goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:24:09 PM

Title: So Allen Chapman...
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:24:09 PM
What's the verdict, did he have a good game or not?  On one hand he had three picks and a TD, but if Gundy just kept calling slants for Charlie Moore he would have had 400 yards receiving.  Is this the worst performance for a Big 12 POW ever?
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: stunted on November 04, 2012, 10:24:55 PM
 :curse:
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: kim carnes on November 04, 2012, 10:26:34 PM
good game imo
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:28:46 PM
How differently would we see it if he hadn't stole Ty's INT?
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:35:51 PM
:curse:

my bad, MODS!!!!!! Do work.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: Bookcat on November 04, 2012, 10:43:09 PM
Bend Don't Break
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: Ira Hayes on November 04, 2012, 10:49:25 PM
What's the verdict, did he have a good game or not?  On one hand he had three picks and a TD, but if Gundy just kept calling slants for Charlie Moore he would have had 400 yards receiving.  Is this the worst performance for a Big 12 POW ever?

Snyder acknowledged your point around 3:15 in the postgame: http://www.kstatesports.com/allaccess/?media=348788

Something about pickles.

Doubt Chapman was spending a lot of time celebrating his POW when they watched the film today.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: nicname on November 04, 2012, 10:51:39 PM
Turnovers are pretty important.  So are touchdowns.  A lot more important than yards. Chapman def. blows coverage and/ or gets beat more than we would like, but at least yesterday, those picks  :love:.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2012, 11:08:27 PM
Any game with more than 1 INT is a pretty good game, imo.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: AbeFroman on November 05, 2012, 01:33:54 AM
For the sheer impact of what the turnovers did (gave us 6 pts, end zone pick) I'd say good game. But yes he got burned a lot.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2012, 06:08:46 AM
It looked like the fighting perpetual peeking into the backfield with a goofy eye Tibesar's out there . . . a lot.

Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: mocat on November 05, 2012, 07:22:59 AM
I mean, did Rocky "win" the fight against Apollo? No, but he went the distance.
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 05, 2012, 07:47:12 AM
he has really good hands
Title: Re: So Alan Chapman...
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 08:01:41 AM
You have to take the good with the bad. Chapman made some excellent plays, but after the first INT he seemed overly interested at times in making plays over fitting into the scheme, which leads to mistake in coverage.

To be fair, OSU's passing attack is one of the more complex ones we see and puts more of a bind on the secondary than most other offenses, especially with the threat that Randle is running the ball.
Title: Re: So Allen Chapman...
Post by: Winters on November 05, 2012, 09:34:25 AM
OT: Brent Musburger just loves himself some Allen Chapman
Title: Re: So Allen Chapman...
Post by: Skipper44 on November 05, 2012, 10:32:05 AM
OT: Brent Musburger just loves himself some Allen Chapman
Did he ever call him Bubba?
Title: Re: So Allen Chapman...
Post by: ChiComCat on November 05, 2012, 10:43:39 AM
3 Picks and a TD is far more than he gave up and you're kidding yourself if you say otherwise.  Was definitely a good game but, considering the 3 picks/TD, far from a perfect game.

I also think he might be catching some blame for Zimms worst game this year.