goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on November 01, 2011, 05:20:39 AM
-
K-State:
Gross Revenues: $68.375 Million
Expenses: $45.479 Million
Net Revenues: $23.395 Million
-
Lets buy something nice
-
How does this compare to prior years?
-
Lets buy something nice
like safeties and dtackles!
-
:kstategrad:
-
like good basketball recruits.
-
Seems like a lot more than previous years :dunno:
-
K-State:
Gross Revenues: $68.375 Million
Expenses: $45.479 Million
Net Revenues: $23.395 Million
Any of that include Nebraska and Colorado exit fee money?
-
Lets buy something nice
I think a diamond-studded shark tank in the locker room would really help with recruiting.
-
That tells me we're not spending enough on blow and hookers for recruits.
-
That tells me we're not spending enough on blow and hookers for recruits.
Maybe they are just saving for one big end of year hooker/blow party with a lot of blow, and really nice hookers? I mean, anyone can get regular hookers and a small amt of blow, right?
-
It's up about $15 million year over year. I haven't had a chance to digest the Annual Report yet.
Strange, but as usual ku hasn't posted their Equity in Athletics report yet, and it wouldn't surprise me if they weren't the last BCS school to have their information updated on the Equity in Athletics website . . . as usual.
-
Lets buy something nice
Like quality assistant coaches for the defense and great recruiters for both men's BB and football.
-
ku's 2010-2011 Equity in Athletics Disclosure:
Expenses: $70.028 Million
Gross Revenues: $70.028 Million
Net Revenue: $0
Noteables: According to their disclosure ku football lost approximately $3.6 million dollars last FY. Reporting Revenue of $9.5 million for football and expenses of $13.095 million.
-
ku women's basketball "lost" $3.6 million last FY, while K-State women's hoops "lost" about $2.5 million.
-
:popcorn:
-
That tells me we're not spending enough on blow and hookers for recruits.
Maybe they are just saving for one big end of year hooker/blow party with a lot of blow, and really nice hookers? I mean, anyone can get regular hookers and a small amt of blow, right?
The scary part of the logistics is where are the hookers going to come from? Junction City (don't read while eating)? Topeka (ditto)? Kansas City? I'm not up on the Manhattan prostitution market, so this is a sincere question.
-
That tells me we're not spending enough on blow and hookers for recruits.
Maybe they are just saving for one big end of year hooker/blow party with a lot of blow, and really nice hookers? I mean, anyone can get regular hookers and a small amt of blow, right?
The scary part of the logistics is where are the hookers going to come from? Junction City (don't read while eating)? Topeka (ditto)? Kansas City? I'm not up on the Manhattan prostitution market, so this is a sincere question.
I think we can afford to import them. We should ask Craig James where he would recommend.
-
Love watching Dax do this. It's like watching Phelps in the pool. Smooth, confident, dominant.
:cheers:
-
ku's 2010-2011 Equity in Athletics Disclosure:
Expenses: $70.028 Million
Gross Revenues: $70.028 Million
Net Revenue: $0
Noteables: According to their disclosure ku football lost approximately $3.6 million dollars last FY. Reporting Revenue of $9.5 million for football and expenses of $13.095 million.
they make a debt payment equal to whatever revenue they were going to make before closing the books?
-
KU would be profitable if they would just drop football.
-
ku's 2010-2011 Equity in Athletics Disclosure:
Expenses: $70.028 Million
Gross Revenues: $70.028 Million
:dubious:
-
Clams . . . they may have made a big debt payment, their FY 2011 Financial Report isn't out, also I could only breeze through K-State's Financial Report, so it's hard to tell exactly why K-State's took such a significant leap.
But it's not unusal for athletic departments to show (for lack of a better word) completely balanced books, with expenses matching revenues. That happens pretty much every year at Baylor for example, but all of their fund raising etc. goes on another set of books for the booster club or foundation or something like that. Which is why I've been saying for years that you can't use these reports and just make blanket statements about the financial status of athletic programs.
I would note that this is the first time in memory that ku has not shown a net revenue number on their report, but, they may have changed their acconting practices, just like K-State may have changed theirs.
-
KU would be profitable if they would just drop football.
Yes. This state can only support one FBS football school. With one, we may not lose as many kids to OU & OSU. :lynchmob:
-
Why on earth is Baylor releasing their numbers?
-
Why on earth is Baylor releasing their numbers?
Any school that gets any kind of federal funds has to put out an Equity in Athletics report.
-
That tells me we're not spending enough on blow and hookers for recruits.
Don't forget the abortions and bounties on opposing QBs
-
K-State:
Gross Revenues: $68.375 Million
Expenses: $45.479 Million
Net Revenues: $23.395 Million
Interesting. I suspect a large part of our revenue increase this year (compared to last year) is due to the fundraising for the basketball facility. :dunno:
-
I don't think donations have anything to do with this figure
-
Yeah, K-State's numbers include Ahearn Fund donations, I don't know if it includes Capital Giving donations. Also keep in mind that many capital giving are commitments or pledges to give, they don't often hand over the big checks all at once.
-
DNR this but looked like something Dax reads.
Alumni voices are critical to the KU Alumni Association’s mission to strengthen the University of Kansas. One of our most important programs is Jayhawks for Higher Education (JHE), a statewide network of alumni and friends who communicate the needs of KU and higher education to the Kansas Legislature. In recent years, JHE members have helped secure state funding for vital initiatives, including:
• the KU School of Pharmacy expansion to help meet a statewide need for pharmacists
• support for the KU Cancer Center’s quest for National Cancer Institute designation
• a 10-year plan to increase the number of engineering graduates in Kansas by 60 percent
Please add your voice to our advocacy efforts by joining JHE. Throughout the legislative session, you will receive brief, timely email updates from the Alumni Association. At key points, we will ask you to contact lawmakers regarding a specific issue. We will provide talking points, and our online tools make it easy to communicate directly with your lawmakers. Please click here to join today.
KU’s 2012 legislative agenda will include the following critical investments:
• “Foundation Faculty” to maintain the University’s prestigious membership in the Association of American Universities and continue KU’s quest for higher national rankings
• Continued support for the KU Cancer Center
• Medical education funding to provide additional physicians for our state
• A 2.8 percent increase in funding of financial aid for students at all Regents universities
• Procedural or policy changes to help the University continue increasing its operational efficiency
Please help us ensure that KU’s interests advance in the Legislature. Thank you for Jayhawk loyalty.
Rock Chalk!
Kevin J. Corbett
President, KU Alumni Association
-
I read every 4th word . . . someone needs to report ku to DHS.