goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: Stupid Fitz on January 02, 2013, 12:26:45 PM
-
pfshoooo. Glad that's over and we don't have to worry about it anymore.
-
Yup. In the past, will never happen again. Amazing when the parties work together!
-
democrats save america again
-
So this means my taxes are not going up as I currently make less than 450k correct?
Besides the whole 2% SS thing that is expiring.
-
So this means my taxes are not going up as I currently make less than 450k correct?
Besides the whole 2% SS thing that is expiring.
Yep, you are good. No more worries.
-
I make way more than 400k (and I'm under 40!) so this thing sucks.
-
I make way more than 400k (and I'm under 40!) so this thing sucks.
Would estimate to be more or less rich than Bwebbs?
-
I make way more than 400k (and I'm under 40!) so this thing sucks.
Time to do your part, get with the program, pay more than your fair share. Have your accountants check that box to pay more than you owe. be patriotic. Good god man, have some compassion for the less fortunate!
-
Spending will continue. No significant cuts coming. Same old story
-
I make way more than 400k (and I'm under 40!) so this thing sucks.
t's and p's. Maybe you could just go find a job that pays less. Then you would love this.
-
democrats save america again
LOL. No.
-
democrats save america again
F&CK YEAHHH!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxMInSfanqg&playnext=1&list=PL8B1B870D4C95652C)
-
democrats save america again
LOL. No.
The democrats were against the Bush tax cuts before they were for them.
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailyoftheday.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FOwl0Z.gif&hash=1b474baa5c737d063775977f4dd1f6a187e2aea3)
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailyoftheday.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FOwl0Z.gif&hash=1b474baa5c737d063775977f4dd1f6a187e2aea3)
This ^^ really does capture the essence of his presidency.
-
I do enjoy listening to some libs still complaining about this bill. I mean, how much more of an asskicking/disaster could it have been?
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailyoftheday.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FOwl0Z.gif&hash=1b474baa5c737d063775977f4dd1f6a187e2aea3)
This ^^ really does capture the essence of his presidency.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ddmcdn.com%2Fgif%2Ftemper-tantrums-0.jpg&hash=c9919f6cbd6dd720baad4528829518ba79b08fdc)
This ^^ really does capture the essence of republicans during his presidency.
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailyoftheday.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FOwl0Z.gif&hash=1b474baa5c737d063775977f4dd1f6a187e2aea3)
This ^^ really does capture the essence of his presidency.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ddmcdn.com%2Fgif%2Ftemper-tantrums-0.jpg&hash=c9919f6cbd6dd720baad4528829518ba79b08fdc)
This ^^ really does capture the essence of republicans during his presidency.
You are probably too young to remember, but the Bush years were a joy for lib watching.
-
2000 was the first election i was allowed to vote in.
i voted for nader... i really dispised both parties until obama came around (still do for the most part). just like the guy.
-
I do enjoy listening to some libs still complaining about this bill. I mean, how much more of an asskicking/disaster could it have been?
I get a kick out of the denial (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxMInSfanqg&playnext=1&list=PL8B1B870D4C95652C).
-
I make way more than 400k (and I'm under 40!) so this thing sucks.
you should be buying your yogurt with the honey mixed in. you're costing someone his job, scrooge mcmichigan.
-
The democrats have made George W Bush's legacy of reducing taxes for the working class permanent. . . and they don't even know it.
Pretty soon, when its time to cut spending, they'll realize they negotiated away all leverage for "revenue" and will see their crony special interest bullshit gouged. They're tickled.
This is hilarious.
-
The democrats have made George W Bush's legacy of reducing taxes for the working class permanent. . . and they don't even know it.
Pretty soon, when its time to cut spending, they'll realize they negotiated away all leverage for "revenue" and will see their crony special interest bullshit gouged. They're tickled.
This is hilarious.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.memegenerator.net%2Finstances%2F400x%2F32839407.jpg&hash=99394ee730ddddac31b6acc503d4e8f76f60248a)
-
:lol:
-
"The core thing [the fiscal deal] says about [the Republicans] is that they want to reform entitlements and cut spending, but they can’t actually propose any plans to do these things because it would be politically unpopular. This is a terrible problem for them,"
This is why I would assign blame roughly evenly.
-
This is why I would assign blame roughly evenly.
i agree with this. i also agree with fsd that the 'pubs won this round. the dem's had all the leverage and ended up negotiating a higher definition of rich than they campaigned on, made the bush tax rates permanent for everyone under 400k, got nothing on defense cuts, gave up the payroll cut and couldn't come to any acceptable agreement on entitlement reform.
they'll never have a better bargaining position and they somehow got less than what they just got elected to enact.
-
The mid terms and 2016 will tell us who won.
-
The R's def won over the hard line D's. I mean, they were able to let the bush stuff expire on Obama's watch, then they were able to vote to re-enact them. So, 2 yrs from now, they will say with a straight face that the D's raised taxes, and the R's wouldn't have it and immediately enacted legislation that lowered taxes. In 2 yrs, the avg american won't remember and will have their face politically spun off to the point that the above will be the god's honest and no details will matter.
Put that with the higher def of "rich",the delay on the sequestration of defense spending, and the fact that the dem's have zero political leverage to hold off spending cuts at this point, and this is a clear R win.
-
Yeah but, he isn't negotiating the debt ceiling!!!!!!!!!!!!!
also, can someone tell me what he means by that???
-
Yeah but, he isn't negotiating the debt ceiling!!!!!!!!!!!!!
also, can someone tell me what he means by that???
He said yesterday that he expects congress to provide payment for the bills they have already incurred or agreed to incur. That was the extent of what I heard in his interview. So, he is spinning it so that ppl think that congress ran up the electric bill with a huge xmas tree and kept the thermostat on 85deg during the day while they were away at work and now doesn't want to pay the KCPL(only in DC, lollers) bill.
It is more involved than that, but he is right to an extent. They all need to stop the rough ridin' bitching about the debt ceiling until they actually work out a spending cut/tax bill that addresses what needs to be addressed rather than just agreeing to give themselves more time. I mean, how do you budget until you know what your income will be. The whole process is dumb and is being addressed partially backward s
-
Yeah but, he isn't negotiating the debt ceiling!!!!!!!!!!!!!
also, can someone tell me what he means by that???
He said yesterday that he expects congress to provide payment for the bills they have already incurred or agreed to incur. That was the extent of what I heard in his interview. So, he is spinning it so that ppl think that congress ran up the electric bill with a huge xmas tree and kept the thermostat on 85deg during the day while they were away at work and now doesn't want to pay the KCPL(only in DC, lollers) bill.
It is more involved than that, but he is right to an extent. They all need to stop the rough ridin' bitching about the debt ceiling until they actually work out a spending cut/tax bill that addresses what needs to be addressed rather than just agreeing to give themselves more time. I mean, how do you budget until you know what your income will be. The whole process is dumb and is being addressed partially backward s
Obama thinks budgets are stupid and completely unnecessary.
-
Yeah but, he isn't negotiating the debt ceiling!!!!!!!!!!!!!
also, can someone tell me what he means by that???
He said yesterday that he expects congress to provide payment for the bills they have already incurred or agreed to incur. That was the extent of what I heard in his interview. So, he is spinning it so that ppl think that congress ran up the electric bill with a huge xmas tree and kept the thermostat on 85deg during the day while they were away at work and now doesn't want to pay the KCPL(only in DC, lollers) bill.
It is more involved than that, but he is right to an extent. They all need to stop the rough ridin' bitching about the debt ceiling until they actually work out a spending cut/tax bill that addresses what needs to be addressed rather than just agreeing to give themselves more time. I mean, how do you budget until you know what your income will be. The whole process is dumb and is being addressed partially backward s
Obama thinks budgets are stupid and completely unnecessary.
So the Ways and Means Committee resides in the White House now? You do realize the debt ceiling is probably the most Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) piece of political theater ever created correct?
-
yeah, that's pretty much what I said.