goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: steve dave on December 19, 2012, 03:15:03 PM
-
Seems like the natural order of things. The world is an increasingly smaller place. I don't see what the fuss is about.
-
One Love
-
Seems like the natural order of things. The world is an increasingly smaller place. I don't see what the fuss is about.
borders violate civil liberties. I should be able to live/work wherever I want without going through a lottery or marrying someone.
-
Seems like the natural order of things. The world is an increasingly smaller place. I don't see what the fuss is about.
Religion
-
darker skinned people
-
bilderbergs man, JFC
-
Religion
darker skinned people
-
:ohno: Would this be like conference realignment
-
Seems like the natural order of things. The world is an increasingly smaller place. I don't see what the fuss is about.
borders violate civil liberties. I should be able to live/work wherever I want without going through a lottery or marrying someone.
So do property rights.
-
:bait:
-
Don't need to make it easier for third-worlders to crap up good places to live. I've had to live near refugees from places like Nigeria and Libya. Dirty savages who don't know how to live in a civilized community.
-
Would drastically increase the cost of good vacation property in countries that are super shitty other than their beaches and stuff. I vote no.
-
:bait:
Yeah, sd will just sit back and observe.
-
just think of how many great non-cons snyder can schedule, though.
2014 home opener against u of madagascar fighting roaches
-
would it still be acceptable to put ice in stuff?
-
:bait:
Yeah, sd will just sit back and observe.
He's 100 % serious FWIW. I'm guessing the thread gets major play.
-
Would we still be able to purchase cheaply made goods from 3rd world countries? How will those countries keep their workers in horrible conditions if they can just move to a better place?
-
Would we still be able to purchase cheaply made goods from 3rd world countries? How will those countries keep their workers in horrible conditions if they can just move to a better place?
LOL at ppl that make $1 a week being able to move anywhere.
-
Would we still be able to purchase cheaply made goods from 3rd world countries? How will those countries keep their workers in horrible conditions if they can just move to a better place?
LOL at ppl that make $1 a week being able to move anywhere.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fasttrackteaching.com%2Fburns%2FUnit_9_1930s%2FMigrant_Ok_to_Ca_1937_pea_pickers_dbloc_sized.gif&hash=c0c227dc5ee80bdb487911ce272eb1ab85eb8f27)
If okies can figure it out anyone can
-
Would we still be able to purchase cheaply made goods from 3rd world countries? How will those countries keep their workers in horrible conditions if they can just move to a better place?
LOL at ppl that make $1 a week being able to move anywhere.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fasttrackteaching.com%2Fburns%2FUnit_9_1930s%2FMigrant_Ok_to_Ca_1937_pea_pickers_dbloc_sized.gif&hash=c0c227dc5ee80bdb487911ce272eb1ab85eb8f27)
If okies can figure it out anyone can
Yeah, but three of those four ppl died and that was before the Builderberg Group wanted to keep them down.
-
borders violate civil liberties. I should be able to live/work wherever I want without going through a lottery or marrying someone.
amen.
-
Seems like the natural order of things. The world is an increasingly smaller place. I don't see what the fuss is about.
borders violate civil liberties. I should be able to live/work wherever I want without going through a lottery or marrying someone.
So do property rights.
yeah, especially the way the Europeans obtained it in the US. Pretty disgusting, really.
-
:bait:
Yeah, sd will just sit back and observe.
He's 100 % serious FWIW. I'm guessing the thread gets major play.
Yes, I am absolutely serious
-
We are already there, take the blinders off sheeple!
-
We are already there, take the blinders off sheeple!
Exactly! We already have a Kenyan as president.
-
would it be a federalism? it would have to be, right?
where would the capitol be?
-
What if the One World Government said you couldn't have Smart Phones, Flat Panel TV's, Ipad's. . . oh, and no private real estate ownership of any kind, and only one brand of really, really bad beer??
What if all able bodied people had to either perform hard labor on a farm or a factory, and the only clothes you could have were issued by the One World Government?
-
What if the US were a state and the whole world was a United States? Which country would be the new kansas? What about the new Arkansas?
-
What if the One World Government said you couldn't have Smart Phones, Flat Panel TV's, Ipad's. . . oh, and no private real estate ownership of any kind, and only one brand of really, really bad beer??
What if all able bodied people had to either perform hard labor on a farm or a factory, and the only clothes you could have were issued by the One World Government?
is that what it would be like?
stupid idea, then, Steve Dave.
-
A special section of the forced labor camp for former Insurance Company Employees with Economics degrees . . . working the slaughter house.
-
yeah, that sounds like it really sucks.
-
A special section of the forced labor camp for former Insurance Company Employees with Economics degrees . . . working the slaughter house.
Lol dax gonna dax
-
What if the One World Government said you couldn't have Smart Phones, Flat Panel TV's, Ipad's. . . oh, and no private real estate ownership of any kind, and only one brand of really, really bad beer??
What if all able bodied people had to either perform hard labor on a farm or a factory, and the only clothes you could have were issued by the One World Government?
is that what it would be like?
stupid idea, then, Steve Dave.
man, I didn't plan on that. really took a bad turn there somewhere. BACK TO THE USA! YOU TOO TEXAS! GETOVERHERE!
-
What if the One World Government said you couldn't have Smart Phones, Flat Panel TV's, Ipad's. . . oh, and no private real estate ownership of any kind, and only one brand of really, really bad beer??
What if all able bodied people had to either perform hard labor on a farm or a factory, and the only clothes you could have were issued by the One World Government?
dax, what if your current government said that? :surprised:
-
If you aren't a 1% person, then a one world economy and government isn't a bad idea, if it's a representative democracy. The uber rich are the source of all of the world's problems. They must be overthrown every now and then, like in Le Mis (COMING TO A THEATER NEAR YOU!).
P.S. I really do believe the uber rich are the problem.
-
I think that it is generally because history has shown that a consolidation of power into just a few hands is almost always a bad thing. A one world government would be the epitome of that.
-
I think that it is generally because history has shown that a consolidation of power into just a few hands is almost always a bad thing. A one world government would be the epitome of that.
where has history shown that? if anything, history has shown that as the world has become smaller via transportation and communication the government can become less spread out.
-
man, I didn't plan on that. really took a bad turn there somewhere. BACK TO THE USA! YOU TOO TEXAS! GETOVERHERE!
Only if you let us annex Colorado (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthe-mainboard.com%2Fstyles%2Fdefault%2Fxenforo%2Fsmilies%2Fcrossedarms.gif&hash=9849fd091c204f9149d7923deb155e33773b033b)
-
What if the One World Government said you couldn't have Smart Phones, Flat Panel TV's, Ipad's. . . oh, and no private real estate ownership of any kind, and only one brand of really, really bad beer??
What if all able bodied people had to either perform hard labor on a farm or a factory, and the only clothes you could have were issued by the One World Government?
it's a brave new world, dax. no one can control me until i'm rough ridin' comfortable as all get out.
-
I think that it is generally because history has shown that a consolidation of power into just a few hands is almost always a bad thing. A one world government would be the epitome of that.
the government would be based on democratic and republican philosophies and stuff. who does the president of the world need to oppress? he's president of the world for crying out loud!
-
Tell me how my life as a really good looking rich guy change? I need this info to decide, because we really already exploit cheap labor and resources from the globe (which is good).
-
Tell me how my life as a really good looking rich guy change? I need this info to decide, because we really already exploit cheap labor and resources from the globe (which is good).
you don't have to change dollars to pounds or euros or stand in passport lines
-
Tell me how my life as a really good looking rich guy change? I need this info to decide, because we really already exploit cheap labor and resources from the globe (which is good).
you don't have to change dollars to pounds or euros or stand in passport lines
Do I need even need to remember where my passport is when I'm going to st. Martin?
-
Tell me how my life as a really good looking rich guy change? I need this info to decide, because we really already exploit cheap labor and resources from the globe (which is good).
you don't have to change dollars to pounds or euros or stand in passport lines
Do I need even need to remember where my passport is when I'm going to st. Martin?
not if you have global entry
-
Would I be able to legally bet on sports through the net?
-
Would I be able to legally bet on sports through the net?
oh yeah
-
I'm for it. It would be so much easier for me to go off the grid.
-
There wouldn't be any more rich. The world would live a spartan life and be happy just getting by because everybody would be poor. Utopia.
