goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: kstatefreak42 on August 02, 2012, 11:50:59 AM
-
Take f*cking notes people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Bn1o2p9VBiw#!
-
Love his foreign policy.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
Oh okay. What exactly turns you off about his economic policy? jw
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yep.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
Oh okay. What exactly turns you off about his economic policy? jw
the part about pegging the currency to something that is pulled from the ground bothers me.
-
His belief that if Iran developes a nuclear weapon they wouldn't use it is dangerous. Even if they didn't use it, they would give it to someone that would.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
Oh okay. What exactly turns you off about his economic policy? jw
the part about pegging the currency to something that is pulled from the ground bothers me.
Yeah, I tune out when he starts bringing up the gold standard and the Fed.
-
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
I agree with you, Nuts Kicked.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
Oh okay. What exactly turns you off about his economic policy? jw
the part about pegging the currency to something that is pulled from the ground bothers me.
Yeah, I tune out when he starts bringing up the gold standard and the Fed.
The Fed is destroying our economy. They have destroyed 99% of the dollar since 1913. They need to be fully audited and the corrupted people need to go to prison. Gold standard is iffy for me.. I really dont know about that. I just think the fed needs to be under control. The fed could work i think if they had to answer to congress or some body of UNITED STATES government. Some regulation to the fed would be nice.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
:thumbs:
His belief that if Iran developes a nuclear weapon they wouldn't use it is dangerous. Even if they didn't use it, they would give it to someone that would.
is there any evidence of this at all? You realize Ahmedinjad (sp) is misquoted by western media to make it seem like he wants to destroy people?
-
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
I agree with you, Nuts Kicked.
i understand this, but from a Austrian economic POV the short term crash, or correction, from RP's economic policy is bound to happen anyway. You may disagree, but he's been right before.
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
Sarcasm? It usually is the opposite. People like the economic standpoint he has and think his foreign policy is just absolute insanity.. lol. Good to hear you guys dont enjoy policing the world.
I like his foreign and social policies, which normally I would say are the most important characteristics of a presidential candidate. I think his economic policy is way too extreme, though, to the point where he would be difficult for me to vote for.
Oh okay. What exactly turns you off about his economic policy? jw
the part about pegging the currency to something that is pulled from the ground bothers me.
Yeah, I tune out when he starts bringing up the gold standard and the Fed.
The Fed is destroying our economy. They have destroyed 99% of the dollar since 1913. They need to be fully audited and the corrupted people need to go to prison. Gold standard is iffy for me.. I really dont know about that. I just think the fed needs to be under control. The fed could work i think if they had to answer to congress or some body of UNITED STATES government. Some regulation to the fed would be nice.
kstate42 and government regulation sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
:thumbs:
His belief that if Iran developes a nuclear weapon they wouldn't use it is dangerous. Even if they didn't use it, they would give it to someone that would.
is there any evidence of this at all? You realize Ahmedinjad (sp) is misquoted by western media to make it seem like he wants to destroy people?
So you are saying that Iran does not supply weapons to Hezbollah, which in turn, fires missiles into Israel?
-
Iranians flooded across the Iraq border to kill Americans so yeah, they'd give it to some one else who would.
-
Iranians flooded across the Iraq border to kill Americans so yeah, they'd give it to some one else who would.
We would flood across the border to kill the crap out of whoever was attacking Canada or Mexico unprovoked.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
-
Love his foreign policy.
Yes, it's probably what I like most about him.
:thumbs:
His belief that if Iran developes a nuclear weapon they wouldn't use it is dangerous. Even if they didn't use it, they would give it to someone that would.
is there any evidence of this at all? You realize Ahmedinjad (sp) is misquoted by western media to make it seem like he wants to destroy people?
So you are saying that Iran does not supply weapons to Hezbollah, which in turn, fires missiles into Israel?
maybe, but we're talking nuclear weapons here
Iranians flooded across the Iraq border to kill Americans so yeah, they'd give it to some one else who would.
is there any evidence of this? Russia was a much bigger threat 40 years ago and probably still is. Now were just speculating about a country that may or may not have the capability of manufacturing a nuclear weapon. This looks a lot like a 10 year war with Iraq
-
I find it hilarious that for the past 20 years, we've had technology that could measure gamma rays on mars - but determining who and who isn't building a nuclear device is just a huge rough ridin' mystery.
-
I find it hilarious that for the past 20 years, we've had technology that could measure gamma rays on mars - but determining who and who isn't building a nuclear device is just a huge rough ridin' mystery.
Yeah, that's the kind of ineptitude that really throws a wrench in the vast majority of government conspiracy theories.
-
dax comes out swinging in classic Pit style.
-
Sounds about right dax.
Bilderberg Group plain and simple/ Its all about globalization. Sick people.
-
Bilderberg Group plain and simple/ Its all about globalization. Sick people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fOvmluFznD8#t=26s
-
yes!!!! :lol:
-
What's your least favorite effect of globalization, freak?
-
Dlew I just watched that sbtb epi! :lol:
-
What's your least favorite effect of globalization, freak?
huh
-
What's your least favorite effect of globalization, freak?
huh
Well, you made kind of an ambiguous statement about how "it's" all about globalization, and I guess I just assumed you were in opposition to that sentiment. So I was just curious about why.
-
Dlew I just watched that sbtb epi! :lol:
lol yeah. love the twist ending!
-
What's your least favorite effect of globalization, freak?
huh
Well, you made kind of an ambiguous statement about how "it's" all about globalization, and I guess I just assumed you were in opposition to that sentiment. So I was just curious about why.
Isn't it obvious? Puppet.
-
Yes. Globalization.
Aka the New World Order. An order in which there is one government, one centralized bank, one global army. That's the goal of the Bilderberg Group. All of these things happening(loss of our rights, military on the streets, monitoring calls, drones etc are just precursors of whats to come. I mean we are going to be in a EPIC police state here in the North American Union (look that crap up, lil gbush)
Or we could choose to own up to our mistakes and vote for somebody who can make some real change. Not just the same old status quo rebloodlican or democrip. That's what the control system wants us to vote for. Thats why they shut out Ron Paul and they are doing it to GJ as well.
-
Yes. Globalization.
Aka the New World Order. An order in which there is one government, one centralized bank, one global army. That's the goal of the Bilderberg Group. All of these things happening(loss of our rights, military on the streets, monitoring calls, drones etc are just precursors of whats to come. I mean we are going to be in a EPIC police state here in the North American Union (look that crap up, lil gbush)
Or we could choose to own up to our mistakes and vote for somebody who can make some real change. Not just the same old status quo rebloodlican or democrip. That's what the control system wants us to vote for. Thats why they shut out Ron Paul and they are doing it to GJ as well.
I don't think you know what globalization means.
-
Yes. Globalization.
Aka the New World Order. An order in which there is one government, one centralized bank, one global army. That's the goal of the Bilderberg Group. All of these things happening(loss of our rights, military on the streets, monitoring calls, drones etc are just precursors of whats to come. I mean we are going to be in a EPIC police state here in the North American Union (look that crap up, lil gbush)
Or we could choose to own up to our mistakes and vote for somebody who can make some real change. Not just the same old status quo rebloodlican or democrip. That's what the control system wants us to vote for. Thats why they shut out Ron Paul and they are doing it to GJ as well.
and, like, what do these mortals (who you claim have been conspiring for decades) gain from such an arrangement?
would they not benefit more from a world with fewer wars and greater economic efficiency?
-
Yes. Globalization.
Aka the New World Order. An order in which there is one government, one centralized bank, one global army. That's the goal of the Bilderberg Group. All of these things happening(loss of our rights, military on the streets, monitoring calls, drones etc are just precursors of whats to come. I mean we are going to be in a EPIC police state here in the North American Union (look that crap up, lil gbush)
Or we could choose to own up to our mistakes and vote for somebody who can make some real change. Not just the same old status quo rebloodlican or democrip. That's what the control system wants us to vote for. Thats why they shut out Ron Paul and they are doing it to GJ as well.
I don't think you know what globalization means.
He's a graduate of the school of exaggerated, ridiculous Alex Jones videos.
Edit: DLew edited his post and my reference doesn't make sense anymore, but I'm leaving it anyway.
-
my original one came off as too condescending.
-
Follow what's happening in Africa (for example) "terrorism" "Al Qaeda" etc. etc. are all being drummed out of thin air and thus is providing air cover to ever increasing U.S. covert/special operations/support of U.S. puppet thugs. It's all a bunch of bull$hit . . . the whole Arab Spring etc. etc. is just B.S. cover for control of Central Asia and its periphery and thwarting Chinese/Russian influence. The U.S. and Western intelligence have turned Al Qaeda aka Al CIAda into their little rent a mob to roll around the world and prop up so the U.S./NATO has an excuse to intervene on one level or another.
Syria is a perfect example of this . . . Western Intelligence has rolled in their usual band of "Freedom Fighters" aka rent-a-thugs to destabilize the Assad regime. What we need to watch now is if their going to use the Balkans formula of fomenting so much unrest and cross tribal/cross religious sect violence in order to push the "ethnic cleansing" which is already happening and likely only to get worse over the edge. So then the U.S. and NATO can run to the U.N. and get "permission" to start bombing in support of their little puppet gangs.
What's also fascinating is seeing what is going to play out with Kurds in Syria and Iraq aka Pipelinistan.
The Fight Against Terrorism . . . pfft, its the fight for global resources.
How do you feel about this dax? Is U.S. hegemony so bad? Or should we just be more honest about why we are killing people with drones?
Personally, I wish freak42's universal government theory was correct. That would be great for a multitude of reasons, but if we can't have that, American Superpower (by any means) is the next best thing, imho.
-
Bildebergs are products of the free market.
-
Bildebergs are products of the free market.
Wait that's Build a Bears. Never mind.
