goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: nicname on September 18, 2012, 10:44:47 PM
-
sorry if luked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQu2SVFF-cU&feature=share
I can't imagine ow long it took to make this.
-
I love it.
Love Michelle.
So much swagger.
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Try :emawkid:
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
50% of our citizens are not self sufficient? Liberals rejoice. That's a voting base you can always rely on.
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Holy crap, you killed it there. Operation dominate
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Holy crap, you killed it there. Operation dominate
Is it the government's responsibility to feed you, LSOC?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
50% of our citizens are not self sufficient? Liberals rejoice. That's a voting base you can always rely on.
Yeah, those rough ridin' free-loading veterans and those rough ridin' free-loading Social Security users and those rough ridin' college students accepting subsidized student loans made readily available to them. Bunch of rough ridin' free-loading liberals.
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Holy crap, you killed it there. Operation dominate
Is it the government's responsibility to feed you, LSOC?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
No. Let them eat cake.
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Holy crap, you killed it there. Operation dominate
Is it the government's responsibility to feed you, LSOC?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
It's not really a responsibility, but do you really want working Americans and their children to go without food? I do think that food stamp benefits extend way beyond what is really necessary for a person to live on, judging by the obesity rate of the poor. I think that we should limit food stamps to produce, meats, and spices, basically everything on the outside of the grocery store.
-
What a knockout blow in response to Romney saying half our country isn't entitled to eat.
Roasted
:flush: or :facepalm: which one do I use here?
Holy crap, you killed it there. Operation dominate
Is it the government's responsibility to feed you, LSOC?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
It's not really a responsibility, but do you really want working Americans and their children to go without food? I do think that food stamp benefits extend way beyond what is really necessary for a person to live on, judging by the obesity rate of the poor. I think that we should limit food stamps to produce, meats, and spices, basically everything on the outside of the grocery store.
No, but it should be a safety net to catch people when they fall on hard times, not an option when people have to make a decision.
Totally agree with the food stamps though.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
-
It is the government's responsibility to feed people who would otherwise starve.
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
-
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
Yes, for freedom.
-
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
Yes, for freedom.
Same question but for Grenada
-
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
Yes, for freedom.
Same question but for Grenada
Yes, for defense contractor growth. And freedom.
-
The gov sure has the responsibility to kill a ton of people...good thing they don't have the responsibility to feed their citizens. Might get in the way of smoking fools who they hate.
-
I'm not sure how defense spending came from foodstamps, but welp, that's goEMAW.
-
I'm not sure how defense spending came from foodstamps, but welp, that's goEMAW.
You seriously can't follow the above? :sdeek:
-
I'm not sure how defense spending came from foodstamps, but welp, that's goEMAW.
You seriously can't follow the above? :sdeek:
It is the government's responsibility to feed people who would otherwise starve.
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
I mean I guess.
-
I'm not sure how defense spending came from foodstamps, but welp, that's goEMAW.
You seriously can't follow the above? :sdeek:
It is the government's responsibility to feed people who would otherwise starve.
Is it the government's resonsibility to bomb people in Pakistan?
I mean I guess.
Good. I was going to think you were pretty bad at logic.
-
Let me break it down:
We waste a crap load of money killing people in other countries
We could be spending that money feeding hungry people in our own country
Some people think that makes sense and is good.
In reality, that is rough ridin' crazy and evil.
-
Let me break it down:
We waste a crap load of money killing people in other countries
We could be spending that money feeding hungry people in our own country
Some people think that makes sense and is good.
In reality, that is rough ridin' crazy and evil.
And I've never disagreed with that. I'm saying that we need more efficient ways to feed the people in our own country. Get people back on their feet as opposed to keeping them above water.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
-
lol, politics
-
So you totally agree that it is government's job to feed hungry people. Cool.
/thread
-
Jesus Christ.
-
I didn't mean that as a personal attack on you 'Meister. I meant that, in response to "is it the governments responsibility to feed you?", the answer, for as long as we have enough money to go killing people around the world, is absofuckinglutely yes.
-
Even if you are not receiving food stamps, the government spends a shitload of money subsidizing farms to keep the cost of food low.
-
I didn't mean that as a personal attack on you 'Meister. I meant that, in response to "is it the governments responsibility to feed you?", the answer, for as long as we have enough money to go killing people around the world, is absofuckinglutely yes.
No I understand and I agree. I'm just saying that simply feeding these people is not enough. Get them to a level of self sustainability and then we dont have to feed them.
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
-
I didn't mean that as a personal attack on you 'Meister. I meant that, in response to "is it the governments responsibility to feed you?", the answer, for as long as we have enough money to go killing people around the world, is absofuckinglutely yes.
No I understand and I agree. I'm just saying that simply feeding these people is not enough. Get them to a level of self sustainability and then we dont have to feed them.
Yeah.
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
Mitt refused his inheritance after his dad made him rich, so really he's gotten to where he is purely on his own merit and he's never been given anything.
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
Mitt refused his inheritance after his dad made him rich, so really he's gotten to where he is purely on his own merit and he's never been given anything.
Huh?
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
Mitt refused his inheritance after his dad made him rich, so really he's gotten to where he is purely on his own merit and he's never been given anything.
Huh?
