goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: chum1 on October 23, 2011, 09:12:00 AM
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
Also because we'll be looking ahead to OSU... :ohno: :ohno: (ftp://:ohno: :ohno:)
JFC guys, try and focus on this weeks game. :ohno: (ftp://:ohno:)
-
Horrible thread. How many coaches actually have good records vs the top ten?
-
Horrible thread. How many coaches actually have good records vs the top ten?
Tommy Tubberville does. :peek:
-
I can't decide if Tubberville is a complete Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or a genius. I mean, he won the game....but what terrible play calling.
-
Horrible thread. How many coaches actually have good records vs the top ten?
horrible reply. not aiming for good here, just better than awful.
-
What's Snyder's record vs the Top 10 while being ranked in the Top 10?
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
According to the media guide (which I think uses the AP ranking at the time of the game):
year opp rank result
1989 Neb 4 L
1989 Col 2 L
1990 Neb 8 L
1990 Col 2 L
1991 Wash 4 L
1991 Neb 9 L
1991 Col 16 L
1991 OU 21 L
1992 Col 9 L
1992 Neb 11 L
1993 Neb 6 L
1993 Col 16 T
1993 OU 13 W
1994 Neb 2 L
1994 Col 2 L
1994 OU 25 W
1995 Neb 2 L
1995 KU 6 W
1995 OU 25 W
1995 Col 9 L
1995 Col St 25 W
1996 Neb 6 L
1996 Col 6 L
1996 BYU 5 L
1997 Neb 3 L
1997 A&M 14 W
1997 Cuse 14 W
1998 Col 14 W
1998 Neb 11 W
1998 Miz 19 W
1998 A&M 10 L
1999 Tex 15 W
1999 Neb 7 L
2000 OU 8 L
2000 Neb 4 W
2000 OU 1 L
2000 Tenn 21 W
2001 OU 3 L
2001 Neb 2 L
2001 Cuse 18 L
2002 USC 11 W
2002 Tex 8 L
2002 ISU 21 W
2003 Tex 13 L
2003 Neb 18 W
2003 OU 1 W
2003 Ohio St 7 L
2004 OU 2 L
2005 Tech 13 L
2009 OU 22 L
2010 Neb 6 L
2010 Ok St 20 L
2010 Miz 20 L
2011 Bay 15 W
2011 OU ? ?
2011 Ok St ? ?
2011 A&M ? ?
If I counted correctly, here is a summary:
vs Top 25 vs Top 10
1989 0-2 0-2
1990 0-2 0-2
1991 0-4 0-2
1992 0-2 0-1
1993 1-1-1 0-1
1994 1-2 0-2
1995 3-2 1-2
1996 0-3 0-3
1997 2-1 0-1
1998 3-1 0-1
1999 1-1 0-1
2000 2-2 1-2
2001 0-3 0-2
2002 2-1 0-1
2003 2-2 1-1
2004 0-1 0-1
2005 0-1 0-0
2009 0-1 0-1
2010 0-3 0-1
2011 1-0 0-0
18-35-1 3-27
-
OU won't be top 10
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
so the ranking are out and OU is still in the Top 10? link
-
OU certainly hasn't looked like a top 10 team the last 2 weeks. If they don't improve quite a bit before Saturday, we have a real good chance to beat them. (Especially at LHCBSFS)
-
If you have the ability to make a bunch of chumps like KU look respectable..even for a half..you don't belong anywhere near the Top 10..
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
so the ranking are out and OU is still in the Top 10? link
Substitute Snyder's record against Bob Stoops, if you'd like. Or the fact that the Sooners haven't lost consecutive games under Stoops since 2003, and haven't lost consecutive regular season games under Stoops since his first season in 1999.
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
so the ranking are out and OU is still in the Top 10? link
Substitute Snyder's record against Bob Stoops, if you'd like. Or the fact that the Sooners haven't lost consecutive games under Stoops since 2003, and haven't lost consecutive games under Stoops since his first season in 1999.
we haven't been 4-0 in conference since '99, either.
OU is good. Not doubt about it..but I still think we have a chance to win. Also, we'll be an underdog...so, that's a bonus.
