goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:13:09 PM

Title: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:13:09 PM: hold on

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1202.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fbb370%2FMJlover17%2FMJ-michael-jackson-9770309-329-223.gif&hash=513e132121e17bc4711c56a344272ccdca8bdcb1)

OK

Yeah I never want him back with how dirty his defense was yesterday. Very obvious that we were mentally weak yesterday. But I hard time believing Stomping on CK, late hits and kicking Lockett weren't ordered.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: Trim on October 30, 2011, 12:14:50 PM: :dubious:
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 30, 2011, 12:17:26 PM: We did many of the same kinds of things during the DOD and the Tucks defended it to the bone . . . to the bone!!

Don't blame Venzy for clowning Slothfense.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: wetwillie on October 30, 2011, 12:18:32 PM: Wait we don't want a dirty filthy defense?
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:21:42 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 30, 2011, 12:17:26 PM
We did many of the same kinds of things during the DOD and the Tucks defended it to the bone . . . to the bone!!

Don't blame Venzy for clowning Slothfense.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fde-verdad.wikispaces.com%2Ffile%2Fview%2F14_tuck_in_shirt.jpg%2F81746261%2F14_tuck_in_shirt.jpg&hash=4ad395923e98662a5c9555354bc7802c666b00db)

I don't remember our players stomping on opposing QBs. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I don't have a problem with the scrum before the game. Get inside the other guy's head. Thats fine. Hit em hard. Dog pile. Let them know you are smashing them in the mouth.

The late hits out of bounds, the kicking players while their down crap doesn't cut it.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: Trim on October 30, 2011, 12:26:53 PM: Quote from: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:21:42 PM
The late hits out of bounds, the kicking players while their down crap doesn't cut it.

This is all completely legal when you're winning.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:30:09 PM: Quote from: Trim on October 30, 2011, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: ednksu on October 30, 2011, 12:21:42 PM
The late hits out of bounds, the kicking players while their down crap doesn't cut it.

This is all completely legal when you're winning.
I'm tucking so hard its in my underwear but:
I agree, but we don't need to do that here
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_ooY1SPy5TLA%2FTMScg0pGDaI%2FAAAAAAAABTk%2FFuHqLE8PJuw%2Fs1600%2FDSCN2793.JPG&hash=0ee9e5dbcbaf71233c137c513759ad3e8bf4d1f7)
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: unleashthemob on October 30, 2011, 04:56:38 PM: eff YEA! THE DIRTIER THE BETTER. WE NEED SOME THUGS. WE HAVE TO MANY NICE GUYS ( PUSSIES)
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: DQ12 on October 30, 2011, 05:02:07 PM: OU didn't play dirty. The stomp was on accident and CK purposely ran into the bench. The OU guy was trying to hold him up.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: Cire on October 30, 2011, 06:38:24 PM: I was hoping beyond hope that we would hit landry late our at his knees
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: 60scat on October 30, 2011, 08:46:31 PM: Don't want under any circumstance. He no longer has any EMAW left in him. He is to be forgotten about forever.
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: EllToPay on October 30, 2011, 09:01:29 PM: Quote from: 60scat on October 30, 2011, 08:46:31 PM
Don't want under any circumstance. He no longer has any EMAW left in him. He is to be forgotten about forever.

:dubious:
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: Rams on October 30, 2011, 09:14:20 PM: He's been a very successful D-Coordinator at a major college program for over 10 years. In that time, almost every major school in the nation has done a coaching search and I don't even know if he's gotten an interview...and if he has, he's clearly botched it. Something's not right there. I don't give a crap which major donor's wife he mumped or how dirty his players are (the dirtier the better, BTW), I'd take him in a second if he could win. Clearly nobody thinks he can. I get why he's poisonous here, but why has nobody else taken a shot? Is he just a figurehead for Bob and a glorified LB coach?
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: Katpappy on October 30, 2011, 09:30:06 PM: Quote from: Rams on October 30, 2011, 09:14:20 PM
He's been a very successful D-Coordinator at a major college program for over 10 years. In that time, almost every major school in the nation has done a coaching search and I don't even know if he's gotten an interview...and if he has, he's clearly botched it. Something's not right there. I don't give a crap which major donor's wife he mumped or how dirty his players are (the dirtier the better, BTW), I'd take him in a second if he could win. Clearly nobody thinks he can. I get why he's poisonous here, but why has nobody else taken a shot? Is he just a figurehead for Bob and a glorified LB coach?
OK Felix Rex, Rams and I want to know what BV did that has kept him from the wonderful land of OZ. :zip:
Title: Re: Have we talked about never wanting BV back?
Post by: unleashthemob on October 30, 2011, 09:45:25 PM: Quote from: Dlew12 on October 30, 2011, 05:02:07 PM
OU didn't play dirty. The stomp was on accident and CK purposely ran into the bench. The OU guy was trying to hold him up.

there were some questionable things not called, but those two things were not cheap, but if the circumstances were reversed, they would have been called on us...