goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 02:10:23 PM

Title: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 02:10:23 PM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 


 :emawkid:
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: doom on November 09, 2011, 02:32:19 PM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 


 :emawkid:

We are 9% of your losses.   :emawkid:
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: AbeFroman on November 09, 2011, 02:38:03 PM
16-1

or whatever the first number is at.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 02:45:27 PM
16-1

or whatever the first number is at.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: KsJoey on November 09, 2011, 03:24:06 PM
I wonder what the NCAA Tournament record is against Mid-Majors?


After March of next year, KU fans will be posting "But we were 165-22 in the 5 years before this past season".
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: theKSU on November 09, 2011, 03:32:26 PM
Lawrence Kansas: Titletown USA
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Cire on November 09, 2011, 03:40:45 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 03:53:08 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 09, 2011, 03:55:33 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.

Just stop it! We play tough games! Even self says so!
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: EuroCat on November 09, 2011, 04:37:45 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 09, 2011, 04:40:41 PM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 


 :emawkid:

I'd be more interested in winning percentage in a 5 year span if I'm handing out some bluest of blue bloods title. 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 04:47:16 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year



I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: EuroCat on November 09, 2011, 04:51:20 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 09, 2011, 04:52:06 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.

Probably had a tough draw
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: pissclams on November 09, 2011, 04:55:24 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.

Probably had a tough draw
too much depth/great players
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 05:00:20 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.


You know you're elite when getting to an Elite Eight is "disappointing." 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: mocat on November 09, 2011, 05:01:05 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.


You know you're elite when getting to an Elite Eight is "disappointing." 

dammit  you're right
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 05:02:03 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.

Probably had a tough draw
too much depth/great players



Upsets happen, which makes it even more incredible that K-State hasn't sniffed a Final Four since the 1960's.  
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: pissclams on November 09, 2011, 05:07:19 PM
i'm pretty sure we sniffed one when we went to the elite eight two years ago. 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 05:09:31 PM
i'm pretty sure we sniffed one when we went to the elite eight two years ago. 



I didn't realize getting to an Elite Eight = Final Four. 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: mocat on November 09, 2011, 05:09:33 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.

Probably had a tough draw
too much depth/great players



Upsets happen, which makes it even more incredible that K-State hasn't sniffed a Final Four since the 1960's.  

Beems to be honest i feel like K-State sniffed it in 09-10. I mean we sniffed it. Sniff sniff, what's that? A final four? Oh crap we lost.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: EuroCat on November 09, 2011, 05:19:51 PM
Seff loves him some cupcakes


It does help getting K-State at least twice on the schedule every year.
We'd like to play you guys more. I'm really pulling for you guys to make it out of the first weekend this year

I'm pretty sure KU made the Elite Eight last year, while K-State was sent packing in the first weekend.
Wow. Must have been pretty disappointing to only make it that far with all that NBA talent.

Probably had a tough draw
too much depth/great players



Upsets happen, which makes it even more incredible that K-State hasn't sniffed a Final Four since the 1960's.  

Beems to be honest i feel like K-State sniffed it in 09-10. I mean we sniffed it. Sniff sniff, what's that? A final four? Oh crap we lost.
He must've been watching the KU game instead.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: ZappaCat on November 09, 2011, 05:25:21 PM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 

Denied!

Not even the best stretch of college basketball in the last 5 years. (UCONN women 182-8 in the last 5 years.)

Not even the best individual NCAA mens Div I coaching effort in the last 5 years:
John Calipari was 172-17 from 2005-2010 and 168-22 from 2006-2011 (Memphis & Kentucky)

Definately not the best 5 year winning percentage ever.
Duke went 164-19 or 89.6% from 1997-2002.
UCLA went 335-22 from 1963-1975  (Wooden lost 22 games in 12 years 93.8%, only took self 5 years to lose 22 games 88.2%)
Kentucky went 241-20 from 1945-1953. (92.3% over 8 years)

It did help KU to average more than 37 games played per season. The NCAA champions for many years averaged less than 30 total games per season.

Not really the bluest of the blue bloods, just a very good team that got to play CU, NU, and ISU a minimum of 6 games per year!
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 05:38:17 PM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 

Denied!

Not even the best stretch of college basketball in the last 5 years. (UCONN women 182-8 in the last 5 years.)

Not even the best individual NCAA mens Div I coaching effort in the last 5 years:
John Calipari was 172-17 from 2005-2010 and 168-22 from 2006-2011 (Memphis & Kentucky)

Definately not the best 5 year winning percentage ever.
Duke went 164-19 or 89.6% from 1997-2002.
UCLA went 335-22 from 1963-1975  (Wooden lost 22 games in 12 years 93.8%, only took self 5 years to lose 22 games 88.2%)
Kentucky went 241-20 from 1945-1953. (92.3% over 8 years)

It did help KU to average more than 37 games played per season. The NCAA champions for many years averaged less than 30 total games per season.

Not really the bluest of the blue bloods, just a very good team that got to play CU, NU, and ISU a minimum of 6 games per year!


1.  We're talking men's college basketball.

2.  We're talking programs, not coaches.

3.  We're talking wins, not winning percentage.


Anything else? 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: pissclams on November 09, 2011, 05:39:13 PM
i'm pretty sure we sniffed one when we went to the elite eight two years ago. 



I didn't realize getting to an Elite Eight = Final Four. 
just sniffin
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Cire on November 09, 2011, 06:29:17 PM
wow
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 09, 2011, 06:55:29 PM

His premise is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). 
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: mcmwcat on November 09, 2011, 07:02:39 PM
that's pretty good.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: OregonSmock on November 09, 2011, 07:46:08 PM
i'm pretty sure we sniffed one when we went to the elite eight two years ago. 



I didn't realize getting to an Elite Eight = Final Four. 
just sniffin



I'll give you this one, my friend.  You may have won the battle, but not the war.


 :curse:
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 09, 2011, 08:21:58 PM
Look at the Validation Express pickin up steam again.

Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 09, 2011, 09:49:35 PM
Look at the Validation Express pickin up steam again.



It's amazing what a steller performance against Fort Hays will do for their confidence.  I was anticipating this after the Pittsburg game, but that was such an underwhelming performance, I guess they had to wait.
Title: Re: 165-22
Post by: SdK on November 10, 2011, 02:13:32 AM
No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 

Denied!

Not even the best stretch of college basketball in the last 5 years. (UCONN women 182-8 in the last 5 years.)

Not even the best individual NCAA mens Div I coaching effort in the last 5 years:
John Calipari was 172-17 from 2005-2010 and 168-22 from 2006-2011 (Memphis & Kentucky)

Definately not the best 5 year winning percentage ever.
Duke went 164-19 or 89.6% from 1997-2002.
UCLA went 335-22 from 1963-1975  (Wooden lost 22 games in 12 years 93.8%, only took self 5 years to lose 22 games 88.2%)
Kentucky went 241-20 from 1945-1953. (92.3% over 8 years)

It did help KU to average more than 37 games played per season. The NCAA champions for many years averaged less than 30 total games per season.

Not really the bluest of the blue bloods, just a very good team that got to play CU, NU, and ISU a minimum of 6 games per year!


1.  We're talking men's college basketball.

2.  We're talking programs, not coaches.

3.  We're talking wins, not winning percentage.


Anything else? 


Are you rough ridin' kidding me?  I know you're not. Yes, you guys have the most wins in 5 years because teams are playing more games. But Jesus Christ, how do you discount numbers that kick the piss out yours for not fitting in your conveniently constructed 5 year span? Idiocy.