goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Fitz Bath on January 20, 2012, 08:32:12 PM

Title: -3
Post by: Fitz Bath on January 20, 2012, 08:32:12 PM
I'm surprised. I figured it would be OK St. by -2 or so.
KU is also favored by 3 in Austin. I think they win by 10+.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: nicname on January 20, 2012, 08:33:11 PM
OSU sucks.  I think we win.  I'm fairly confident.

Title: Re: -3
Post by: kso_FAN on January 20, 2012, 08:33:41 PM
OSU sucks.  I think we win.  I'm fairly confident.

Me too.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: Spaces on January 20, 2012, 08:35:28 PM
Yeah, we'll cover easily. They really aren't good.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: TaqMan on January 20, 2012, 08:40:34 PM
Yeah, we'll cover easily. They really aren't good.

Neither is ou
Title: Re: -3
Post by: Spaces on January 20, 2012, 08:45:13 PM
that's assuming ar-t plays, and frank isn't being frank.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: nicname on January 20, 2012, 08:47:14 PM
good grief.  quit being gigantic wimps guys.  we're not losing to those turds.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: kso_FAN on January 20, 2012, 10:47:30 PM
Yeah, we'll cover easily. They really aren't good.

Neither is ou

OU has a better coach. Plus losing Olukemi was huge for OSU; he destroyed us last year.

I'm not saying we can't lose, but if we play reasonably well we should win. V Tech beat these guys twice this year also which makes me feel a bit more confident.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: j-von on January 20, 2012, 11:03:54 PM
At this point it's really up to Rodney whether we win or not.  Somebody should just call him and ask.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 21, 2012, 09:42:14 AM
Wasn't  :ohno: until right about now. Very anxious about this game.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: kso_FAN on January 21, 2012, 10:15:25 AM
At this point it's really up to Rodney whether we win or not.  Somebody should just call him and ask.

I think Rodney will play well. The key to me will be others stepping up, especially Jamar and Sprads. Then one of the Frosh. I'd like to see a decent defensive eFG% as well, hopefully below 45%.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: Kat Kid on January 21, 2012, 10:42:49 AM
good grief.  quit being gigantic wimps guys.  we're not losing to those turds.

look at nicname, smokin his pipe, full of swag.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: sys on January 21, 2012, 11:03:21 AM
all depends on the d.  assume we'll score, assume we'll rebound, assume we'll turn it over.   don't feel there is a basis to assume we either will or will not play decent defense.


better chance ku loses today than against bu, agree with vegas on that.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: _33 on January 21, 2012, 11:38:36 AM
all depends on the d.  assume we'll score, assume we'll rebound, assume we'll turn it over.   don't feel there is a basis to assume we either will or will not play decent defense.


D should be the thing you should be able to count on. The other things should be the variables. I wonder why it's not that way for us this year.  Weird.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: catzacker on January 21, 2012, 11:43:05 AM
it really depends on the kind of production victor and diaz can give us in the post.  let that sink in.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 21, 2012, 11:45:36 AM
My confidence level is  :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid: out of 5 emawkids
Title: Re: -3
Post by: sys on January 21, 2012, 11:49:53 AM
it really depends on the kind of production victor and diaz can give us in the post.  let that sink in.

no it doesn't.  stop being stupid (before the game).
Title: Re: -3
Post by: SwiftCat on January 21, 2012, 12:15:35 PM
all depends on the d.  assume we'll score, assume we'll rebound, assume we'll turn it over.   don't feel there is a basis to assume we either will or will not play decent defense.

Yes, the defense  is key. I agree 100%
Title: Re: -3
Post by: catzacker on January 21, 2012, 12:17:03 PM
it really depends on the kind of production victor and diaz can give us in the post.  let that sink in.

no it doesn't.  stop being stupid (before the game).

i know, but i couldn't figure out a way to drag JO into this.  
Title: Re: -3
Post by: mocat on January 21, 2012, 12:23:01 PM
I'd like to see a decent defensive eFG% as well, hopefully below 45%.

This.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: sys on January 21, 2012, 12:23:24 PM
i know, but i couldn't figure out a way to drag JO into this.  

"we'd have a lot better chance of playing decent defense if we had more of our 7'0" interior defenders available."


there you go, but that's the last time.  from now on you do your job, and i'll do mine.
Title: Re: -3
Post by: kim carnes on January 21, 2012, 12:31:25 PM
we are going to get demolished
Title: Re: -3
Post by: Spaces on January 21, 2012, 07:55:31 PM
Yeah, we'll cover easily. They really aren't good.
  :cool: