goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Thecatwhisperer on April 05, 2012, 08:28:55 PM

Title: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 05, 2012, 08:28:55 PM
So let's say hypothetically Frank was paying players under the table.  We all know some players had their feelings hurt and left.  I'm wondering if things may start to come out from past players who ended their relationship with Frank on a sour note once they are finished with their athletic careers. Sort of a last jab in the direction of old Frank to say F you to the old man.  It makes you wonder from what CC said if some of that hasn't been revealed to the AD by past players. 
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: nicname on April 05, 2012, 08:30:32 PM
I don't like this guy.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: CNS on April 05, 2012, 08:34:32 PM
Yeah... I mean, surely there is a fire somewhere this guy should be dying in

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 05, 2012, 08:52:07 PM
Sorry to see you guys are still in love with your old girlfriend who dumped you.  She was cheating on you and you still don't respect yourselves enough to move on. Keep crying yourselves to sleep at night if it makes you feel better. 
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: AzCat on April 05, 2012, 10:19:13 PM
No we just don't like the whiney bitchy chick that keeps coming around no mater how many times we tell her to go the eff away.   :facepalm:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Cire on April 06, 2012, 07:21:06 AM
FRank wasn't paying anyone under the table.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: steve dave on April 06, 2012, 07:33:31 AM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: michigancat on April 06, 2012, 07:44:48 AM
Frank should have paid them to keep their mother rough ridin' mouths shut.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: g2brg on April 06, 2012, 07:47:44 AM
If you're paying players, shouldn't they be nba talent?
 :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: AzCat on April 06, 2012, 08:00:17 AM
If you're paying players, shouldn't they be nba talent?
 :bwpopcorn:

We are K-State.   :flush:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 08:00:53 AM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

 :love:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Fuktard on April 06, 2012, 08:20:37 AM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

he appears to be really good at bbs'ing   :dunno:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: steve dave on April 06, 2012, 08:25:36 AM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

he appears to be really good at bbs'ing   :dunno:

you know, I'm really not shocked you feel that way fuktard
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Bloodfart on April 06, 2012, 08:32:55 AM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

he appears to be really good at bbs'ing   :dunno:

you know, I'm really not shocked you feel that way fuktard

Well he's definitely better bbs'r than me.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 06, 2012, 09:05:08 AM
i feel like i should've been able to figure out who's sock this is by now but i haven't been able to.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 09:19:17 AM
i feel like i should've been able to figure out who's sock this is by now but i haven't been able to.

I'll save you some time. I don't post over there. Just read it for recruiting info and the random awkward press announcements that preempt the hiring of football coaches.  There are a few intelligent posters and one entertaining one (koppe22, no offense to you personally Storm Nut). 
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 06, 2012, 09:26:52 AM
i feel like i should've been able to figure out who's sock this is by now but i haven't been able to.

I'll save you some time. I don't post over there. Just read it for recruiting info and the random awkward press announcements that preempt the hiring of football coaches.  There are a few intelligent posters and one entertaining one (koppe22, no offense to you personally Storm Nut).

yeah i don't care about any of that. what i was trying to convey was that you already post over here, but created a new account so that you could make the dumbest posts possible and then wait to see the reactions.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 09:35:56 AM
i feel like i should've been able to figure out who's sock this is by now but i haven't been able to.

I'll save you some time. I don't post over there. Just read it for recruiting info and the random awkward press announcements that preempt the hiring of football coaches.  There are a few intelligent posters and one entertaining one (koppe22, no offense to you personally Storm Nut).


yeah i don't care about any of that. what i was trying to convey was that you already post over here, but created a new account so that you could make the dumbest posts possible and then wait to see the reactions.

Used to post on the old site years ago. Came back to haunt you Rick.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 09:43:11 AM
FRank wasn't paying anyone under the table.

Ding! Ding! Ding!. It was just wired in via traceable means from a guy under investigation for allegedly being a front runner for agents. Rookie mistake Jamar and Frank. Lol, You gotta love their attempts to play with the big boys though. You really do!
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Cire on April 06, 2012, 09:53:28 AM
FRank wasn't paying anyone under the table.

Ding! Ding! Ding!. It was just wired in via traceable means from a guy under investigation for allegedly being a front runner for agents. Rookie mistake Jamar and Frank. Lol, You gotta love their attempts to play with the big boys though. You really do!
are you being serious?
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: steve dave on April 06, 2012, 09:56:36 AM
I'm starting to think this guy is actually being serious
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 06, 2012, 10:00:05 AM
The fact that Currie was trying to renegotiate all season and then tried to keep him from going to South Carolina is a fireable offense.

Now we have the ammo to push Shulz.  Currie is dirty.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 10:00:16 AM
FRank wasn't paying anyone under the table.

Ding! Ding! Ding!. It was just wired in via traceable means from a guy under investigation for allegedly being a front runner for agents. Rookie mistake Jamar and Frank. Lol, You gotta love their attempts to play with the big boys though. You really do!
are you being serious?

I don't think Frank knew about this payment, no. This was obviously a Jamar mistake but I wouldn't be surprised if Malone who has been accused of being a front runner by Beasley was being monitored by either Currie or NCAA.  Not sure if this is even legal or how it would be handled but the trash can/receipt story makes less sense than this.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: SkinnyBenny on April 06, 2012, 10:03:11 AM
what makes the least sense is how much your posts suck.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 10:04:38 AM
what makes the least sense is how much your posts suck.

 :blush:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: mcmwcat on April 06, 2012, 10:06:03 AM
of course he's being serious.  he's just bought in to all the AD talking points
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 10:14:43 AM
of course he's being serious.  he's just bought in to all the AD talking points

Correction, I bought into what the NCAA told Schulz. That was that Frank made a big mistake on National TV.  Connect the dots, it's not very hard to do. Frank is leaving, he comes on National TV to tell us this why? Because he knows there is more to the story that hasn't come out yet. He's preempting that by saying "yeah, I paid players in the past, no big deal". CC has confirmed this may not be over yet and that the NCAA is involved. Currie even deflected questions at his presser to the NCAA.  Currie said he wishes the receipt never made it to his office. I believe that part but I don't believe he wasn't actively trying to make sure this wasn't going on.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: EllToPay on April 06, 2012, 10:17:47 AM
If you're paying players, shouldn't they be nba talent?
 :bwpopcorn:

don't want this post to go unappreciated.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: LickNeckey on April 06, 2012, 10:30:32 AM
why can't we see that the way to do this is to funnel money to players through walk-ons  :facepalm:

http://www2.kusports.com/news/2012/apr/06/evan-manning-join-ku-walk-/?mens_basketball
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: mcmwcat on April 06, 2012, 10:36:06 AM
of course he's being serious.  he's just bought in to all the AD talking points

Correction, I bought into what the NCAA told Schulz. That was that Frank made a big mistake on National TV.  Connect the dots, it's not very hard to do. Frank is leaving, he comes on National TV to tell us this why? Because he knows there is more to the story that hasn't come out yet. He's preempting that by saying "yeah, I paid players in the past, no big deal". CC has confirmed this may not be over yet and that the NCAA is involved. Currie even deflected questions at his presser to the NCAA.  Currie said he wishes the receipt never made it to his office. I believe that part but I don't believe he wasn't actively trying to make sure this wasn't going on.

can you draw a picture with dots and captions to make it easier for us.  tia.

send a kora to the athletic department.  they might give you your own connect the dots play book.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 10:46:11 AM
of course he's being serious.  he's just bought in to all the AD talking points

Correction, I bought into what the NCAA told Schulz. That was that Frank made a big mistake on National TV.  Connect the dots, it's not very hard to do. Frank is leaving, he comes on National TV to tell us this why? Because he knows there is more to the story that hasn't come out yet. He's preempting that by saying "yeah, I paid players in the past, no big deal". CC has confirmed this may not be over yet and that the NCAA is involved. Currie even deflected questions at his presser to the NCAA.  Currie said he wishes the receipt never made it to his office. I believe that part but I don't believe he wasn't actively trying to make sure this wasn't going on.

can you draw a picture with dots and captions to make it easier for us.  tia.

send a kora to the athletic department.  they might give you your own connect the dots play book.

