goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on November 20, 2011, 12:33:57 AM

Title: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 20, 2011, 12:33:57 AM
sound about right? f*cking cal, hope notre dame can knock off SU next week. ohio state stands no shot vs mich
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 12:36:03 AM
sound about right? f*cking cal, hope notre dame can knock off SU next week. ohio state stands no shot vs mich

Houston will get an auto-bid if they don't lose. That will eff us over.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kso_FAN on November 20, 2011, 12:36:37 AM
Man, it's fun to have this discussion again. Man.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: SabiNation on November 20, 2011, 12:38:44 AM
Man, it's fun to have this discussion again. Man.

 :blush: Me too
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 20, 2011, 12:40:57 AM
sound about right? f*cking cal, hope notre dame can knock off SU next week. ohio state stands no shot vs mich

Houston will get an auto-bid if they don't lose. That will eff us over.

no sh*t. they are automatic at this point.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: SabiNation on November 20, 2011, 12:44:28 AM
sound about right? f*cking cal, hope notre dame can knock off SU next week. ohio state stands no shot vs mich

Houston will get an auto-bid if they don't lose. That will eff us over.

no sh*t. they are automatic at this point.

Guys, that simply is not true. They play Tulsa this Friday. Tulsa is a pretty good team as well. If they hadn't played a brutal non-con schedule, they could be unbeaten also.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/_/id/202/tulsa-golden-hurricane

 :dunno: Losses only to Oklahoma, Oklahoma St and Boise.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Shacks on November 20, 2011, 12:45:48 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 20, 2011, 12:46:57 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 12:48:56 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Shacks on November 20, 2011, 12:51:43 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 20, 2011, 12:54:43 AM
Quote
I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl k-state grad

we would win the big 12. period. i realize it's not the same like winning the dr. pepper, but we would be champions. end of story.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 12:58:11 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Shacks on November 20, 2011, 12:59:51 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?

I believe the team participating in the bowl keeps the lion's share of the payout (I want to say half but I'm not completely sure) while the rest is distributed among all nine teams
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on November 20, 2011, 01:13:13 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?

I believe the team participating in the bowl keeps the lion's share of the payout (I want to say half but I'm not completely sure) while the rest is distributed among all nine teams

Think of all the  :kstategrad: the big 12 will have to throw around, with what 7 teams probably going bowling this year. If you take away the free loaders to the east everyone is making this a profitable year to be in the big 12.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 01:18:59 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?

I believe the team participating in the bowl keeps the lion's share of the payout (I want to say half but I'm not completely sure) while the rest is distributed among all nine teams

Think of all the  :kstategrad: the big 12 will have to throw around, with what 7 teams probably going bowling this year. If you take away the free loaders to the east everyone is making this a profitable year to be in the big 12.

We will have 9 teams bowling. Bank it.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on November 20, 2011, 01:22:23 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?

I believe the team participating in the bowl keeps the lion's share of the payout (I want to say half but I'm not completely sure) while the rest is distributed among all nine teams

Think of all the  :kstategrad: the big 12 will have to throw around, with what 7 teams probably going bowling this year. If you take away the free loaders to the east everyone is making this a profitable year to be in the big 12.

We will have 9 teams bowling. Bank it.

Nine teams bowling woul be huge, Eff you Gill and company
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 01:24:36 AM
Really pulling for Oklahoma State to beat OU.  If that happens and K-State takes care of business...

OSU 11-1
KSU 10-2
OU 9-3

With all the upsets today and a few more that are certain to come in the next couple weeks, I've got a good feeling about the Fiesta Bowl if ^^^ unfolds

i'd rather have cotton + share of big 12.

Yeah, I just can't understand how anybody can undersell a share of the Big 12, especially with a true round robin schedule.