-
This is an oppressive totalitarian police state global government.
:grin:
-
Yes. Globalization.
Aka the New World Order. An order in which there is one government, one centralized bank, one global army. That's the goal of the Bilderberg Group. All of these things happening(loss of our rights, military on the streets, monitoring calls, drones etc are just precursors of whats to come. I mean we are going to be in a EPIC police state here in the North American Union (look that crap up, lil gbush)
Or we could choose to own up to our mistakes and vote for somebody who can make some real change. Not just the same old status quo rebloodlican or democrip. That's what the control system wants us to vote for. Thats why they shut out Ron Paul and they are doing it to GJ as well.
I don't think you know what globalization means.
He's a graduate of the school of exaggerated, ridiculous Alex Jones videos.
Edit: DLew edited his post and my reference doesn't make sense anymore, but I'm leaving it anyway.
Graduate of Higher Consciousness. Its okay, hopefully one day you can get there and join us.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plo-1rLZ3Jo
WIDEN THE EYES BOYS.
Most of you are to indoctrinated anyway.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plo-1rLZ3Jo
WIDEN THE EYES BOYS.
Most of you are to indoctrinated anyway.
too*
Higher Consciousness A&M doesn't have time to educate on the to/too/two stuff, apparently.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plo-1rLZ3Jo
WIDEN THE EYES BOYS.
Most of you are to indoctrinated anyway.
too*
Higher Consciousness A&M doesn't have time to educate on the to/too/two stuff, apparently.
nice bro!
-
If this group is all powerful and completely dangerous, why don't they just kill Ron Paul for making that kind of a statement? I'm asking that question seriously.
-
If this group is all powerful and completely dangerous, why don't they just kill Ron Paul for making that kind of a statement? I'm asking that question seriously.
Would be pretty easy for an all-powerful world running group to silence him. Some kind of poison that made it look like he died of old age would be good.
-
Yep, 8man. Only two possibilities as two (sp?) why Paul is still alive:
1. This group is incapable of silencing him, meaning that they're not that powerful.
or
2. This group doesn't want to silence him, which means they're not that evil.
-
Yep, 8man. Only two possibilities as two (sp?) why Paul is still alive:
1. This group is incapable of silencing him, meaning that they're not that powerful.
or
2. This group doesn't want to silence him, which means they're not that evil.
What if an opponent like Paul is exactly the adversary they need to take over?
Man. These guys are smart. They should run for president or something.
-
Or they just understand that there is a big percentage of young people...well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe. So if you were to kill ron paul, that would just be so blatantly obvious
-
Or they just understand that there is a big percentage of young people...well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe. So if you were to kill ron paul, that would just be so blatantly obvious
I have no idea what you're talking about with young people.
Anyways, couldn't they just pin it on Israelis or some one who might be in opposition to Paul's unorthodox foreign policy?
-
Or they just understand that there is a big percentage of young people...well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe. So if you were to kill ron paul, that would just be so blatantly obvious
But he's like 90 so it wouldn't be obvious. These guys are morons.
-
well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe
This is simply not true. The number of people smarter than Joe is the same as the number of people dumber. It's the nature of average Joe. He's average.
-
well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe
This is simply not true. The number of people smarter than Joe is the same as the number of people dumber. It's the nature of average Joe. He's average.
I think you're referring to median Joe.
-
:lol:
-
well most of the young people under the age of 30 are smarter than the average joe
This is simply not true. The number of people smarter than Joe is the same as the number of people dumber. It's the nature of average Joe. He's average.
I think you're referring to median Joe.
Yeah, got me there. I knew that when I was typing, but hoped no one would catch it. :embarrassed:
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxqYnxrxHX8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Interesting perspective.
Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.
-
Iranians flooded across the Iraq border to kill Americans so yeah, they'd give it to some one else who would.
We would flood across the border to kill the crap out of whoever was attacking Canada or Mexico unprovoked.
Sent from my GT-S5830M using Tapatalk 2
Yes!
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxqYnxrxHX8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Interesting perspective.
Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.
Local news alarmist retardation.
The most well traveled BBC reporters who have interviewed many fighters up Islamists at only a handful with no out and out AQ they had met. The vast majority were secular fighters.
-
what if paul is actually PART of this powerful group, but he's pretending to not be so that the conspiracy theory nuts will follow him?
:dance:
-
Wow that's so brilliant it has to be true. Because someone attacking them makes them more powerful!!! WOW!!!!
(https://p.twimg.com/Azoz_TCCIAAGVcg.jpg:large)
-
Wow that's so brilliant it has to be true. Because someone attacking them makes them more powerful!!! WOW!!!!
(https://p.twimg.com/Azoz_TCCIAAGVcg.jpg:large)
That's a pretty great picture.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxqYnxrxHX8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Interesting perspective.
Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.
isn't this the same guy that did the aurora shooting guy thing?
-
Probably - Ben Swann is becoming known throughout the nation as being a purely non-biased reporter that likes to ask questions that normally people wouldn't ask.
Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.