goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on December 27, 2012, 03:52:00 AM
-
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/12/20/178065/caught-between-al-qaida-and-iran.html
Hey uh, maybe we shouldn't have had all those "presidential finding" and executive orders to support the Overthrow of Assad.
But somehow, some way, this administration won't be forced to own it.
-
cricket term
-
globalism has already taken dax's native son.
-
So Obama has the bad guys fighting each other in a grinding guerilla war with no end in sight yet very low chance of US casualties? Pretty smart
-
So Obama has the bad guys fighting each other in a grinding guerilla war with no end in sight yet very low chance of US casualties? Pretty smart
US of A has kicked so much butt in the Middle East over the last 10 years that we got first round bye this week. Whichever bad guy emerges will get about 6 months to rest up before we start ball stomping them into the sand.
-
USA, you guys. :fistpump:
-
Just tugging on the puppet master strings while gas prices sit below $3/gal. Man, I am not sure we have ever been so in control over there.
-
dubya's dad is about to die and Barack is rubbing all this crap in his face.
Such a pimp move.
-
dubya's dad is about to die and Barack is rubbing all this crap in his face.
Such a pimp move.
I watched some crazy documentary(dark legacy) on neflix last night about how H.W. was behind the kennedy assasination. I fell asleep before they got to the part about how H.W. was behind it but it had something to do with the cia.
-
Who controls the Chemical Weapons . . . well uh, we're pretty sure the Syrian Gov't still does . . . we think . . . anyway.
Stinger Anti-Aircraft Missiles . . . we're pretty sure they fell into the "good" rebels hands.
But it all started out so good, we were gonna get rid of Assad (for what reason nobody has been forced to say), now we're going to hand yet another country over to the "bad guys" (that we control).
Perfect.
-
Overthrow a dictator while our enemies bash each other's faces in while we all get free gas? Masterful
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
-
nice red herring from the ultra conservatives. AQ is not a significant force in the opposition. Anyone who even takes a casual observance of this conflict knows that.
Also lulz at FSD. Very low economics and FP IQ.
-
nice red herring from the ultra conservatives. AQ is not a significant force in the opposition. Anyone who even takes a casual observance of this conflict knows that.
Also lulz at FSD. Very low economics and FP IQ.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
You're the bigot clamoring over dead brown women and children. If that's not irrational anger, I don't know what is.
-
People have been killing each other in the ME forever. It is the will of the gods.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
You're the bigot clamoring over dead brown women and children. If that's not irrational anger, I don't know what is.
You are an angry racist. I bet if our president where white you'd be all on board.
Disgusting.
-
What's a sticky wicket?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjasontracewell.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F08%2FWebsite-Sticky_Wicket.jpg&hash=4f233918192c2bb39930fd1f04b8ac8fbb0259c8)
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
You're the bigot clamoring over dead brown women and children. If that's not irrational anger, I don't know what is.
You are an angry racist. I bet if our president where white you'd be all on board.
Disgusting.
Our president is white.
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
You're the bigot clamoring over dead brown women and children. If that's not irrational anger, I don't know what is.
You are an angry racist. I bet if our president where white you'd be all on board.
Disgusting.
Our president is white.
WOW. :opcat:
-
Poll Question:
Which of B.O.'s policies is the worst?
a) foreign
b) economic
I'll let the mongoloids decide whether "worst" means relative to all of his other policies, or ever, in the history of all policies.
Economic, no doubt because we are currently owning the ME.
The ME is an unmitigated disaster right now you racist ignoramus. Just bc you think killing brown people is awesome, doesn't make it good policy.
You mad?
You're the bigot clamoring over dead brown women and children. If that's not irrational anger, I don't know what is.
You are an angry racist. I bet if our president where white you'd be all on board.
Disgusting.
Our president is white.
interesting....your people invented the one drop rule.
And nice work changing my name before. That kind of hard hitting analysis creates the meaningful dialog in the Joe Montgomery Birther Pit.
-
Insert: [global hegemony is bad and blowing up "suspected" terrorists and everyone within 200 yards is a war crime . . . unless the president is a democrat]
I don't know what the "one drop rule" is, but let me get something straight. . .
1) If you call a guy with a white mom and a black dad "white," you're a racist
2) If you call a guy with a white mom and a black dad "black," and drool over killing brown women and children with rockets from 50,000 feet, you're not racist.
Sounds perfectly democrat. No thanks
What a collection of mad, angry and confused goof balls.
-
:opcat:
-
The proper term is mulatto, you racist.
:sdeek:
JFC :facepalm:
-
makes me sad that fsd doesn't realize how badly lsoc wants to be a republican.
-
makes me sad that fsd doesn't realize how badly lsoc wants to be a republican.
As far as I know, all he has to do is sign up. If he can't figure that out, I suggest the democrat party, or, preferably, abstention from the process altogether.
-
makes me sad that fsd doesn't realize how badly lsoc wants to be a republican.
As far as I know, all he has to do is sign up. If he can't figure that out, I suggest the democrat party, or, preferably, abstention from the process altogether.
it's difficult for a smart person to sign up for republican stances on gay marriage, climate change, and gun control, yet these things define the gop. and that's before you get to the tea party.
-
dax, which is the bigger issue? 1. gE liberals don't understand how many people obama kills on a daily basis; or 2. that this board doesn't understand how the conflicts relate to u.s. hegemony
i think these two points overlap sometimes and i get confused as to what you're trying to say
-
makes me sad that fsd doesn't realize how badly lsoc wants to be a republican.
As far as I know, all he has to do is sign up. If he can't figure that out, I suggest the democrat party, or, preferably, abstention from the process altogether.
it's difficult for a smart person to sign up for republican stances on gay marriage, climate change, and gun control, yet these things define the gop. and that's before you get to the tea party.
That's weird, all the really stupid people I know vote solely on those exact issues and abortion.
I would think it would be really hard to be a democrat as well, since they vote exactly the same as Republicans on those issues.
-
makes me sad that fsd doesn't realize how badly lsoc wants to be a republican.
As far as I know, all he has to do is sign up. If he can't figure that out, I suggest the democrat party, or, preferably, abstention from the process altogether.
it's difficult for a smart person to sign up for republican stances on gay marriage, climate change, and gun control, yet these things define the gop. and that's before you get to the tea party.
That's weird, all the really stupid people I know vote solely on those exact issues and abortion.
I would think it would be really hard to be a democrat as well, since they vote exactly the same as Republicans on those issues.
reading these made me think of this... http://rt.com/news/oliver-stone-us-orwellian-022/