goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: HerrSonntag on December 19, 2012, 10:19:55 PM

Title: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: HerrSonntag on December 19, 2012, 10:19:55 PM
Pretty sure not yet luked, but:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2012/12/19/best-college-football-teams-for-the-money-2/

Probably how we can remain all  :kstategrad: 
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Winters on December 19, 2012, 10:58:36 PM
Thanks, LukeSonntag.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Bloodfart on December 19, 2012, 11:13:26 PM
wildcats are so badass.  t's&p's to the all those big fat loser schools which means everyone else.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: AbeFroman on December 20, 2012, 12:22:06 AM
We just take in money, spend little, and still put out a quality brand. We are the American Dream.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 20, 2012, 12:27:27 AM
This is why John Currie will remain at K-State for as long as he wants. Kind of a catch 22.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 20, 2012, 03:11:23 AM
We're in a very bizarre situation in which we have an amazing coach that no one wants (or at least, everyone knows they can't have). Penn State was in the same situation with JoePa. Very great way to not have to give you coaches consistent raises and extentions to keep them around.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: highway61 on December 20, 2012, 07:44:31 AM
Does this count as some kind of ATM style national championship?
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: unleashthemob on December 20, 2012, 08:03:57 AM
Ironic little bro ranks dead last....
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: SEK_EMAW on December 20, 2012, 09:40:58 AM
T's and P's, little bro.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: CNS on December 20, 2012, 10:53:20 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.

Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: unleashthemob on December 20, 2012, 10:56:04 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: MadCat on December 20, 2012, 11:28:58 AM
SLTH all around

:party:
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: SEK_EMAW on December 20, 2012, 11:37:30 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.

Let's hope that LHCBS's only purposes in life right now are 1) winning football and 2) "outlasting" Currie.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: deputy dawg on December 20, 2012, 11:39:19 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come

John Currie, what he means to our dreams:
 (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcandy-lee.com%2Fimages%2Ffreddy-krueger.jpg&hash=b4878c76e3e20e0286316a6463259ec6515df613)
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: BWebbs0 on December 20, 2012, 12:42:46 PM
KSU and Currie are the David Glass and Dayton Moore's of the world who have stumbled upon a gold mine within an oil well. Once HCBS leaves, we are all effed because they won't spend any money and think the results will be guaranteed.

Nice to be on Forbes though, should send a link to any and all recruits.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: scottwildcat on December 20, 2012, 12:50:25 PM
KSU and Currie are the David Glass and Dayton Moore's of the world

 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: CNS on December 20, 2012, 12:54:55 PM
KSU and Currie are the David Glass and Dayton Moore's of the world who have stumbled upon a gold mine within an oil well. Once HCBS leaves, we are all effed because they won't spend any money and think the results will be guaranteed.

Nice to be on Forbes though, should send a link to any and all recruits.

No.  Don't want kids thinking we are cheap.  just send them all a scrap book of our players holding trophies and getting rings and crap.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: steve dave on December 20, 2012, 01:03:42 PM
KSU and Currie are the David Glass and Dayton Moore's of the world

good comparo
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Katpappy on December 20, 2012, 01:29:04 PM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
Our fan base would never allow this.  If we get a sucky coach, we'll fire him along with the admin.; just like when Prince was fired.  Remember, the talking point by the media was that we didn't give Prince a chance.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Katpappy on December 20, 2012, 01:31:16 PM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: GoodForAnother on December 20, 2012, 05:45:20 PM
Currie just made a huge investment with the press box because he knows it will pay off. He will do the same thing with a football coach and spend the money if he knows we will win.

We hired Bryce Wefald or whatever because basketball doesn't make any money and because there wasn't a high level coach available that was worth the investment.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 20, 2012, 07:02:57 PM
I fully believe Currie will bust his ass to make a good football hire, if he gets to.  His resume currently sucks, it reads "raised lots of money for an overdue project, ran off best basketball coach in 30 years, pissed fans off with indefensible hire"
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: CNS on December 20, 2012, 08:04:51 PM
You guys give him to much credit. Wanting to do something and actually doing it are two separate things.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Katpappy on December 20, 2012, 09:07:16 PM
You guys give him to much credit. Wanting to do something and actually doing it are two separate things.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
IMHO, I think this will make or break his career.  I agreed fully with LSOC, because this is his ticket out of here.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: wes mantooth on December 20, 2012, 09:56:14 PM
I'm in the Snyder doesn't trust currie, and will wait him out camp.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: bunter on December 20, 2012, 10:09:38 PM
I'm part of the the hire will be messed up and it's hard to be a cats fan camp  :frown:
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: MakeItRain on December 20, 2012, 11:18:33 PM
Currie just made a huge investment with the press box because he knows it will pay off. He will do the same thing with a football coach and spend the money if he knows we will win.

We hired Bryce Wefald or whatever because basketball doesn't make any money and because there wasn't a high level coach available that was worth the investment.

Basketball does make money and draws donors.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: BWebbs0 on December 21, 2012, 03:44:54 AM
Currie just made a huge investment with the press box because he knows it will pay off. He will do the same thing with a football coach and spend the money if he knows we will win.

We hired Bryce Wefald or whatever because basketball doesn't make any money and because there wasn't a high level coach available that was worth the investment.

Basketball does did make money and draws drew donors.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: 1863 on December 21, 2012, 04:10:14 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.

Funny, since we are historically a Basketball school. But since this is historically is historically the football discussion board and not the basketball one I have to agree.
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Katpappy on December 21, 2012, 07:25:47 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.

Funny, since we are historically a Basketball school. But since this is historically is historically the football discussion board and not the basketball one I have to agree.
:lol: Yea, for many years we didn't give a crap about football... TGFS.  :love:

Thank God For Synder
[/size]

Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: HerrSonntag on December 21, 2012, 10:39:11 AM
Thanks, LukeSonntag.

There's no pleasing some people
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: unleashthemob on December 22, 2012, 08:46:13 AM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.
wasn't the point...
Title: Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
Post by: Katpappy on December 22, 2012, 07:08:19 PM
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.
wasn't the point...
To be truthful, I always thought KSU was a joke during the so called BB days. I guess that was what I hated about not being any good in football and being dominated in BB by KU.   LHCBS gave us legit sport that we could win at, and beat the Squawks most of the time.  This feels good; and if JC doesn't hit a home run, we'll bench him permanently.