I'm not big on share of the Big 12 because we lost to both of the teams we would be tied with.  Wouldn't feel right about claiming a share in a three way tie when the dirt burglars and Pokes both have head to head over us.  A win in the Fiesta Bowl would be huge for K-State, plus the payout is bigger for a BCS bowl than for any non-BCS bowl :kstategrad:

Aren't bowl payouts split evenly among Big 12 teams after travel expenses are paid, anyway?

I believe the team participating in the bowl keeps the lion's share of the payout (I want to say half but I'm not completely sure) while the rest is distributed among all nine teams

Think of all the  :kstategrad: the big 12 will have to throw around, with what 7 teams probably going bowling this year. If you take away the free loaders to the east everyone is making this a profitable year to be in the big 12.

We will have 9 teams bowling. Bank it.

Nine teams bowling woul be huge, Eff you Gill and company

It takes a KU for a 10 team conference to get 9 teams bowling, honestly. And that nine teams bowling comment goes out on the limb that Baylor will be Baylor against Tech after their huge win. It's likely, but "bank it" might have been extreme.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kcchiefdav on November 20, 2011, 07:24:57 AM
The team that attends the bowl gets to take its expenses out of the payout and the rest of the money goes to the confy to get split evenly.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: _33 on November 20, 2011, 07:58:28 AM
Big XII 'ship would be better than any bowl by far. Can't believe we're even discussing it.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: wes mantooth on November 20, 2011, 08:14:35 AM
Big XII 'ship would be better than any bowl by far. Can't believe we're even discussing it.

i know, don't understand people like this shacks loser.  how don't we deserve it, we'd have the same record as ou and osu.  we didn't beat them, but it's pretty impressive that the only 2 losses we'd have are to the other 2 co champs, not some loser schools like iowa state and tech.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: ksucrcoop on November 20, 2011, 09:07:43 AM
Big XII 'ship would be better than any bowl by far. Can't believe we're even discussing it.

i know, don't understand people like this shacks loser.  how don't we deserve it, we'd have the same record as ou and osu.  we didn't beat them, but it's pretty impressive that the only 2 losses we'd have are to the other 2 co champs, not some loser schools like iowa state and tech.

Guess what?

NOBODY CARES. The hardware doesn't come with some asterisk on it. When we're pulling in 2-3 stars left in right to come on visits, you think they'll care? No, they will not. That's something 4-5 stars worry about ("did you win it outright? no? oh well then...blahblahblahpayme").

The only reasonable argument that can be made for not wanting the Big 12 co champ is that in that scenario, it will most definitely mean we don't get bcs bid, which could me a lot smaller payout (although Cotton bowl is nice) Since we are trying to un-K-State our stadium and put a hale library where the press box used to be, we could probably use the extra $4 mil.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Lemonrock on November 20, 2011, 11:34:27 AM
The squawks have no problem beating their chests regarding shared conference titles and claiming them as their own.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 20, 2011, 12:02:51 PM
The way I see it, of the 4 BCS at-large spots, the SEC definitely gets one, and Houston almost certainly gets the other (even if they lose to Tulsa, they'll probably finish top 16 and win their champioship, so the only way they don't get in is if they lose to Southern Miss in their championship).

So, that leaves two at-large spots up for grabs. Currently, those have to be held by Stanford/Oregon and Michigan.

So, we first need to open up one of those spots for OU/OSU/KSU, which means we need Michigan to lose Ohio State, or Oregon to lose to Oregon State. (Or, I guess, Houston loses to Southern Miss in champioship, but that's even less likely).

Then, we just need OSU to crush OU. If all that happens, the Cats are BCS bowling, right?

I wouldn't even be considering this, but for all the crazy upsets this past weekend.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 12:06:46 PM
The way I see it, of the 4 BCS at-large spots, the SEC definitely gets one, and Houston almost certainly gets the other (even if they lose to Tulsa, they'll probably finish top 16 and win their champioship, so the only way they don't get in is if they lose to Southern Miss in their championship).

So, that leaves two at-large spots up for grabs. Currently, those have to be held by Stanford/Oregon and Michigan.

So, we first need to open up one of those spots for OU/OSU/KSU, which means we need Michigan to lose Ohio State, or Oregon to lose to Oregon State. (Or, I guess, Houston loses to Southern Miss in champioship, but that's even less likely).

Then, we just need OSU to crush OU. If all that happens, the Cats are BCS bowling, right?

I wouldn't even be considering this, but for all the crazy upsets this past weekend.

Uhh, Michigan isn't even yet high enough for BCS selection.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: joda on November 20, 2011, 12:13:33 PM
Is it greedy of me to want both the confy and a BCS bowl? Cause I do and I think there's an outside chance for it. I'm guessing we're 10 or 11 in the new BCS rankings, and even if Boise St. and Houston both get at large bids that still leaves 1 spot after the 2nd SEC team. I've got to think we're a candidate for that over the CCG loser of the B10, ACC, or P12 and OSU with a 2nd loss to OU. It all depends on how we get ranked in the polls, but if some chips fall the right way we could be looking at as high a BCS ranking as 5 or 6 when you consider how many teams above or around us still have to play each other.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 20, 2011, 12:19:04 PM
The way I see it, of the 4 BCS at-large spots, the SEC definitely gets one, and Houston almost certainly gets the other (even if they lose to Tulsa, they'll probably finish top 16 and win their champioship, so the only way they don't get in is if they lose to Southern Miss in their championship).

So, that leaves two at-large spots up for grabs. Currently, those have to be held by Stanford/Oregon and Michigan.

So, we first need to open up one of those spots for OU/OSU/KSU, which means we need Michigan to lose Ohio State, or Oregon to lose to Oregon State. (Or, I guess, Houston loses to Southern Miss in champioship, but that's even less likely).

Then, we just need OSU to crush OU. If all that happens, the Cats are BCS bowling, right?

I wouldn't even be considering this, but for all the crazy upsets this past weekend.

Uhh, Michigan isn't even yet high enough for BCS selection.

But they will be tonight, won't they? And they certainly would be if they win out.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 12:29:27 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 12:35:46 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: sysdax on November 20, 2011, 12:38:42 PM
We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2011, 12:40:55 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

LSU isn't losing to Georgia
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 20, 2011, 12:41:34 PM
We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: sysdax on November 20, 2011, 12:48:48 PM
We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

Not supposed to be funny, just edgy and cool because I'm not satisfied with mediocrity and stuff.  Only losers are happy when we're 9-2 and BARELY winning games and not recruiting 5 star players.  Loser.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 20, 2011, 12:50:56 PM
We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

Not supposed to be funny, just edgy and cool because I'm not satisfied with mediocrity and stuff.  Only losers are happy when we're 9-2 and BARELY winning games and not recruiting 5 star players.  Loser.

No, I get it. It's just not as funny as it could have been.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 12:59:21 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: michigancat on November 20, 2011, 01:00:03 PM
is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 01:18:53 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 01:19:14 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

LSU isn't losing to Georgia

Don't disagree.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Skipper44 on November 20, 2011, 01:23:05 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.
Link?  I have not seen this anywhere?
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: _33 on November 20, 2011, 01:23:43 PM
is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.

Yes. Has to be.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 01:26:10 PM
If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.
Link?  I have not seen this anywhere?

1 v 2 guaranteed.

SEC champ guaranteed.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: sysdax on November 20, 2011, 01:27:29 PM
is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.

Yes. Has to be.

pffft.  Bookcat is a rough ridin' tuck that thinks we're good and stuff.  I'm edgy and cool, unsatisfied with the medicority that KState football has become.  
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 01:31:16 PM
 :lol: It is Bookcat.
Title: Re: BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford
Post by: sys on November 20, 2011, 01:40:15 PM
We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

take my name off this sock.  i was perfectly satisfied with mediocrity.