfart on February 25, 2013, 11:30:59 PM
Gip has taken the lead as my favorite wild wildcat.  Great game big guy!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: bones129 on February 25, 2013, 11:37:02 PM

Gip did just what he had to do tonight. Excellent effort, Gip!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 25, 2013, 11:59:39 PM
Gipson is on his way toward maximizing his potential. I hope by next year that he is able to not be a detriment in games vs tall dudes. But, will take dominating performance against dudes about his size until that point in time.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 27, 2013, 09:04:24 PM
Gipson is on his way toward maximizing his potential. I hope by next year that he is able to not be a detriment in games vs tall dudes. But, will take dominating performance against dudes about his size until that point in time.
Ya, once he can hold his own against tall guys he will be great
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 27, 2013, 10:02:01 PM
Big Gip ave 10.9 pts in last 9 games, while shooting 61% FG and 75% from the FT
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: scottwildcat on February 27, 2013, 10:11:55 PM
Big Gip ave 10.9 pts in last 9 games, while shooting 61% FG and 75% from the FT

oscar is DEVELOPING a monster!
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: 'taterblast on October 16, 2013, 08:49:55 PM
Quote
"I feel a lot lighter than last year in losing 30-35 pounds," Gipson said. "It helps and I'm proud of that. I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but if I get the ball, it's either a foul or a point. I don't pay attention to (notoriety), I just get the job done."

  :love:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: ksupamplemousse on October 17, 2013, 12:53:39 AM
Quote
"I feel a lot lighter than last year in losing 30-35 pounds," Gipson said. "It helps and I'm proud of that. I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but if I get the ball, it's either a foul or a point. I don't pay attention to (notoriety), I just get the job done."

  :love:

If his drop in weight results in a marginal increase in quickness, then I could see him being a serviceable defender this year. He showed last year that he can put it in the hoop, now he just needs to not be a liability on the defensive end  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: scottwildcat on October 17, 2013, 08:49:08 AM
Quote
"I feel a lot lighter than last year in losing 30-35 pounds," Gipson said. "It helps and I'm proud of that. I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but if I get the ball, it's either a foul or a point. I don't pay attention to (notoriety), I just get the job done."

  :love:

God I love Gip
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: EuroCat on October 18, 2013, 09:24:14 PM
Saw him in Aggieville last weekend. Looked pretty thin but was still strong enough to fend off the swarm of groupies at Rusty's.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 18, 2013, 11:29:40 PM
Saw him in Aggieville last weekend. Looked pretty thin but was still strong enough to fend off the swarm of groupies at Rusty's.
Did Timhawk ever tell you the story when he mouthed off to him 5 blocks away in Aggieville, bragged about it, and lived to tell the tale? He screamed "rock chalk!" And drove off like a pussy. Sorry to ruin the story for you.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2013, 01:10:55 AM
Saw him in Aggieville last weekend. Looked pretty thin but was still strong enough to fend off the swarm of groupies at Rusty's.
Did Timhawk ever tell you the story when he mouthed off to him 5 blocks away in Aggieville, bragged about it, and lived to tell the tale? He screamed "rock chalk!" And drove off like a pussy. Sorry to ruin the story for you.


This thread just got better.
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2013, 05:19:49 AM
Saw him in Aggieville last weekend. Looked pretty thin but was still strong enough to fend off the swarm of groupies at Rusty's.

saw him and two other players last night.  lots of groupies at the booth.  at one quiet moment gip looks at one of the girls and says really loud "ey, you like black guys?"  everyone in the bar cracked up  :D
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: scottwildcat on October 21, 2013, 08:58:23 AM
Saw him in Aggieville last weekend. Looked pretty thin but was still strong enough to fend off the swarm of groupies at Rusty's.

saw him and two other players last night.  lots of groupies at the booth.  at one quiet moment gip looks at one of the girls and says really loud "ey, you like black guys?"  everyone in the bar cracked up  :D

Gip is the rough ridin' best
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: Trim on October 21, 2013, 09:03:12 AM
https://vine.co/v/hdOJOAYvB9W
Title: Re: T Gipson. Man.
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 21, 2013, 09:47:49 AM
https://vine.co/v/hdOJOAYvB9W

omg. he totally said Gip is two different people :lol: :lol: