goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: username on March 31, 2012, 08:03:56 PM

Title: Pathetic
Post by: username on March 31, 2012, 08:03:56 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: kstater on March 31, 2012, 08:04:56 PM
Why do you think it's unrealistic to get a good coach?  Pro tip:  You're part of the problem.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Pete on March 31, 2012, 08:07:55 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

How do you feel about Weber's losing record in the Big 10?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: hemmy on March 31, 2012, 08:08:30 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

What an idiot.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 31, 2012, 08:09:30 PM
Yes, we were being completely unrealistic expecting our school to make a homerun hire who went on the radio and begged for the job.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: unleashthemob on March 31, 2012, 08:14:36 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.
eff you john
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: OK_Cat on March 31, 2012, 08:16:48 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

i don't think you understand who a lot of us are.  there is quite a bit of $$$ here.  will it matter?  who knows.  but we'll be able to live with ourselves for doing something about the problem. 
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: _33 on March 31, 2012, 08:17:21 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

So you hated Frank because he couldn't recruit but you support this hire. You're a dumbass.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 08:19:57 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 31, 2012, 08:24:41 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 08:29:22 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 31, 2012, 08:32:13 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

Express a reasoned opinion with support.  Don't just be shitty at trolling.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 31, 2012, 08:32:37 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

It's not group think. There wouldn't be a meltdown and organized future "fire curry" rallies if Currie would have hired Underwood. Currie just hired a shitty coach because he thought it would look better on his resume. It won't.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: CHONGS on March 31, 2012, 08:33:23 PM
You can still say what you want idiot. What you want is zero-resistance.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 31, 2012, 08:34:57 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

dumb, incorrect and indefensible opinions have never been welcomed.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: 0.42 on March 31, 2012, 08:35:22 PM
You can still say what you want idiot. What you want is zero-resistance.

 :thumbs:

You either bring the zeal or get the eff out
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 08:36:11 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

Express a reasoned opinion with support.  Don't just be shitty at trolling.

thanks for the advice - does reasoned thought apply to okcat as well?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: CHONGS on March 31, 2012, 08:36:53 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

Express a reasoned opinion with support.  Don't just be shitty at trolling.

thanks for the advice - does reasoned thought apply to okcat as well?
jyst because he's a crap poster doesnt mean you have to be
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: j-von on March 31, 2012, 08:37:04 PM

It's not group think. There wouldn't be a meltdown and organized future "fire curry" rallies if Currie would have hired Underwood. Currie just hired a shitty coach because he thought it would look better on his resume. It won't.

This is exactly right, I'm not sure how anybody wouldn't agree.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 31, 2012, 08:37:45 PM
All of you losers.

Let me guess, you're so mad you'll stop donating your zero dollars a year to the university and stop attending the zero games a year you go to.

You brought this all upon yourselves by being delusional and having unrealistic expectations.

careful - don't be a contrarian - this board is developing the same type of singlemindedness that they despise/ridicule over at gpc and attempt to pi anyone who doesn't share that singlemindedness

Are you more impressed with Weber's shitty recruiting or his inability to be competitive with other teams that also have no talent?

neither - don't like the hire either - was intriqued with gottlieb and would have stuck with underwood otherwise - thanks for asking :ksu:

i am impressed about the singlemindedness goEMAW has developed - used to be anybody's opinion was welcome here - now it obviously is not

Express a reasoned opinion with support.  Don't just be shitty at trolling.

thanks for the advice - does reasoned thought apply to okcat as well?

I'll let you know.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: purplenutz on March 31, 2012, 08:55:33 PM
Yes, we were being completely unrealistic expecting our school to make a homerun hire who went on the radio and begged for the job.

We were being completely emotional.  No way in heck does any administration in a BCS confy go after Doug Gottlieb.  If that's the truth, then why aren't they knocking on his door to hire him?  Answer: They're not.

What's unrealistic is that K-State is a destination job. It's not unless your name is Steve Henson.

Fact: Gottlieb is a popular radio personality, he has great analysis when it comes to basketball. Crap: Homerun hire, he has no experience. Period.

Remember when Huggy got hired here?  Yeah, nobody else wanted him. It was a risk, but it was worth it because the sucker can coach and had collected a bunch of wins and a final four. 

Why in the Freak do we act like Frank was such a great legendary coach anyway?  Because he took us to the elite 8?  Because we were on College Gameday?  Because we got our asses kicked by Iowa State and Oklahoma and Kansas? If the 6 players that were rumored to leave after this season, Frank would have been 16-18 overall next season and 6-12 in conference play and then we're really in a bigger mess. 









Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 31, 2012, 08:59:56 PM
Yes, we were being completely unrealistic expecting our school to make a homerun hire who went on the radio and begged for the job.

We were being completely emotional.  No way in heck does any administration in a BCS confy go after Doug Gottlieb.  If that's the truth, then why aren't they knocking on his door to hire him?  Answer: They're not.

What's unrealistic is that K-State is a destination job. It's not unless your name is Steve Henson.

Fact: Gottlieb is a popular radio personality, he has great analysis when it comes to basketball. Crap: Homerun hire, he has no experience. Period.

Remember when Huggy got hired here?  Yeah, nobody else wanted him. It was a risk, but it was worth it because the sucker can coach and had collected a bunch of wins and a final four. 

Why in the Freak do we act like Frank was such a great legendary coach anyway?  Because he took us to the elite 8?  Because we were on College Gameday?  Because we got our asses kicked by Iowa State and Oklahoma and Kansas? If the 6 players that were rumored to leave after this season, Frank would have been 16-18 overall next season and 6-12 in conference play and then we're really in a bigger mess.

Gottlieb would have been a home run because he would have provided exposure. We will just go in a corner and die with Weber. I can understand an AD being too cowardly to hire Gottlieb, but there is absolutely no excuse for hiring somebody worse than Underwood when it would be Underwood's dream job.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: DQ12 on March 31, 2012, 09:01:23 PM
Yes, we were being completely unrealistic expecting our school to make a homerun hire who went on the radio and begged for the job.

We were being completely emotional.  No way in heck does any administration in a BCS confy go after Doug Gottlieb.  If that's the truth, then why aren't they knocking on his door to hire him?  Answer: They're not.

What's unrealistic is that K-State is a destination job. It's not unless your name is Steve Henson.

Fact: Gottlieb is a popular radio personality, he has great analysis when it comes to basketball. Crap: Homerun hire, he has no experience. Period.

Remember when Huggy got hired here?  Yeah, nobody else wanted him. It was a risk, but it was worth it because the sucker can coach and had collected a bunch of wins and a final four. 

Why in the Freak do we act like Frank was such a great legendary coach anyway?  Because he took us to the elite 8?  Because we were on College Gameday?  Because we got our asses kicked by Iowa State and Oklahoma and Kansas? If the 6 players that were rumored to leave after this season, Frank would have been 16-18 overall next season and 6-12 in conference play and then we're really in a bigger mess.
Don't be an idiot.  People liked Frank because he won a lot and it was a lot of fun.  People wanted Gottleib because it would have been a lot of fun and he had a plan and he wanted to come here.

People don't like Weber because he's a boring loser.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: naturalselection on March 31, 2012, 09:18:41 PM
If the 6 players that were rumored to leave after this season, Frank would have been 16-18 overall next season and 6-12 in conference play and then we're really in a bigger mess.

I hate this talking point so much already.  There will be idiots 3 years from now when we're at the bottom of the conference and Frank has South Carolina in the dance saying:  "Yeah, but if we would have kept him we would have lost everybody and sucked."  That it's built on rumors makes it even worse.  Rumors that come from the same man/group that ran Frank out of town and just gave us oscar Weber in his place. 
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: CHONGS on March 31, 2012, 09:21:24 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 09:32:00 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber

bigger challenge
find any top ten road win for gottlieb, or underwood
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: kim carnes on March 31, 2012, 09:33:43 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber

bigger challenge
find any top ten road win for gottlieb, or underwood

ban this rough ridin' idiot
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 09:36:03 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber

bigger challenge
find any top ten road win for gottlieb, or underwood

ban this rough ridin' idiot

reasoned thought = ban this rough ridin' idiot?

this is the singlemindedness of which i speak painful as it might be
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Pete on March 31, 2012, 09:39:15 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber

bigger challenge
find any top ten road win for gottlieb, or underwood

ban this rough ridin' idiot

reasoned thought = ban this rough ridin' idiot?

this is the singlemindedness of which i speak painful as it might be

I think he might be high on marijuana.  I will not ban him for this.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Barry McCockner on March 31, 2012, 09:39:18 PM
Where there is one obvious conclusion, the fact that multiple people share that opinion does not constitute "single-mindedness"




However, the fact that you are unable to comprehend how rough ridin' tragic this situation is, does, in fact, make you a blathering rough ridin' idiot.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: _33 on March 31, 2012, 09:41:38 PM
tuck34, are you ksu34 or whatever from gpc? Because if you are that would explain why you are such a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: 0.42 on March 31, 2012, 09:42:09 PM
Challenge:

Find the last top ten road win for oscar Weber

bigger challenge
find any top ten road win for gottlieb, or underwood

ban this rough ridin' idiot

reasoned thought = ban this rough ridin' idiot?

this is the singlemindedness of which i speak painful as it might be

If you think this is "reasoned thought," this place is going to eat you alive.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: naturalselection on March 31, 2012, 09:44:23 PM
reasoned thought = ban this rough ridin' idiot?

this is the singlemindedness of which i speak painful as it might be

Reasoned thought?  Where?  You've done nothing but reverse troll, which is the most rough ridin' aggravating form of trolling yet invented.  Pointing out that coaches who have never coached a game have never won a game is not a reasoned argument.  It's stupid. 

Yeah, but Undy and Leib are undefeated against Bill Self, Coach K, Roy Williams, Dean Smith, Bobby Knight, Adolph Rupp, and Jesus Christ combined derp derp derp.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 09:44:46 PM
Where there is one obvious conclusion, the fact that multiple people share that opinion does not constitute "single-mindedness"

However, the fact that you are unable to comprehend how rough ridin' tragic this situation is, does, in fact, make you a blathering rough ridin' idiot.

emphasis on key word "opinion"

one with courage makes a majority - john f kennedy
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 09:46:57 PM
tuck34, are you ksu34 or whatever from gpc? Because if you are that would explain why you are such a respect.

no i'm not - you don't like him either?  thanks for the "respect" though
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: naturalselection on March 31, 2012, 09:55:31 PM
tuck34, are you ksu34 or whatever from gpc? Because if you are that would explain why you are such a respect.

derp derp derp - derp derp derp derp derp?  derp derp derp "derp" derp

God that reads so much better.  Can the mods turn on the derp filter so I don't have to do this manually every time he posts?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: _33 on March 31, 2012, 09:59:04 PM
tuck34, are you ksu34 or whatever from gpc? Because if you are that would explain why you are such a respect.

no i'm not - you don't like him either?  thanks for the "respect" though

Turn off your filter you dipshit.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 10:00:25 PM
tuck34, are you ksu34 or whatever from gpc? Because if you are that would explain why you are such a respect.

derp derp derp - derp derp derp derp derp?  derp derp derp "derp" derp

God that reads so much better.  Can the mods turn on the derp filter so I don't have to do this manually every time he posts?

omg - are you always that creative?

let me see how that works . . .

Derp derp derps derp derp derp.  Derp derp derps derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp der derp derp derp derp derp derp derps?

sheesh, even a respect like me can do that
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: kstater on March 31, 2012, 10:02:33 PM
reasoned thought = ban this rough ridin' idiot?

this is the singlemindedness of which i speak painful as it might be


Yeah, but Undy and Leib are undefeated against Bill Self, Coach K, Roy Williams, Dean Smith, Bobby Knight, Adolph Rupp, and Jesus Christ combined derp derp derp.
A lot of truthiness here. 
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: CNS on March 31, 2012, 10:02:58 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: naturalselection on March 31, 2012, 10:10:35 PM
derp - derp derp derp derp derp?

derp derp derp derp derp derp . . .

