goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 06:16:34 PM

Title: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 06:16:34 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 06:17:10 PM
Do not think I can root for Wisky.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2012, 06:18:51 PM
EMHABGDOTB

(every man hopes a bomb gets dropped on the building)
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 06:19:27 PM
would take
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2012, 06:26:36 PM
Emao, for sure.
Title: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: That_Guy on March 22, 2012, 06:52:09 PM
EMAO
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Winters on March 22, 2012, 07:11:15 PM
Not even close, EMAO.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 07:32:16 PM
Really glad we lost to emao wisconsin would have destroyed us.  Maybe kenpom gets the last laugh
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: BleedingPurple7 on March 22, 2012, 07:49:30 PM
13 for 21 from 3 for emab...gtfo
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: AppleJack on March 22, 2012, 07:50:03 PM
my god i hate wisconsin.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2012, 07:55:31 PM
6 straight 3's in 6 possessions for Wisconsin.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: AppleJack on March 22, 2012, 08:15:24 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Winters on March 22, 2012, 08:16:11 PM
 :bigtoke:
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 22, 2012, 08:16:40 PM
Whew
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Pete on March 22, 2012, 08:16:51 PM
I rough ridin' hate Syracuse.  I hate every last mother rough ridin' thing about that school. 
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: EMAWzified on March 22, 2012, 09:52:51 PM
I don't think mothers are the family members they're rough ridin', fuckers
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 23, 2012, 02:31:15 PM
This game was the perfect example of the stupidity of using tempo based stats. I heard several times about Syracuse being on pace to surpass Wisconsin's "nation leading 53 points per game defense".

The score "only" ended up being 64-63.

Yet the offensive efficiencies were a ridiculous 1.22 ppp to 1.20 ppp because the game was only 52 possessions. There were hard shots made, but also not great defense for much of the game.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Cire on March 23, 2012, 03:00:19 PM
Both teams made a lot of jumpers it seemed.  or at least a high percentage.
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: ChiComCat on March 23, 2012, 03:03:49 PM
This game was the perfect example of the stupidity of using tempo based stats. I heard several times about Syracuse being on pace to surpass Wisconsin's "nation leading 53 points per game defense".

The score "only" ended up being 64-63.

Yet the offensive efficiencies were a ridiculous 1.22 ppp to 1.20 ppp because the game was only 52 possessions. There were hard shots made, but also not great defense for much of the game.

Wisconsin had a lot of good looks for 3 and they made every rough ridin' one for about a 4 minute stretch.  You could probably find a 5-10 minute segment of that game where Wisky was 2+ ppp
Title: Re: EMAB Or EMAO?
Post by: Skipper44 on March 23, 2012, 03:50:36 PM
This game was the perfect example of the stupidity of using tempo based stats. I heard several times about Syracuse being on pace to surpass Wisconsin's "nation leading 53 points per game defense".

The score "only" ended up being 64-63.

Yet the offensive efficiencies were a ridiculous 1.22 ppp to 1.20 ppp because the game was only 52 possessions. There were hard shots made, but also not great defense for much of the game.

Wisconsin had a lot of good looks for 3 and they made every rough ridin' one for about a 4 minute stretch.  You could probably find a 5-10 minute segment of that game where Wisky was 2+ ppp
didn't they hit 6 straight meaning they would have a PPP of 3?   :eek: