goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: LickNeckey on November 29, 2011, 10:47:37 AM

Title: War on Drugs
Post by: LickNeckey on November 29, 2011, 10:47:37 AM
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2011/11/cocaine-plummeting-price-nationwide-drop-violent-crime/474/

you damn Coke Heads in the 80's were the problem.  :excited:
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 29, 2011, 01:58:56 PM
That article lacks some key research.  Mainly, where this cheap and very pure cocaine being sold.  I can't accept it's premise.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 29, 2011, 02:54:21 PM
That article lacks some key research.  Mainly, where this cheap and very pure cocaine being sold.  I can't accept it's premise.

Canadian friend of mine said you can pick it up at any Occupy protest site. It's being subsidized by George Soros.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 29, 2011, 03:33:08 PM
That article lacks some key research.  Mainly, where this cheap and very pure cocaine being sold.  I can't accept it's premise.

Canadian friend of mine said you can pick it up at any Occupy protest site. It's being subsidized by George Soros.

Yeah, this girl I know from Winnipeg said that the Occupy guys have crappy blow and are very suspicious. 
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 29, 2011, 03:59:21 PM
That article lacks some key research.  Mainly, where this cheap and very pure cocaine being sold.  I can't accept it's premise.

Canadian friend of mine said you can pick it up at any Occupy protest site. It's being subsidized by George Soros.

Yeah, this girl I know from Winnipeg said that the Occupy guys have crappy blow and are very suspicious. 

Canadian friend said the US occupy coke was cut half as much as the Canadian occupy stuff (gov subsidized), so he drove to the Seattle occupy (Soros subsidized) to pick some up.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: LickNeckey on November 29, 2011, 04:33:36 PM
so if i understand what you are saying.  Soros's coke is responsible for reducing crime in our country?  Cool

Thanks George!!!
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 29, 2011, 05:11:06 PM
so if i understand what you are saying.  Soros's coke is responsible for reducing crime in our country?  Cool

Thanks George!!!

No, crystal meth taking over for coke traded violent crime for petty theft.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: 8manpick on November 29, 2011, 07:16:32 PM
My buddy from Toronto has not been able to find any cheap coke anywhere.  This article is misleading. :curse:
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: bubbles4ksu on November 29, 2011, 08:31:13 PM
My buddy from Toronto has not been able to find any cheap coke anywhere.  This article is misleading. :curse:

Damn, I hate to hear this.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 29, 2011, 08:48:06 PM

Good example of correlation without causation. 

Funny, they quote the author of Freakanomics in the first 4 sentences, but don't mention his correlation without causation reason for drop in violent crime, abortion (aka the erradication of poor, mainly minority children).

Nice twist, but I have a hard time believing much violent crime was ever strongly correlated with the rich mans drug.  Unless you count crack as cocaine.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: LickNeckey on November 30, 2011, 08:17:36 AM
watch "cocaine cowboys" 1&2
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: AbeFroman on November 30, 2011, 12:50:44 PM
Most drugs nowadays are sold by hippies and other privileged white kids. Well at least the good quality drugs are. This whole concept of the Cartel using your money to fund crime is a lie, unless you are buying meth, laundry detergent "coke", or schwag.
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: LickNeckey on November 30, 2011, 01:13:57 PM
it doesn't fund crime.  it creates opportunity to engage in criminal activity with limited legal recourse. 

i.e. I know a guy is a drug dealer. i know he has large amounts of drugs/cash. i know that i can rob him and get drugs/cash and he has limited recourse outside vigilanty justice. 

i.e. a dealer moves into my area and creates competition within my region.  i do not appreciate this competition and deal with the threat to my business accordingly.

Abe you know this
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 30, 2011, 08:30:01 PM
it doesn't fund crime.  it creates opportunity to engage in criminal activity with limited legal recourse. 

i.e. I know a guy is a drug dealer. i know he has large amounts of drugs/cash. i know that i can rob him and get drugs/cash and he has limited recourse outside vigilanty justice. 

i.e. a dealer moves into my area and creates competition within my region.  i do not appreciate this competition and deal with the threat to my business accordingly.

Abe you know this

does anyone really care of a bunch of drug dealers and users kill, batter, assault, and rob each other? 

The whole myth that if we just legalized drugs all the violence in Mexico would stop is more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) than the B.O. and the "if we close Gitmo terrorism will stop".
Title: Re: War on Drugs
Post by: LickNeckey on December 02, 2011, 11:27:24 AM
crime in mexico wouldn't stop.

criminals though wouldn't have billions of dollars of revenue to build narco armies with though,  which i think would be good

as it relates to dealers killing dealers.  no nobody really cares.  however such struggles inevitably create collateral damage that affects soceities.