goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Fuktard on January 16, 2012, 08:42:17 AM

Title: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Fuktard on January 16, 2012, 08:42:17 AM
making the Frank haters look like foo's
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: ednksu on January 16, 2012, 08:47:44 AM
CNs?
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2012, 09:38:59 AM
Once again, this board has gone full tuck when it comes to Frank.

Absolutely no criticism of Frank is allowed . . .  :flush:
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: wabash909 on January 16, 2012, 09:52:12 AM
I don't think we've gone full tuck.

The last two games have been dreadful in many respects, especially defense and just some flat out undisciplined basketball.  That's on Frank.  The team's preparedness is on Frank.

I do think we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that we have played the top three teams in the conference out of the gate and won one and should have won two of the three had it not been for some lapses down the stretch.  OU is inexcusable, but looking at this season collectively at this point, we need to take some relative context into account here.




Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 16, 2012, 09:56:26 AM
Doesn't matter, we're going 8-10 in conference if we're lucky and headed to the NIT.  While that may have sounded ok when the season started it is unacceptable after the start of the season.  Will probably not watch any more of this crap-infested dumpster fire of a team the rest of the season, they are a joke and so are Frank's antics
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2012, 09:58:59 AM
Once again, this board has gone full tuck when it comes to Frank.

Absolutely no criticism of Frank is allowed . . .  :flush:

yeah, nobody is stopping anyone from criticizing anyone.  
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Stupid Fitz on January 16, 2012, 10:02:21 AM
Once again, this board has gone full tuck when it comes to Frank.

Absolutely no criticism of Frank is allowed . . .  :flush:

yeah, nobody is stopping anyone from criticizing anyone.  

Dax is just mad people started ignoring his "Frank sucks at recruiting" post he puts in every thread. 
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: MakeItRain on January 16, 2012, 10:03:21 AM
Doesn't matter, we're going 8-10 in conference if we're lucky and headed to the NIT.  While that may have sounded ok when the season started it is unacceptable after the start of the season.  Will probably not watch any more of this crap-infested dumpster fire of a team the rest of the season, they are a joke and so are Frank's antics

Awww please don't go, we need you.  Just kidding, no one cares.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 16, 2012, 10:08:18 AM
Doesn't matter, we're going 8-10 in conference if we're lucky and headed to the NIT.  While that may have sounded ok when the season started it is unacceptable after the start of the season.  Will probably not watch any more of this crap-infested dumpster fire of a team the rest of the season, they are a joke and so are Frank's antics

Awww please don't go, we need you.  Just kidding, no one cares.

likewise with this team,....they are absolute crap and will not improve from absolute crap at all this year.  I have a hard time believing we will even be a .500 team next year.  Keep thinking we will be something tho, gotta have a few delusional fans in here that think we can somehow luck into an NCAA tourney berth.  It's not happening folks, this team is crap and nobody even needs to bring up postseason crap because this worthless team is not even gonna be invited
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 16, 2012, 10:23:10 AM
Can't tell if serious?  :dubious: Have fun waiting for NIT games to start at the OOD while I catch my flight to the sweet 16.  :drool:
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 16, 2012, 10:26:17 AM
Can't tell if serious?  :dubious: Have fun waiting for NIT games to start at the OOD while I catch my flight to the sweet 16.  :drool:
:dubious:

We're not even gonna sniff that idiot.  I have no idea why any of you tards have any reason to believe we will either.  For fucks sake, we couldn't make the sweet 16 with Mike & Bill, we barely made the sweet 16 with Jake and Denis piggybacking us past BYU and Xavier.  Keep dreaming though you rough ridin' morons  :flush:
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2012, 10:28:37 AM
GO BIGWILLIE GO! 

  :excited:
Title: Re: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 10:42:38 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2012, 10:49:33 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 
Title: Re: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 10:56:59 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

as a snapshot/point in time, probably.  I think this year as more potential going forward though.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 16, 2012, 11:01:47 AM
I am done melting down.  There isn't anything to even melt down about anymore.  This team is crap, their effort is crap, and the only thing that's gonna happen the rest of the year is throwing a big pile of crap onto the floor and getting our ass handed to us like the worthless rough ridin' bitches we are.
Title: Re: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2012, 11:02:45 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

as a snapshot/point in time, probably.  I think this year as more potential going forward though.

I don't know, we were picked 6th in the league.  Can cat fans muster enough anger without expectations?  We will see.  We will see.  
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: michigancat on January 16, 2012, 11:04:29 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been.  

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2012, 11:05:29 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been.  

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well.  
Title: Re: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 11:09:03 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

as a snapshot/point in time, probably.  I think this year as more potential going forward though.

I don't know, we were picked 6th in the league.  Can cat fans muster enough anger without expectations?  We will see.  We will see.  

I think the rankings are somewhat meaningless to a lot of our bb fans.  I mean, when have rankings ever really meant much towards the expectations of Cat fans?  Look at our FB team.  I mean, people think that we are going to win 9-10 games every year regardless. 

If we are ranked in preseason, it gives them a useful stat.  If we aren't ranked, we are unappreciated and will "show them". 
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: michigancat on January 16, 2012, 11:10:18 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Fuktard on January 16, 2012, 11:10:58 AM
Once again, this board has gone full tuck when it comes to Frank.

Absolutely no criticism of Frank is allowed . . .  :flush:

Don't make me break out sysdax!
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: catzacker on January 16, 2012, 11:55:33 AM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 



After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Not that I’m any gage, but I believe last year I melted down after the Loyola-Ch. game.  This year it took me to the 10 minute mark of our first game.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 16, 2012, 12:00:28 PM
I'll make a deal. If we lose at home to Texas on Wednesday ill go full Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) with BigWillie. How's that sound?
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 16, 2012, 12:01:48 PM
I'll make a deal. If we lose at home to Texas on Wednesday ill go full Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) with BigWillie. How's that sound?

Really don't see how it's full Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) when we rough ridin' suck ass  :dunno:
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 16, 2012, 12:04:18 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 



After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Not that I’m any gage, but I believe last year I melted down after the Loyola-Ch. game.  This year it took me to the 10 minute mark of our first game.

The expectations and rankings must have tempered you last year, then. This team looked much better throughout the noncon than last year's team.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 12:06:29 PM
I'll make a deal. If we lose at home to Texas on Wednesday ill go full Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) with BigWillie. How's that sound?

I think you are misinterpreting the thread.  not making a case on why we should melt down, but only why some will/have.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: kougar24 on January 16, 2012, 12:08:29 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Point of order: Tech is the worst team in the league.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 12:13:04 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Point of order: Tech is the worst team in the league.

it's early(it's only mid January).  may be splitting hairs here.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Trim on January 16, 2012, 12:14:04 PM
I'll make a deal. If we lose at home to Texas on Wednesday ill go full Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) with BigWillie. How's that sound?

Like when you were twitter spamming everyone, I won't know the difference.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: michigancat on January 16, 2012, 12:15:12 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Point of order: Tech is the worst team in the league.

Duly noted, kougs. Good to know we were on track to win the league, though.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 16, 2012, 12:18:34 PM
so what did Dave Armstrong say?
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: kougar24 on January 16, 2012, 12:22:20 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

hmmm, yeah, probably.  the excellent non-con and MU win set this year's meltdown up nicely as well. 

yeah, the Duke loss to UF blowout to the suspension UNLV loss right before Christmas kind of gave us a nice, slow decline last year. This year we went from beating two undefeated top 5 teams and being league champs if Frank wasn't a respect to getting blown out by the worst team in the league in 7 days.

Point of order: Tech is the worst team in the league.

it's early(it's only mid January).  may be splitting hairs here.

I'm pretty confident with the Tech assumption.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: kso_FAN on January 16, 2012, 12:34:05 PM
Man. This year could be the meltdowniest BB year in a while.  Could be worth a few more losses.

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk

wasn't last year about this time the meltdowniest?  seems like it should have been. 

After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5. Although it feels a little more meltdowny this year. Not sure why. Probably because ksu_FAN is no longer a Frankite and he was pretty good at talking people off the ledge.

Meh, I'm still a Frankite. And I'll defend Frank plenty this season before its over.

I will admit Hawaii/Missouri probably heightened my expectations for the team/Frank to unreasonable levels and I need to move on from that.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: michigancat on January 16, 2012, 12:35:04 PM
dammit, I was hoping FAN wouldn't see that and I could avoid an ed/MiR scenario.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: MakeItRain on January 16, 2012, 12:41:12 PM
ed

Very effective way to keep name out of mouth, bravo
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Fuktard on January 16, 2012, 12:47:06 PM
Armstrong said that Frank has his way of doing things and that's not going to change and he agrees with how he does it.  Was asked "yeah but it looks like he sacrificed a league game just to make a point, which ay cost him a chance to win the league"  Dave answered with we won't have a chance to win the league anyway if everyones not on the same page and everyone clearly is not on the same page or palyers wouldn't be running stairs for 2 hours the day before a game.  Said Frank will get control of this team and it will be better for it....can't win without everyone pulling together.  It was actually a very good interview and Dave brought up some good points to reinforce why Frank was being Frank...much to the chagrin of St John of whoever the hell was doing the interview.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: sys on January 16, 2012, 12:50:51 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: ben ji on January 16, 2012, 01:04:56 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.