Can you imagine working every day, taking a couple of jobs, saving your money so that your brother could go to—I mean, I would never do that for my brother—that he could go to co…so he went to college, and got a degree at the General Motors Institute of Technology, which is one of these programs where you work a semester, and then you go to school a semester and…and then after it was over he started a little company, he became more successful, and he was able to hire his brothers and his brother-in-law, and provide for them in an extraordinary way. By the way, both my dad and Ann's dad did quite well in their life, but when they came to the end of their lives, and, and passed along inheritances to Ann and to me, we both decided to give it all away. So, I had inherited nothing. Everything that Ann and I have we earned the old-fashioned way, and that's by hard work
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/full-transcript-mitt-romney-secret-video (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/full-transcript-mitt-romney-secret-video)
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
Mitt refused his inheritance after his dad made him rich, so really he's gotten to where he is purely on his own merit and he's never been given anything.
Huh?
His entire inheritance was donated to charity. He still had an advantage in life, but his success wasn't a gift.
-
what if we give them a gun and let them go kill people around the world? 2 birds one bullet?
We do do that.
This started on Mitt being a dumb ass who was born on third and truly thinks he hit a triple saying that eating is not a right,
Mitt refused his inheritance after his dad made him rich, so really he's gotten to where he is purely on his own merit and he's never been given anything.
Huh?
His entire inheritance was donated to charity. He still had an advantage in life, but his success wasn't a gift.
Yeah, it's commendable that Mitt donated his inheritance, but his advantage was huge, and for him to downplay and not even acknowledge that is pretty laughable.
-
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />His entire inheritance was donated to charity. He still had an advantage in life, but his success wasn't a gift.<br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />Yeah, it's commendable that Mitt donated his inheritance, but his advantage was huge, and for him to downplay and not even acknowledge that is pretty laughable.
Yeah it absolutely is. But someone who donated their entire inheritance to charity probably doesn't believe that poor people don't deserve to eat.
-
His parents bought his house, car, paid for his school. All of it.
-
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />His entire inheritance was donated to charity. He still had an advantage in life, but his success wasn't a gift.<br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />Yeah, it's commendable that Mitt donated his inheritance, but his advantage was huge, and for him to downplay and not even acknowledge that is pretty laughable.
Yeah it absolutely is. But someone who donated their entire inheritance to charity probably doesn't believe that poor people don't deserve to eat.
There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. And I mean, the president starts off with 48, 49, 48—he starts off with a huge number.
He seems to be saying that poor people are not entitled to food here.
-
Yeah.
-
His parents bought his house, car, paid for his school. All of it.
Oh well in that case any success he had in business should obviously be discredited.
-
His parents bought his house, car, paid for his school. All of it.
Oh well in that case any success he had in business should obviously be discredited.
Not at all. But it just makes his opinion that Americans who can't afford to eat should starve look wrong.
-
and about twice as much as China, not 10 times as much like it's reported. And we have responsibility for the whole world. They're only focused on one little area of the world, the South China Sea, the East China Sea, that's it. And they're building a military at a rapid rate. So this idea that somehow we've already spent so much money in the military—it's like, guys, don't overthink how strong we are. We—you probably know it, this was a couple of years ago, but we had one of our aircraft carriers sailing by Japan, and the Chinese pulled up behind it in a diesel sub, in a super-quiet diesel sub, pulled up behind it. It could have been torpedoed. And, I mean, we're in that kind of—our Navy's smaller in number of ships than anytime since 1917, and this president wants to shrink it. The list goes on. Our Air Force is older and smaller than anytime since '47 when the Air Force was formed, and he wants to shrink it. If we go the way of Europe, which is spending 1 to 2 percent of their economy on the military, we will not be able to have freedom in the world.
Apparently, the whole world is entitled to protection from our military, and we just can't cut funding, because Christ, guys, China could have torpedoed one of our ships with a shitty super-quiet diesel sub.
-
So you totally agree that it is government's job to feed hungry people. Cool.
/thread
I think you should clarify hungry a little bit better. I am hungry right now, should I expect the government to come feed me?
-
So you totally agree that it is government's job to feed hungry people. Cool.
/thread
I think you should clarify hungry a little bit better. I am hungry right now, should I expect the government to come feed me?
No, because Mitt Romney doesn't think you're worthy of food. Duh.
-
So you totally agree that it is government's job to feed hungry people. Cool.
/thread
I think you should clarify hungry a little bit better. I am hungry right now, should I expect the government to come feed me?
They will if you just wait long enough.
-
So you totally agree that it is government's job to feed hungry people. Cool.
/thread
I think you should clarify hungry a little bit better. I am hungry right now, should I expect the government to come feed me?
No, but you should expect gov to educate you so you are better at making a point that isn't moronic.
-
Even if you are not receiving food stamps, the government spends a shitload of money subsidizing farms to keep the cost of food low.
This is not necessarily true. Review what the Farm Bill all funds. Additionally, farm subsidies don't really lower the costs of food any significant amount, even if you are at the poverty level.
-
What if the gun we gave them actually shot out chic-fil-a sandwiches?
-
What if the gun we gave them actually shot out chic-fil-a sandwiches?
Then they'd all become bigots who hate gays and vote republican.
-
Even if you are not receiving food stamps, the government spends a shitload of money subsidizing farms to keep the cost of food low.
This is not necessarily true. Review what the Farm Bill all funds. Additionally, farm subsidies don't really lower the costs of food any significant amount, even if you are at the poverty level.
The government spends billions subsidizing corn production, which leads to greatly increased production, giving us the cheapest food in the world, by far.