-
seems to me like this would be tea party heaven. they all scream about less government, but what is less than getting rid of all governments except 1?!?!?!?!
-
I think that it is generally because history has shown that a consolidation of power into just a few hands is almost always a bad thing. A one world government would be the epitome of that.
where has history shown that? if anything, history has shown that as the world has become smaller via transportation and communication the government can become less spread out.
hmmm... the Soviet Union??? But , i guess killing a dozen or so million citizens (Ukraine) isn't a big deal. You just confirmed how ignorant you really are.
-
This is a designed plan to take over. Bilderberg Group. That is the global government you will live in. A totalitarian police state.
-
seems to me like this would be tea party heaven. they all scream about less government, but what is less than getting rid of all governments except 1?!?!?!?!
one incredibly large government with a constituency that is very jealous of anyone making more than $10 a day.
-
where would the capitol be?
paris.
-
where would the capitol be?
paris.
Excellent choice. Beautiful city.
-
where would the capitol be?
paris.
Close. Rome.
-
yeah eff this. I don't want to be governed by people in Europe, Asia, Africa, or Washington DC for that matter
That's not to say globalization is bad, but global governance is dumb
-
Close. Rome.
great city, but doesn't have the infrastructure to accommodate the global govt.
-
There will be a lot of international butthurt over where the capital goes. The Brits will be so jealous.
-
If anything I say we go the other way. More decentralization. City-States.
-
If anything I say we go the other way. More decentralization. City-States.
Yes!
-
Not a big fan of the idea because I believe most decisions should be made on a local level(#10).
Just think about the us of a. We are all americans but people in the texas have different priorities than people in new york. If you have a world government there would be riots all over the place...
New japanese president? Riots in china.
New saudia arabian president? Riots in iran(and probably europe and the south just because he is muslim).
New american president? Riots everywere because those dam americans run everything.
In summary it wouldn't work because if a government wishes to succeed it must unite all of its people under a common banner.
-
Everyone for themselves. Anarchy.
-
If anything I say we go the other way. More decentralization. City-States.
Yes!
-
Everyone for themselves. Anarchy.
I doubt it is possible for Anarchy to exist outside of a temporary situation between governments.
I hate to sound like a broken record, but the American model, if implemented world wide, would be the best bet.
Sovereign nations voluntarily entered into a union of smaller regional governments, with smaller areas inside of them, with the scope of government power inverse to the size of the area/ population it covers. Free-trade, no alliances, only defensive war, no standing armies, the bill of rights, the whole gambit. If the globe would adopt this idea you would basically peace. Nations wouldn't be guaranteed prosperity, but each, and the people living in them would have the freedom to take care of themselves.
In reality there will always be thirsts for power and nations using aggression and isolationism against others or their own citizens.
-
maybe here? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Monetary_Fund)...
or, here? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank)...
say it ain't so?!? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System)
-
So nobody has any legitimate negatives?
-
So nobody has any legitimate negatives?
Impractical. We can't even agree on accounting standards with European countries.
I mean, there aren't "negatives" other than humans hate each other and can't get along. Think about pushing through a highway bill but Uganda is holding it up.
-
So nobody has any legitimate negatives?
Impractical. We can't even agree on accounting standards with European countries.
I mean, there aren't "negatives" other than humans hate each other and can't get along. Think about pushing through a highway bill but Uganda is holding it up.
yeah, it will take some time, I don't think it's practical to just start today or anything like that. I'm just curious why there is always outrage about the idea of it every time we take another step towards it.
-
I bet we get there sooner than later
-
I bet we get there sooner than later
I don't think we will in our lifetimes but I bet we see global currency in some form. paper/metal money is on the way out which was one of the barriers. there will be weird outlier countries that don't participate of course.
-
The problem with one government is how would we have wars? You can't fight other countries if there aren't other countries.
-
The problem with one government is how would we have wars? You can't fight other countries if there aren't other countries.
yeah, we should just not do them. hopefully aliens come and unite us all in a fight against them but they are super pud and we win like it's no big whoop and then we realize everyone is a war mongering dipshit and we should just knock that stuff off.