Chingon already did this for us. See other thread...
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: MakeItRain on April 06, 2012, 03:07:42 PM
I would love to meet posters like fuktard, catwhisperer, and kim carnes.  It would be fascinating to see how they interact with people face-to-face.  I also love how catwhisper put something in quotations that Frank didn't actually say, not to be intentionally inaccurate but because he actually doesn't know how to use quotations.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: fr@ck me on April 06, 2012, 03:20:20 PM
why can't we see that the way to do this is to funnel money to players through walk-ons  :facepalm:

http://www2.kusports.com/news/2012/apr/06/evan-manning-join-ku-walk-/?mens_basketball

They have the wrong kid in the picture, don't they  :opcat:

It is customary for top tier schools like KU to offer some white kid who doesn't even start on his HS team a walkon spot, isn't it?
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 03:23:58 PM
I would love to meet posters like fuktard, catwhisperer, and kim carnes.  It would be fascinating to see how they interact with people face-to-face.  I also love how catwhisper put something in quotations that Frank didn't actually say, not to be intentionally inaccurate but because he actually doesn't know how to use quotations.

 :driving:    :cheers:    :blah:   :lol:  :clac:  :flush:   :cheers:   :blah:  :curse:  :driving: :zzz:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: 8manpick on April 06, 2012, 03:44:13 PM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

Can one of the mods give him the title that is underneath Rams' name?  The crown has been passed.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 03:59:07 PM
I don't like this guy.

thecatwhisperer has really exploded onto the goEMAW scene in a pretty awful way

Can one of the mods give him the title that is underneath Rams' name?  The crown has been passed.


:woot:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 04:51:58 PM
I heard a rumor there was a player that was pushing to get paid and then left because he didn't.  Probably not hard to guess who that is.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ben ji on April 06, 2012, 04:53:03 PM
I heard a rumor there was a player that was pushing to get paid and then left because he didn't.  Probably not hard to guess who that is.

RON ANDERSON  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 04:58:46 PM
I heard a rumor there was a player that was pushing to get paid and then left because he didn't.  Probably not hard to guess who that is.

JASON BENNETT? :sdeek:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: michigancat on April 06, 2012, 05:00:03 PM
Apparently it is fairly hard to guess.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 06, 2012, 05:01:51 PM
I heard a rumor there was a player that was pushing to get paid and then left because he didn't.  Probably not hard to guess who that is.

Dom?

Wally?
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 05:02:58 PM
I heard a rumor there was a player that was pushing to get paid and then left because he didn't.  Probably not hard to guess who that is.

Dom?

Wally?
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 06, 2012, 05:05:23 PM
Does anybody think Frank was paying AAU coaches for players.... Art, Malone, some random Gaucho guy?? and some of the money getting cycled back to the players? His recruitment outside those pipelines was pretty shitty.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:06:42 PM
Man I wish Wally could have played to his potential.  I was really sad watching him struggle.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 05:10:55 PM
Man I wish Wally could have played to his potential.  I was really sad watching him struggle.

Wally was the player I've hated the most since Frank, with Sprads just beating him out this offseason.  Congrats Sprads :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:14:32 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO
Title: Re: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: michigancat on April 06, 2012, 05:17:28 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

lol, Sprads was not playing to his potential this year.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: CHONGS on April 06, 2012, 05:19:35 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

lol, Sprads was not playing to his potential this year.
but he's white so that means he tried harder and has more heart

Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 05:21:30 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

Sprads, the man of many excuses once the season ends?  Sprads has no heart
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:23:40 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

lol, Sprads was not playing to his potential this year.
but he's white so that means he tried harder and has more heart

Thank you!  Couldn't say he was injured. That's too much of a cop out.  It is his fault he's white though. Kind of like Michael Jackson.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 06, 2012, 05:24:34 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

Sprads, the man of many excuses once the season ends?  Sprads has no heart

Probably was hard for Sprads to focus on Basketball this year, he spent most his time and energy on finding a way to destroy Frank Martin.. I believe he succeed  :dunno:
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:27:53 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

Sprads, the man of many excuses once the season ends?  Sprads has no heart

Probably was hard for Sprads to focus on Basketball this year, he spent most his time and energy on finding a way to destroy Frank Martin.. I believe he succeed  :dunno:

I think his dad led the chargre more than he did.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 05:29:35 PM
They've both been extremely frustrating but at least Sprads was playing at his potential. Wally could have been special if he had the heart of Sprads. JMO

Sprads, the man of many excuses once the season ends?  Sprads has no heart

Probably was hard for Sprads to focus on Basketball this year, he spent most his time and energy on finding a way to destroy Frank Martin.. I believe he succeed  :dunno:

I think his dad led the chargre more than he did.
eff them both
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:33:31 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 06, 2012, 05:35:58 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Thecatwhisperer on April 06, 2012, 05:40:29 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave

I thought it was pretty common knowledge Rods was shaky on coming back last year?  I was shocked when the rumors about JHR being in the group came out but then thought about how Frank benched him at the strangest time.  In Franks defense, it awoke the beast in JHR when he came back.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 06, 2012, 05:40:55 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave

It is pretty prevalent that frank was out of control at practices this year. But, I have no idea what that was leading to. 
Title: Re: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: CNS on April 06, 2012, 07:30:05 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave

It is pretty prevalent that frank was out of control at practices this year. But, I have no idea what that was leading to.