I had given up all hope after that CU loss, all hope. That run afterwards cemented Pullens place in my heart  :love:
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: mcmwcat on January 16, 2012, 01:33:25 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                    Offense                                            Defense                    
                       Date                                            Opponent                                            Result                                                                Pace                                            Eff                                            eFG%                                            TO%                                            OR%                                            FTR                                            Eff                                            eFG%                                            TO%                                            OR%                                            FTR                    
                       Mon Feb 14                                            3                                            Kansas                                            W, 84-68                                            H                                            70                                            119.5                                            1                                            62.5                                            24.2                                            42.9                                            60.4                                            96.8                                            6                                            47.0                                            25.6                                            35.5                                            58.0                    
                       Sat Feb 19                                            137                                            Oklahoma                                            W, 77-62                                            H                                            65                                            118.8                                            5                                            54.7                                            20.1                                            32.7                                            39.6                                            95.7                                            12                                            52.1                                            23.1                                            22.8                                            31.9                    
                       Wed Feb 23                                            60                                            Nebraska                                            W, 61-57                                            A                                            65                                            94.2                                            16                                            40.4                                            15.4                                            26.8                                            68.1                                            88.0                                            4                                            39.8                                            26.3                                            34.8                                            55.1                    
                       Sat Feb 26                                            44                                            Missouri                                            W, 80-70                                            H                                            69                                            115.3                                            7                                            58.3                                            24.5                                            42.6                                            44.4                                            100.9                                            9                                            48.1                                            15.8                                            23.6                                            44.4                    
                       Mon Feb 28                                            5                                            Texas                                            W, 75-70                                            A                                            67                                            112.1                                            7                                            54.6                                            13.4                                            31.8                                            38.9                                            104.6                                            12                                            37.5                                            12.0                                            40.2                                            38.2                    
                       Sat Mar 5                                            81                                            Iowa St.                                            W, 67-55                                            H                                            69                                            97.0                                            18                                            54.3                                            27.5                                            31.0                                            46.8                                            79.6                                            3                                            40.3                                            20.3                                            25.0                                            16.1                    
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: puniraptor on January 16, 2012, 01:35:22 PM
Beep boop boop beep boop boop beep
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: Gooch on January 16, 2012, 01:50:01 PM
What a cluster eff.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 01:59:06 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.

It's become the expectation: start conf weak, then run hard until we are a bubble team that can inexplicable lose to ISU at home in March and nervously sit around until Selection Sunday finally gets here and we find out if we will be playing next week at OOD in the NIT, or heading to the local NCAA regional.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: mcmwcat on January 16, 2012, 02:04:27 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.

It's become the expectation: start conf weak, then run hard until we are a bubble team that can inexplicable lose to ISU at home in March and nervously sit around until Selection Sunday finally gets here and we find out if we will be playing next week at OOD in the NIT, or heading to the local NCAA regional.

the 3 times under Frank we've been in we've been in solidly.  his first year was the closest we came to not making it and i really had no doubt that Beasley / Walker.  we would have been really close in 09 with a field of 68.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: CNS on January 16, 2012, 02:15:59 PM
After the @CU loss, sys was saying we were NIT bound IIRC. We were 1-4 and 4-6 after starting the season in the top 5.

i remember that.  you posted that we still could make the tourney and i was like - it's wonderful that you still believe that little michigancat :patsmichigancatonhead:


the run after the cu loss was just incredible.  i know kstate fans appreciate it, but i don't think we appreciate it enough.

It's become the expectation: start conf weak, then run hard until we are a bubble team that can inexplicable lose to ISU at home in March and nervously sit around until Selection Sunday finally gets here and we find out if we will be playing next week at OOD in the NIT, or heading to the local NCAA regional.

the 3 times under Frank we've been in we've been in solidly.  his first year was the closest we came to not making it and i really had no doubt that Beasley / Walker.  we would have been really close in 09 with a field of 68.

Yeah, I was making fun.
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2012, 02:28:01 PM
Frank being a great brand = Bubble Buster

Neck Brace = NIT
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: mcmwcat on January 16, 2012, 02:58:24 PM
Neck Brace = NIT

in some alternate universe?
Title: Re: Dave Armstrong on 810....
Post by: sys on January 16, 2012, 04:56:31 PM
Neck Brace = NIT

in some alternate universe?

some guy on kstatefans or maybe phog.net referred to wooldridge as mcneck (a couple of days ago).  it really made me mad.