-
OU loses at home to unranked and is 4 spots higher than K-State in coaches 9, 13
-
:confused:
-
[Oops...accidental post]
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
so the ranking are out and OU is still in the Top 10? link
Substitute Snyder's record against Bob Stoops, if you'd like. Or the fact that the Sooners haven't lost consecutive games under Stoops since 2003, and haven't lost consecutive games under Stoops since his first season in 1999.
this is the big issue imo. we've won every game I thought we were screwed in, but this time pretty sure I'm right.
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
We're mumped because OU is coming off a loss.
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
We're mumped because OU is coming off a loss.
and because they have way better players than we do, I think that is the main reason we lose.
-
Whoever thinks we are going to get drilled should be PI'd into oblivion. WTF is it going to take for you battered women to realize our team is good and can compete with OU especially in manhattan.
-
Admittedly it was awhile back, but someone broke down D1 school's records against Top 10 teams, and as I recall the very best record was barely .500
-
Miami, Baylor, Mizzou, and TTU all had better talent than us. OU (and all their talent) has looked very average the last two weeks.
-
Admittedly it was awhile back, but someone broke down D1 school's records against Top 10 teams, and as I recall the very best record was barely .500
well... 3-27 is 0.111, that is a far cry from .500
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
We're mumped because OU is coming off a loss.
and because they have way better players than we do, I think that is the main reason we lose.
I don't know about the " way better players" part, that CB for OU ,#9, got burned like an August praire fire last night
-
that's why we're mumped vs ou.
We're mumped because OU is coming off a loss.
and because they have way better players than we do, I think that is the main reason we lose.
I don't know about the " way better players" part, that CB for OU ,#9, got burned like an August praire fire last night
It was truly a joy to just watch TT beat the crap out of him again and again.
I enjoy it when a team finds something that works and just beats it into the ground. Doesn't happen as often as you'd think
-
Admittedly it was awhile back, but someone broke down D1 school's records against Top 10 teams, and as I recall the very best record was barely .500
well... 3-27 is 0.111, that is a far cry from .500
Well Gee thanks there kim, and the teams that were near .500 were historically much better than K-State. The point being that even the most storied programs don't dominate Top 10 teams.
-
They're top 10 teams. They are really good. You don't beat them much.
-
They are 11 in ap so :dunno:
-
They are 11 in ap so :dunno:
Interesting tidbit, Snyder's teams are actually 29-28 vs teams in the top 11
:horrorsurprise:
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
-
They are 11 in ap so :dunno:
Interesting tidbit, Snyder's teams are actually 29-28 vs teams in the top 11
:horrorsurprise:
I think you meant to say vs teams ranked #11 to #25, not "teams in the top 11".
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
Coaches poll decides 2/3 of the BCS. Its not looking good.
-
They are 11 in ap so :dunno:
Interesting tidbit, Snyder's teams are actually 29-28 vs teams in the top 11
:horrorsurprise:
I think you meant to say vs teams ranked #11 to #25, not "teams in the top 11".
:dubious: I know what I said
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
Coaches poll decides 2/3 of the BCS. Its not looking good.
This is not true
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
Coaches poll decides 2/3 of the BCS. Its not looking good.
haha, no.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.e-forwards.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F09%2FTrouble-With-Fractions-Professor-Funny-Math-Mathematics-Humor-300x243.jpg&hash=a6fd6dc92787668534b1df19e2278b7a0289b3f7)
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
Coaches poll decides 2/3 of the BCS. Its not looking good.
This is not true
Link?
-
OU is 11 in the AP. :emawkid:
9 in the USA today :ohno:
I guess we should wait and see what the BCS decides
Coaches poll decides 2/3 of the BCS. Its not looking good.
This is not true
Link?
The statistical rating system used to determine the teams that will participate in the championship game of the Bowl Championship Series consists of three components and each will count as 1/3rd of the final BCS formula - subjective polls of Harris Interactive (replaces AP) and coaches (USA Today) and six computer rankings.
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html (http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bcs_explained.html)
-
Kim- You must be stupid, stupid, stupid.
-
human polls make up 2/3 of the BCS