goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: CHONGS on October 15, 2011, 10:11:42 PM

Title: We should be ranked higher
Post by: CHONGS on October 15, 2011, 10:11:42 PM: yes we should
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: kim carnes on October 15, 2011, 10:12:05 PM: Quote from: Chingon on October 15, 2011, 10:11:42 PM
yes we should

Tell that to ChiRP.
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: hemmy on October 15, 2011, 10:12:38 PM: What did the chingon power rankings say before this game?
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: CHONGS on October 15, 2011, 10:13:23 PM: Quote from: hemmy on October 15, 2011, 10:12:38 PM
What did the chingon power rankings say before this game?
we would win
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM: we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: CHONGS on October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM: Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: ChiComCat on October 15, 2011, 10:14:50 PM: I look at a bunch of rankings and see that we COULD beat every team behind us and a few in front, that's not to say that we would though. And there is an echelon that we flat out could not compete with.
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: TaqMan on October 15, 2011, 10:18:11 PM: want to be #13 against ku IMO
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: ednksu on October 15, 2011, 10:23:24 PM: I'm completely in favor of the human polls screwing us and keeping us the same. BCS can put us high though.
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 15, 2011, 10:23:42 PM: Quote from: Chingon on October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO

i refuse to hear such nonsense. we suck and have officially run out of schemes. just checked the tank. it's empty fellas and we're miles from the next scheme station. fun run though. we'll always have that.
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: pike on October 15, 2011, 10:24:49 PM: Quote from: Chingon on October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO

Illinois
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 15, 2011, 10:25:50 PM: Is it time to start getting pissed about Wisconsin not having to play anybody and rough ridin' up our national championship hopes yet?
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: ksu101 on October 15, 2011, 10:26:32 PM: GT, Illinois, Michigan all lost today. So what does that make it? 10 undefeated teams now? and WE ARE ONE OF THEM! :gocho:
Title: Re: We should be ranked higher
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 15, 2011, 10:28:36 PM: Quote from: ksu101 on October 15, 2011, 10:26:32 PM
GT, Illinois, Michigan all lost today. So what does that make it? 10 undefeated teams now? and WE ARE ONE OF THEM! :gocho:

won't matter. chingon chingdex will prob move illinois up to top five. we'll never catch them.