-
The problem with one government is how would we have wars? You can't fight other countries if there aren't other countries.
yeah, we should just not do them. hopefully aliens come and unite us all in a fight against them but they are super pud and we win like it's no big whoop and then we realize everyone is a war mongering dipshit and we should just knock that stuff off.
Why can't we just get along with the aliens?
-
The problem with one government is how would we have wars? You can't fight other countries if there aren't other countries.
yeah, we should just not do them. hopefully aliens come and unite us all in a fight against them but they are super pud and we win like it's no big whoop and then we realize everyone is a war mongering dipshit and we should just knock that stuff off.
Why can't we just get along with the aliens?
The Native Americans tried that strategy. It didn't work out so well for them.
-
The problem with one government is how would we have wars? You can't fight other countries if there aren't other countries.
yeah, we should just not do them. hopefully aliens come and unite us all in a fight against them but they are super pud and we win like it's no big whoop and then we realize everyone is a war mongering dipshit and we should just knock that stuff off.
Why can't we just get along with the aliens?
you can't reason with those war mongering gun freaks
-
I believe all aliens to be like E.T. Just here for the Reeses Pieces.
-
Somebody explain to me how you would handle Horton, KS.
-
Somebody explain to me how you would handle Horton, KS.
Take their guns away.
-
apparently we're all dying tomorrow, so none of this conversation matters.
-
If there were a one world gov, would I win Time POTY then?
-
If there were a one world gov, would I win Time POTY then?
You got my vote.
-
If there were a one world gov, would I win Time POTY then?
You got my vote.
can't look past the weak bench press #'s
-
If there were a one world gov, would I win Time POTY then?
You got my vote.
can't look past the weak bench press #'s
Bulletin board material right there. Will print off and keep in my gym bag
-
we're all in your corner limestone (if you get the #'s up)
-
I say we try this out on the moon colony and see how it goes there first.
-
Is this being confused with "a New World Order" Because I've always understood that as a completely different thing.
I would be fine with a one world government, if it was limited to protecting your rights from being trampled on by others and not protecting you from yourself. Not to mention protecting the government from trampling on your rights.
-
Is this being confused with "a New World Order" Because I've always understood that as a completely different thing.
I would be fine with a one world government, if it was limited to protecting your rights from being trampled on by others and not protecting you from yourself. Not to mention protecting the government from trampling on your rights.
"new world order" is a weirdo conspiracy theory thing that doesn't exist. I'm talking about globalization.
-
Then I say who cares.
-
Weirdo Conspiracy? :lol:
-
Weirdo Conspiracy? :lol:
yes, confirmed
-
racists/bigots
-
I think that it is generally because history has shown that a consolidation of power into just a few hands is almost always a bad thing. A one world government would be the epitome of that.
where has history shown that? if anything, history has shown that as the world has become smaller via transportation and communication the government can become less spread out.
hmmm... the Soviet Union??? But , i guess killing a dozen or so million citizens (Ukraine) isn't a big deal. You just confirmed how ignorant you really are.
What about the Union of American States? It's the same population. What bad things happened with that? Are our historical mistakes (slavery, Native American mistreatment) due to federalism and consolidated government of states?
Or how about the European Union? It's even more populous and almost as diverse as the USSR. What's bad about that? Serious question. Seems like a bunch of folks have actually wanted to be in the EU.
Was the Indian Partition a good thing, then? A million died at the time. Why?
What about when Italy was unified in 1861? Problematic?
I'm not sure "history has shown" anything of the sort being asserted here...
-
all our wealth (or whats left of it) would be redistributed to those losers in Europe. Anyone think Germany enjoys bailing out Greece all the time?
-
Anyone think Germany enjoys bailing out Greece all the time?
a) they aren't bailing out greece, they're bailing out the european (french/german) banks that loaned greece money, b) think greece enjoys exporting their consumer and industrial demand to the benefit of german factories all the time?
-
Anyone think Germany enjoys bailing out Greece all the time?
a) they aren't bailing out greece, they're bailing out the european (french/german) banks that loaned greece money, b) think greece enjoys exporting their consumer and industrial demand to the benefit of german factories all the time?
thanks for proving my point. Getting imvolved in things we'd rather not get involved in cause theyre a huge mess
-
Whoever mentioned something about aliens is right. That's what it would take to unify humanity. Not necessarily aliens invading Earth and attacking humans, just their existence - especially if some galactic alien government with tons of different species is in place. If you've played the Mass Effect video games, there would need to be something like that for humans to band together as a species rather than individual countries. Even then, there would still be a few generations of squabbling and fighting among humans before unifying under one flag.