Stroke.  Coulda gave him another year.  I mean, that would have gone a long way toward saving face.....for everyone.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: gatoveintisiete on April 06, 2012, 09:10:27 PM
can you imagine how different things would be if Wally had been what he was supposed to be.
Title: Re: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: michigancat on April 06, 2012, 09:44:01 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave

It is pretty prevalent that frank was out of control at practices this year. But, I have no idea what that was leading to.

It may be prevalent, but it sure as hell hasn't been detailed by a credible source. There's also nothing to suggest that this was the first year Frank was "out of control".
Title: Re: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 06, 2012, 10:10:04 PM
What about Rods and JHR? Should we do the same?  Maybe Sprads dad is paying them under the table to threaten to leave!!  Now we're getting somewhere!

Or maybe no credible source ever came out and said they were going to leave

It is pretty prevalent that frank was out of control at practices this year. But, I have no idea what that was leading to.

It may be prevalent, but it sure as hell hasn't been detailed by a credible source. There's also nothing to suggest that this was the first year Frank was "out of control".

yeah. jesus guys, every god damn person alive has heard this crap. #1-who cares. #2-who did you hear it from? #3-is this new? why is it a big deal now? #4-i'm not an english major but i'm pretty god damn sure that you did not use the word "prevalent" correctly. adjectives, adverbs, etc. i don't care about this crap but jesus, if you are going to try and act all smart and pull the word out then use it in the right way. also, mich used it correctly.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: TBL on April 06, 2012, 10:14:34 PM
why can't we see that the way to do this is to funnel money to players through walk-ons  :facepalm:

http://www2.kusports.com/news/2012/apr/06/evan-manning-join-ku-walk-/?mens_basketball

They have the wrong kid in the picture, don't they  :opcat:

It is customary for top tier schools like KU to offer some white kid who doesn't even start on his HS team a walkon spot, isn't it?

Actually........no.....   (Michael Jackson Syndrome???)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.lawrence.com%2Fimg%2Fphotos%2F2010%2F02%2F12%2Ffshs_bkb_onw_05_t460.jpg%3F926875e5be5f93a8dc1e86b8d949ee54b77d1e0d&hash=c94e6d6106382fbfc73393d645dd3ba95c4c9cb3)
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 07, 2012, 02:02:19 AM
I have more than confirmed frank was beyond control and has been growing out of control every year, I have all ways hoped frank would recruit kids he could keep because it would take him to the next level (final four contenders) but with the whole jr class to be leaving and gip it is obvious frank is just a journey man and can't keep success at one place.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 07, 2012, 02:44:52 AM
I have more than confirmed frank was beyond control and has been growing out of control every year

How have you done that?

Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 07, 2012, 11:39:29 AM
I have more than confirmed frank was beyond control and has been growing out of control every year

How have you done that?


Golf
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 07, 2012, 12:16:47 PM
The fact that Currie tried so hard to retain Frank shows he was clueless to Frank's rogue behavior.  grounds for firing Currie in my book.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2012, 10:29:59 PM
but with the whole jr class to be leaving

so dumb

I wish people would make these evil Frank rumors even a little believable
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: wetwillie on April 08, 2012, 08:31:38 AM
Rumblings frank was playing call of duty and getting blown by high school girls while doing lines of coke during scheduled practice times.  Source A-
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 08, 2012, 09:04:42 AM
No wonder all of his assistants abandoned him.
Title: Re: Angry players = future liability for old Frank?
Post by: ChiComCat on April 08, 2012, 09:09:03 AM
Rumblings frank was playing call of duty and getting blown by high school girls while doing lines of coke during scheduled practice times.  Source A-

"I'll be out when I'm done with I die"
"No, don't start working on shooting, I want to be there for that."
"I don't know, have them work on rebounding or something.  Can't you see I'm busy, leave me alone"