I have always liked young boys.  I  find them easier to subdue by force and take to my basement where they are never heard from again?

derp, derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp

 :sdeek:

TURN THE FILTER OFF!  TURN IT OFF NOW!!!!!
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 10:15:29 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: doom on March 31, 2012, 10:23:36 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done

Do you make your gay lover tuck your shirts in for you, or are you a self tucker?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 31, 2012, 10:30:12 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done

If he gets Semi I will give him a year.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 10:31:08 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done

Do you make your gay lover tuck your shirts in for you, or are you a self tucker?

thanks for the reasoned thought - you've added a lot to this thread :ksu:
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Barry McCockner on March 31, 2012, 10:35:01 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done

If he gets Semi I will give him a year.

He sure as hell better retain the current players if he is going to have any chance.  If we lose Angel (he's gone, deal with it), check out our guards for the 13-14 season:  Sprads and whoever the eff he can scrape up next year.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: CNS on March 31, 2012, 10:40:14 PM
If he recommits upshaw or brings in a strong replacment this year for what would have been upshaw's ship, it will go a long way to him getting a chance. 

I agree that he needs to hit on Semi and maybe bring a kid with him from Ill commits(were there any dece ones)?

Also, he needs to not play a slow, grab ass, type of Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) doc ball.  Unless you are Bo ryan, you can gtfoomf with that crap.

I want what Gottlieb described as far as offense goes.

Most importantly, he needs to hire a really good recruiter.  Like a really good one.  Every non goEMAW'er is saying how good of a coach this guy is, he needs to prove it by pulling an assistant that wants to work for him and will bring kids. 

He needs to shed the nice guy bullshit.  We are the angriest fans in America and are housed in the motherfucking Octogon of Doom(nationally recognized as being badass).  He needs to take on our personality rather than the other way around because, I swear to god if the polite townie nice guy crap flies he will fail.

Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 31, 2012, 10:48:22 PM
This guy is a great example of what I was tweeting about earlier.  Tucks don't give a crap about BB.  They have made this all about Tuck v goEMAW.  Prob is that we are all losers in this deal.

Stick or leave, couldn't care less.  you will get board with this unless you start bringing something to discuss other than reverse trolling.

i love basketball - never missed a home game when i was in school; rarely went to a football game.  the last six years have been effing incredible - hope the next six will be as well.  have my doubts.  currie didn't do what i would have done, but apparently, unlike many on here, i realize that my zone of influence doesn't include coaching hires no matter how much/little i give.

i also realize that the collective opinion/though/mentality on here was that snyder 2.0 was a horrible idea.  that's actually worked out quite well and even as a basketball guy i'm pretty pumped about football.

also know that no matter how strongly i feel about something, and how many of my friends/colleagues agree/reinforce that feeling, that i'm occasionally wrong.  doesn't appear that this board recognizes that

if weber can keep the team together, that's a great start.  if he can get a guy like semi interested again that's good as well,  if he can bring in some other talent that we wouldn't otherwise have gotten in on, that's even better.  we can bitch all we want, but what's done is done

people disliked snyder 2.0 because it was being compared to patterson 1.0. i'll stick by that. i'd fire snyder now to hire patterson tomorrow.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: EMAW SP8 on March 31, 2012, 10:52:36 PM
 :facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 10:55:23 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: USCbballIsBack on March 31, 2012, 11:05:47 PM
Our AD > your AD.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: EMAW SP8 on March 31, 2012, 11:06:25 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Testy Westy on March 31, 2012, 11:07:16 PM
Our AD > your AD.

obviously
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 31, 2012, 11:07:51 PM
Our AD > your AD.

no crap
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: jtksu on March 31, 2012, 11:12:42 PM
Honestly, I don't think this is a terrible hire.  It's a very "meh" hire though.  I'm not going to boycott the program over it or anything but I seriously don't see myself giving a eff about the team again in the near future.  Hey, if Webber has our team back in the tournament next  season and brings in some nice recruits, I'm sure I'll jump back on the bandwagon.  Right now, this looks like a giant buzzkill and an end to the momentum our program looked to have been building under Frank. 
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 11:17:26 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: EMAW SP8 on March 31, 2012, 11:29:13 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?

Honestly what is a silver lining, but someone looking for a reason not to be miserable.  If you see things how they actually are, will you be as miserable as you would be if you were always hoping for the best, but for the most part receiving the worst?  Doubtful.

That is our life as a KSU Q@tz fan.  We can be hopeful for great things, and we can hope to be on par with some of the elite universities in the country. But realistically we never will be, due to the fact that we are always "ok" with mediocre things happening to our program.  We get a mediocre coach, and we Hope he can perform to his potential, when we know for a fact that he will not as he has proven with his past performances. 

I get what you are saying, but "tucking" is what you do, there is no way that you can change it.  And I feel for you always being optimistic, and more often than not, having your hopes crushed every time.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: tuck34 on March 31, 2012, 11:36:58 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?

Honestly what is a silver lining, but someone looking for a reason not to be miserable.  If you see things how they actually are, will you be as miserable as you would be if you were always hoping for the best, but for the most part receiving the worst?  Doubtful.

That is our life as a KSU Q@tz fan.  We can be hopeful for great things, and we can hope to be on par with some of the elite universities in the country. But realistically we never will be, due to the fact that we are always "ok" with mediocre things happening to our program.  We get a mediocre coach, and we Hope he can perform to his potential, when we know for a fact that he will not as he has proven with his past performances. 

I get what you are saying, but "tucking" is what you do, there is no way that you can change it.  And I feel for you always being optimistic, and more often than not, having your hopes crushed every time.

who the eff said i'm optimistic - i hated the hire

better to have loved, then lost, than never to have loved

better to have believed, then been disappointed, than never to have believed

go ahead and believe that we can't/never will be on par with the elite universities - in doing so, you're holding us back imho
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 31, 2012, 11:40:35 PM
Our AD > your AD.

We landed on the moon!!!!
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 31, 2012, 11:44:14 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?

Honestly what is a silver lining, but someone looking for a reason not to be miserable.  If you see things how they actually are, will you be as miserable as you would be if you were always hoping for the best, but for the most part receiving the worst?  Doubtful.

That is our life as a KSU Q@tz fan.  We can be hopeful for great things, and we can hope to be on par with some of the elite universities in the country. But realistically we never will be, due to the fact that we are always "ok" with mediocre things happening to our program.  We get a mediocre coach, and we Hope he can perform to his potential, when we know for a fact that he will not as he has proven with his past performances. 

I get what you are saying, but "tucking" is what you do, there is no way that you can change it.  And I feel for you always being optimistic, and more often than not, having your hopes crushed every time.

who the eff said i'm optimistic - i hated the hire

better to have loved, then lost, than never to have loved

better to have believed, then been disappointed, than never to have believed

go ahead and believe that we can't/never will be on par with the elite universities - in doing so, you're holding us back imho

The real goEMAWers have loved, believed and then lost/been disappointed more than you could ever be cursed with.  Count your rough ridin' lucky stars and count all your blessings you aren't in our shoes.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 31, 2012, 11:44:54 PM
Honestly, I don't think this is a terrible hire.  It's a very "meh" hire though.  I'm not going to boycott the program over it or anything but I seriously don't see myself giving a eff about the team again in the near future.  Hey, if Webber has our team back in the tournament next  season and brings in some nice recruits, I'm sure I'll jump back on the bandwagon.  Right now, this looks like a giant buzzkill and an end to the momentum our program looked to have been building under Frank.

It is the absolute worst hire we could have had. This bad person is going to be just mediocre enough for K-State to keep him around like they did Woolridge and by the time we get rid of him, nobody will even remember that K-State used to be a pretty good team.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: EMAW SP8 on March 31, 2012, 11:46:19 PM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?

Honestly what is a silver lining, but someone looking for a reason not to be miserable.  If you see things how they actually are, will you be as miserable as you would be if you were always hoping for the best, but for the most part receiving the worst?  Doubtful.

That is our life as a KSU Q@tz fan.  We can be hopeful for great things, and we can hope to be on par with some of the elite universities in the country. But realistically we never will be, due to the fact that we are always "ok" with mediocre things happening to our program.  We get a mediocre coach, and we Hope he can perform to his potential, when we know for a fact that he will not as he has proven with his past performances. 

I get what you are saying, but "tucking" is what you do, there is no way that you can change it.  And I feel for you always being optimistic, and more often than not, having your hopes crushed every time.

who the eff said i'm optimistic - i hated the hire

better to have loved, then lost, than never to have loved

better to have believed, then been disappointed, than never to have believed

go ahead and believe that we can't/never will be on par with the elite universities - in doing so, you're holding us back imho

A) You had hopes that he could keep this program afloat with getting semi, and also keeping the team together.  Without know what is going to happen, i.e. optimism
B) True, but once you have been scorned so many times, such as most of us at goEMAW, you start to see things differently
C) See B
D) I believe it was you that said earlier that you wouldn't have done the same thing that Currie did. Which I give you credit for there. But you also said that no matter what you did/would have done, that it wouldn't affect the universities decisions.  So I doubt that my mindset is keeping us off the same levels of the likes of Texas, Florida, and Ohio State just to name a few.

But I'm shitfaced and really don't want to put in the effort of explaining my inner workings to you.  So I will leave now, Good day 'tuck.
Title: Re: Pathetic
Post by: KSUTOMMY on April 01, 2012, 07:43:11 AM
:facepalm: these threads are rough ridin' stupid.

Outing tucks is almost easier than breathing right now.

this "tuck" thing is a myth - go read gpc (if you can afford it) - they're as pissed at currie and as upset with the hire as folks on here are - course that doesn't fit your myth

I have GPC, can't stand to read the drill crap that is spewed over there on a daily basis, but I'm sure it's not you talking all that bullshit over at Fitz's palace.  You are probably a ring of honor member, right?

This board is 150 times the rough ridin' board fitz could ever dream of owning, and it's tucks like you that are making this board GPCII.

You do know that tucking isn't necessarily a "myth" right, tucking is a mindset, and one that you seem to embody to it's fullest.  You "tucks" always try to find the silver lining in things instead of seeing this bullshit in its entirety. 

This hire could have been so much more than hiring a coach who was just bought out of his declining program for being awful. 

If he turns this around, then we will all gladly eat the vast amounts of crow that you are going to feed us, but please try to be realistic when looking at this abortion of a coaching hire we just had.

eloquent - i'm impressed

hardly ring of fame

question - if you're not a tuck, can you ever see a silver lining?

second question - if you never see a silver lining isn't life miserable?

Honestly what is a silver lining, but someone looking for a reason not to be miserable.  If you see things how they actually are, will you be as miserable as you would be if you were always hoping for the best, but for the most part receiving the worst?  Doubtful.

That is our life as a KSU Q@tz fan.  We can be hopeful for great things, and we can hope to be on par with some of the elite universities in the country. But realistically we never will be, due to the fact that we are always "ok" with mediocre things happening to our program.  We get a mediocre coach, and we Hope he can perform to his potential, when we know for a fact that he will not as he has proven with his past performances. 

I get what you are saying, but "tucking" is what you do, there is no way that you can change it.  And I feel for you always being optimistic, and more often than not, having your hopes crushed every time.

who the eff said i'm optimistic - i hated the hire

better to have loved, then lost, than never to have loved

better to have believed, then been disappointed, than never to have believed

go ahead and believe that we can't/never will be on par with the elite universities - in doing so, you're holding us back imho

The real goEMAWers have loved, believed and then lost/been disappointed more than you could ever be cursed with.  Count your rough ridin' lucky stars and count all your blessings you aren't in our shoes.

This is it right here. How on earth can anyone look at where we were in BB when frank was here, then look at this hire and have optimism? I don't give a eff how many times you spin this one - it's a horrible hire. Remember how exciting it was during the football season to also have some kickass basketball to watch as well? That rough ridin' crap is gone. This is a dark time for this program.