-
Lol no. Missles nukes etc. Boom bang flash. Winner take all
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
-
Was it a bad thing when Charlemagne united western Europe and they had the Carolingian Renaissance?
Would people be better off if we had simply allowed the Confederate States of America to splinter off? Which people? Everyone?
Has China sufferred for being a forced union of diverse peoples for millennia? Maybe. Maybe not.
-
I think the Romans did a pretty good job of ruling the world.
-
I think the Romans did a pretty good job of ruling the world.
whatever, if there is one thing we can all agree on it's that the world was much better off after the fall of their empire
-
I think the Romans did a pretty good job of ruling the world.
whatever, if there is one thing we can all agree on it's that the world was much better off after the fall of their empire
They built aqueducts throughout the empire. And arches. How can you hate on anyone who invented arches? I think the only negative I can think of is that whole Jesus "incident".
-
I think the Romans did a pretty good job of ruling the world.
whatever, if there is one thing we can all agree on it's that the world was much better off after the fall of their empire
Why was it better? Was it better because people could establish their own rulers/government?
-
I was cracking wise on the dark ages dipshits
-
Well, the president would always be Chinese. Not necessarily a negative, but something to consider.
I would rather see it like European soccer, with a super elite group of former countries that you have to play your way into/can be kicked out of.
Of course, I also think we should run goEMAW this way, demoting posters who had a bad run to ksf until they play their way back up.
-
I was cracking wise on the dark ages dipshits
At what point? You said TOTALLY SERIOUS. Are you not to be trusted?!! :runaway:
-
Well, the president would always be Chinese. Not necessarily a negative, but something to consider.
I would rather see it like European soccer, with a super elite group of former countries that you have to play your way into/can be kicked out of.
Of course, I also think we should run goEMAW this way, demoting posters who had a bad run to ksf until they play their way back up.
I don't think we should be making assumptions about what the makeup of the global govt. would be. I think everything is on the table.
-
I was cracking wise on the dark ages dipshits
At what point? You said TOTALLY SERIOUS. Are you not to be trusted?!! :runaway:
dobber, go sit in the corner
-
I was cracking wise on the dark ages dipshits
At what point? You said TOTALLY SERIOUS. Are you not to be trusted?!! :runaway:
dobber, go sit in the corner
Dobber, that's a week on ksf for you, buddy. Be better.
-
I was cracking wise on the dark ages dipshits
At what point? You said TOTALLY SERIOUS. Are you not to be trusted?!! :runaway:
dobber, go sit in the corner
Okay. I should probably try to follow along better before I just type whatever thought enters my head. That would drastically improve my bbs style. :dobbersettingincorner:
-
Well, the president would always be Chinese. Not necessarily a negative, but something to consider.
I would rather see it like European soccer, with a super elite group of former countries that you have to play your way into/can be kicked out of.
Of course, I also think we should run goEMAW this way, demoting posters who had a bad run to ksf until they play their way back up.
I don't think we should be making assumptions about what the makeup of the global govt. would be. I think everything is on the table.
Are we talking popular vote? If we had two rounds and the option to select ranked choices, I think we could avoid some basic problems.
Also, Netflix and ESPN3 everywhere!
-
I'd put a Bush in charge of making sure we always won world President.
-
Obama would win in a landslide with or without help from a Bush. Only weird Americans hate him, lol.
-
the ottomans did a bang up job.
-
Are we talking popular vote? If we had two rounds and the option to select ranked choices, I think we could avoid some basic problems.
no, fight wars for control of the global presidency. the winning country (or team of rich people) gets to pick the president by any means they choose.
-
Have you seen how corrupt foreign governments are? Makes our look like an ethics foundation.
-
Have you seen how corrupt foreign governments are? Makes our look like an ethics foundation.
So how does this help Obama and the Bilderburgs? I mean, corrupt foreign governments taking our loot screws both of them right in the face.